《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (12): 1465-1472.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2023.12.011

• 辅助技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

深圳市公共体育场馆无障碍设施建设与辅助技术应用

邱服冰1,2, 杨亚茹2,3()   

  1. 1.深圳大学体育学院,广东深圳市 518060
    2.世界卫生组织国际分类家族合作中心,北京市 100068
    3.华东师范大学体育与健康学院,上海市 200241
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-12 修回日期:2023-10-23 出版日期:2023-12-25 发布日期:2023-12-28
  • 通讯作者: 杨亚茹(1997-),女,汉族,北京市人,博士研究生,世界卫生组织国际分类家族合作中心委员,中国心理学会康复心理学专委会委员,中国残疾人康复协会残疾分类研究专业委员会常务委员,主要研究方向:ICF、康复心理学、特殊教育、康复科学、健康心理学、锻炼心理学、残疾研究。E-mail: alison-y2050@hotmail.com
  • 作者简介:邱服冰(1966-),男,汉族,湖北公安县人,硕士,副教授,主要研究方向:体育与健康,康复心理学,运动与康复。
  • 基金资助:
    中国残联残疾人辅助器具专项研究课题(2022CDPFAT-24)

Accessible facilities construction and assistive technology application of public sports venues in Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

QIU Fubing1,2, YANG Yaru2,3()   

  1. 1. Physical Education College, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518060, China
    2. WHO-FICs Collaborating Center in China, Beijing 100068, China
    3. College of Physical Education and Health, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
  • Received:2023-10-12 Revised:2023-10-23 Published:2023-12-25 Online:2023-12-28
  • Contact: YANG Yaru, E-mail: alison-y2050@hotmail.com
  • Supported by:
    Research Project of China Disabled Persons' Federation on Assistive Devices for the Disabled(2022CDPFAT-24)

摘要:

目的 调查深圳市现有体育场馆无障碍设施建设与辅助技术应用现状,分析存在的问题。

方法 2022年10月19日至2023年2月17日,运用无障碍体育场馆建设的标准,对深圳8个区级公共体育场馆无障碍建设和服务以及辅助技术应用情况进行现场调查和评估。

结果 所有体育场馆均建设缘石坡道、无障碍公共厕所,87.5% (7/8)建设盲道,62.5% (5/8)建设轮椅坡道、无障碍电梯、无障碍轮椅席位,37.5% (3/8)建设无障碍通道,12.5% (1/8)建设扶手,75% (6/8)建设无障碍机动车停车位,25% (2/8)应用辅助技术。

结论 本研究对深圳市体育场馆无障碍设施和辅助技术的可及性进行评估,即进入体育场馆、进入体育场馆内部、身体活动期间对各类无障碍环境及其辅助技术的使用和体验情况。在无障碍设施建设方面,缘石坡道和无障碍公共厕所建设场馆数量最多,扶手建设场馆数量最少,辅助技术应用情况最差。

关键词: 公共体育场馆, 无障碍环境, 建设, 服务, 辅助技术

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the current situation of accessible facilities construction and assistive technology application of existing sports venues in Shenzhen, and analyze the existing problems.

Methods From November 19, 2022 to Februry 17, 2023, using the standards for the construction of accessible sports venues, the accessible construction and services of public sports venues and the application of assistive technology in eight districts of Shenzhen were investigated and evaluated on the spot.

Results There were curb ramps and accessible public toilets for all the stadiums; surface indicator for 87.5% (7/8) stadiums; wheelchair ramps, accessible elevators and accessible wheelchair seats for 62.5% (5/8) stadiums; accessible route for 37.5% (3/8) stadiums; handrails for 12.5% (1/8) stadiums; accessible vehicles parking lots for 75% (6/8) stadiums; and 25% (2/8) stadiums used assistive technology.

Conclusion This study evaluated the accessibility of accessible facilities and assistive technologies in sports venues in Shenzhen, including entering the stadium, entering the interior of the stadium and taking exercise. In terms of accessible facilities, the number of venues for the construction of curb ramps and accessible public toilets is the most, the number of venues for the construction of accessible handrails is the least, and the application of assistive technology is the worst.

Key words: public sports venues, accessible environment, construction, service, assistive technology

中图分类号: