3D打印矫形鞋垫在扁平足中应用的系统综述

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2023.04.007

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 416-422.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2023.04.007

3D打印矫形鞋垫在扁平足中应用的系统综述

黄承兰¹, 侯俞彤¹, 杨云霄¹, 曾红^2a, 张子砚³, 赵文宽⁴, 王赞博⁵, 单春雷⁶, 戴尅戎^2b, 蔡斌^2a, 王金武^2b()

1.潍坊医学院康复医学院，山东潍坊市 261053
2.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院，a.康复科；b.骨科，上海市 200011
3.上海体育学院运动健康学院，上海市 200438
4.河南工业大学机电工程学院，河南郑州市 450007
5.上海交通大学转化医学研究院，上海市 200240
6.上海中医药大学康复医学院，上海市 201203

收稿日期:2022-08-20 修回日期:2023-03-21 出版日期:2023-04-25 发布日期:2023-05-19
通讯作者: 王金武(1971-)，男，汉族，上海市人，博士，教授、主任医师，主要研究方向：骨科、康复工程。E-mail： wangjw-team@shsmu.edu.cn
作者简介:黄承兰(1997-)，女，彝族，贵州毕节市人，硕士研究生，主要研究方向：肌肉骨骼康复、康复工程。
基金资助:
1.国家科技部重点研发计划项目(2018YFC2001300);2.上海市科委项目(18441903700);上海市科委项目(19XD1434200);上海市科委项目(19441908700);上海市科委项目(19441917500);3.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院临床研究型多学科诊疗项目(201914)

3D printed orthopedic insoles for flatfoot: a systematic review

HUANG Chenglan¹, HOU Yutong¹, YANG Yunxiao¹, ZENG Hong^2a, ZHANG Ziyan³, ZHAO Wenkuan⁴, WANG Zanbo⁵, SHAN Chunlei⁶, DAI Kerong^2b, CAI Bin^2a, WANG Jinwu^2b()

1. School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China
2. a. Department of Rehabilitation, b. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China
3. School of Sports and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China
4. School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan 450007, China
5. Institute of Translational Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China
6. School of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China

Received:2022-08-20 Revised:2023-03-21 Published:2023-04-25 Online:2023-05-19
Contact: WANG Jinwu, E-mail: wangjw-team@shsmu.edu.cn
Supported by:
National Key R & D Program of China(2018YFC2001300);Shanghai Science and Technology Commission Project(18441903700);Shanghai Science and Technology Commission Project(19XD1434200);Shanghai Science and Technology Commission Project(19441908700);Shanghai Science and Technology Commission Project(19441917500);Clinical Research Project of Multi-Disciplinary Team, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine(201914)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的了解矫形鞋垫的分类，3D打印矫形鞋垫常用技术、常用材料及其在扁平足中的应用。
方法检索PubMed、Web of Science、中国知网和万方数据库2012年至2022年发表的相关文献，总结相关内容。
结果最终纳入文献10篇，来自5个国家，涉及290例参与者，发表时间主要集中于2019年至2022年。矫形鞋垫可分为预制型、半定制型和定制型，其中定制型可分为传统定制型和3D打印定制型。3D打印制作矫形鞋垫时常选择的打印技术为选择性激光烧结、熔融沉积成型(FDM)和PolyJet打印，材料包括乙烯醋酸乙烯酯(EVA)、聚乳酸、热塑性聚氨酯、聚酰胺、聚丙烯。3D打印矫形鞋垫应用于扁平足，改善足底压力，缓解足部疼痛，联合使用鞋垫张贴能有效控制后足外翻。
结论 3D打印定制鞋垫的制作效率和精确度优于传统定制鞋垫；常选择的打印技术和材料主要为FDM和EVA。3D打印矫形鞋垫可对扁平足足底压力、舒适度和足部运动功能产生积极影响。

关键词: 足弓, 扁平足, 3D打印, 个性化, 矫形鞋垫, 系统综述

Abstract:

Objective To review the classification of orthopedic insoles, common techniques of 3D printing orthopedic insoles, common materials and their application for flatfoot.
Methods Literatures were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI and Wanfang Data from 2012 to 2022, and the relevant contents were summarized.
Results A total of ten studies were finally included, from 5 countries, involving 290 participants, which published from 2019 to 2022. Orthotic insoles were classified as prefabricated, semi-custom, and custom, while custom ones were classified as traditional custom and 3D printed custom. 3D printed orthotic insoles were often made with selective laser sintering, fused deposition modeling (FDM) and PolyJet printing technologies, and commonly used materials included ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA), polylactic acid, thermoplastic polyurethane, polyamide, and polypropylene. For flatfoot, 3D printed orthotic insoles could improve plantar pressure, relieve foot pain and the combined use of insole posting could control rearfoot valgus.
Conclusion 3D printed custom insoles can be made more efficiently and accurately than traditional custom insoles. The printing technologies and materials often chosen for 3D printed orthotic insoles are mainly FDM and EVA. 3D printed orthotic insoles is effective on plantar pressure, comfort and foot movement function of flatfoot.

