《中国康复理论与实践》

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2004, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (07): 423-424.

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

粗大运动功能测试量表与Peabody粗大运动发育量表在脑性瘫痪康复疗效评估中的应用

史惟; 廖元贵; 杨红; 徐秀娟; 王素娟   

  1. 复旦大学附属儿科医院康复中心 上海市 200032
  • 收稿日期:2004-02-12 出版日期:2004-07-25 发布日期:2004-07-25

Applications of Gross Motor Function Measure Scale and Peabody Developmental Measure Scale-Gross Motor in the evaluation of children with cerebral palsy

SHI Wei,LIAO Yuan-gui, YANG Hong,et al   

  1. Children’s Hospital Affiliated To Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China
  • Received:2004-02-12 Published:2004-07-25 Online:2004-07-25

PDF (PC)

被引次数

197

摘要： 目的比较粗大运动功能测试量表(GMFM)与Peabody粗大运动发育量表(PDMS-GM)两种粗大运动评估方法在脑瘫康复疗效评估中的应用价值。方法用GMFM和PDMS-GM两种方法对29例脑瘫儿童进行3次评估,用t检验分析GMFM月相对百分比与PDMS-GM月相对百分比之间的差异。结果GMFM的月相对百分比与PDMS-GM的月相对百分比之间有显著性差异。结论GMFM的评估结果比PDMS-GM更有利于疗效判断。

关键词: 脑瘫, 粗大运动, 粗大运动功能测试量表(GMFM), Peabody粗大运动发育量表(PDMS-GM)

Abstract: Objective To compare the advantages of two gross motor measure scales, Peabody Developmental Measure Scale Gross Motor (PDMS-GM) and Gross Motor Function Measure Scale (GMFM), in the evaluation of children with cerebral palsy (CP).Methods The gross motor functions of 29 CP children, 0-3 years old, were evaluated three times using PDMS-GM and GMFM respectively. The improvement percentile each month of PDMS-GM and GMFM were compared by t test.Results There was significant difference between the improvement percentile each month of PDMS-GM and GMFM. Conclusion The GMFM was more sensitive than PDMS-GM in the evaluation of CP children especially in the evaluation of treatment effect.

Key words: cerebral palsy, gross motor, Gross Motor Function Measure Scale (GMFM), Peabody Developmental Measure Scale-Gross Motor (PDMS-GM)