《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2021, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (8): 900-907.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2021.08.004

• 专题 康复政策与发展研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

日本辅助器具社会保障政策研究

魏晨婧1(),田中理2,王清3,李高峰1,何艳4,杨慧1,王林5   

  1. 1.北京社会管理职业学院,北京市 101601
    2.一般社团法人QOLTON研究所,日本横滨市 2220033
    3.北京鹤逸慈老年生活用品有限公司,北京市 100035
    4.中国残疾人辅助器具中心,北京市 100050
    5.中国康复研究中心,北京市 100068
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-28 修回日期:2021-08-06 出版日期:2021-08-25 发布日期:2021-08-25
  • 通讯作者: 魏晨婧 E-mail:390702133@qq.com
  • 作者简介:魏晨婧(1985-),女,汉族,江苏无锡市人,硕士,副教授,主要研究方向:辅助器具应用与服务。
  • 基金资助:
    中国残联课题项目(CJFJRRB47-2020)

Analysis of Japanese Assistive Devices Social Security Policy

WEI Chen-jing1(),TANAKA Satosi2,WANG Qing3,LI Gao-feng1,HE Yan4,YANG Hui1,WANG Lin5   

  1. 1. Beijing College of Social Administration, Beijing 101601, China
    2. QOLTON Associates INC., Yokohama 2220033, Japan
    3. Beijing Heyici Elderly Living Products Co., Ltd., Beijing 100035, China
    4. China Assistive Devices and Technology Center for Persons with Disabilities, Beijing 100050, China
    5. China Rehabilitation Research Center. Beijing 100068, China
  • Received:2020-07-28 Revised:2021-08-06 Published:2021-08-25 Online:2021-08-25
  • Contact: WEI Chen-jing E-mail:390702133@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    China Disabled Person's Federation Project(CJFJRRB47-2020)

摘要:

目的 梳理日本辅助器具社会保障政策,归纳其对我国辅助器具社会保障政策体系的启示。方法 基于四维社会保障政策分析框架总结日本老年人与残疾人辅助器具保障政策的政策对象、给付内容、服务输送机制和资金来源。结果 日本辅助器具社会保障政策是以法律保障为基础,覆盖了多数功能障碍群体;用于给付的辅助器具产品和服务丰富多样;通过限定人群,总价控制,单价、数量与年限控制,严格评估条件,用户自付等方式避免经费超支;在服务实施过程中保证评估主体严格中立,而服务环节则依靠市场机制推动;在资金来源上,建立了用户自付、各级政府财政支持、社会保险等多渠道的筹资体系。结论 日本建立了成熟的辅助器具社会保障政策制度与服务体系,可供我国借鉴。

关键词: 辅助器具, 社会保障政策, 长期照护保险, 日本

Abstract:

Objective To sort out the assistive device social security policy of Japan. Methods The assistive devices social security policy for the older adults and the disabled in Japan was summarized in term of four dimensions: who, what, how to deliver and how to fund. Results Japanese assistive device social security policy covered most of disabled groups according to the legal protections, delivering a variety of assistive devices products and services. Meanwhile, it has tried to avoid over expenditure through ways of lump-sum control, unit price and quantity control, users self-pay and strict evaluation system. For the service delivery system, the evaluators were strictly neutral, while the providers were in market. The funding came from user-payments, public finance and insurances, etc. Conclusion Japan has established a mature social security policy system and service system for assistive devices, which can be used as a reference for China.

Key words: assistive device, social security policy, elderly long-term care insurance, Japan