不完全性脊髓损伤患者运动功能对称性与步态对称性的关系

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2023.06.003

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 639-645.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2023.06.003

• 专题运动功能与身体活动评定 • 上一篇下一篇

不完全性脊髓损伤患者运动功能对称性与步态对称性的关系

王一吉¹^,²^,³, 周红俊¹^,²(), 何泽佳¹^,², 刘根林¹^,², 郑樱¹^,², 郝春霞¹^,², 卫波¹^,², 康海琼¹^,², 张缨¹^,², 逯晓蕾¹^,², 袁媛¹^,², 蒙倩茹¹^,²

1.中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院，北京市 100068
2.首都医科大学康复医学院，北京市100068
3.日本藤田医科大学，日本名古屋 4701192

收稿日期:2022-10-10 修回日期:2023-03-22 出版日期:2023-06-25 发布日期:2023-07-14
通讯作者: 周红俊，E-mail： zh87569303@qq.com
作者简介:王一吉(1982-)，男，汉族，湖南衡阳市人，医学博士，副主任医师，主要研究方向：脊髓损伤康复。
基金资助:
1.中国康复研究中心科研基金项目(2020-Q8);2.国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFC2007505)

Relationship between symmetry of lower limb function and gait symmetry in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury

WANG Yiji¹^,²^,³, ZHOU Hongjun¹^,²(), HE Zejia¹^,², LIU Genlin¹^,², ZHENG Ying¹^,², HAO Chunxia¹^,², WEI Bo¹^,², KANG Haiqiong¹^,², ZHANG Ying¹^,², LU Xiaolei¹^,², YUAN Yuan¹^,², MENG Qianru¹^,²

1. Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China
2. Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing 100068, China
3. Fujita Healthy University, Nagoya 4701192, Japan

Received:2022-10-10 Revised:2023-03-22 Published:2023-06-25 Online:2023-07-14
Contact: ZHOU Hongjun, E-mail: zh87569303@qq.com
Supported by:
China Rehabilitation Research Center Fund for Research(2020-Q8);China National Key R & D Program(2020YFC2007505)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的观察不完全性脊髓损伤患者步态对称性特点及影响因素。
方法 2018年5月至2021年11月，北京博爱医院不完全性脊髓损伤患者34例，根据左右下肢运动评分的差异分为下肢对称损伤组(对称组，n = 15)和下肢非对称损伤组(非对称组，n = 19)。采用三维运动采集系统和足底压力采集系统进行步态测试。计算步长以及站立相和迈步相对称值。
结果对称组的步长对称值、站立相对称值和迈步相对称值均明显低于非对称组(|t| > 2.619, P < 0.01)。非对称组站立相对称值和迈步相对称值与双侧下肢肌力差值呈正相关(r > 0.468, P < 0.01)。判别分析显示，下肢损伤不同对称性患者的步态参数方程不同。
结论下肢运动功能对称性影响脊髓损伤患者步态对称性，左右下肢运动总分的差值是重要的影响因素。步态参数可用于判定脊髓损伤患者的下肢损伤对称性。

关键词: 脊髓损伤, 步态, 运动功能, 下肢, 对称性

Abstract:

Objective To observe the characteristics of gait symmetry and its influencing factors in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury (ISCI).
Methods From May, 2018 to November, 2021, 34 patients with ISCI in Beijing Bo'ai Hospital were divided into symmetrical injury of lower limb (SI) group and asymmetrical injury of lower limb (ASI) group according to the lower extremities motor score (LEMS). Three dimensional motion acquisition system and plantar pressure acquisition system were used for gait test. The symmetry indexes of step length, stance time and swing time were caculated.
Results The symmetry indexes of step length, stance time and swing time were significant lower in SI group than in ASI group (|t| > 2.619, P < 0.01). Stance time and swing time significantly correlated to the difference of bilateral LEMS in ASI group (r > 0.468, P < 0.01). Discriminant analysis showed that gait parameter equations were different for patients with different symmetry of lower limb injuries.
Conclusion The symmetry of lower limb motor function impacts gait symmetry for patients with ISCI, especially the difference value of bilateral total LEMS. Gait parameters can be used to determine the symmetry of lower limb injury in patients with ISCI.

