听觉辨别训练对儿童构音障碍的疗效

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2020.11.017

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的观察听觉辨别训练对儿童构音障碍的康复治疗效果。方法 2017年7月至2019年7月,选取本院构音障碍患儿43例,随机分为对照组(n = 21)和治疗组(n = 22)。对照组每天行常规语言训练30 min,治疗组用其中10 min行听觉辨别训练,共4周。治疗前后行构音检查和言语清晰度测试。结果治疗组治疗后辅音正确率和言语清晰度均显著提高(t > 7.919, P < 0.001),对照组仅辅音正确率显著提高( t = 7.047, P < 0.001)。结论听觉辨别训练可提高构音障碍患儿的治疗效果,可作为儿童构音障碍训练的常规内容。

关键词: 构音障碍, 儿童, 听觉辨别训练

Abstract:

Objective To observe the effect of auditory discrimination training on dysarthria of children.Methods From July, 2017 to July, 2019, 43 children with dysarthria were randomly divided into control group (n = 21) and treatment group (n = 22). The control group received routine speech training for 30 minutes a day, while the the treatment group spent ten minutes out of 30 minutes for auditory discrimination training, for four weeks. They were tested the articulation and speech intelligibility before and after treatment.Results Both the percentage of consonants correct and speech intelligibility increased in the treatment group after treatment (t > 7.919, P < 0.001), but only the percentage of consonants correct increased in the control group ( t = 7.047, P < 0.001). Conclusion Auditory discrimination training can promote the outcome of children with dysarthria, which can be as a routine part of training for them.

Key words: dysarthria, children, auditory discrimination training

中图分类号:

R767.92

何怡,庞子建. 听觉辨别训练对儿童构音障碍的疗效[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(11): 1344-1348.

HE Yi,PANG Zi-jian. Effect of Auditory Discrimination Training on Dysarthria of Children[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2020, 26(11): 1344-1348.

