多模态镜像疗法对脑卒中患者上肢及手功能的效果

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2023.01.011

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 77-81.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2023.01.011

多模态镜像疗法对脑卒中患者上肢及手功能的效果

孙凤宝¹^,², 章晓峰², 刘勇², 徐智韬², 金振华²()

1.浙江中医药大学，浙江杭州市 310053
2.浙江省人民医院康复中心，浙江省康复与运动医学研究所，浙江省人民医院康复医学科，杭州医学院附属人民医院，浙江杭州市 310014

收稿日期:2022-10-25 修回日期:2022-12-08 出版日期:2023-01-25 发布日期:2023-02-17
通讯作者: 金振华，男，硕士，主管技师，主要研究方向：神经康复、肌骨康复，E-mail： 441707836@qq.com。
作者简介:孙凤宝(1992-)，男，汉族，浙江杭州市人，硕士研究生，技师，主要研究方向：神经康复、心肺康复。
基金资助:
浙江省自然科学基金公益技术应用研究项目(LGF21H170005)

Effect of multimodal mirror therapy on upper limb and hand function for stroke patients

SUN Fengbao¹^,², ZHANG Xiaofeng², LIU Yong², XU Zhitao², JIN Zhenhua²()

1. Zhejiang University of Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310053, China
2. Center for Rehabilitation Medicine, Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine Research Institute of Zhejiang Province, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310014, China

Received:2022-10-25 Revised:2022-12-08 Published:2023-01-25 Online:2023-02-17
Contact: JIN Zhenhua, E-mail: 441707836@qq.com
Supported by:
Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Public Welfare Technology Application Research Project(LGF21H170005)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的探讨多模态镜像疗法对脑卒中患者上肢及手功能的效果。

方法选取2021年4月至2022年8月浙江省人民医院康复医学科住院治疗的脑卒中患者60例，随机分为A组、B组和C组，各20例。3组均予常规康复，B组增加镜像疗法，C组增加多模态镜像疗法，共6周。治疗前后采用Fugl-Meyer评定量表上肢部分(FMA-UE)、Carroll手功能评定(UEFT)、患手最大握力和捏力、改良Barthel指数(MBI)进行评定。

结果治疗后，3组FMA-UE评分、UEFT评分、患手最大握力和捏力、MBI评分均显著提高(|t| > 7.878, P < 0.001)，C组各项成绩均最优(F > 12.563, P < 0.001)。

结论多模态镜像疗法能进一步改善脑卒中患者上肢运动功能和手功能，提高患手肌力和患者日常生活活动能力。

关键词: 脑卒中, 镜像疗法, 上肢功能, 手功能

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effect of multimodal mirror therapy on upper limb and hand function in stroke patients.

Methods From April, 2021 to August, 2022, 60 stroke patients from the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital were randomly divided into group A (n = 20), group B (n = 20) and group C (n = 20). All the patients accepted routine rehabilitation, while group B accepted mirror therapy, and group C accepted multimodal mirror therapy, in addition, for six weeks. They were assessed with Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremities (FMA-UE), Upper Extremity Function Test (UEFT) and modified Barthel Index (MBI), while the maximum grip strength and pinch strength of the affected hand were measured.

Results The FMA-UE score, UEFT score, maximum hand grip strength and pinch strength, and MBI scores improved in all groups after treatment (|t| > 7.878, P < 0.001), and it was the most in group C (F> 12.563, P< 0.001).

Conclusion Multimodal mirror therapy may further improve the upper limb motor function and hand function of stroke patients, as well as the strength of the affected hand and the activities of daily living.

Key words: stroke, mirror therapy, upper limb function, hand function

中图分类号:

R743.3

孙凤宝, 章晓峰, 刘勇, 徐智韬, 金振华. 多模态镜像疗法对脑卒中患者上肢及手功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(1): 77-81.

SUN Fengbao, ZHANG Xiaofeng, LIU Yong, XU Zhitao, JIN Zhenhua. Effect of multimodal mirror therapy on upper limb and hand function for stroke patients[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2023, 29(1): 77-81.