Key words: spinal cord injury, gait, motor function, lower limb, symmetry

中图分类号:

R651.2

王一吉, 周红俊, 何泽佳, 刘根林, 郑樱, 郝春霞, 卫波, 康海琼, 张缨, 逯晓蕾, 袁媛, 蒙倩茹. 不完全性脊髓损伤患者运动功能对称性与步态对称性的关系[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 639-645.

WANG Yiji, ZHOU Hongjun, HE Zejia, LIU Genlin, ZHENG Ying, HAO Chunxia, WEI Bo, KANG Haiqiong, ZHANG Ying, LU Xiaolei, YUAN Yuan, MENG Qianru. Relationship between symmetry of lower limb function and gait symmetry in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2023, 29(6): 639-645.

图/表 4

表1

表2

表3

表4

参考文献 46

[1]	WANG H, LIU X, ZHAO Y, et al. Incidence and pattern of traumatic spinal fractures and associated spinal cord injury resulting from motor vehicle collisions in China over 11 years: an observational study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2016, 95(43): e5220. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005220
[2]	JIANG B, SUN D, SUN H, et al. Prevalence, incidence, and external causes of traumatic spinal cord injury in China: a nationally representative cross-sectional survey[J]. Front Neurol, 2022, 12: 784647. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.784647
[3]	CHEN J, CHEN Z, ZHANG K, et al. Epidemiological features of traumatic spinal cord injury in Guangdong Province, China[J]. J Spinal Cord Med, 2021, 44(2): 276-281. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1654190
[4]	TAKAZAWA A, KAMEI N, ADACHI N, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress transducer old astrocyte specifically induced substance contributes to astrogliosis after spinal cord injury[J]. Neural Regen Res, 2018, 13(3): 536-540. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.228759 pmid: 29623941
[5]	PATATHONG T, KLAEWKASIKUM K, WORATANARAT P, et al. The efficacy of gait rehabilitations for the treatment of incomplete spinal cord injury: a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2023, 18(1): 60. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03459-w pmid: 36683024
[6]	LIU J, LIU H W, GAO F, et al. Epidemiological features of traumatic spinal cord injury in Beijing, China[J]. J Spinal Cord Med, 2022, 45(2): 214-220. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2020.1793505
[7]	WERNER C, AWAI EASTHOPE C, CURT A, et al. Towards a mobile gait analysis for patients with a spinal cord injury: a robust algorithm validated for slow walking speeds[J]. Sensors (Basel), 2021, 21(21): 7381. doi: 10.3390/s21217381
[8]	SHANK C D, WALTERS B C, HADLEY M N. Current topics in the management of acute traumatic spinal cord injury[J]. Neurocrit Care, 2019, 30(2): 261-271. doi: 10.1007/s12028-018-0537-5 pmid: 29651626
[9]	DO ESPIRITO SANTO C C, SWAROWSKY A, RECCHIA T L, et al. Is body weight-support treadmill training effective in increasing muscle trophism after traumatic spinal cord injury? A systematic review[J]. Spinal Cord, 2015, 53(3): 176-181. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.198 pmid: 25403505
[10]	DAMBREVILLE C, DE FONTENAY B P, BLANCHETTE A K, et al. Ankle proprioception during gait in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury[J]. Physiol Rep, 2019, 7(24): e14328.
[11]	STAMPACCHIA G, GAZZOTTI V, OLIVIERI M, et al. Gait robot-assisted rehabilitation in persons with spinal cord injury: a scoping review[J]. NeuroRehabilitation, 2022, 51(4): 609-647. doi: 10.3233/NRE-220061 pmid: 36502343
[12]	BANIASAD M, FARAHMAND F, ARAZPOUR M, et al. Kinematic and electromyography analysis of paraplegic gait with the assistance of mechanical orthosis and walker[J]. J Spinal Cord Med, 2020, 43(6): 854-861. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1585705
[13]	ELISEEV A S, KALININA S Y, YASHIN K S, et al. Application of 2D gait analysis for the assessment of gait disturbance in patients with spastic tetraparesis[J]. Sovrem Tekhnologii Med, 2021, 13(5): 24-29.
[14]	GOLLIE J M, GUCCIONE A A. Overground locomotor training in spinal cord injury: a performance-based framework[J]. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil, 2017, 23(3): 226-233. doi: 10.1310/sci2303-226 pmid: 29339898
