《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 510-515.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2023.05.003
朱晓敏1,2, 刘惠林1,2, 刘元旻1,2, 闫志宇1,2, 杜雪晶1,2, 王亚囡1,2, 张通1,2()
收稿日期:
2022-10-25
修回日期:
2023-02-24
出版日期:
2023-05-25
发布日期:
2023-06-19
通讯作者:
张通(1961-),男,汉族,博士,主任医师、教授,博士研究生导师,主要研究方向:神经病学、神经康复学。E-mail:Tom611@126.com
作者简介:
朱晓敏(1986-),女,汉族,河北唐县人,硕士研究生,主管治疗师,主要研究方向:神经康复。
ZHU Xiaomin1,2, LIU Huilin1,2, LIU Yuanmin1,2, YAN Zhiyu1,2, DU Xuejing1,2, WANG Ya'nan1,2, ZHANG Tong1,2()
Received:
2022-10-25
Revised:
2023-02-24
Published:
2023-05-25
Online:
2023-06-19
Contact:
ZHANG Tong, E-mail: 摘要:
目的 分析脑卒中患者步行中自发性转身方向与平衡能力和跌倒风险之间的关系。
方法 2021年12月至2022年11月,北京博爱医院脑卒中患者94例,分别进行单任务计时“起立-行走”测试(TUGT, TUGT1)、拿水杯TUGT (TUGT2)和计算任务下TUGT (TUGT3),根据患者3项TUGT于标记点处自发转弯方向分为转向一致组和转向不一致组(n = 34),转向一致组再分为患侧组(n = 33)和健侧组(n = 27);每次TUGT后,要求患者再进行一次与自发方向相反转身的TUGT;并进行患侧下肢单腿支撑测试、功能性前伸测试(FRT)、患侧360°转向测试和Morse跌倒量表评定。
结果 患侧组左侧偏瘫比例最高(χ2 = 7.995, P < 0.05)。TUGT1、TUGT2、TUGT3向健侧和患侧转向后测试时间均为患侧组最长,健侧组最短(F > 4.009, P < 0.05),患侧组长于健侧组(P < 0.05)。单腿支撑时间(H = 9.403, P = 0.009)、FRT距离(F = 4.300, P = 0.016)均为患侧组最短,健侧组最长,患侧组短于健侧组(P < 0.05);患侧360°转向时间(F = 4.134, P = 0.019)和转向步数(F = 5.611, P = 0.003)均为患侧组最多,健侧组最少,患侧组多于健侧组(P < 0.05)。Morse跌倒量表评分患侧组最高,健侧组最低(H = 8.192, P = 0.017),患侧组高于健侧组(P < 0.05)。
结论 步行转弯时自发转向患侧的脑卒中患者通常平衡功能较差,跌倒风险较高。
中图分类号:
朱晓敏, 刘惠林, 刘元旻, 闫志宇, 杜雪晶, 王亚囡, 张通. 脑卒中患者步行中自发性转身方向与平衡和跌倒风险间的关系[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(5): 510-515.
ZHU Xiaomin, LIU Huilin, LIU Yuanmin, YAN Zhiyu, DU Xuejing, WANG Ya'nan, ZHANG Tong. Relationship among spontaneous turning direction, balance and fall risk in stroke patients during walking[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2023, 29(5): 510-515.