图/表 6

表1

表2

表3

表4

表5

表6

参考文献 36

[1]	TONG Y, PENDY J T, LI W A, et al. Motor imagery-based rehabilitation: potential neural correlates and clinical application for functional recovery of motor deficits after stroke[J]. Aging Dis, 2017, 8(3): 364-371. doi: 10.14336/AD.2016.1012
[2]	HANG T, ZHAO J, LI X, et al. Chinese Stroke Association Guidelines for Clinical Management of Cerebrovascular Disorders: Executive Summary and 2019 Update of Clinical Management of Stroke Rehabilitation[J]. Stroke Vasc Neurol, 2020, 5(3): 250-259. doi: 10.1136/svn-2019-000321 pmid: 32595138
[3]	林佳丽, 贾杰. 脑卒中后感觉训练在上肢及手功能康复中的研究进展[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2020, 35(4): 488-492.
	LIN J L, JIA J. Chin J Rehabil Med, 2020, 35(4): 488-492.
[4]	RAFFIN E, HUMMEL F C. Restoring motor functions after stroke: multiple approaches and opportunities[J]. Neuroscientist, 2018, 24(4): 400-416. doi: 10.1177/1073858417737486 pmid: 29283026
[5]	ZENG W, GUO Y, WU G, et al. Mirror therapy for motor function of the upper extremity in patients with stroke: a meta-analysis[J]. J Rehabil Med, 2018, 50(1): 8-15. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2287 pmid: 29077129
[6]	彭娟, 杨仕彬, 李爱玲, 等. 镜像疗法改善脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢功能障碍的Meta分析[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2018, 40(11): 844-853.
	PENG J, YANG S B, LI A L, et al. Mirror therapy improves the upper limb function of hemiparetic stroke survivors: a meta-analysis[J]. Chin J Phys Med Rehabil, 2018, 40(11): 844-853.
[7]	陈英伦, 白玉龙. 镜像疗法在脑卒中偏瘫患者运动康复中的研究进展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2018, 24(6): 659-666.
	CHEN Y L, BAI Y L. Advance in mirror therapy for motor rehabilitation of stroke patients with hemiplegia (review)[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2018, 24(6): 659-666.
[8]	梁爽, 邹任玲, 姜亚斌, 等. 镜像集成疗法的上肢康复训练技术研究进展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2017, 23(1): 59-62.
	LIANG S, ZOU R L, JIANG Y B, et al. Advance of mirror integrated therapy for upper limbs rehabilitation (review)[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2017, 23(1): 59-62.
[9]	丁力, 荣积峰, 崔晓, 等. 基于"闭环康复"的数字化镜像疗法对脑卒中患者上肢功能恢复的影响[J]. 华西医学, 2018, 33(10): 1232-1237.
	DING L, RONG J F, CUI X, et al. Effects of "closed-loop rehabilitation"-based digital mirror therapy on upper limb function in patients with stroke[J]. West Chin Med J, 2018, 33(10): 1232-1237.
[10]	丁力, 贾杰. "镜像疗法"作为一种康复治疗技术的新进展[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2015, 30(5): 509-512.
	DING L, JIA J. New advances in "mirror therapy" as a rehabilitation treatment technique[J]. Chin J Rehabil Med, 2015, 30(5): 509-512.
[11]	吴江, 杨弋, 饶明俐. 中国脑血管疾病分类2015[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2017, 50(3): 168-171.
	WU J, YANG Y, RAO M L. Chinese Classification of Cerebrovascular Diseases (2015)[J]. Chin J Neurol, 2017, 50(3): 168-171.
[12]	HSIEH Y W, HSUEH I P, CHOU Y T, et al. Development and validation of a short form of the Fugl-Meyer motor scale in patients with stroke[J]. Stroke, 2007, 38(11): 3052-3054. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.490730
[13]	王玉龙. 康复功能评定学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012: 358-359.
	WANG Y L. Assessment and evaluation for rehabilitation therapy[M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2012: 358-359.
[14]	冯亚男, 曹海燕, 张志杰, 等. 新型手部肌力评估系统的信度和效度研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2012, 18(9): 803-804.
	FENG Y N, CAO H Y, ZHANG Z J, et al. Reliability and validity of E-LINK System for measuring hand strength[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2012, 18(9): 803-804.
[15]	闵瑜, 吴媛媛, 燕铁斌. 改良Barthel指数(简体中文版)量表评定脑卒中患者日常生活活动能力的效度和信度研究[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2008, 30(3): 185-188.
	MIN Y, WU Y Y, YAN T B. Validity and reliability of the simplified Chinese version of modified Barthel index for Chinese stroke patients[J]. Chin J Phys Med Rehabil, 2008, 30(3): 185-188.
[16]	WU S, WU B, LIU M, et al. Stroke in China: advances and challenges in epidemiology, prevention, and management[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2019, 18(4): 394-405. doi: S1474-4422(18)30500-3 pmid: 30878104
[17]	POLLOCK A, FARMER S E, BRADY M C, et al. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014, 2014(11): CD010820.
[18]	李胜, FRANCISCO G E, 李旭红, 等. 脑卒中后痉挛的病理生理机制新见解[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2018, 40(1): 73-78.
	LI S, FRANCISCO G E, LI X H, et al. New insights into the pathophysiology of post-stroke spasticit[J]. Chin J Phys Med Rehabil, 2018, 40(1): 73-78.
