功能性伸展测试临床应用进展

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2021.05.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

评估平衡功能主要有临床观察法、量表测试法和仪器测量。功能性伸展测试测评简便，可在立位和坐位下进行；但读取量尺误差较大。为此，学者们设计出新的移动量尺和惯性传感器加以解决。影响测试结果的因素还包括运动策略、年龄、运动效率、目标导向、单双臂、人体特征、测试次数及其他。未来可利用肌电图与惯性传感器相互结合的方式，测试动员的肌肉种类和肌力变化，并对影响测试结果的因素进行探讨。

关键词: 功能性伸展, 多向伸展试验, 平衡, 康复评定, 综述

Abstract:

The evaluation of balance includes clinical observation, scales and instrumental measures. Functional Reach Test is simple and can be carried out in both standing and sitting, but the error of reading the measuring ruler is large, which results in new moving rulers and inertial sensors. The factors influencing the results of Functional Reach Test are moving strategy, age, moving efficiency, goal orientation, single or double arms, human characteristics, number of experiments and others. In the future, combination of electromyogram and inertia sensor can be used to discuss the variety of muscles and the changes of muscle strength, and more influence factors for the test are needed to research.

Key words: Functional Reach Test, multi-directional reach test, balance, rehabilitation assessment, review

中图分类号:

R493

朱晓敏,刘元旻,杜雪晶,王亚囡,王华伟,刘惠林,张通. 功能性伸展测试临床应用进展[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(5): 583-587.

Xiao-min ZHU,Yuan-min LIU,Xue-jing DU,Ya-nan WANG,Hua-wei WANG,Hui-lin LIU,Tong ZHANG. Advance in Application of Functional Reach Test (review)[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2021, 27(5): 583-587.

