《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2020, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (9): 1097-1101.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2020.09.018

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

膝关节使用肌内效贴对位置觉及下肢功能的影响

周越1,2,朱悦彤3,王紫敏3,胡春英1,2,黄秋晨1,2,刘尊4()   

  1. 1.首都医科大学康复医学院,北京市 100068
    2.中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院物理疗法科,北京市 100068
    3.国际医疗福祉大学大学院,日本栃木县大田原市324-0851
    4.沧州医学高等专科学校,河北沧州市 061001
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-17 修回日期:2020-05-29 出版日期:2020-09-25 发布日期:2020-09-24
  • 通讯作者: 刘尊 E-mail:mary860114@163.com
  • 作者简介:周越(1980-),男,汉族,北京市人,主管治疗师,主要研究方向:脊髓损伤和骨关节疾患的运动疗法。|刘尊(1986-),女,汉族,河北沧州市人,硕士,讲师、康复治疗师,主要研究方向:康复治疗学教育。

Effect of Kinesio Taping at Knee on Position Sense and Lower-limb Function

ZHOU Yue1,2,ZHU Yue-tong3,WANG Zi-min3,HU Chun-ying1,2,HUANG Qiu-chen1,2,LIU Zun4()   

  1. 1. Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing 100068, China
    2. Department of Physical Therapy, Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China
    3. International University of Health and Welfare Graduate School, Ootawara, Japan, 324-0851
    4. Cangzhou Medical College, Cangzhou, Hebei 061001, China
  • Received:2020-01-17 Revised:2020-05-29 Published:2020-09-25 Online:2020-09-24
  • Contact: LIU Zun E-mail:mary860114@163.com

摘要:

目的 观察膝关节行肌内效贴贴扎或使用护膝对位置觉和下肢功能的影响。
方法 2019年9月,21~27岁健康成年男性20例,分别在无干预、单纯肌内效贴贴扎、单纯应用护膝、同时应用肌内效贴和护膝的4种条件下,角度重现测试检测不同干预下膝关节位置觉,并行功能性够取试验(FRT)、10米步行时间(10MWT)测量和计时起立-行走测试(TUGT)。
结果 膝关节角度误差测试,无干预条件下最大,单纯肌内效贴贴扎最小(F = 61.260, P < 0.001);各条件下FRT均无显著性差异( F = 1.793, P = 0.988);单纯肌内效贴贴扎下10MWT最小(F = 23.817, P < 0.001);无干预条件下TUGT时间最长( F = 19.865, P < 0.001)。
结论 肌内效贴能提高膝关节位置觉和步行功能,附加护膝不能获得进一步利益。

关键词: 肌内效贴, 护膝, 位置觉, 本体感觉,

Abstract:

Objective To observe the effects of Kinesio Taping and kneepad on position sense of knee in healthy young adult male.
Methods In September, 2019, 20 healthy adult male aged 21 to 27 were selected. They were measured the joint angle error in angle reproduction test, and tested with functional reach test (FRT), 10-meter walking time (10MWT), and Timed "Up and Go" Test (TUGT) under follow four conditions: non-intervention, simple Kinesio Taping, simple kneepad, and both Kinesio Taping and kneepad.
Results For the angle error, it was the most under non-intervention, and the least under simple Kinesio Taping (F = 61.260, P < 0.001). For FRT, there was no significant difference among all the conditions ( F = 1.793, P = 0.988). For 10MWT, it was the least under simple Kinesio Taping (F = 23.817, P < 0.001). For TUGT, it was the most under non-intervention ( F = 19.865, P < 0.001).
Conclusion Kinesio Taping can improve position sense of knee, as well as walking, without further benefit along with kneepad.

Key words: Kinesio Tape, kneepad, position sense, proprioception, knee