《中国康复理论与实践》

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2013, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (4): 378-380.

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同针灸方法治疗第3 腰椎横突综合征的临床效果

麦超常，陈莹，王升旭   

  1. 南方医科大学中医药学院，广东广州市510515
  • 收稿日期:2012-09-16 修回日期:2012-11-13 出版日期:2013-04-25 发布日期:2013-04-25

Effect of 3 Methods of Acupuncture on the Third Lumbar Transverse Process Syndrome

MAI Chao-chang, CHEN Ying, WANG Sheng-xu.   

  1. College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2012-09-16 Revised:2012-11-13 Published:2013-04-25 Online:2013-04-25

PDF (PC)

摘要： 目的比较不同针灸方法治疗第3 腰椎横突综合征的临床疗效。方法90 例第3 腰椎横突综合征患者分成电针组(n=30)、温针组(n=30)和普通针刺组(n=30)，分别采用电针、温针及普通针刺治疗，共20 次。于治疗前后采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)及日本骨科学会下腰痛评分(JOA)进行评定。结果治疗后，3 组VAS评分较治疗前显著降低(P<0.001)，JOA评分显著提高(P<0.001)，电针组效果最佳(P<0.05)。结论3种针灸方法均对第3 腰椎横突综合征有很好治疗作用，其中电针效果最佳。

关键词: 第3腰椎横突综合征, 针刺, 电针, 温针

Abstract: Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of electroacupuncture, warm needling therapy and acupuncture on the third lumbar transverse process syndrome. Methods 90 patients were assigned to receive electroacupuncture therapy (n=30), warm needling therapy (n=30) and acupuncture therapy (n=30) for 20 times. They were assessed with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring systems for lower back pain before and after treatment. Results The scores of JOA increased and the scores of VAS decreased significantly in all the groups after treatment (P<0.001). Both the scores were better in the electroacupuncture group (P<0.05). Conclusion Electroacupuncture, warm needling therapy, and acupuncture are effective on the third lumbar transverse process syndrome, among which the electroacupuncture is most effective.

Key words: third lumbar transverse process syndrome, acupuncture, electroacupuncture, warm needling