[19]	贾杰. "中枢-外周-中枢"闭环康复:脑卒中后手功能康复新理念[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2016, 31(11): 1180-1182.
	JIA J. Chin J Rehabil Med, 2016, 31(11): 1180-1182.
[20]	梁思捷, 朱玉连, 王卫宁, 等. 脑机接口技术在脑卒中患者上肢功能障碍康复中的应用[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2020, 35(2): 185-188.
	LIANG S J, ZHU Y L, WANG W N, et al. Application of brain-computer interface technology in rehabilitation of upper limb dysfunction in stroke patients[J]. Chin J Rehabil Med, 2020, 35(2): 185-188.
[21]	沈芳, 王晶, 曾明. 镜像疗法在脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢运动功能康复中应用的研究进展[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2016, 31(5): 590-593.
	SHEN F, WANG J, ZENG M. Chin J Rehabil Med, 2016, 31(5): 590-593.
[22]	THIEME H, MEHRHOLZ J, POHL M, et al. Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke[J]. Stroke, 2013, 44(1): e1-e2. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.112.673087 pmid: 23390640
[23]	陈波, 孟兆祥, 施加加, 等. 镜像疗法对脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢功能及皮质运动区μ波的影响[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2018, 40(8): 588-591.
	CHEN B, MENG Z X, SHI J J, et al. Effect of mirror therapy on upper limb function and cortical motorμ wave in stroke patients with hemiplegia[J]. Chin J Phys Med Rehabil, 2018, 40(8): 588-591.
[24]	DING L, WANG X, CHEN S, et al. Camera-based mirror visual input for priming promotes motor recovery, daily function, and brain network segregation in subacute stroke patients[J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2019, 33(4): 307-318. doi: 10.1177/1545968319836207 pmid: 30909797
[25]	王强, 黄富表, 颜如秀, 等. 双侧运动训练对脑卒中恢复期上肢运动功能障碍的疗效[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2015, 21(7): 821-825.
	WANG Q, HUANG F B, YAN R X, et al. Effect of bilateral movement training on upper extremity dysfunction after stroke[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2015, 21(7): 821-825.
[26]	荣积峰, 丁力, 张雯, 等. 康复机器人结合镜像疗法对脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢功能的效果[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2019, 25(6): 709-713.
	RONG J F, DING L, ZHANG W, et al. Effects of robot-assisted therapy combined with mirror therapy on upper limbs rehabilitation in patients with hemiplegia after stroke[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2019, 25(6): 709-713.
[27]	LEE D, LEE M, LEE K, et al. Asymmetric training using virtual reality reflection equipment and the enhancement of upper limb function in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2014, 23(6): 1319-1326. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.11.006 pmid: 24468068
[28]	KANG Y J, PARK H K, KIM H J, et al. Upper extremity rehabilitation of stroke: facilitation of corticospinal excitability using virtual mirror paradigm[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2012, 9: 71. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-71 pmid: 23035951
[29]	YUAN T F, CHEN W, SHAN C, et al. Activity-dependent neurorehabilitation beyond physical trainings: "mental exercise" through mirror neuron activation[J]. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets, 2015, 14(10): 1267-1271. doi: 10.2174/1871527315666151111130956
[30]	COOK R, BIRD G, CATMUR C, et al. Mirror neurons: from origin to function[J]. Behav Brain Sci, 2014, 37(2): 177-192. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13000903 pmid: 24775147
[31]	常冬梅, 陈兴, 林建华. 脑卒中患者的运动认知能力与运动功能的关系[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2009, 15(9): 849-850.
	CHANG D M, CHEN X, LIN J H. Correlation between cognitive ability and motor ability in stroke patients[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2009, 15(9): 849-850.
[32]	RIZZOLATTI G, CRAIGHERO L. The mirror-neuron system[J]. Annu Rev Neurosci, 2004, 27: 169-192. pmid: 15217330
[33]	STEVENS J A, STOYKOV M E. Using motor imagery in the rehabilitation of hemiparesis[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2003, 84(7): 1090-1092. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00042-X
[34]	STINEAR J W, BYBLOW W D. Disinhibition in the human motor cortex is enhanced by synchronous upper limb movements[J]. J Physiol, 2002, 543(Pt 1): 307-316. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.023986
[35]	SAMUELKAMALESHKUMAR S, REETHAJANETSUREKA S, PAULJEBARAJ P, et al. Mirror therapy enhances motor performance in the paretic upper limb after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2014, 95(11): 2000-2005. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.06.020
[36]	JIA J. Exploration on neurobiological mechanisms of the central-peripheral-central closed-loop rehabilitation[J]. Front Cell Neurosci, 2022, 16: 982881.

