《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2013, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (1): 72-73.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

腓总神经损伤的综合治疗

刘敏,李嵩,刘春辉,李红玲,石汉文   

  1. 河北医科大学第二医院康复科,河北石家庄市050000。
  • 收稿日期:2012-07-08 修回日期:2012-08-08 出版日期:2013-01-25 发布日期:2013-01-25

Effect of Comprehensive Treatment on Common Peroneal Nerve Injury

LIU Min, LI Song, LIU Chun-hui, et al.   

  1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, Hebei, China
  • Received:2012-07-08 Revised:2012-08-08 Published:2013-01-25 Online:2013-01-25

摘要:

目的观察腓总神经损伤综合治疗的疗效。方法80 例腓总神经损伤患者分成治疗组和对照组各40 例。治疗组在常规药物治疗同时配合超短波、调制中频电疗法和肌电生物反馈治疗,对照组用常规药物治疗及针灸、康复锻炼。治疗前及治疗2个疗程后用Fugl-Meyer 评定法(FMA)评定下肢功能,采用医学研究院神经外伤学会(MCRR)标准评定疗效。结果治疗后,治疗组FMA评分值较对照组增高(P<0.05),治疗组优良率为80.00%,对照组为50.00% (P<0.01)。结论综合方法治疗腓总神经损伤临床疗效显著。

关键词: 腓总神经损伤, 超短波, 调制中频电疗法, 肌电生物反馈治疗, Fugl-Meyer 评定法

Abstract: Objective To study the effect of comprehensive treatment on common peroneal nerve injury. Methods 80 patients with common peroneal nerve injury were divided into treatment group (n=40) and control group (n=40). The treatment group accepted ultrashort wave, modulated medium frequency electrotherapy and electromyographic biofeedback therapy, while the control group accepted medication,acupuncture and excecise. All the patients were assessed with Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) in lower limbs before and after treatment.The effectiveness were recorded with MCRR. Results The scores of FMA of lower limb significantly improved after treatment and improved more in the treatment group than in the control group (P<0.05). The excellent and good rate was 80.00% in the treatment group, and 50.00% in the control group (P<0.01). Conclusion It is effective of comprehensive treatment on common peroneal nerve injury.

Key words: common peroneal nerve injury, ultrashort wave, modulated medium frequency electrotherapy, electromyographic biofeedback, Fugl-Meyer assessment