[15]	KRAWETZ P, NANCE P. Gait analysis of spinal cord injured subjects: effects of injury level and spasticity[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1996, 77(7): 635-638. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90000-3
[16]	GIL-AGUDO A, PÉREZ-NOMBELA S, PÉREZ-RIZO E, et al. Comparative biomechanical analysis of gait in patients with central cord and Brown-Séquard syndrome[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2013, 35(22): 1869-1876. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.766268
[17]	PRAMODHYAKUL N, AMATACHAYA P, SOOKNUAN T, et al. Effects of a visuotemporal cue on walking ability of independent ambulatory subjects with spinal cord injury as compared with healthy subjects[J]. Spinal Cord, 2014, 52(3): 220-224. doi: 10.1038/sc.2013.160 pmid: 24394605
[18]	TAMBURELLA F, SCIVOLETTO G, COSENTINO E, et al. Walking in water and on land after an incomplete spinal cord injury[J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2013, 92(10 Suppl 2): e4-e15. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182a1e6c3
[19]	WANG P, LOW K H, MCGREGOR A H, et al. Detection of abnormal muscle activations during walking following spinal cord injury (SCI)[J]. Res Dev Disabil, 2013, 34(4): 1226-1235. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.12.013 pmid: 23396198
[20]	RUSU L, NEAMTU M C, ROSULESCU E, et al. Analysis of foot and ankle disorders and prediction of gait in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation[J]. Eur J Med Res, 2014, 19: 73. doi: 10.1186/s40001-014-0073-5 pmid: 25539821
[21]	NEAMŢU M C, RUSU L, MARIN M, et al. Morphofunctional aspects of lower limb in multiple sclerosis[J]. Rom J Morphol Embryol, 2012, 53(1): 117-120.
[22]	KIM S J, HOWSDEN S, BARTELS N, et al. Concurrent locomotor adaptation and retention to visual and split-belt perturbations[J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17(12): e0279585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279585
[23]	WEERDESTEYN V, DE NIET M, VAN DUIJNHOVEN H J R, et al. Falls in individuals with stroke[J]. J Rehabil Res Dev, 2008, 45: 1195-1213. pmid: 19235120
[24]	KUMPROU M, AMATACHAYA P, SOOKNUAN T, et al. Do ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury walk symmetrically?[J]. Spinal Cord, 2017, 55(2): 204-207. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.149 pmid: 27824056
[25]	CHERNI Y, LAURENDEAU S, ROBERT M, et al. The influence of transtibial prosthesis type on lower-body gait adaptation: a case study[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 20(1): 439. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010439
[26]	LI J, ZHU Y, LI Y, et al. Motor unit number index detects the effectiveness of surgical treatment in improving distal motor neuron loss in patients with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2020, 21(1): 549. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03567-w
[27]	SOLANKI D, KUMAR S, SHUBHA B, et al. Implications of physiology-sensitive gait exercise on the lower limb electromyographic activity of hemiplegic post-stroke patients: a feasibility study in low resource settings[J]. IEEE J Trans Eng Health Med, 2020, 1(8): 2100709.
[28]	康海琼, 周红俊, 刘根林, 等. 脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准检查表2019版最新修订及解读[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2019, 25(8): 983-985. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.00.009
	KANG H Q, ZHOU H J, LIU G L, et al. Modification and interpretation of the 2019 International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Worksheet[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2019, 25(8): 983-985.
[29]	LIU H, FAN L, LI J, et al. Combined selective peripheral neurotomy in the treatment of spastic lower limbs of spinal cord injury patients[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2022, 164(8): 2263-2269. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05265-z pmid: 35665860
[30]	GUAN X, KUAI S, JI L, et al. Trunk muscle activity patterns and motion patterns of patients with motor complete spinal cord injury at T₈ and T₁₀ walking with different un-powered exoskeletons[J]. J Spinal Cord Med, 2017, 40(4): 463-470. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1319033
