孤独症谱系障碍个体互动期间脑间同步特点的Scoping综述

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2024.02.005

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 168-175.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2024.02.005

• 专题儿童功能障碍与康复 • 上一篇下一篇

孤独症谱系障碍个体互动期间脑间同步特点的Scoping综述

吴进龙¹, 任占兵², 易子珍³, 彭莉¹()

1.西南大学体育学院，重庆市 400715
2.深圳大学体育学院，广东深圳市 518060
3.保定学院教师教育学院，河北保定市 071000

收稿日期:2023-12-18 修回日期:2024-01-15 出版日期:2024-02-25 发布日期:2024-03-01
通讯作者: 彭莉 E-mail:plmzs@swu.edu.cn
作者简介:吴进龙(1995-)，男，汉族，山东青岛市人，博士研究生，主要研究方向：适应性体育、特殊教育。
基金资助:
广东省普通高校重点领域项目(2022ZDZX2086)

Characteristics of interbrain synchrony during interactions among individuals with autism spectrum disorder: a scoping review

WU Jinlong¹, REN Zhanbing², YI Zizhen³, PENG Li¹()

1. School of Physical Education, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
2. School of Physical Education, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518060, China
3. School of Teacher Education, Baoding College, Baoding, Hebei 071000, China

Received:2023-12-18 Revised:2024-01-15 Published:2024-02-25 Online:2024-03-01
Contact: PENG Li E-mail:plmzs@swu.edu.cn
Supported by:
Guangdong Universities Special Projects in Key Areas(2022ZDZX2086)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的综述孤独症谱系障碍(ASD)个体与健康个体在互动期间脑间同步的特点。
方法 2023年11月，从PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus和中国知网数据库，检索关于ASD个体互动期间脑间同步的相关研究。筛选文献，并提取相关数据;采用横截面研究质量评价工具进行质量评价。
结果共纳入5项研究，发表日期集中在2020年至2023年，共包括130例ASD个体。ASD个体互动任务期间脑间同步较健康个体低，主要涉及前额叶和颞顶联合区;脑电图θ、α和β波段也与健康个体存在同步性差异。ASD个体脑间同步性存在性别差异;ASD个体脑间同步异常与社交障碍密切相关。
结论脑间同步障碍可能是ASD个体社交障碍的潜在神经机制，主要涉及镜像神经系统和心智理论相关脑区。

关键词: 孤独症谱系障碍, 脑间同步, 社交障碍, Scoping综述

Abstract:

Objective To review the characteristics of interbrain synchrony between individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and healthy individuals during interactions.
Methods Researches on interbrain synchrony during interactions in individuals with ASD were retrieved from databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and CNKI in November, 2023. Researches were screened and the relevant data were extracted. The quality of the methodology was evaluated using critical appraisal tool for analytic cross sectional study.
Results Five researches were returned, publicated mainly from 2020 to 2023, including 130 individuals with ASD. Interbrain synchrony was lower during the interaction task in the individuals with ASD compared with the healthy, mainly involving the prefrontal and temporo-parietal joint regions; as well as the interbrain synchrony of theta, alpha and beta bands of electroencephalography. There was difference in interbrain synchrony between genders in individuals with ASD; furthermore, abnormal interbrain synchrony in individuals with ASD associated with social impairment.
Conclusion Interbrain synchrony deficits may be a potential neural mechanism for social impairment in individuals with ASD, and the abnormalities mainly happen in the brain areas related with mirror nervous system and theories of mind network.

Key words: autism spectrum disorder, interbrain synchrony, social disorders, scoping review

中图分类号:

R749.94

吴进龙, 任占兵, 易子珍, 彭莉. 孤独症谱系障碍个体互动期间脑间同步特点的Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(2): 168-175.

WU Jinlong, REN Zhanbing, YI Zizhen, PENG Li. Characteristics of interbrain synchrony during interactions among individuals with autism spectrum disorder: a scoping review[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2024, 30(2): 168-175.