参考文献 68

1	World Health Organization. WHO Global Report on Falls Prevention in Older Age [R]. Geneva: WHO Press, 2018.
2	HOPEWELL S, ADEDIRE O, COPSEY B J, et al. Multifactorial and multiple component interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018, 7(7): CD012221.
3	LAMB S E, BECKER C, GILLESPIE L D, et al. Reporting of complex interventions in clinical trials: development of a taxonomy to classify and describe fall-prevention interventions [J]. Trials, 2011, 12: 125.
4	金肖青,贾桂锋,宁钢民. 人体平衡能力评估技术的应用与发展趋势[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2015, 2(2): 1-6.
	JIN X Q, JIA G F, NING G M. Application and development trend of human balance ability evaluation technology [J]. Chin J Geriatrics Res (Electron Ed), 2015, 2(2): 1-6.
5	贾桂锋. 人体平衡能力定量评估方法研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2015.
	JIA G F. Study on quantitative evaluation method of human body balance ability [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2015.
6	王玉龙. 康复功能评定学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2013: 121-122.
	WANG Y L. Rehabilitation Function Evaluation and Assessment [M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2013: 121-122.
7	张冉,余波. 功能性前伸测试研究进展[J]. 实用老年医学, 2020, 34(7): 728-730.
	ZHANG R, YU B. Research progress of Functional Reach Test [J]. Pract Geriatr, 2020, 34(7): 728-730.
8	CHO H Y, KIM J S, LEE G C. Effects of motor imagery training on balance and gait abilities in post-stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Clin Rehabil, 2013, 27(8): 675-680.
9	KANG H K, KIM Y, CHUNG Y, et al. Effects of treadmill training with optic flow on balance and gait in individuals following stroke: randomized controlled trials [J]. Clin Rehabil, 2012, 26(3): 246-255.
10	SMITH P S, HEMBREE J A, THOMPSON MARY E. Berg Balance Scale and Functional Reach: determining the best clinical tool for individuals post acute stroke [J]. Clin Rehabil, 2004, 18(7): 811-818.
11	曹玲,杨光. 老年人功能性前伸测试法的实用价值[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2014, 34(8): 4399-4401.
	CAO L, YANG G. The practical value of functional reach test in the elderly [J]. Chin J Gerontol, 2014, 34(8): 4399-4401.
12	李贞兰,刘世文,王桂芳,等. 功能前伸试验在脑卒中偏瘫患者康复评定中的应用研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2004, 19(3): 179-181.
	LI Z L, LIU S W, WANG G F, et al. A clinical research of functional reach test on the rehabilitation assessment in stroke patients with hemiplegia [J]. Chin J Rehabil Med, 2004, 19(3): 179-181.
13	李凤侠,吴暇,常冬梅,等. 功能伸展测试在评估脑卒中偏瘫患者跌倒风险中的应用[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2010, 16(10): 969-972.
	LI F X, WU X, CHANG D M, et al. Application of functional reach test in assessment of fall risk in stroke patients with hemiplegia [J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2010, 16(10): 969-972.
14	DUNCAN P W, WEINER D K, CHANDLER J, et al. Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance [J]. Geront Med Sci, 1990, 45(6): 192-197.
15	NEWTON R A. Validity of the multi-directional reach test: a practical measure for limits of stability in older adults [J]. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2010, 56(4): 248-252.
16	KATZ-LEURER M, FISHER I, NEEB M, et al. Reliability and validity of the modified functional reach test at the sub-acute stage post-stroke [J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2009, 31(3): 243-248.
17	TAKAHASHI T, ISHIDA K, YAMAMOTO H, et al. Modification of the functional reach test: analysis of lateral and anterior functional reach in community-dwelling older people [J]. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2006, 42(2): 167-173.
18	MARTINS E F, DE MENEZES L T, DE SOUSA P H, et al. Reliability of the Functional Reach Test and the influence of anthropometric characteristics on test results in subjects with hemiparesis [J]. NeuroRehabilitation, 2012, 31(12):161-169.
19	TSUSHIMA H, SUTOH M. Dynamic balance in standing position in hemiplegic patients: repeatability of functional reach test and timed up and go test for hemiplegic patients [J]. Bull Sch Allied Med, 2001, 25: 119-129.
20	RUSSELL M A, HILL K D, BLACKBERRY I, et al. Falls risk and functional decline in older fallers discharged directly from emergency departments [J]. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2006, 61(10): 1090-1095.
21	DE WAROQUIER-LEROY L, BLEUSE S, SERAFI R, et al. The Functional Reach Test: strategies, performance and the influence of age [J]. Ann Phys Rehabil Med, 2014, 57(6-7): 452-464.
22	TEDLA J S, ASIRI F, ALSHAHRANI M S, et al. Reference values of functional and lateral reach test among the young saudi population: their psychometric properties and correlation with anthropometric parameters [J]. Med Sci Monit, 2019, 31(25): 5683-5689.
23	CLARKS, ILTIS P W, ANTHONY C J, et al. Comparison of older adult performance during the functional reach and limits of stability tests [J]. Aging Phys Act, 2005, 13(3): 266-275.
24	LI F, FISHER K J, HARMER P, et al. Fear of falling in elderly persons: Association with falls, functional ability and quality of life [J]. Geront, 2003, 58(5): 283-290.
25	OUTERMANS J C, PEPPEN R P VAN, WITTINK H, et al. Effects of a high-intensity task-oriented training on gait performance early after stroke: a pilot study [J]. Clin Rehabil, 2010, 24(11): 979-987.
26	LYNCH S M, LEAHY P, BARKER S P. Reliability of measurements obtained with a modified functional reach test in subjects with spinal cord injury [J]. PhysTher, 1998, 78(2): 128-133.
27	王陇德,刘建民,杨弋,等. 中国脑卒中防治报告2018 [J]. 中国循环杂志, 2019, 34(2): 105-119.
	WANG L D, LIU J M, YANG Y, et al. Brief report on stroke prevention and treatment in China 2018 [J]. Chin Circ J, 2019, 34(2): 105-119.
28	KAGE H, OKUDA M, NAKAMURA I, et al. Measuring methods for Functional Reach Test: comparison of 1-arm reach and 2-arm reach [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2009, 90(12): 2103-2107.
29	ASHBURN A, HYNDMAN D, PICKERING R, et al. Predicting people with stroke at risk of falls [J]. Age Ageing, 2008, 37(3): 270-276.
30	PORTNOY S, REIF S, MENDELBOIM T, et al. Postural control of individuals with chronic stroke compared to healthy participants: Timed-Up-and-Go, Functional Reach Test and center of pressure movement [J]. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2017, 53(5): 685-693.
31	WILLIAMS B, ALLEN B, HU Z, et al. Real-time fall risk assessment using Functional Reach Test [J]. Int J Telemed Appl, 2017, 2017: 2042974.
32	DEMURA S, YAMADA T. Simple and easy assessment of falling risk in the elderly by Functional Reach Test using elastic stick [J]. Tohoku J Exp Med, 2007, 213(2): 105-111.
33	CRUZ-DÍAZ D, HITA-CONTRERAS F, MARTÍNEZ-AMAT A, et al. Ankle-joint self-mobilization and cross fit training in patients with chronic ankle instability: a randomized controlled trial [J]. J Athl Train, 2020, 55(2): 159-168.
34	MARANESI E, RABINI R A, FIORETTI S. Functional Reach Test: movement strategies in diabetic subjects [J]. Gait Posture, 2014, 39(1): 501-505.
35	MARANESI E, DI NARDO F, RABINi R A, et al. Muscle activation patterns related to diabetic neuropathy in elderly subjects: a Functional Reach Test study [J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2016, 32: 236-240.
36	TÜTÜN YÜMIN E, ŞIMŞEK T T, SERTEL M, et al. The effect of foot plantar massage on balance and functional reach in patients with type II diabetes [J]. Physiother Theory Pract, 2017, 33(2): 115-123.
37	BEHRMAN A L, LIGHT K E, FLYNN S M, et al. Is the functional reach test useful for identifying falls risk among individuals with Parkinson's disease? [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2002, 83(4): 538-542.
38	JENKINS M E, JOHNSON A M, HOLMESET J D, et al. Predictive validity of the UPDRS postural stability score and the Functional Reach Test, when compared with ecologically valid reaching tasks [J]. Parkinsonism Relat Disord, 2010, 16(6): 409-411.
39	RADTKA S, ZAYAC J, GOLDBERG K, et al. Reliability and comparison of trunk and pelvis angles, arm distance and center of pressure in the seated functional reach test with and without foot support in children [J]. Gait Posture, 2017, 53: 86-91.
40	FASOLI S E, TROMBLY C A, TICKLE-DEGNEN L, et al. Effect of instructions on functional reach in persons with and without cerebrovascular accident [J]. Am J Occup Ther, 2002, 56(4): 380-390.
41	ASHBURN A, HYNDMAN D, PICKERING R, et al. Predicting people with stroke at risk of falls [J]. Age Ageing, 2008, 37(3): 270-276.
42	李维佳,张超红,肖惠英,等. 功能性前伸试验预测老年住院患者跌倒危险的效果观察[J]. 中国医学创新, 2019, 16(29): 152-155.
	LI W J, ZHANG C H, XIAO H Y, et al. Effect of Functional Reach Test for predicting falls in elderly [J]. Med Innov of Chin, 2019, 16(29): 152-155.
43	孙嘉泽. 上肢功能性前伸测试预测老年住院患者跌倒危险的有效性研究[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(25): 173-176.
	SUN J Z. Effectiveness of upper limb Functional Extension Test in predicting the risk of falls in elderly hospitalized patients [J]. Chin Modern Med, 2018, 25(25): 173-176.
44	SLIWINSKI M M, AKSELRAD G, ALLA V, et al. Community exercise programing and its potential influence on quality of life and functional reach for individuals with spinal cord injury [J]. J Spinal Cord Med, 2020, 43(3): 358-363.