[31]	AMATACHAYA S, AMATACHAYA P, KEAWSUTTHI M, et al. External cues benefit walking ability of ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury[J]. J Spinal Cord Med, 2013, 36(6): 638-644. doi: 10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000086 pmid: 24090447
[32]	高明明, 何泽佳, 恽晓萍, 等. Gaitboter与Noraxon步态分析系统时空参数的一致性比较[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2021, 27(2): 216-221. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2021.02.016
	GAO M M, HE Z J, YUN X P, et al. Agreement of spatiotemporal gait characteristics between Gaitboter gait analysis system and Noraxon gait analysis system[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2021, 27(2): 216-221.
[33]	MONTEIRO B P, LEE N H, STEAGALL P V. Can cat caregivers reliably assess acute pain in cats using the Feline Grimace Scale? A large bilingual global survey[J]. J Feline Med Surg, 2023, 25(1): 1098612X221145499.
[34]	ZHANG W, SMUCK M, LEGAULT C, et al. Gait symmetry assessment with a low back 3D accelerometer in post-stroke patients[J]. Sensors (Basel), 2018, 18(10): 3322. doi: 10.3390/s18103322
[35]	LEE S, LEE K, SONG C. Gait training with bilateral rhythmic auditory stimulation in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Brain Sci, 2018, 8(9): 164. doi: 10.3390/brainsci8090164
[36]	OH G B, PARK C S, CHO K H. Immediate effect of weight load on lower limb muscle activity and gait ability in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury during walker gait training[J]. J Spinal Cord Med, 2022, 6: 1-7.
[37]	KNIPPENBERG E, VERBRUGGHE J, LAMERS I, et al. Markerless motion capture systems as training device in neurological rehabilitation: a systematic review of their use, application, target population and efficacy[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2017, 14(1): 61. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0270-x pmid: 28646914
[38]	LORA-MILLAN J S, SANCHEZ-CUESTA F J, ROMERO J P, et al. A unilateral robotic knee exoskeleton to assess the role of natural gait assistance in hemiparetic patients[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2022, 19(1): 109. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01088-2
[39]	SHIN J, CHUNG Y. The effects of treadmill training with visual feedback and rhythmic auditory cue on gait and balance in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial[J]. NeuroRehabilitation, 2022, 51(3): 443-453. doi: 10.3233/NRE-220099 pmid: 35964207
[40]	WOOD J M, KIM H E, FRENCH M A, et al. Use-dependent plasticity explains aftereffects in visually guided locomotor learning of a novel step length asymmetry[J]. J Neurophysiol, 2020, 124(1): 32-39. doi: 10.1152/jn.00083.2020 pmid: 32432516
[41]	OGAWA T, KAWASHIMA N, OBATA H, et al. Mode-dependent control of human walking and running as revealed by split-belt locomotor adaptation[J]. J Exp Biol, 2015, 218(Pt 20): 3192-3198.
[42]	RUSU L, NEAMTU M C, ROSULESCU E, et al. Analysis of foot and ankle disorders and prediction of gait in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation[J]. Eur J Med Res, 2014, 19: 73. doi: 10.1186/s40001-014-0073-5 pmid: 25539821
[43]	SZYMONIUK M, LITAK J, SAKWA L, et al. Molecular mechanisms and clinical application of multipotent stem cells for spinal cord injury[J]. Cells, 2022, 12(1): 120. doi: 10.3390/cells12010120
[44]	NORI S, WATANABE K, TAKEDA K, et al. Influence of the timing of surgery for cervical spinal cord injury without bone injury in the elderly: a retrospective multicenter study[J]. [ahead of print]. J Orthop Sci, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2023.01.004. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2023.01.004
[45]	KIM C M, ENG J J, WHITTAKER M W. Level walking and ambulatory capacity in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury: relationship with muscle strength[J]. Spinal Cord, 2004, 42(3): 156-162. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101569 pmid: 15001980
[46]	MIDIK M, PAKER N, BUĞDAYCI D, et al. Effects of robot-assisted gait training on lower extremity strength, functional independence, and walking function in men with incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury[J]. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil, 2020, 66(1): 54-59.