图/表 3

图1

表1

表2

纳入文献基本特征"

纳入文献	国家	试验组	诊断标准	对照组	互动对象	位置	条件	任务	工具 (脑区)	脑间相干分析	行为结果	脑成像结果
Wang等^[11] (2020)	中国	高功能ASD 5~12岁 n = 16	DSM-V	无	父母	并排	合作;单人	合作竞争任务	fNIRS(前额叶)	小波相干分析	相比于单人条件，合作条件下前额叶脑间同步性更高	病情越严重(孤独症谱系商和想象分量表)，脑间同步性越低
Quiñones-Camacho等^[12](2021)	美国	高功能ASD 18~43岁 n = 26	ADOS-2	健康成年人 n = 25	同一不熟悉的女性研究助理	面对面	未提及	口头交流	fNIRS(前额叶和颞顶联合区)	稳健相关分析	ASD个体在互动过程中存在更大的社交障碍	ASD参与者左右颞顶联合区脑间同步性更低社交障碍和颞顶联合区脑间同步性降低，与刻板行为和限制性兴趣没有明显关联
Kruppa等^[22](2021)	德国	高功能ASD 8~18岁 n = 18	ADOS-G	健康儿童 n = 18	陌生人与父母性别相匹配(非同一个人)	并排	父母和陌生人	合作竞争任务	fNIRS(额叶)	小波相干分析	在竞争和合作期间，ASD儿童同步性较差	对照组竞争任务时同步性更强，合作任务时局部一致性更强与对照组相比，ASD儿童的前额叶同步性无显著性差异
Key等^[23] (2022)	美国	高功能ASD 10~16岁 n = 34	DSM-V	无	配对的健康青少年	面对面	安静;社交	口头交流	脑电图	循环相关	社交行为无性别差异	与安静时相比，社交互动中，θ、α和β波同步性更高;较低的行为特征与较低的颞顶联合区同步性相关社交互动中，仅ASD女童颞顶联合区同步提高
Tang等^[24] (2023)	中国	高功能ASD (7.96±2.16)岁 n = 36	DSM-V	健康儿童 n = 35	父母	并排	延迟反应策略、即时反应策略、无具体策略	合作竞争任务	fNIRS(额顶叶)	小波相干分析	两组合作行为无显著性差异	两组任务期间脑间同步无显著性差异延迟策略会产生更强的额顶皮质同步