组别	n	性别(男/女)/n	年龄/岁	病程/d	病变性质(梗死/出血)/n	偏瘫侧别(左/右)/n
A组	20	11/9	55.95±12.30	26.10±6.71	13/7	8/12
B组	20	10/10	59.85±9.16	26.65±5.06	12/8	9/11
C组	20	12/8	59.50±11.39	27.45±5.25	9/11	11/9
χ²/F值		0.404	0.766	0.282	1.765	0.938
P值		0.817	0.470	0.756	0.414	0.626

组别	n	治疗前	治疗后	t值	P值
A组	20	16.85±3.30	26.45±4.07	-33.720	< 0.001
B组	20	17.55±3.65	30.05±4.40^a	-32.275	< 0.001
C组	20	17.40±3.66	34.65±4.02^a,b	-98.098	< 0.001
F值		0.217	19.483
P值		0.806	< 0.001

组别	n	治疗前	治疗后	t值	P值
A组	20	15.25±5.64	23.45±5.06	-8.654	< 0.001
B组	20	15.75±6.43	28.95±6.48^a	-16.568	< 0.001
C组	20	15.40±5.25	34.45±8.14^a,b	-22.314	< 0.001
F值		0.039	13.562
P值		0.962	< 0.001

组别	n	治疗前	治疗后	t值	P值
A组	20	3.43±1.33	7.37±2.86	-11.354	< 0.001
B组	20	3.48±1.31	13.35±4.56^a	-13.081	< 0.001
C组	20	3.49±1.23	17.24±5.26^a,b	15.034	< 0.001
F值		0.012	26.22
P值		0.988	< 0.001

