《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2022, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (10): 1217-1223.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2022.10.013

• 应用研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

功能性踝关节不稳足底压力分析

王建国1,唐佳2,3,董继革2(),陈亚平1()   

  1. 1.首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院康复医学科,北京市 100176
    2.中国中医科学院望京医院康复治疗中心,北京市 100102
    3.天津体育学院社会体育与健康科学学院,天津市 303617
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-25 修回日期:2022-08-24 出版日期:2022-10-25 发布日期:2022-11-08
  • 通讯作者: 董继革,陈亚平 E-mail:yishengd2010@sina.com;yaping_chen0725@sina.com
  • 作者简介:王建国(1989-),男,汉族,山东莱芜市人,硕士研究生,医师,主要研究方向:神经系统损伤和疾病康复、骨科康复。|唐佳(1994-),女,汉族,江苏淮安市人,硕士研究生,初级康复治疗师,主要研究方向:骨科康复、神经康复。|董继革(1967-),女,北京市人,汉族,主任治疗师,主要研究方向:神经、骨关节疾病康复。|陈亚平(1964-),女,汉族,主任医师,主要研究方向:神经、骨关节疾病康复。

Analysis of plantar pressure for functional ankle instability

WANG Jianguo1,TANG Jia2,3,DONG Jige2(),CHEN Yaping1()   

  1. 1. Department of Rehabilitation, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100176, China
    2. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100102, China
    3. Faculty of Social Sports and Health Sciences, Tianjin University of Sport, Tianjin 303617, China
  • Received:2022-03-25 Revised:2022-08-24 Published:2022-10-25 Online:2022-11-08
  • Contact: DONG Jige,CHEN Yaping E-mail:yishengd2010@sina.com;yaping_chen0725@sina.com

摘要:

目的 观察功能性踝关节不稳(FAI)患者的足底压力分布特征。

方法 2021年1月至7月,采用Freestep足底压力分析系统对北京同仁医院FAI患者20例进行足底压力测试,并进行健、患侧之间的比较。

结果 双足睁眼站立时,患侧前足负荷占体重比小于健侧(t = 2.251, P = 0.036),后足负荷占体重比大于健侧(t = 2.251, P = 0.036);单足睁眼站立时,患侧平均纵向移动距离(Y)明显大于健侧(t = 3.271, P < 0.01);单足闭眼站立时,患侧球长度、椭圆面积、平均速度、平均Y均明显大于健侧(t > 3.140, P < 0.01)。行走时,患侧内侧足跟的受力面积和负荷大于健侧(t > 2.260, P < 0.05),患侧的前足和后足受力负荷分布与健侧不同(t = 2.153, P < 0.001),患侧足的最大压强和平均压强显著小于健侧(t > 5.005, P < 0.001),患侧压力中心连线增量及压力中心连线占脚印长度比例显著大于健侧(t > 20.567, P < 0.001)。

结论 FAI患者双足站立时,患侧前后足重心分布不均匀;单足支撑时,姿势控制稳定性弱,尤其是闭眼状态下;行走时,患侧动态稳定性较差。

关键词: 功能性踝关节不稳, 足底压力, 稳定性

Abstract:

Objective To observe the distribution characteristics of plantar pressure of patients with functional ankle instability (FAI).

Methods From January to July, 2021, the Freestep plantar pressure analysis system was used to measure plantar pressure of 20 patients with FAI in Department of Rehabilitation, Beijing Tongren Hospital. The data beteen the healthy side and the affected side were compared.

Results When standing with both feet and eyes open, the weight ratio of the forefoot load was less (t = 2.251, P = 0.036), and the weight ratio of the hindfoot load was more (t = 2.251, P = 0.036) in the affected side than in the healthy side. When standing with the affected foot and eyes open, the average longitudinal distance (Y) was more in the affected side than in the healthy side (t = 3.271, P< 0.01); when standing with the affected foot and eyes closed, the length of the ball, the area of the ellipse, the average speed, and the average Y were more in the affected side than in the healthy side (t > 3.140, P< 0.01). When walking, the force area and load of the medial heel were more (t > 2.260, P < 0.05), the maximum pressure and average pressure were significantly less (t > 5.005, P < 0.001), and the line increment of the pressure center and the ratio of foot gait line length/footprint length were significantly more (t > 20.567, P < 0.001) in the affected side than in the healthy side. The contribution of loads of both forefoot and hindfoot was significantly different from the health side (t = 2.153, P < 0.001).

Conclusion For patients with FAI, when standing with both feet, the center of gravity of the affected side is more unevenly distributed; when standing with the affected foot, the posture control stability is obviously weaker, especially when the eyes are closed; when walking, the dynamic stability of the affected side is worse.

Key words: functional ankle instability, plantar pressure, stability

中图分类号: