《中国康复理论与实践》

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2011, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (6): 535-538.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

注意障碍康复训练的疗效观察

张慧丽1,2，恽晓平1,2，高明明1,2，张新1,3，郭华珍1,2，沈敏4，潘华舫5，张雨梅6，郭刚花7，寄婧8，郑文权9，李丹10   

  1. 1.首都医科大学康复医学院，北京市 100068；2.中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院康复评定科，北京市 100068；3.首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院康复科，北京市 100050；4.上海市残疾人康复职业培训中心门诊部，上海市 200127；5.浙江省残疾人康复指导中心，浙江杭州市 310012；6.黑龙江省海员总医院康复科，黑龙江哈尔滨市 150020；7.河南省郑州大学第五附属医院康复中心，河南郑州市 450052；8.甘肃省康复医院康复治疗科，甘肃兰州市 730030；9.河南平顶山煤业集团总医院神经科，河南平顶山市 467000；10.山西省康复中心，山西太原市 030012。
  • 收稿日期:2011-06-16 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2011-06-25 发布日期:2011-06-25
  • 通讯作者: 恽晓平

Efficacy of Rehabilitation on Attention Deficits

ZHANG Hui-li, YUN Xiao-ping, GAO Ming-ming, et al.   

  1. Department of Rehabilitation Evaluation, Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing Charity Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center,Beijing 100068, China
  • Received:2011-06-16 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2011-06-25 Online:2011-06-25

PDF (PC)

摘要： 目的探讨不同训练模式对注意障碍康复的疗效。方法按照训练模式将47 例注意障碍患者分为仪器训练组(n=16)、人工训练组(n=21)和对照组(n=10)。训练组均进行每次30 min，每日1次的注意训练。3 组在入组及6 周后进行蒙特利尔认知功能评定(MoCA)和洛文斯顿认知成套测验(LOTCA)，分别比较3 组训练前后注意评分及其差值。结果仪器训练组和人工训练组训练后注意评分提高(P<0.05)，3 组间注意评分的差值比较，仪器训练组注意评分差值最高(P<0.05)。结论采用认知康复工作站辅助注意障碍训练是一种高效的训练方法。

关键词: 注意障碍, 脑损伤, 计算机辅助训练

Abstract: Objective To compare the efficacy of different models of attention rehabilitation on attention deficits after acquired brain injury. Methods According to the training models, 47 patients with attention deficits were randomly assigned to 3 groups: computer-assisted training group(n=16), face-to-face training group(n=21) and control group(n=10). The training groups were given attention training once a day which sustained 30 minutes for 6 weeks. All patients were tested with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment Battery (LOTCA) before and 6 weeks after the rehabilitation. Results The performance of both the computer-assisted training group and the face-to-face training group significantly improved (P<0.05). The various of the scores was the most in the computer-assisted training group among them (P<0.05). Conclusion The computer-assisted training is a high-effective method for attention deficits.

Key words: attention deficits, acquired brain injury, computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation