《中国康复理论与实践》

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2011, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (10): 997-998.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

温针灸结合关节松动术治疗肩周炎的临床研究

林子玲1a，周小军1b，赖家盈1a   

  1. 1.中山大学附属第五医院，a.康复医学科，b.消化内科，广东珠海市519000。
  • 收稿日期:2011-05-05 修回日期:2011-06-08 出版日期:2011-10-25 发布日期:2011-10-25

Effect of Moxibustion with Warming Needles Combined with Joint Mobilization on Scapulohumeral Periarthritis

LIN Zi-ling,ZHOU Xiao-jun, LAI Jia-ying.   

  1. Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2011-05-05 Revised:2011-06-08 Published:2011-10-25 Online:2011-10-25

PDF (PC)

被引次数

50

摘要： 目的比较温针灸结合关节松动术与单纯温针灸治疗肩周炎的疗效和镇痛作用。方法按随机数字表法，将126 例肩周炎患者随机分为两组，分别采用温针灸结合关节松动术(观察组)和单纯温针灸(对照组)治疗。采用简化McGill 疼痛问卷进行评定。结果观察组总有效率为98.4%，对照组为95.2%，疗效比较无显著性差异(P>0.05)；但在视觉模拟评分、现有疼痛强度、疼痛分级指数上，观察组均优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论温针灸结合关节松动术和单纯温针灸治疗肩周炎均有良好的疗效，但前者更有利于肩周炎的疼痛缓解。

关键词: 肩周炎, 温针灸, 关节松动术

Abstract: Objective To investigate the efficacy and analgesia of moxibustion with warming needles combined with joint mobilizationon scapulohumeral periarthritis. Methods 126 subjects were randomly divided into 2 groups, the observation group received moxibustionwith warming needles combined with joint mobilization; the control group received moxibustion with warming needles only. Short-form ofMcGill pain questionnaire and effect were assessed. Results The effective rate was 98.4% and 95.2% for the 2 groups respectively(P>0.05);but there was significant differences between the 2 groups in the visual analogue scale (VAS), present pain intensity (PPI) and pain rating index(PRI) (P<0.05). Conclusion The moxibustion with warming needles combined with joint mobilization is a good effective therapy forscapulohumeral periarthritis.

Key words: scapulohumeral periarthritis, moxibustion with warming needles, joint mobilization