表2

参考文献 66

[1]	STELLA J, MUNDY P, TUCHMAN R. Social and nonsocial factors in the childhood autism rating scale[J]. J Autism Dev Disord, 1999, 29(4): 307-317. pmid: 10478730
[2]	ABRAHAMS B S, GESCHWIND D H. Advances in autism genetics: on the threshold of a new neurobiology[J]. Nat Rev Genet, 2008, 9(5): 341-355. doi: 10.1038/nrg2346 pmid: 18414403
[3]	KOUL A, AHMAR D, IANNETTI G D, et al. Interpersonal synchronization of spontaneously generated body movements[J]. iScience, 2023, 26(3): 106104. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106104
[4]	HAJNAL A, DURGIN F H. How frequent is the spontaneous occurrence of synchronized walking in daily life?[J]. Exp Brain Res, 2023, 241(2): 469-478. doi: 10.1007/s00221-022-06536-y pmid: 36576509
[5]	马昕玥, 崔丽莹. 人际同步对合作行为的促进机制及解释模型[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(6): 1317-1326. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.01317
	MA X Y, CUI L Y. Mechanisms and models of interpersonal synchrony in promoting cooperation[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2022, 30(6): 1317-1326. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.01317
[6]	张琳琳, 魏坤琳, 李晶. 儿童的人际运动同步[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(3): 623-634. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.00623
	ZHANG L L, WEI K L, LI J. Interpersonal motor synchronization in children[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2022, 30(3): 623-634. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.00623
[7]	MARKOVA G, NGUYEN T, HOEHL S. Neurobehavioral interpersonal synchrony in early development: the role of interactional rhythms[J]. Fron Psychol, 2019, 10: 2078.
[8]	LU H, WANG X, ZHANG Y, et al. Increased interbrain synchronization and neural efficiency of the frontal cortex to enhance human coordinative behavior: a combined hyper-tES and fNIRS study[J]. NeuroImage, 2023, 282: 120385. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120385
[9]	LIU T, SAITO H, OI M. Role of the right inferior frontal gyrus in turn-based cooperation and competition: a near-infrared spectroscopy study[J]. Brain Cogn, 2015, 99: 17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.07.001
[10]	JIANG J, DAI B, PENG D, et al. Neural synchronization during face-to-face communication[J]. J Neurosci, 2012, 32(45): 16064-16069. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2926-12.2012 pmid: 23136442
[11]	WANG Q D, HAN Z, HU X Y, et al. Autism symptoms modulate interpersonal neural synchronization in children with autism spectrum disorder in cooperative interactions[J]. Brain Topogr, 2020, 33(1): 112-122. doi: 10.1007/s10548-019-00731-x pmid: 31560088
[12]	QUIÑONES-CAMACHO L E, FISHBURN F A, BELARDI K, et al. Dysfunction in interpersonal neural synchronization as a mechanism for social impairment in autism spectrum disorder[J]. Autism Res, 2021, 14(8): 1585-1596. doi: 10.1002/aur.v14.8
[13]	HASEGAWA C, IKEDA T, YOSHIMURA Y, et al. Mu rhythm suppression reflects mother-child face-to-face interactions: a pilot study with simultaneous MEG recording[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 34977. doi: 10.1038/srep34977 pmid: 27721481
[14]	CIRELLI L K. How interpersonal synchrony facilitates early prosocial behavior[J]. Curr Opin Psychol, 2018, 20: 35-39. doi: S2352-250X(17)30121-5 pmid: 28830004
[15]	魏燕燕, 张天宏, 王继军. 社交互动影像超扫描技术及其在精神障碍研究中的应用[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2022, 48(1): 60-64.
	WEI Y Y, ZHANG T H, WANG J J. Hyperscan of social interaction and its application in the study of mental disorders[J]. Chin J Nerv Ment Dis, 2022, 48(1): 60-64.
[16]	CZESZUMSKI A, EUSTERGERLING S, LANG A, et al. Hyperscanning: a valid method to study neural inter-brain underpinnings of social interaction[J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2020, 14: 39. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00039 pmid: 32180710
[17]	KOIKE T, TANABE H C, SADATO N. Hyperscanning neuroimaging technique to reveal the "two-in-one" system in social interactions[J]. Neurosci Res, 2015, 90: 25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2014.11.006 pmid: 25499683
[18]	KONVALINKA I, BAUER M, STAHLHUT C, et al. Frontal alpha oscillations distinguish leaders from followers: multivariate decoding of mutually interacting brains[J]. NeuroImage, 2014, 94: 79-88. doi: S1053-8119(14)00144-X pmid: 24631790
[19]	DE VICO FALLANI F, NICOSIA V, SINATRA R, et al. Defecting or not defecting: how to "read" human behavior during cooperative games by EEG measurements[J]. PLoS One, 2010, 5(12): e14187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014187
[20]	NOZAWA T, SASAKI Y, SAKAKI K, et al. Interpersonal frontopolar neural synchronization in group communication: an exploration toward fNIRS hyperscanning of natural interactions[J]. NeuroImage, 2016, 133: 484-497. doi: S1053-8119(16)30003-9 pmid: 27039144
[21]	周英凤, 顾莺, 胡雁, 等. JBI循证卫生保健中心对关于不同类型研究的质量评价工具:患病率及分析性横断面研究的质量评价[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2018, 33(3): 219-221.
	ZHOU Y F, GU Y, HU Y, et al. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools for use in systematic review: prevalence study and analytical cross sectional study[J]. J Nur Train, 2018, 33(3): 219-221.