Key words: arch, flatfoot, 3D printing, personalization, orthopedic insole, systematic review

中图分类号:

R496

黄承兰, 侯俞彤, 杨云霄, 曾红, 张子砚, 赵文宽, 王赞博, 单春雷, 戴尅戎, 蔡斌, 王金武. 3D打印矫形鞋垫在扁平足中应用的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(4): 416-422.

HUANG Chenglan, HOU Yutong, YANG Yunxiao, ZENG Hong, ZHANG Ziyan, ZHAO Wenkuan, WANG Zanbo, SHAN Chunlei, DAI Kerong, CAI Bin, WANG Jinwu. 3D printed orthopedic insoles for flatfoot: a systematic review[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2023, 29(4): 416-422.

图/表 6

图1

表1

纳入文献的基本特征"

文献	国家	样本特征	鞋垫类型	鞋垫材料	打印技术	干预方案	评估	结论
Jandova等^[14](2022)	捷克	正常足(n = 26) 扁平足(n = 18) 高弓足(n = 7)	原始鞋垫；定制鞋垫； 3D打印解剖鞋垫	EVA	PolyJet	佩戴鞋垫站立和行走	测量使用3种鞋垫行走时的足底压力分布	定制鞋垫和3D打印解剖鞋垫可改善扁平足足底压力
Xu等^[15](2019)	中国	扁平足(n = 80)	3D打印定制鞋垫；预制鞋垫	EVA	未提及	每天穿戴6~8 h，持续8周	测量足底压力；VAS	3D打印定制鞋垫可改善足底压力分布，并提高舒适度
Cherni等^[16](2022)	加拿大	扁平足(n = 19)	3D打印柔性矫形鞋垫；带张贴的3D打印柔性矫形鞋垫； 3D打印刚性鞋垫	未提及	未提及	穿戴不同鞋垫持续步行3 min	测量穿戴不同鞋垫下足底压力；肌电图	刚性鞋垫可改善足底压力，压力中心向中外侧方向位移减少，步行时姿势稳定性提高
赵碎浪等^[17](2022)	中国	扁平足(n = 9)	3D打印全负重鞋垫； 3D打印半负重鞋垫； 3D打印非负重鞋垫	PLA	FDM	步行8 m	测量足底压力；VAS	带足弓支撑的半负重3D打印鞋垫支撑期总触地时间降低，压力中心向内侧移动，与足弓支撑高度正相关
Cheng等 ^[18](2021)	中国	扁平足(n = 10)	足弓加固支撑鞋垫；足弓支撑鞋垫；无足弓支撑鞋垫	TPU	FDM	步行	测量足部运动学参数和足底压力	鞋垫降低后足区峰值压力，控制后足外翻和前足外展
Ho等^[19](2022)	澳大利亚	扁平足(n = 13)	3D打印定制鞋垫；传统定制鞋垫	PP	未提及	步行5 m	测量足和足踝生物力学变量	3D打印鞋垫降低踝关节跖屈力矩和力量
Desmyttere等^[20](2021)	加拿大	扁平足(n = 19)	3D打印定制柔性矫形鞋垫；带有张贴的3D打印定制柔性矫形鞋垫； 3D打印定制刚性矫形鞋垫	PA	SLS	步行3 min	测量运动学和动力学参数	刚性鞋垫可减少中足外翻和前足外展；带有张贴的3D打印定制柔性矫形鞋垫可有效减少后足外翻角度和踝关节内翻力矩，增加膝外展力矩，控制足内旋
Hsu等^[21](2022)	中国	扁平足(n = 10)	3D打印自动扫描鞋垫； 3D打印全接触鞋垫； 3D打印内侧楔形鞋垫	TPU； EVA	FDM	行走	运动分析系统；舒适度	3种鞋垫可以有效改善踝关节运动学和动力学以及主观舒适度
Lin等^[22](2019)	中国	扁平足(n = 12)	3D打印定制矫形鞋垫	PLA	FDM	行走	测量运动学和动力学参数	降低踝关节外翻和外旋力矩，纠正足部异常，提供足够的机械强度承受步行中的重量
Yurt等^[23](2019)	土耳其	扁平足(n = 67)	3D打印鞋垫；传统定制鞋垫；平面鞋垫	EVA	未提及	佩戴8周	VAS；国际体力活动量表	3D打印鞋垫和传统定制鞋垫比平面鞋垫能更有效减轻扁平足疼痛

表1

表2

表3

表4

表5

参考文献 48

[1]	SU S, MO Z, GUO J, et al. The effect of arch height and material hardness of personalizedinsole on correction and tissues of flatfoot[J]. J Healthc Eng, 2017, 2017: 8614341.
[2]	SALATHE E P, ARANGIO G A. A biomechanical model of the foot: the role of muscles, tendons, and ligaments[J]. J Biomech Eng, 2002, 124(3): 281-287. doi: 10.1115/1.1468865
[3]	GWANI A S, ASARI M A, MOHD ISMAIL Z I. How the three arches of the foot intercorrelate[J]. Folia Morphol (Warsz), 2017, 76(4): 682-688.
[4]	ABOUTORABI A, SAEEDI H, KAMALI M, et al. Immediate effect of orthopedic shoe and functional foot orthosis on center of pressure displacement and gait parameters in juvenile flexible flat foot[J]. Prosthet Orthot Int, 2014, 38(3): 218-223. doi: 10.1177/0309364613496111 pmid: 23986466
[5]	FLORES D V, MEJÍA GÓMEZ C, FERNÁNDEZ HERNANDO M, et al. Adult acquired flatfoot deformity: anatomy, biomechanics, staging, and imaging findings[J]. Radiographics, 2019, 39(5): 1437-1460. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019190046 pmid: 31498747
[6]	PARK S Y, PARK D J. Comparison of foot structure, function, plantar pressure and balance ability according to the body mass index of young adults[J]. Osong Public Health Res Perspect, 2019, 10(2): 102-107. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2019.10.2.09
[7]	ZHAO X, GU Y, YU J, et al. The influence of gender, age, and body mass index on arch height and arch stiffness[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2020, 59(2): 298-302. doi: S1067-2516(19)30317-5 pmid: 32130994
[8]	PITA-FERNANDEZ S, GONZALEZ-MARTIN C, ALONSO-TAJES F, et al. Flat foot in a random population and its impact on quality of life and functionality[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2017, 11(4): LC22-LC27.
[9]	KODITHUWAKKU ARACHCHIGE S N K, CHANDER H, KNIGHT A. Flatfeet: biomechanical implications, assessment and management[J]. Foot (Edinb), 2019, 38: 81-85. doi: S0958-2592(18)30153-6 pmid: 30844660
[10]	DARS S, UDEN H, BANWELL H A, et al. The effectiveness of non-surgical intervention (foot orthoses) for paediatric flexible pes planus: a systematic review: update[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(2): e0193060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193060
[11]	ZUIL-ESCOBAR J C, MARTÍNEZ-CEPA C B, MARTÍN-URRIALDE J A, et al. Evaluating the medial longitudinal arch of the foot: correlations, reliability, and accuracy in people with a low arch[J]. Phys Ther, 2019, 99(3): 364-372. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy149
[12]	宋艳, 郑坤, 魏浩馨, 等. 足姿指数评估扁平足信度及在3D打印鞋垫中的应用[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2022, 26(3): 344-349.
	SONG Y, ZHENG K, WEI H X, et al. Reliability of flat feet evaluated by foot posture index and its application in three-dimensional printing insoles[J]. Chin J Tissue Eng Res, 2022, 26(3): 344-349.
[13]	WAGNER E, WAGNER P. Current concepts in treatment of ligament incompetence in the acquired flatfoot[J]. Foot Ankle Clin, 2021, 26(2): 373-389. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2021.03.010 pmid: 33990259
[14]	JANDOVA S, MENDRICKY R. Benefits of 3D printed and customized anatomical footwear insoles for plantar pressure distribution[J]. 3D Print Addit Manuf, 2022, 9(6): 547-556. doi: 10.1089/3dp.2021.0002 pmid: 36660748
[15]	XU R, WANG Z, REN Z, et al. Comparative study of the effects of customized 3D printed insole and prefabricated insole on plantar pressure and comfort in patients with symptomatic flatfoot[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2019, 25: 3510-3519. doi: 10.12659/MSM.916975
[16]	CHERNI Y, DESMYTTERE G, HAJIZADEH M, et al. Effect of 3D printed foot orthoses stiffness on muscle activity and plantar pressures in individuals with flexible flatfeet: a statistical non-parametric mapping study[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2022, 92: 105553. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105553
