《中国康复理论与实践》

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2009, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (10): 988-990.

• 社区康复 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同养老方式下老年人日常生活能力的比较研究

张保利;兰志敏;韩学青;陈建;李娟;冯锋;杨甫德   

  1. 北京回龙观医院老年科19区，北京市 100096
  • 收稿日期:2009-08-12 出版日期:2009-10-01 发布日期:2009-10-01

Comparative Study on Activities of Daily Living of Elderly

ZHANG Bao-li,LAN Zhi-min,HAN Xue-qing,et al   

  1. Department of Geriatrics, Beijing Huilongguan Hospital, Beijing 100096, China
  • Received:2009-08-12 Published:2009-10-01 Online:2009-10-01

PDF (PC)

被引次数

22

摘要： 目的 探讨社会养老和家庭养老两种方式对老年人日常生活能力的影响。方法 采用ADL(日常生活能力)、PADL(生理性日常生活能力)、IADL(工具性日常生活能力)量表及自制的一般情况调查量表，对662例年龄为60～100岁社会养老和620例年龄为60～98岁北京城区家庭养老者进行评定。结果 两组的ADL得分没有显著性差异(P＞0.05)。ADL与年龄(OR=3.05, 95%CI: 1.805～2.935)、教育程度（OR=2.01, 95%CI: 1.512～2.544）、健康状况（OR=1.25, 95%CI: 1.524～2.012)有明显的相关性。结论 年龄是影响日常生活能力的最重要的因素(OR=3.05, 95%CI: 1.805～2.935)，不同养老方式下老年人的日常生活能力没有明显的不同。

关键词: 老年人, 养老方式, 日常生活活动能力

Abstract: Objective To compare the activities of daily living(ADL) of the elderly in different styles of providing.Methods 662 subjects were in range of 60～100 years old living in the organization for the aged and 620 subjects were in the range of 60～98 years old living at home from Beijing urban. They were evaluated with the ADL rating scales and a self-designed health status questionnaire.Results The total scores of ADL were not significantly difference between the elderly living at home and living in the organization(t=-0.299, P＞0.05). But age (OR=3.05, 95%CI: 1.805～2.935), educational level (OR=2.01, 95%CI: 1.512～2.544), and physical health (OR=1.25, 95%CI: 1.524～2.012) were related to ADL. Conclusion Age is the important factor affecting ADL (OR=3.05, 95%CI: 1.805～2.935), but ADL of the elderly in different styles of providing is not significantly difference.

Key words: elderly, style of providing for the aged, activities of daily life (ADL)