[22]	KRUPPA J A, REINDL V, GERLOFF C, et al. Brain and motor synchrony in children and adolescents with ASD: a fNIRS hyperscanning study[J]. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 2021, 16(1/2): 103-116. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa092
[23]	KEY A P, YAN Y, METELKO M, et al. Greater social competence is associated with higher interpersonal neural synchrony in adolescents with autism[J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2022, 15: 790085. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.790085
[24]	TANG Y, WANG C B, LIU X, et al. Children with autism spectrum disorder perform comparably to their peers in a parent-child cooperation task[J]. Exp Brain Res, 2023, 241(7): 1905-1917. doi: 10.1007/s00221-023-06626-5
[25]	IGELSTRÖM K M, WEBB T W, KELLY Y T, et al. Topographical organization of attentional, social, and memory processes in the human temporoparietal cortex[J]. eNeuro, 2016, 3(2): ENEURO.0060-16.2016.
[26]	KLEINHANS N M, RICHARDS T, STERLING L, et al. Abnormal functional connectivity in autism spectrum disorders during face processing[J]. Brain, 2008, 131: 1000-1012. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm334 pmid: 18234695
[27]	KAWASAKI M, KITAJO K, FUKAO K, et al. Frontal theta activation during motor synchronization in autism[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 15034. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14508-4 pmid: 29118348
[28]	LOTTER L D, KOHL S H, GERLOFF C, et al. Revealing the neurobiology underlying interpersonal neural synchronization with multimodal data fusion[J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2023, 146: 105042. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105042
[29]	KRALL S C, ROTTSCHY C, OBERWELLAND E, et al. The role of the right temporoparietal junction in attention and social interaction as revealed by ALE meta-analysis[J]. Brain Struct Funct, 2015, 220(2): 587-604. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0803-z pmid: 24915964
[30]	BUZSÁKI G, MOSER E I. Memory, navigation and theta rhythm in the hippocampal-entorhinal system[J]. Nat Neurosci, 2013, 16(2): 130-138. doi: 10.1038/nn.3304 pmid: 23354386
[31]	GIRAUD A L, POEPPEL D. Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations[J]. Nat Neurosci, 2012, 15(4): 511-517.
[32]	JOKISCH D, JENSEN O. Modulation of gamma and alpha activity during a working memory task engaging the dorsal or ventral stream[J]. J Neurosci, 2007, 27(12): 3244-3251. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5399-06.2007 pmid: 17376984
[33]	BOUDEWYN M A, CARTER C S. I must have missed that: alpha-band oscillations track attention to spoken language[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2018, 117: 148-155. doi: S0028-3932(18)30223-9 pmid: 29842859
[34]	SPITZER B, HAEGENS S. Beyond the status quo: a role for beta oscillations in endogenous content (re)activation[J]. eNeuro, 2017, 4(4): ENEURO.0170-17.
[35]	GROSS J, SCHMITZ F, SCHNITZLER I, et al. Modulation of long-range neural synchrony reflects temporal limitations of visual attention in humans[J]. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A, 2004, 101(35): 13050-13055. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404944101
[36]	PÉREZ A, CARREIRAS M, DUÑABEITIA J A. Brain-to-brain entrainment: EEG interbrain synchronization while speaking and listening[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 4190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04464-4 pmid: 28646190
[37]	PÉREZ A, DUMAS G, KARADAG M, et al. Differential brain-to-brain entrainment while speaking and listening in native and foreign languages[J]. Cortex, 2019, 111: 303-315. doi: S0010-9452(18)30405-2 pmid: 30598230
[38]	HU Y, PAN Y F, SHI X W, et al. Inter-brain synchrony and cooperation context in interactive decision making[J]. Biol Psychol, 2018, 133: 54-62. doi: S0301-0511(17)30353-8 pmid: 29292232
[39]	PALVA S, PALVA J M. New vistas for α-frequency band oscillations[J]. Trend Neurosci, 2007, 30(4): 150-158. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.02.001
[40]	TOGNOLI E, LAGARDE J, DEGUZMAN G C, et al. The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination[J]. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A, 2007, 104(19): 8190-8195. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611453104
[41]	BABILONI C, BUFFO P, VECCHIO F, et al. Brains "in concert": frontal oscillatory alpha rhythms and empathy in professional musicians[J]. NeuroImage, 2012, 60(1): 105-116. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.008 pmid: 22186679
[42]	TOGNOLI E, KELSO J A. The coordination dynamics of social neuromarkers[J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2015, 9: 563. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00563 pmid: 26557067
[43]	LIN J F L, IMADA T, MELTZOFF A N, et al. Dual-MEG interbrain synchronization during turn-taking verbal interactions between mothers and children[J]. Cerebral Cortex, 2023, 33(7): 4116-4134. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac330
[44]	BAIRD G, SIMONOFF E, PICKLES A, et al. Prevalence of disorders of the autism spectrum in a population cohort of children in South Thames: the Special Needs and Autism Project (SNAP)[J]. Lancet, 2006, 368(9531): 210-215. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69041-7 pmid: 16844490