[17]	赵碎浪, 祁子芮, 曹中华, 等. 3D打印支撑鞋垫对扁平足足底压力分布的影响[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2022, 32(3): 85-89.
	ZHAO S L, QI Z R, CAO Z H, et al. Effect of 3D printed arch-support insoles on plantar pressure distribution in flat feet[J]. J Leather Sci Eng, 2022, 32(3): 85-89.
[18]	CHENG K W, PENG Y, CHEN T L W, et al. A three-dimensional printed foot orthosis for flexible flatfoot: an exploratory biomechanical study on arch support reinforcement and undercut[J]. Materials (Basel), 2021, 14(18): 5297. doi: 10.3390/ma14185297
[19]	HO M, NGUYEN J, HEALES L, et al. The biomechanical effects of 3D printed and traditionally made foot orthoses in individuals with unilateral plantar fasciopathy and flat feet[J]. Gait Posture, 2022, 96: 257-264. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.06.006 pmid: 35709609
[20]	DESMYTTERE G, HAJIZADEH M, BLEAU J, et al. Anti-pronator components are essential to effectively alter lower-limb kinematics and kinetics in individuals with flexible flatfeet[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2021, 86: 105390. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105390
[21]	HSU C Y, WANG C S, LIN K W, et al. Biomechanical analysis of the flatfoot with different 3D-printed insoles on the lower extremities[J]. Bioengineering (Basel), 2022, 9(10): 563.
[22]	LIN K W, HU C J, YANG W W, et al. Biomechanical evaluation and strength test of 3D-printed foot orthoses[J]. Appl Bionics Biomech, 2019, 2019: 4989534.
[23]	YURT Y, ŞENER G, YAKUT Y. The effect of different foot orthoses on pain and health related quality of life in painful flexible flat foot: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2019, 55(1): 95-102.
[24]	COLLINGS R, FREEMAN J, LATOUR J M, et al. Footwear and insole design features for offloading the diabetic at risk foot: a systematic review and meta‐analyses[J]. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab, 2020, 4(1): e00132.
[25]	GIL-CALVO M, JIMENEZ-PEREZ I, PRIEGO-QUESADA J I, et al. Effect of custom-made and prefabricated foot orthoses on kinematic parameters during an intense prolonged run[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(3): e0230877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230877
[26]	MO S, LEUNG S H S, CHAN Z Y S, et al. The biomechanical difference between running with traditional and 3D printed orthoses[J]. J Sports Sci, 2019, 37(19): 2191-2197. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1626069
[27]	KIM G B, LEE S, KIM H, et al. Three-dimensional printing: basic principles and applications in medicine and radiology[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2016, 17(2): 182-197. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.2.182 pmid: 26957903
[28]	CHOO Y J, BOUDIER-REVÉRET M, CHANG M C. 3D printing technology applied to orthosis manufacturing: narrative review[J]. Ann Palliat Med, 2020, 9(6): 4262-4270. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1185 pmid: 33040564
[29]	LIGON S C, LISKA R, STAMPFL J, et al. Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing[J]. Chem Rev, 2017, 117(15): 10212-10290. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 pmid: 28756658
[30]	SHAHRUBUDIN N, LEE T C, RAMLAN R. An overview on 3D printing technology: technological, materials, and applications[J]. Proc Manuf, 2019, 35: 1286-1296.
[31]	LIAW C Y, GUVENDIREN M. Current and emerging applications of 3D printing in medicine[J]. Biofabrication, 2017, 9(2): 024102. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa7279
[32]	ZOLFAGHARIAN A, LAKHI M, RANJBAR S, et al. Custom shoe sole design and modeling toward 3D printing[J]. Int J Bioprint, 2021, 7(4): 396. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v7i4.396
[33]	SALEH ALGHAMDI S, JOHN S, ROY CHOUDHURY N, et al. Additive manufacturing of polymer materials: progress, promise and challenges[J]. Polymers (Basel), 2021, 13(5): 753. doi: 10.3390/polym13050753