45	LEE O, ALI Z. Reliability of the Functional Reach Test using a mobile pole versus the traditional fixed ruler [J]. J Acut Care Phys Ther, 2019, 10(1): 31-35.
46	MERCHÁN‑BAEZA J A, GONZÁLEZ-SÁNCHEZ M, CUESTA-VARGAS A I. Comparison of kinematic variables obtained by inertial sensors among stroke survivors and healthy older adults in the Functional Reach Test: cross-sectional study [J]. Bio Med Eng Online, 2015, 14(49): 1-15.
47	MERCHÁN-BAEZA J A, GONZÁLEZ-SÁNCHEZ M, CUESTA-VARGAS A I. Reliability in the parameterization of the Functional Reach Test in elderly stroke patients: a pilot study [J]. Biomed Res Int, 2014, 2014: 637671.
48	MERCHÁN‑BAEZA J A, GONZÁLEZ-SÁNCHEZ M, CUESTA-VARGAS A I. Mobile functional reach test in people who suffer stroke: a pilot study [J]. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol, 2015, 2(1): 1-10.
49	HORAK F B, NASHNER L M. Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support surface configurations [J]. J Neurophysiol, 1986, 55: 1369-1381.
50	WERNICK R M, KREBS D E, GIORGETTI M M. Functional reach: does it really measure dynamic balance? [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1999, 80: 262-269.
51	DINIZ L H, DE MELLO E C, RIBEIRO M F, et al. Impact of hippotherapy for balance improvement and flexibility in elderly people [J]. J Bodyw Mov Ther, 2020, 24(2): 92-97.
52	GRIMPAMPI E, BONNET V, TAVIANI A, et al. Estimate of lower trunk angles in pathological gaits using gyroscope data [J]. Gait Posture, 2013, 38(3): 523-527.
53	ROSA M V, PERRACINI M R, RICCI N A. Usefulness, assessment and normative data of the Functional Reach Test in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2019, 81: 149-170.
54	ALMEIDA S T, SOLDERA C L, CARLI G A, et al. Analysis of extrinsic and intrinsic factors that predispose elderly individuals to fall [J]. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992), 2012, 58(4): 427-433.
55	HAGEMAN P A, LEIBOWITZ J M, BLANKE D. Age and gender effects on postural control measures [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1995, 76(10): 961-965.
56	SUGIHARA T, MISHIMA S, TANAKA M, et al. Physical ability estimation and falling in the elderly [J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2006, 18(2): 137-141.
57	NORRIS B, MEDLEY A. The effect of context and age on functional reach performance in healthy adults aged 21 to 94 years [J]. J Geriatr Phys Ther, 2011, 34(2): 82-87.
58	CHIEN C W, HU M H, TANG P F, et al. A comparison of psychometric properties of the smart balance master system and the postural assessment scale for stroke in people who have had mild stroke [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2007, 88(3): 374-380.
59	NORRIS B, MEDLEY A. The effect of context and age on functional reach performance in healthy adults aged 21 to 94 years [J]. J Geriatr Phys Ther, 2011, 34(2): 82-87.
60	CHEVAN J, ATHERTON H L, HART M D, et al. Non-target and target-oriented functional reach among older adults at risk for falls [J]. J Geriatr PhysTher, 2003, 26: 22-25.
61	安彦鉄平,村田伸,中野英樹,他. Functional Reach Test と足圧中心の移動および動揺との関連性[J]. ヘルスプロモーション理学療法研究, 2018, 8(1): 7-11.
	ABIKO T, MURATA S, NAKANO H, et al. Relationship between Functional Reach Test and the displacement and sway of center of foot pressure [J]. Jpn J Health Promot Phys Ther, 2018, 8(1): 7-11.
62	GIORGETTI M M, HARRIS B A, JETTE A. Reliability of clinical balance outcome measures in the elderly [J]. Physiother Res Int, 1998, 3(4): 274-283.
63	KEMOUN G, WATELAIN E, DEFEBVRE L, et al. Postural strategies and falls in elderly and in Parkinsonism [J]. Ann Readapt Med Phys, 2002, 45(9): 485-492.
64	ACAR M, KARATAS G K. The effect of arm sling on balance in patients with hemiplegia [J]. Gait Posture, 2010, 32(4): 641-644.
65	FABUNMI A A, GBIRI C A. Relationship between balance performance in the elderly and some anthropometric variables [J]. Afr J Med Med Sci, 2008, 37(4): 321-326.
66	THAPA P B, GIDEON P, FOUGHT R L, et al. Comparison of clinical and biomechanical measures of balance and mobility in elderly nursing home residents [J]. Am Geriatr Soc, 1994, 42(5): 493-500.
67	LIN Y H, CHEN T R, TANG Y W, et al. A reliabilitiy study for standing functional reach test using modified and traditional rulers [J]. Percep Mot Skills, 2012, 115(2): 512-520.
68	CHIARI L, MANCINI M, HORAK F B, et al. Effects of Parkinson's disease and levodopa on functional limits of stability [J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2008, 23(4): 450-458.