[45]	MANDY W, CHILVERS R, CHOWDHURY U, et al. Sex differences in autism spectrum disorder: evidence from a large sample of children and adolescents[J]. J Autism Dev Disord, 2012, 42(7): 1304-1313. doi: 10.1007/s10803-011-1356-0 pmid: 21947663
[46]	TIERNEY S, BURNS J, KILBEY E. Looking behind the mask: social coping strategies of girls on the autistic spectrum[J]. Res Autism Spectrum Disord, 2016, 23: 73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2015.11.013
[47]	SONG A, COLA M, PLATE S, et al. Natural language markers of social phenotype in girls with autism[J]. J Child Psychol Psychiatr, 2021, 62(8): 949-960. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.v62.8
[48]	CHO S, COLA M, KNOX A, et al. Sex differences in the temporal dynamics of autistic children's natural conversations[J]. Mol Autism, 2023, 14(1): 13. doi: 10.1186/s13229-023-00545-6 pmid: 37024960
[49]	TSENG P H, RAJANGAM S, LEHEW G, et al. Interbrain cortical synchronization encodes multiple aspects of social interactions in monkey pairs[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 4699. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22679-x
[50]	MÜLLER V, PERDIKIS D, MENDE M A, et al. Interacting brains coming in sync through their minds: an interbrain neurofeedback study[J]. Ann New York Acad Sci, 2021, 1500(1): 48-68. doi: 10.1111/nyas.v1500.1
[51]	HU Y, HU Y Y, LI X C, et al. Brain-to-brain synchronization across two persons predicts mutual prosociality[J]. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 2017, 12(12): 1835-1844. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx118 pmid: 29040766
[52]	MUTHUKUMARASWAMY S D, JOHNSON B W. A dual mechanism neural framework for social understanding[J]. Philos Psychol, 2007, 20(1): 43-63. doi: 10.1080/09515080601085864
[53]	RIZZOLATTI G, FADIGA L, GALLESE V, et al. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions[J]. Cogn Brain Res, 1996, 3(2): 131-141. doi: 10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0
[54]	MUKAMEL R, EKSTROM A D, KAPLAN J, et al. Single-neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions[J]. Curr Biol, 2010, 20(8): 750-756. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.02.045 pmid: 20381353
[55]	潘威, 陈巍, 汪寅, 等. 自闭症碎镜理论之迷思:缘起、问题与前景[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(6): 958-973. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00958
	PAN W, CHEN W, WANG Y, et al. The myth of broken mirror theory of autism: origins, problems and prospects[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2016, 24(6): 958-973. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00958
[56]	张曼, 刘欢欢. 社会交流中人际神经同步的认知机制[J]. 心理科学, 2018, 41(2): 378-383.
	ZHANG M, LIU H H. Cognitive mechanism of interpersonal neural synchronization during social communication[J]. J Psychol Sci, 2018, 41(2): 378-383.
[57]	MITCHELL J P. Inferences about mental states[J]. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2009, 364(1521): 1309-1316. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0318
[58]	张芸瑕, 康立超, 高彤琪, 等. 孤独症谱系障碍者内隐心理理论研究的新进展[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2023(10): 53-60.
	ZHANG Y X, KANG L C, GAO T Q, et al. New progress in the study of implicit theory of mindin individuals with autism spectrum disorder[J]. Chin J Spec Educ, 2023(10): 53-60
[59]	RYNKIEWICZ A, SCHULLER B, MARCHI E, et al. An investigation of the 'female camouflage effect' in autism using a computerized ADOS-2 and a test of sex/gender differences[J]. Mol Autism, 2016, 7: 10. doi: 10.1186/s13229-016-0073-0 pmid: 26798446
[60]	HEAD A M, MCGILLIVRAY J A, STOKES M A. Gender differences in emotionality and sociability in children with autism spectrum disorders[J]. Mol Autism, 2014, 5(1): 19. doi: 10.1186/2040-2392-5-19 pmid: 24576331
[61]	TOFANI M, SCARCELLA L, GALEOTO G, et al. Behavioral gender differences across pre-school children with autism spectrum disorders: a cross-sectional study[J]. J Autism Dev Disord, 2023, 53(8): 3301-3306. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05498-y
[62]	LAWSON L, JOSHI R, BARBARO J, et al. Gender differences during toddlerhood in autism spectrum disorder: a prospective community-based longitudinal follow-up study[J]. J Autism Dev Disord, 2018, 48(8): 2619-2628. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3516-y pmid: 29497988
[63]	HARTLEY S L, SIKORA D M. Sex differences in autism spectrum disorder: an examination of developmental functioning, autistic symptoms, and coexisting behavior problems in toddlers[J]. J Autism Dev Disord, 2009, 39(12): 1715-1722. doi: 10.1007/s10803-009-0810-8 pmid: 19582563
[64]	BAL V H, KIM S H, FOK M, et al. Autism spectrum disorder symptoms from ages 2 to 19 years: implications for diagnosing adolescents and young adults[J]. Autism Res, 2019, 12(1): 89-99. doi: 10.1002/aur.2004 pmid: 30101492
[65]	HOFFMANN A, SCHELLHORN A M, RITTER M, et al. Blink synchronization increases over time and predicts problem-solving performance in virtual teams[J]. Small Group Res, 2023: 10464964231195618.
[66]	MU Y, GUO C Y, HAN S H. Oxytocin enhances inter-brain synchrony during social coordination in male adults[J]. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 2016, 11(12): 1882-1893. pmid: 27510498