表1
3组基线资料比较"
项目 | n | 性别 (男/女)/n | 年龄/岁 | 体质量/kg | 身高/cm | 偏瘫侧 (左/右)/n | 卒中性质 (出血/梗死) /n | 病程/月 | MMSE 评分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
患侧组 | 33 | 16/17 | 68.00±4.75 | 67.70±4.41 | 165.33±4.47 | 23/10 | 15/18 | 4(2.5, 5) | 28(27, 28) |
健侧组 | 27 | 14/13 | 67.44±3.38 | 69.48±4.77 | 166.07±4.77 | 10/17 | 13/14 | 4(2, 5) | 28(27, 28) |
转向不一致组 | 34 | 17/17 | 67.02±3.29 | 67.21±4.60 | 164.65±5.09 | 14/20 | 16/18 | 4(2, 5) | 28(27, 28) |
χ2/F/H值 | 0.067 | 0.524 | 1.991 | 0.670 | 7.995 | 0.045 | 0.037 | 0.528 | |
P值 | 0.967 | 0.594 | 0.142 | 0.514 | 0.018 | 0.978 | 0.982 | 0.768 |
表2
不同自发转向方向组间TUGT比较 单位:s"
组别 | n | TUGT1 | TUGT2 | TUGT3 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
健侧 | 患侧 | 健侧 | 患侧 | 健侧 | 患侧 | ||||
患侧组 | 33 | 26.33±5.75 | 26.18±6.10 | 26.58±5.47 | 26.48±5.79 | 30.00±5.79 | 30.51±6.34 | ||
健侧组 | 27 | 20.89±6.68a | 21.07±6.84a | 21.33±6.64a | 21.63±7.08a | 24.81±6.62a | 25.07±7.02a | ||
转向不一致组 | 34 | 23.12±7.43 | 22.62±7.20 | 23.50±7.33 | 23.44±7.34 | 26.62±7.49 | 26.88±7.67 | ||
F值 | 4.666 | 5.101 | 4.962 | 4.009 | 4.740 | 4.745 | |||
P值 | 0.012 | 0.008 | 0.009 | 0.021 | 0.011 | 0.011 |
表4
不同自发转向方向组间平衡功能及跌倒风险比较"
组别 | n | 单腿支撑/s | FRT/cm | 转向时间/s | 转向步数/n | MFS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
患侧组 | 33 | 5(4.5, 7.5) | 14.76±4.10 | 8.97±1.87 | 10.39±1.85 | 25(15, 25) |
健侧组 | 27 | 8(6, 9)a | 18.04±5.06a | 7.20±2.54a | 8.56±2.31a | 15(15, 25)a |
转向不一致组 | 34 | 6(5, 9) | 17.53±5.14 | 8.04±2.70 | 9.09±2.45 | 15(15, 25) |
F/H值 | 9.403 | 4.300 | 4.134 | 5.611 | 8.192 | |
P值 | 0.009 | 0.016 | 0.019 | 0.003 | 0.017 |
[1] |
TSUR A, SEGAL Z. Falls in stroke patients: risk factors and risk management[J]. Isr Med Assoc J, 2010, 12(4): 216-219.
pmid: 20803880 |
[2] |
MORONE G, MARTINO CINNERA A, PAOLUCCI T, et al. Clinical features of fallers among inpatient subacute stroke: an observational cohort study[J]. Neurol Sci, 2020, 41(9): 2599-2604.
doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04352-2 pmid: 32253635 |
[3] | LUO Y Q, DENG X Q, WU C K, et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for falls within two years after stroke in elderly patients[J]. Chin J Geriatr, 2018, 37(9): 978-983. |
[4] |
KOH J S G, HILL A M, HILL K D, et al. Evaluating a novel multifactorial falls prevention activity programme for community-dwelling older people after stroke: a mixed-method feasibility study[J]. Clin Interv Aging, 2020, 15: 1099-1112.
doi: 10.2147/CIA.S251516 pmid: 32764897 |
[5] | 仵三娟, 杨辉, 曹慧丽, 等. 脑卒中病人跌倒危险因素及预防策略的研究进展[J]. 护理研究, 2020, 34(13): 2351-2355. |
WU S J, YANG H, CAO H L, et al. Research progress on fall risk factors and prevention strategies in stroke patients[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2020, 34(13): 2351-2355. | |
[6] |
YANG F, LEES J, SIMPKINS C, et al. Interventions for preventing falls in people post-stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Gait Posture, 2021, 84: 377-388.
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.12.034 pmid: 33476831 |
[7] |
XU T, CLEMSON L, O'LOUGHLIN K, et al. Risk factors for falls in community stroke survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2018, 99(3): 563-573.e5.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.032 |
[8] |
LEACH J M, MELLONE S, PALUMBO P, et al. Natural turn measures predict recurrent falls in community-dwelling older adults: a longitudinal cohort study[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 4316.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22492-6 pmid: 29531284 |
[9] |
BONNYAUD C, PRADON D, BENSMAIL D, et al. Dynamic stability and risk of tripping during the Timed Up and Go Test in hemiparetic and healthy subjects[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(10): e0140317.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140317 |
[10] |
GOTO Y, OTAKA Y, SUZUKI K, et al. Incidence and circumstances of falls among community-dwelling ambulatory stroke survivors: a prospective study[J]. Geriatr Gerontol Int, 2019, 19(3): 240-244.
