《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2020, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (9): 1076-1082.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2020.09.014

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

工作能力支持量表(中文版)在就业年龄脑卒中患者中的信度和效度

郭亚雯,林蓓蕾,张振香(),王永利,符博,齐琲   

  1. 郑州大学护理与健康学院,河南郑州市 450001
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-22 修回日期:2019-10-12 出版日期:2020-09-25 发布日期:2020-09-24
  • 通讯作者: 张振香 E-mail:zhangzx6666@126.com
  • 作者简介:郭亚雯(1995-),女,汉族,河南洛阳市人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:社区康复护理。|张振香(1961-),女,河南郑州市人,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向:社区与老年学。
  • 基金资助:
    河南省科技攻关计划项目(192102310098)

Work-ability Support Scale-Chinese Version for Stroke Patients: Reliability and Validity Analysis

GUO Ya-wen,LIN Bei-lei,ZHANG Zhen-xiang(),WANG Yong-li,FU Bo,QI Bei   

  1. School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China
  • Received:2019-09-22 Revised:2019-10-12 Published:2020-09-25 Online:2020-09-24
  • Contact: ZHANG Zhen-xiang E-mail:zhangzx6666@126.com
  • Supported by:
    Henan Science and Technology Research Project(192102310098)

摘要:

目的 检验工作能力支持量表(WSS)在就业年龄脑卒中患者中的信度和效度。
方法采用翻译-回译方法将WSS译为中文。2018年12月至2019年3月,便利选取郑州市2所社区卫生服务中心下属社区的就业年龄脑卒中患者193例,由2名护士采用WSS中文版进行调查。进行项目分析、内容效度分析、探索性因子分析、内部一致性分析和评定者间信度分析。
结果 A部分内容效度为0.94,B部分为0.90;A部分16个条目,提取3个公因子,累积方差贡献率67.747%;B部分12个条目,提取3个公因子,累积方差贡献率56.056%;A和B部分Cronbach α系数为0.933和0.778,评定者间信度除条目B8、B10外,kappa系数均 > 0.6。
结论 WSS中文版信效度满意,可用于评估中青年脑卒中患者重返工作过程中的工作能力支持。

关键词: 脑卒中, 重返工作, 工作能力支持量表, 信度, 效度

Abstract:

Objective To test the reliability and validity of Work-ability Support Scale (WSS) in stroke patients.
Methods WSS was translated into Chinese with the standard translation-retroversion. From December, 2018 to March, 2019, 193 middle-aged and young stroke patients from two community health service centers in Zhengzhou were conveniently selected, and investigated with Chinese WSS by two nurses. The data were analyzed with item analysis, content validity, exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency reliability and inter-rater reliability.
Results The content validity was 0.94 in WSS A and 0.90 in WSS B. Three factors were extracted from 16 items in WSS A, with cumulative variance contribution of 67.747%; while three factors were extracted from 12 items in WSS B, with cumulative variance contribution of 56.056%. Cronbach's α was 0.933 and 0.778 in WSS A and WSS B, respectively. The kappa coefficient was above 0.6 between two raters in every item, except items B8 and B10.
Conclusion Chinese WSS is satisfactory in validity and reliability for using in young and middle-aged stroke patients during their return to work.

Key words: stroke, return to work, Work-ability Support Scale, reliability, validity