《中国康复理论与实践》

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2002, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (04): 241-242.

• 临床康复 • 上一篇    下一篇

主动运动治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效分析

梁镇宏; 陈自成   

  1. 广东省茂名市人民医院康复科 广东茂名市 525000
  • 收稿日期:2001-08-15 出版日期:2002-04-25 发布日期:2002-04-25

Effective analysis of active movement treatment on prolapse of lumber intervertebral disc

LIANG Zhen-hong,CHEN Zi-cheng   

  1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine,Maoming People's Hospital,Maoming 525000,Guangdong,China
  • Received:2001-08-15 Published:2002-04-25 Online:2002-04-25

PDF (PC)

摘要： 目的探讨主动运动治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法将68例经手法推拿按摩、腰椎牵引和电疗等治疗,病情已明显好转或已痊愈出院的腰椎间盘突出症患者,分为主动运动治疗组(31例)和对照组(37例)进行为期1年的追踪观察,比较两组患者1年后的复发率和F波传导速度的变化情况。结果主动运动治疗组患者的复发率低于对照组(P<0.05),F波传导速度明显快于对照组(P<0.01),与治疗前比较也有非常高度显著性差异(P<0.001)。结论腰椎间盘突出症患者症状和体征好转后配合主动运动治疗,可巩固疗效、减少复发 ,并进一步改善神经根的功能。

关键词: 腰椎间盘突出症, 运动疗法, 主动运动

Abstract: ObjectiveTo study the necessity of treating prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc by active movement treatment. Methods68 patients with prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc were divided into the group of active movement treatment (31 cases) and the control group (37 cases). One year later, the recurrence rate and F wave motor nerve conduction velocity of two groups were compared. ResultsThere is a lower recurrence rate (P<0.05) and a faster F wave motor nerve conduction velocity (P<0.01) in the group of active movement treatment compared with the control group. F wave motor nerve conduction velocity of the group of active movement treatment is also faster than that of 1 year ago (P<0.001). Conclusions It is necessary for patients with prolapse of lumbar intervertebral disc doing active movement.

Key words: prolapse of lumbar interverbral disc, movement treatment, active movement