组别	n	治疗前	治疗后	t值	P值
A组	20	1.89±0.70	2.53±0.81	-7.878	< 0.001
B组	20	1.87±0.73	3.82±1.32^a	-10.385	< 0.001
C组	20	1.97±0.82	7.97±2.28^a,b	16.189	< 0.001
F值		0.103	63.87
P值		0.902	< 0.001

多模态镜像疗法对脑卒中患者上肢及手功能的效果

Effect of multimodal mirror therapy on upper limb and hand function for stroke patients

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 36

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

组别	n	治疗前	治疗后	t值	P值
A组	20	35.25±6.62	49.05±7.08	-60.393	< 0.001
B组	20	35.95±6.26	54.90±7.72^a	-45.836	< 0.001
C组	20	34.90±6.03	60.70±7.24^a,b	-25.896	< 0.001
F值		0.144	12.563
P值		0.867	< 0.001

[1]	林娜, 高菡璐, 卢惠苹, 陈燕清, 郑军凡, 陈述荣. 虚拟现实技术对脑卒中上肢功能影响的弥散张量成像研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 61-67.
[2]	王昊懿, 史亚伟, 鲁俊, 许光旭. 主观垂直感知障碍对脑卒中患者功能影响的回顾性研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 68-73.
[3]	陈珺雯, 陈谦, 陈程, 李淑月, 刘玲玲, 吴存书, 龚翔, 鲁俊, 许光旭. 改良八段锦身体活动对脑卒中患者心肺功能、运动功能和日常生活活动能力的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 74-80.
[4]	胡永林, 马颖, 窦超, 陆安民, 江小鸽, 宋新建, 肖玉华. 肩部控制训练联合神经松动术对脑卒中偏瘫患者肩痛及上肢功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 81-86.
[5]	王贺, 韩靓, 阚梦凡, 于少泓. 电刺激治疗脑卒中后肩手综合征有效性的系统评价与Meta分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1048-1056.
[6]	孙藤方, 任梦婷, 杨琳, 王耀霆, 王红雨, 闫兴洲. 高压氧治疗联合重复外周磁刺激干预脑卒中患者踝运动功能和平衡能力的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 875-881.
[7]	王亚楠, 刘西花. 脑卒中偏瘫患者主观和客观平衡功能测量的相关性及预测效能[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 890-895.
[8]	王海云, 王寅, 周信杰, 何爱群. 基于“中枢-外周-中枢”理论的经颅直流电刺激结合针刺干预脑卒中患者中枢及上肢功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 919-925.
[9]	陈怡婷, 王倩, 崔慎红, 李映彩, 张思鈺, 魏衍旭, 任慧, 冷军, 陈斌. 双侧序贯重复经颅磁刺激干预脑卒中患者上肢运动功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 926-932.
[10]	李振亚, 孙洁, 郭鹏飞, 王光明. 脑卒中患者口期和咽期吞咽功能改变与误吸的相关性：基于电视透视吞咽检查[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 933-939.
[11]	华玲, 张一楠, 郑玉, 孙俏仪, 房辉, 宋达. 手控节律音乐治疗对脑卒中后单侧空间忽略的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 833-838.
[12]	蒋孝翠, 刘臻, 苏清伦, 赵秦, 夏晓昧, 陆飞. 间歇性Theta节律经颅磁刺激对脑卒中后非流利性失语的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 839-843.
[13]	许苗苗, 李楠, 应颖, 杨凯翔, 杨婧瑞, 李杰, 邱彦群. 重复外周磁刺激对左右颈7神经交叉移位术后脑卒中患者上肢运动功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 686-690.
[14]	郑莉, 鲍治诚, 张琪, 任绪艳, 苏敏. 经皮耳迷走神经电刺激结合康复机器人训练对脑卒中患者上肢功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 691-696.
[15]	顾彬, 张津沁, 夏元浩, 胡靖然, 诸桥直纪, 黄富表. 反复促进疗法对脑卒中恢复期偏瘫患者手功能的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 697-702.