图/表 2

参考文献 32

[1]	Merzenich M M, Jenkins W M, Johnston P, et al. Temporal processing deficits of language-learning impaired children ameliorated by training[J]. Science, 1996, 271(5245):77-81. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5245.77
[2]	Gillam R B, Loeb D F, Hoffman L M, et al. The efficacy of fast forword language intervention in school-age children with language impairment: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Speech Lang Hearing Res, 2008, 51(1):97-119. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/007)
[3]	Murphy C F B, Moore D R, Schochat E. Generalization of auditory sensory and cognitive learning in typically developing children[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(8):e0135422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135422
[4]	Tallal P, Miller S L, Bedi G, et al. Language comprehension in language-learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech[J]. Science, 1996, 271(5245):81-84. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5245.81
[5]	焦建红. 小组语言训练应用于脑瘫合并语言障碍患儿的效果及对构音障碍的影响分析[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2019, 32(10):1611-1613.
	Jiao J H. J Med Theory Prac, 2019, 32(10):1611-1613.
[6]	王立英, 桂瑜. 呼吸训练治疗脑瘫患儿构音障碍的疗效观察[J]. 中国疗养医学, 2019, 28(9):964-966.
	Wang L Y, Gui Y. Chin J Convalescent Med, 2019, 28(9):964-966.
[7]	黄玉柱, 李晓捷, 周丽, 等. 口部肌肉训练联合头皮针治疗痉挛型脑性瘫痪儿童构音障碍的疗效分析[J]. 中国中西医结合儿科学, 2019, 11(6):502-505.
	Huang Y Z, Li X J, Zhou L, et al. Therapeutic effect of oral muscle training combined with scalp acupuncture on dysarthria in children with spastic cerebral palsy[J]. Chin Pediatr Integr Trad West Med, 2019, 11(6):502-505.
[8]	张妙冰, 黄双苗, 张焕英. 语音矫治结合口肌训练对功能性构音障碍的应用效果[J]. 中国医药指南, 2020, 18(5):56-57.
	Zhang M B, Huang S M, Zhang H Y. Guid Chin Med, 2020, 18(5):56-57.
[9]	张秀玲, 李寄平, 秦明镜, 等. Gesell发展诊断量表3.5~6岁北京修订本的制定[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 1994(3): 148-150, 191-192.
	Zhang X L, Li J P, Qin M J, et al. Chin J Clin Psychol, 1994(3): 148-150, 191-192.
[10]	李胜利. 构音障碍的评价[J]. 中国康复, 1993, 8(2):84-86.
	Li S L. Chin J Rehabil, 1993, 8(2):84-86.
[11]	李胜利, 孙喜斌, 王荫华, 等. 第二次全国残疾人抽样调查言语残疾标准研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2007, 13(9):801-803.
	Li S L, Sun X B, Wang Y H, et al. The Second China National Sample Survey on Disability: standard of speech disability[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2007, 13(9):801-803.
[12]	Knudsen E I. Sensitive periods in the development of the brain and behavior[J]. J Cogn Neurosci, 2004, 16(8):1412-1425. doi: 10.1162/0898929042304796
[13]	Murphy C F, Schochat E. How auditory temporal processing deficits relate to dyslexia[J]. Braz J Med Biol Res, 2009, 42(7):647-654. doi: S0100-879X2009000700009 pmid: 19578644
[14]	Shriberg L D, Gruber F A, Kwiatkowski J. Developmental phonological disorders. III: long-term speech-sound normalization[J]. J Speech Hear Res, 1994, 37(5):1151-1177. pmid: 7823558
[15]	Rvachew S, Rafaat S, Martin M. Stimulability, speech perception skills, and the treatment of phonological disorders[J]. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 1999, 8(1):33. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360.0801.33
[16]	Rvachew S. Speech perception training can facilitate sound production learning[J]. J Speech Hear Res, 1994, 37(2):347-357. pmid: 8028316
[17]	Murphy C F, Pagan-Neves L O, Wertzner H F, et al. Auditory and visual sustained attention in children with speech sound disorder[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(3):e93091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093091
[18]	Goncalves I C, Wertzner H F, Samelli A G, et al. Speech and non-speech processing in children with phonological disorders: an electrophysiological study[J]. Clinics (Sao Paulo), 2011, 66(2):293-298. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322011000200019
[19]	Preston J L, Felsenfeld S, Frost S J, et al. Functional brain activation differences in school-age children with speech sound errors: speech and print processing[J]. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 2012, 55(4):1068-1082. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0056)
[20]	Froud K, Khamis-Dakwar R. Mismatch negativity responses in children with a diagnosis of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS)[J]. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 2012, 21(4):302-312. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0003)
[21]	Preston J L, Molfese P J, Mencl W E, et al. Structural brain differences in school-age children with residual speech sound errors[J]. Brain Lang, 2014, 128(1):25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.11.001
[22]	Mesgarani N, Cheung C, Johnson K, et al. Phonetic feature encoding in human superior temporal gyrus[J]. Science, 2014, 343(6174):1006-1010. doi: 10.1126/science.1245994
[23]	Gauvin H S, de Baene W, Brass M, et al. Conflict monitoring in speech processing: an fMRI study of error detection in speech production and perception[J]. Neuroimage, 2016, 126:96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.037 pmid: 26608243
[24]	Johnson E P, Pennington B F, Lowenstein J H, et al. Sensitivity to structure in the speech signal by children with speech sound disorder and reading disability[J]. J Commun Disord, 2011, 44(3):294-314. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.01.001
[25]	Nijland L. Speech perception in children with speech output disorders[J]. Clin Linguist Phon, 2009, 23(3):222-239. doi: 10.1080/02699200802399947
[26]	Hoffman P, Daniloff R, Bengoa D, et al. Misarticulating and normally articulating children's identification and discrimination of synthetic [r] and [w][J]. J Speech Hear Disord, 1985, 50(1):46-53. pmid: 3974212
[27]	Baker E, Williams A L, Mcleod S, et al. Elements of phonological interventions for children with speech sound disorders: the development of a taxonomy[J]. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 2018, 27(3):906-935. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0127
[28]	Sugden E, Baker E, Munro N, et al. Service delivery and intervention intensity for phonology-based speech sound disorders[J]. Int J Lang Commun Disord, 2018, 53(4):718-734. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.2018.53.issue-4
[29]	Aravamudhan S, Awasthi S. Behavioral interventions to treat speech sound disorders in children with autism[J]. Behav Anal Pract, 2020, 13(1):174-185. doi: 10.1007/s40617-019-00362-5 pmid: 32231978
[30]	Ozcebe E, Noyan Erbas A, Bacik Tirank S, et al. Turkish stimulability treatment program for children with speech sound disorders: a preliminary study[J]. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol, 2020. doi: / 10.1080/14015439.2020.1740317. doi: 10.1080/14015439.2020.1740317
[31]	Scherer N J, Kaiser A P, Frey J R, et al. Effects of a naturalistic intervention on the speech outcomes of young children with cleft palate[J]. Int J Speech Lang Pathol, 2020. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2019.1702719. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2019.1702719
[32]	Jamieson D, Rvachew S. Remediating speech production errors with sound identification training[J]. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol, 1992, 16(3):201-210.

组别	n	性别(n)		年龄(岁)	语言商	交流商
组别	n	男	女	年龄(岁)	语言商	交流商
对照组	21	17	4	5.4±0.86	75.48±16.53	78.24±13.80
治疗组	22	18	4	5.07±0.68	79.86±16.53	84.27±19.12
χ²/t值		0.000		1.385	0.786	1.182
P值		0.719		0.174	0.436	0.244

组别	n	指标	治疗前	治疗后	t值	P值
对照组	21	PCC(%)	58.95±12.28	80.00±15.28	7.047	< 0.001
对照组	21	SI(%)	46.14±19.27	55.14±25.54	1.515	0.145
治疗组	22	PCC(%)	66.23±15.90	81.55±17.49	7.919	< 0.001
治疗组	22	SI(%)	50.09±21.43	77.73±20.27	9.096	< 0.001