纳入文献	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	总分
Wang等^[11](2020)	√	√	√	√			√	√	6
Quiñones-Camacho等^[12](2021)	√	√		√			√	√	5
Kruppa等^[22](2021)	√	√	√	√			√	√	6
Key等^[23](2022)	√	√	√	√	√		√	√	7
Tang等^[24](2023)	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	8

孤独症谱系障碍个体互动期间脑间同步特点的Scoping综述

Characteristics of interbrain synchrony during interactions among individuals with autism spectrum disorder: a scoping review

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 66

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	穆姿辰, 唐强, 史云秋, 王艳, 朱淑伟, 庄亚楠, 徐丹双, 李宏玉, 李保龙, 张春艳, 袁孟珂. 丰富环境训练结合头穴丛刺对孤独症谱系障碍模型大鼠行为的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(2): 176-182.
[2]	邵伟婷, 雷江华. 反应中断再定向干预孤独症谱系障碍儿童刻板语言的效果：Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 10-20.
[3]	魏晓微, 杨剑, 魏春艳. 特殊教育学校孤独症谱系障碍儿童参与适应性瑜伽活动的心理与行为效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1021-1028.
[4]	耿立蒙, 刘聪聪, 李玲, 吕攀攀, 王鑫, 刘芳. 运用心理教育量表(第3版)评估孤独症谱系障碍儿童心理行为特征[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1035-1039.
[5]	张园, 杨剑. 基于世界卫生组织健康促进学校架构的学校健康服务及效果：Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 791-799.
[6]	袁媛, 杨剑. 社区老年人身体活动融合慢性病管理的健康效益：Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(5): 541-550.
[7]	朱凯轩, 王宇翔, 王献娜, 张雁, 王云雷, 张豪杰, 白晨, 李星珠, 张通. 学龄前孤独症谱系障碍儿童的睡眠障碍及其与社交行为的相关性[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(5): 608-614.
[8]	曹雨菡, 李瑾, 何民, 王丹, 陈伟. 基于ICF冠心病患者远程康复的Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(4): 433-442.
[9]	黄凯琪, 辛榕, 凌耿强, 王朴. 重复经颅磁刺激治疗脑卒中后下肢运动功能障碍的Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(3): 286-293.
[10]	宋贝贝, 刘辉, 柏开祥. 基于ICF-CY残疾儿童青少年运动功能评价量表内容和心理测量指标的Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(2): 182-192.
[11]	程斯曼, 辛榕, 赵燕, 刘庆余, 谢加乐, 刘鹏, 王朴. 重复经颅磁刺激改善脑卒中功能障碍的功能磁共振成像研究：Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(2): 193-204.
[12]	石孝宇, 杨剑. 脊髓损伤患者适应性身体活动及其健康效益：基于ICF的Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(12): 1395-1404.
[13]	胡嘉铨, 祝丽玲, 姜志梅. 近20年有关孤独症谱系障碍早期筛查工具研究的可视化分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(11): 1304-1315.
[14]	王馨婷, 杨剑. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童结构化身体活动方案及其健康效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(10): 1117-1124.
[15]	胡庆奎, 尹航, 贾绍辉, 刘辉. 残奥运动员的损伤率、类别、风险因素以及干预策略：Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(10): 1154-1163.