[34]	MELIA G, SIEGKAS P, LEVICK J, et al. Insoles of uniform softer material reduced plantar pressure compared to dual-material insoles during regular and loaded gait[J]. Appl Ergon, 2021, 91: 103298. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103298
[35]	UDDIN K Z, YOUSSEF G, TRKOV M, et al. Gradient optimization of multi-layered density-graded foam laminates for footwear material design[J]. J Biomech, 2020, 109: 109950. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109950
[36]	GENINA N, HOLLÄNDER J, JUKARAINEN H, et al. Ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) as a new drug carrier for 3D printed medical drug delivery devices[J]. Eur J Pharm Sci, 2016, 90: 53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2015.11.005 pmid: 26545484
[37]	VALERGA A P, BATISTA M, SALGUERO J, et al. Influence of PLA filament conditions on characteristics of FDM parts[J]. Materials (Basel), 2018, 11(8): 1322. doi: 10.3390/ma11081322
[38]	TAKANO M, TAKAMATSU K, SAITO H. High-strength heat-elongated thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer consisting of a stacked domain structure[J]. Polymers (Basel), 2022, 14(7): 1470. doi: 10.3390/polym14071470
[39]	STOIA D I, MARŞAVINA L, LINUL E. Correlations between process parameters and outcome properties of laser-sintered polyamide[J]. Polymers (Basel), 2019, 11(11): 1850. doi: 10.3390/polym11111850
[40]	FISCHER K M, HOWELL A P. Reusability of autoclaved 3D printed polypropylene compared to a glass filled polypropylene composite[J]. 3D Print Med, 2021, 7: 20. doi: 10.1186/s41205-021-00111-x pmid: 34370133
[41]	ABAS M, HABIB T, NOOR S, et al. Parametric investigation and optimization to study the effect of process parameters on the dimensional deviation of fused deposition modeling of 3D printed parts[J]. Polymers (Basel), 2022, 14(17): 3667. doi: 10.3390/polym14173667
[42]	HOANG N T T, CHEN S, CHOU L W. The impact of foot orthoses and exercises on pain and navicular drop for adult flatfoot: a network meta-analysis[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(15): 8063. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158063
[43]	SHI Q Q, LI P L, YICK K L, et al. Influence of contoured insoles with different materials on kinematics and kinetics changes in diabetic elderly during gait[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19(19): 12502. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912502
[44]	GERRARD J M, BONANNO D R, WHITTAKER G A, et al. Effect of different orthotic materials on plantar pressures: a systematic review[J]. J Foot Ankle Res, 2020, 13(1): 35. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-00401-3 pmid: 32527296
[45]	AMINIAN G, SAFAEEPOUR Z, FARHOODI M, et al. The effect of prefabricated and proprioceptive foot orthoses on plantar pressure distribution in patients with flexible flatfoot during walking[J]. Prosthet Orthot Int, 2013, 37(3): 227-232. doi: 10.1177/0309364612461167 pmid: 23085538
[46]	DESMYTTERE G, HAJIZADEH M, BLEAU J, et al. Effect of foot orthosis design on lower limb joint kinematics and kinetics during walking in flexible pes planovalgus: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2018, 59: 117-129. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.09.018
[47]	HAJIZADEH M, DESMYTTERE G, CARMONA J P, et al. Can foot orthoses impose different gait features based on geometrical design in healthy subjects? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Foot (Edinb), 2020, 42: 101646. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2019.10.001
[48]	OERLEMANS L N T, PEETERS C M M, MUNNIK-HAGEWOUD R, et al. Foot orthoses for flexible flatfeet in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-reported outcomes[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2023, 24(1): 16. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-06044-8

类型	制作过程	特点
传统	手工制作。通过石膏获得足部模型，选择合适材料，对足部阳模进行加热，修剪多余材料，并打磨成型^[23]。	鞋垫无微孔，需进行微调或对准等操作，高度依赖矫形师的经验和工艺，制作较为复杂、费力、耗时，且存在一定误差^[26]。
3D打印	足部距下关节中立位时使用足部扫描仪获取足部参数，导出数据并处理成3D文件格式或立体平版印刷数据文件，选择合适的3D打印机、打印材料和打印技术，制造表面具有光滑小孔的鞋垫^[27]。	提高鞋垫适配性，减轻质量，增加通风，促进定制形状的创新和几何形状的产生；制作过程无接触，环境较为干净整洁，精密度较高，效率较快，穿戴体验改善^[28]。

3D打印矫形鞋垫在扁平足中应用的系统综述

3D printed orthopedic insoles for flatfoot: a systematic review

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 48

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

类型	特点
定制型	满足不同个体的生物力学需求。需要专业医生或矫形师检查下肢生物力学，获得足部印模，并开具鞋垫处方^[24]。
半定制型	对预制鞋垫进行修改，使其匹配足部畸形^[16]。
预制型	批量生产，根据足部尺寸进行选择，对足部畸形矫正较差^[25]。

技术	特点
FDM	商业化技术。通过加热和挤压热塑性细丝，从底部到顶部层层堆积。原材料利用率较高，成型原理简单^[33]。
SLS	通过反射引导激光束局部加热熔化粉末材料，可应用于多种材料，精度高，效率较高^[31]。
PolyJet	化学树脂通过紫外线曝光后打印固化。通常采用蜡支撑，印刷后通过融化去除。最大优点是允许产品中包含多种材料^[31]。

材料	特点
EVA	由乙烯和醋酸乙烯酯(vinyl acetate, VA)形成的热塑性共聚物，其性能与VA比例有关，VA比例大增加极性、粘合性、抗冲击性、柔韧性和相容性，降低结晶度、刚度、软化和熔点^[36]。
PLA	易于印刷，机械性能高于大多数塑料^[37]。
TPU	具有多功能的热塑性、弹性体性能和优异的机械性能，可分成硬段和软段，硬段能增加TPU强度，软段有助于提高柔韧性和伸长率，被广泛应用于工业、医疗、体育领域^[38]。
PA	机械强度高，软化点高，耐热，耐磨损，具有一定的吸震性，品种多、产量大、应用较为广泛^[39]。
PP	成本较低，有较高的耐化学性、防潮性，优异的机械性能，广泛应用于医疗设备^[40]。

[1]	王航宇, 葛可可, 范永红, 都丽露, 邹敏, 封磊. 基于ICD-11和ICF主动式音乐疗法改善认知障碍老年人认知功能的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 36-43.
[2]	闻嘉宁, 金秋艳, 张琦, 李杰, 司琦. 认知参与型身体活动对发展儿童青少年执行功能的效果：基于ICF的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 44-53.
[3]	葛可可, 范永红, 王航宇, 都丽露, 李长江, 邹敏. 失眠老年人正念干预健康效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 54-60.
[4]	张婧雅, 邹敏, 孙宏伟, 孙昌隆, 朱峻同. 听障儿童青少年焦虑或抑郁情绪心理干预效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1004-1011.
[5]	王俊宇, 杨永, 袁逊, 谢婷, 庄洁. 高强度间歇训练对健康儿童青少年执行功能效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1012-1020.
[6]	魏晓微, 杨剑, 魏春艳. 特殊教育学校孤独症谱系障碍儿童参与适应性瑜伽活动的心理与行为效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1021-1028.
[7]	杨亚茹, 杨剑. 基于WHO-HPS架构学校身体活动相关健康服务及其健康效益：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1040-1047.
[8]	史佳伟, 李凌宇, 杨浩杰, 王琴潞, 邹海欧. 预康复对全膝关节置换术后患者的有效性：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1057-1064.
[9]	蒋长好, 黄辰, 高晓妍, 戴元富, 赵国明. 神经反馈训练对老年人认知功能效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 903-909.
[10]	魏晓微, 杨剑, 魏春艳, 贺启令. 学校环境下适应性体育课程促进智力与发展性残疾儿童心理运动发展的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 910-918.
[11]	余中起, 王超, 贺刚, 刁连福, 刘梦婷, 于瑶, 张梁, 王瑞艳. 三种足内在肌训练对扁平足患者拇外展肌横截面积和足形态的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 961-966.
[12]	王少璞, 陈钢. 基于世界卫生组织健康促进学校架构的心理行为健康服务及其健康效益：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 800-807.
[13]	蒋长好, 高晓妍. 短时身体活动对儿童认知功能影响的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 667-672.
[14]	余中起, 王超, 贺刚, 张梁, 王瑞艳. 短足训练对成年扁平足患者干预效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(5): 551-557.
[15]	蓝诗玲, 庞伟, 李鑫, 刘梦云, 战玉军. 动作观察疗法对脑性瘫痪患儿上肢功能作用的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(5): 558-564.