《中国康复理论与实践》

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2013, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (10): 945-948.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

年龄、教育水平及性别对汉语版日常注意成套测验的影响

王科英，恽晓平   

  1. 1.黑龙江省大庆油田总医院康复科，黑龙江大庆市163001；2.首都医科大学康复医学院，北京市100068；3.中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院康复评定科，北京市100068。
  • 收稿日期:2012-12-18 修回日期:2013-04-08 出版日期:2013-10-25 发布日期:2013-10-25
  • 通讯作者: 恽晓平

Effects of Age, Education and Gender on the Chinese Version of the Test of Everyday Attention

WANG Ke-ying, YUN Xiao-ping.   

  1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Daqing Oil Field General Hospital, Daqing 163001, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2012-12-18 Revised:2013-04-08 Published:2013-10-25 Online:2013-10-25

PDF (PC)

摘要： 目的检验年龄、教育水平及性别对汉语版日常注意成套测验(TEA)测试结果的影响。方法选取正常受试者117人，完成蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)量表筛查后进行TEA测验(A 版)；分别进行年龄、教育水平与TEA各项测验的相关性分析，进行性别组的组间比较。结果年龄除与电梯计数、视觉电梯计数(VE1)和彩票任务无显著性相关外，与其余分测验存在显著性相关。青年组中教育水平与地图搜索和电梯上下运行任务相关，中青年组中教育水平与视觉电梯(VE2)和计数时电话簿搜索相关，壮年组中教育水平与地图搜索、视觉电梯(VE1、VE2)、电梯上下运行任务和电话簿搜索相关。性别组间除电话簿搜索外，与其余TEA分测验的评分无显著性差异。结论年龄、教育水平对TEA测验有影响，性别对TEA测验未见明显影响。

关键词: 年龄, 教育水平, 性别, 日常注意成套测验

Abstract: Objective To test the impact of age, education and gender on the Chinese Version of the Test of Everyday Attention (TEA).Methods 117 normal volunteers were selected. They were grouped by age and education. After screening of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the volunteers were administered to the TEA (version A). Correlation analysis was performed between age and education with TEA. Comparisons between groups were tested in gender. Results There were significant correlations between most subtests with age except elevator counting, visual elevator counting (VE1) and lottery task. Education correlated with map search and elevator counting with reversal in the youth group. There were correlation between visual elevator (VE2) and telephone search while counting with education in the young and middle-aged group. Education related to map search, visual elevator (VE1, VE2), elevator counting with reversal, and telephone search in the middle-aged group. The subtests were not statistically different between different gender groups except telephone search. Conclusion Age and education had effect on TEA while Gender had no significant effect.

Key words: age, education, gender, the Test of Everyday Attention