doi: 10.1111/ggi.13594 pmid: 30623545 |
[11] | 罗玉球, 邓晓清, 吴彩葵, 等. 老年脑卒中后2年跌倒的临床特点及危险因素分析[J]. 中华老年医学杂志, 2018, 37(9): 978-983. |
LUO Y Q, DENG X Q, WU C K, et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for falls within two years after stroke in elderly patients[J]. Chin J Geriatr, 2018, 37(9): 978-983. | |
[12] |
BARROIS R P, RICARD D, OUDRE L, et al. Observational study of 180° turning strategies using inertial measurement units and fall risk in poststroke hemiparetic patients[J]. Front Neurol, 2017, 8: 194.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00194 |
[13] |
CHEN I H, LIANG P J, CHIU V J, et al. Trunk muscle activation patterns during standing turns in patients with stroke: an electromyographic analysis[J]. Front Neurol, 2021, 12: 769975.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.769975 |
[14] |
CHAN P P, SI TOU J I, TSE M M, et al. Reliability and validity of the Timed Up and Go Test with a motor task in people with chronic stroke[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2017, 98(11): 2213-2220.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.008 |
[15] | 闫睿, 周健, 刘博, 等. 计时起立行走测试在老年跌倒风险筛查中的应用研究进展[J]. 中华老年医学杂志, 2022, 41(6): 743-747. |
YAN R, ZHOU J, LIU B, et al. The Timed Up and Go Test for fall risk prediction in older adults: the latest advances[J]. Chin J Geriatr, 2022, 41(6): 743-747. | |
[16] |
郭静霞, 陈亮, 余启超, 等. 运动对预防老年人跌倒效果的网状Meta分析[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2021, 27(5): 563-573.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2021.05.009 |
GUO J X, CHEN L, YU Q C, et al. Efficacy of exercise on fall in old adults: a network meta-analysis[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2021, 27(5): 563-573. | |
[17] | 中华医学会神经病学分会, 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国脑血管病一级预防指南2019[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2019, 52(9): 684-709. |
Chinese Society of Neurology, Chinese Stroke Society. Guidelines for the Primary Prevention of Cerebrovascular Diseases in China 2019[J]. Chin J Neurol, 2019, 52(9): 684-709. | |
[18] |
LIPARULO L, ZHANG Z, PANELLA M, et al. A novel fuzzy approach for automatic Brunnstrom stage classification using surface electromyography[J]. Med Biol Eng Comput, 2017, 55(8): 1367-1378.
doi: 10.1007/s11517-016-1597-3 pmid: 27909939 |
[19] |
WATANABE H, TASHIRO K. Brunnstrom stages and Wallerian degenerations: a study using MRI[J]. Tohoku J Exp Med, 1992, 166(4): 471-473.
pmid: 1502693 |
[20] | 郭铁成, 卫小梅, 陈小红. 改良Ashworth量表用于痉挛评定的信度研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2008, 23(10): 906-909. |
GUO T C, WEI X M, CHEN X H. Reliability of clinical measurements obtained with modified Ashworth Scale in Chinese patients with spasticity[J]. Chin J Rehabil Med, 2008, 23(10): 906-909. | |
[21] |
BURTON L, TYSON S F. Screening for cognitive impairment after stroke: a systematic review of psychometric properties and clinical utility[J]. J Rehabil Med, 2015, 47(3): 193-203.
doi: 10.2340/16501977-1930 pmid: 25590458 |
[22] |
LOUIE D R, ENG J J. Berg Balance Scale score at admission can predict walking suitable for community ambulation at discharge from inpatient stroke rehabilitation[J]. J Rehabil Med, 2018, 50(1): 37-44.
doi: 10.2340/16501977-2280 pmid: 29068037 |
[23] |
WONG C K. Interrater reliability of the Berg Balance Scale when used by clinicians of various experience levels to assess people with lower limb amputations[J]. Phys Ther, 2014, 94(3): 371-378.
doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130182 pmid: 24092903 |
[24] | 黄小芳, 严谨, 杨土保, 等. Morse跌倒量表评估在住院患者防跌倒护理中的成本效果[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2021, 46(5): 529-535. |
HUANG X F, YAN J, YANG T B. Cost-effectiveness of Morse Fall Scale assessment in fall prevention care in hospitalized patients[J]. J Central South Univ (Med Sci), 2021, 46(5): 529-535. | |
[25] |
MORSE J M, BLACK C, OBERLE K, et al. A prospective study to identify the fall-prone patient[J]. Soc Sci Med, 1989, 28(1): 81-86.
pmid: 2928815 |
[26] |
MACIASZEK J. Effects of posturographic platform biofeedback training on the static and dynamic balance of older stroke patients[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2018, 27(7): 1969-1974.
doi: S1052-3057(18)30117-4 pmid: 29598908 |
[27] | PORTNOY S, REIF S, MENDELBOIM T, et al. Postural control of individuals with chronic stroke compared to healthy participants: Timed-Up-and-Go, Functional Reach Test and center of pressure movement[J]. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2017, 53(5): 685-693. |
[28] |
朱晓敏, 刘元旻, 杜雪晶, 等. 功能性伸展测试临床应用进展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2021, 27(5): 583-587.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2021.05.011 |
ZHU X M, LIU Y M, DU X J, et al. Advance in application of Functional Reach Test (review)[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2021, 27(5): 583-587. | |
[29] |
SHIU C H, NG S S, KWONG P W, et al. Timed 360° Turn Test for assessing people with chronic stroke[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2016, 97(4): 536-544.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.11.010 |
[30] |
ZOU T E, LIANG P J, LEE S C. Turning duration and steps predict future falls in poststroke hemiplegic individuals: a preliminary cohort study[J]. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2021, 28(1): 33-41.
doi: 10.1080/10749357.2020.1760644 |
[31] |
HEUNG T H, NG S S. Effect of seat height and turning direction on the Timed Up and Go Test scores of people after stroke[J]. J Rehabil Med, 2009, 41(9): 719-722.
doi: 10.2340/16501977-0411 pmid: 19774304 |
[32] |
LYDERS JOHANSEN K, DERBY STISTRUP R, SKIBDAL SCHJØTT C, et al. Absolute and relative reliability of the Timed 'Up & Go' Test and '30 second Chair-Stand' test in hospitalised patients with stroke[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(10): e0165663.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165663 |
[33] |
ZAK M, KRUPNIK S, BROLA W, et al. Functional capacity and dual-task cost in the institutionalized older adults, both affected and unaffected by mild cognitive impairment[J]. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act, 2021, 18(1): 16.
doi: 10.1186/s11556-021-00270-0 |
[34] |
AL-YAHYA E, DAWES H, SMITH L, et al. Cognitive motor interference while walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2011, 35(3): 715-728.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.08.008 |
[35] |
YANG L, HE C, PANG M Y. Reliability and validity of dual-task mobility assessments in people with chronic stroke[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(1): e0147833.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147833 |
[36] | LIANG P J, CHIU V J, TENG Y C, et al. Turning difficulties after stroke and its relationship with trunk function[J]. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2021, 57(6): 859-865. |
[37] | BARROIS R P, RICARD D, OUDRE L, et al. Observational study of 180° turning strategies using inertial measurement units and fall risk in poststroke hemiparetic patients[J]. Front Neurol, 2017, 15(8): 194. |
[38] |
KUAN Y C, LIN L F, WANG C Y, et al. Association between turning mobility and cognitive function in chronic poststroke[J]. Front Neurol, 2022, 13: 772377.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.772377 |
[39] |
STUART S, BELLUSCIO V, QUINN J F, et al. Pre-frontal cortical activity during walking and turning is reliable and differentiates across young, older adults and people with Parkinson's disease[J]. Front Neurol, 2019, 10: 536.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00536 pmid: 31191434 |
[40] |
LAMONTAGNE A, FUNG J. Gaze and postural reorientation in the control of locomotor steering after stroke[J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2009, 23(3): 256-266.