[1]	邵伟婷, 雷江华. 反应中断再定向干预孤独症谱系障碍儿童刻板语言的效果：Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 10-20.
[2]	王航宇, 葛可可, 范永红, 都丽露, 邹敏, 封磊. 基于ICD-11和ICF主动式音乐疗法改善认知障碍老年人认知功能的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 36-43.
[3]	闻嘉宁, 金秋艳, 张琦, 李杰, 司琦. 认知参与型身体活动对发展儿童青少年执行功能的效果：基于ICF的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 44-53.
[4]	葛可可, 范永红, 王航宇, 都丽露, 李长江, 邹敏. 失眠老年人正念干预健康效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 54-60.
[5]	王昊懿, 史亚伟, 鲁俊, 许光旭. 主观垂直感知障碍对脑卒中患者功能影响的回顾性研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 68-73.
[6]	张婧雅, 邹敏, 孙宏伟, 孙昌隆, 朱峻同. 听障儿童青少年焦虑或抑郁情绪心理干预效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1004-1011.
[7]	王俊宇, 杨永, 袁逊, 谢婷, 庄洁. 高强度间歇训练对健康儿童青少年执行功能效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1012-1020.
[8]	魏晓微, 杨剑, 魏春艳. 特殊教育学校孤独症谱系障碍儿童参与适应性瑜伽活动的心理与行为效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1021-1028.
[9]	杨亚茹, 杨剑. 基于WHO-HPS架构学校身体活动相关健康服务及其健康效益：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1040-1047.
[10]	史佳伟, 李凌宇, 杨浩杰, 王琴潞, 邹海欧. 预康复对全膝关节置换术后患者的有效性：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1057-1064.
[11]	杨雅楠, 穆丽萍, 邢凤梅, 薛新宏, 王晓光, 陶徉聿, 孙竹梅, 张小丽. 基于计划行为理论的干预对肌少症老年人肌肉衰减状况及平衡能力的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 869-874.
[12]	孙藤方, 任梦婷, 杨琳, 王耀霆, 王红雨, 闫兴洲. 高压氧治疗联合重复外周磁刺激干预脑卒中患者踝运动功能和平衡能力的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 875-881.
[13]	马圣楠, 柯竟悦, 董洪铭, 李建萍, 张洪浩, 刘超, 沈双, 李古强. 核心稳定性训练干预前交叉韧带重建术后动态平衡及表面肌电的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 882-889.
[14]	王亚楠, 刘西花. 脑卒中偏瘫患者主观和客观平衡功能测量的相关性及预测效能[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 890-895.
[15]	蒋长好, 黄辰, 高晓妍, 戴元富, 赵国明. 神经反馈训练对老年人认知功能效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 903-909.