组别	n	性别 (男/女)/n	年龄/岁	身高/cm	体质量/kg	双下肢运动总分	肌张力	步速/(m·s^-1)	损伤平面/n		AIS分级/n		人辅助/n		辅助器/n
组别	n	性别 (男/女)/n	年龄/岁	身高/cm	体质量/kg	双下肢运动总分	肌张力	步速/(m·s^-1)	颈段	胸腰段	C	D	是	否	是	否
对称组	15	13/2	38±15	172.4±4.8	69.8±10.8	36.9±3.8	0±1	0.2±0.1	6	9	1	14	6	9	1	14
非对称组	19	11/8	44±17	169.1±8.9	67.5±11.8	33.8±5.8	0±1	0.2±0.1	9	10	1	18	10	9	0	19
χ²/t/Z值		3.342	1.073	-1.315	-0.579	-1.802	-0.400	-0.542	0.185		0.030		0.537		1.305
P值		0.128	0.291	0.198	0.566	0.081	0.689	0.592	0.738		1.000		0.510		0.441

组别	n	步长对称值	站立相对称值	迈步相对称值
对称组	15	0.147±0.096	0.004±0.023	0.205±0.156
非对称组	19	0.364±0.275	0.112±0.082	0.508±0.329
t值		-2.619	3.390	3.281
P值		0.009	0.002	0.003

变量	步长对称值	站立相对称值	迈步相对称值
步速	-0.393	0.557^b	-0.189
跨步长	-0.582^a	0.150	-0.254
左侧下肢运动总分	-0.321	0.319	-0.091
右侧下肢运动总分	-0.321	0.319	-0.091

变量	步长对称值	站立相对称值	迈步相对称值
步速	-0.179	0.237	-0.254
跨步长	-0.533^a	0.312	-0.246
瘫痪重侧下肢运动总分	-0.051	-0.198	-0.290
瘫痪轻侧下肢运动总分	-0.372	0.442	0.586^c
双侧肌力差值	0.251	0.468^b	0.625^d

不完全性脊髓损伤患者运动功能对称性与步态对称性的关系

Relationship between symmetry of lower limb function and gait symmetry in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 46

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	陈珺雯, 陈谦, 陈程, 李淑月, 刘玲玲, 吴存书, 龚翔, 鲁俊, 许光旭. 改良八段锦身体活动对脑卒中患者心肺功能、运动功能和日常生活活动能力的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 74-80.
[2]	刘冬, 徐子涵, 李江, 鞠萍. M1区联合背外侧前额叶高频重复经颅磁刺激对脊髓损伤后神经病理性疼痛患者脑电图θ振幅的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 87-94.
[3]	赵盼超, 纪仲秋, 姜桂萍, 文蕊香. 不同任务干扰对儿童早期步态特征和任务成本的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1072-1082.
[4]	胡晓诗, 张琦, 岳青, 梁艳华, 李晓松, 冯啊美, 张燕庆. 矫形弹力绷带对痉挛性偏瘫脑性瘫痪患儿步态对称性和步行能力的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1083-1089.
[5]	孙藤方, 任梦婷, 杨琳, 王耀霆, 王红雨, 闫兴洲. 高压氧治疗联合重复外周磁刺激干预脑卒中患者踝运动功能和平衡能力的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 875-881.
[6]	王亚楠, 刘西花. 脑卒中偏瘫患者主观和客观平衡功能测量的相关性及预测效能[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 890-895.
[7]	张意彬, 吕杰, 喻洪流. 基于模糊逻辑算法的智能膝关节假肢步态相位识别[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 896-902.
[8]	王海云, 王寅, 周信杰, 何爱群. 基于“中枢-外周-中枢”理论的经颅直流电刺激结合针刺干预脑卒中患者中枢及上肢功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 919-925.
[9]	陈怡婷, 王倩, 崔慎红, 李映彩, 张思鈺, 魏衍旭, 任慧, 冷军, 陈斌. 双侧序贯重复经颅磁刺激干预脑卒中患者上肢运动功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 926-932.
[10]	李芳, 霍速, 杜巨豹, 刘秀贞, 李小爽, 宋为群. 经颅直流电刺激联合任务导向性康复训练对脊髓损伤大鼠前肢运动障碍的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 777-781.
[11]	崔尧, 丛芳, 黄富表, 曾明, 颜如秀. 不同镜像神经元训练策略下脑与肌肉的活动特征：基于近红外光谱与表面肌电图技术[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 782-790.
[12]	刘宁, 刘雨泉, 祝斌, 于凌佳, 谭海宁, 杨雍, 李想. 脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准国内应用情况的文献计量学研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 808-815.
[13]	刘辉, 尹航, 贾绍辉, 邱服冰. 适用于残疾儿童青少年运动功能和运动能力测量工具的结构、内容和心理测量特性的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 630-638.
[14]	许苗苗, 李楠, 应颖, 杨凯翔, 杨婧瑞, 李杰, 邱彦群. 重复外周磁刺激对左右颈7神经交叉移位术后脑卒中患者上肢运动功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 686-690.
[15]	郑莉, 鲍治诚, 张琪, 任绪艳, 苏敏. 经皮耳迷走神经电刺激结合康复机器人训练对脑卒中患者上肢功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 691-696.