doi: 10.1177/1545968308324549 |
[41] |
LEWALLEN L K, SRIVASTAVA S, KAUTZ S A, et al. Assessment of turning performance and muscle coordination in individuals post-stroke[J]. J Biomech, 2021, 114: 110113.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110113 |
[42] |
HOLLANDS K L, VAN VLIET P, ZIETZ D, et al. Stroke-related differences in axial body segment coordination during preplanned and reactive changes in walking direction[J]. Exp Brain Res, 2010, 202(3): 591-604.
doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2162-1 pmid: 20107979 |
[43] |
ROUTSON R L, KAUTZ S A, NEPTUNE R R. Modular organization across changing task demands in healthy and poststroke gait[J]. Physiol Rep, 2014, 2(6): e12055.
doi: 10.14814/phy2.12055 |
[44] |
CHAN W N, TSANG W W. The performance of stroke survivors in turning-while-walking while carrying out a concurrent cognitive task compared with controls[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(12): e0189800.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189800 |
[45] | 方潇. 传统中国"利手性"及其礼法境遇:兼与西方传统比较[J]. 安徽史学, 2022(5): 5-15. |
FANG X. Traditional Chinese "Chirality" and its ritual and legal circumstances: a comparison with western tradition[J]. Anhui Historiography, 2022(5): 5-15. |
[1] | 王航宇, 葛可可, 范永红, 都丽露, 邹敏, 封磊. 基于ICD-11和ICF主动式音乐疗法改善认知障碍老年人认知功能的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 36-43. |
[2] | 闻嘉宁, 金秋艳, 张琦, 李杰, 司琦. 认知参与型身体活动对发展儿童青少年执行功能的效果:基于ICF的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 44-53. |
[3] | 林娜, 高菡璐, 卢惠苹, 陈燕清, 郑军凡, 陈述荣. 虚拟现实技术对脑卒中上肢功能影响的弥散张量成像研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 61-67. |
[4] | 王昊懿, 史亚伟, 鲁俊, 许光旭. 主观垂直感知障碍对脑卒中患者功能影响的回顾性研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 68-73. |
[5] | 陈珺雯, 陈谦, 陈程, 李淑月, 刘玲玲, 吴存书, 龚翔, 鲁俊, 许光旭. 改良八段锦身体活动对脑卒中患者心肺功能、运动功能和日常生活活动能力的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 74-80. |
[6] | 胡永林, 马颖, 窦超, 陆安民, 江小鸽, 宋新建, 肖玉华. 肩部控制训练联合神经松动术对脑卒中偏瘫患者肩痛及上肢功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 81-86. |
[7] | 王贺, 韩靓, 阚梦凡, 于少泓. 电刺激治疗脑卒中后肩手综合征有效性的系统评价与Meta分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1048-1056. |
[8] | 杨雅楠, 穆丽萍, 邢凤梅, 薛新宏, 王晓光, 陶徉聿, 孙竹梅, 张小丽. 基于计划行为理论的干预对肌少症老年人肌肉衰减状况及平衡能力的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 869-874. |
[9] | 孙藤方, 任梦婷, 杨琳, 王耀霆, 王红雨, 闫兴洲. 高压氧治疗联合重复外周磁刺激干预脑卒中患者踝运动功能和平衡能力的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 875-881. |
[10] | 马圣楠, 柯竟悦, 董洪铭, 李建萍, 张洪浩, 刘超, 沈双, 李古强. 核心稳定性训练干预前交叉韧带重建术后动态平衡及表面肌电的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 882-889. |
[11] | 王亚楠, 刘西花. 脑卒中偏瘫患者主观和客观平衡功能测量的相关性及预测效能[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 890-895. |
[12] | 蒋长好, 黄辰, 高晓妍, 戴元富, 赵国明. 神经反馈训练对老年人认知功能效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 903-909. |
[13] | 王海云, 王寅, 周信杰, 何爱群. 基于“中枢-外周-中枢”理论的经颅直流电刺激结合针刺干预脑卒中患者中枢及上肢功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 919-925. |
[14] | 陈怡婷, 王倩, 崔慎红, 李映彩, 张思鈺, 魏衍旭, 任慧, 冷军, 陈斌. 双侧序贯重复经颅磁刺激干预脑卒中患者上肢运动功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 926-932. |
[15] | 李振亚, 孙洁, 郭鹏飞, 王光明. 脑卒中患者口期和咽期吞咽功能改变与误吸的相关性:基于电视透视吞咽检查[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 933-939. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
|