《中国康复理论与实践》

《中国康复理论与实践》

• 康复护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

协同干预对脑卒中患者自我效能及自我感受负担的影响①

胡燕利，谢家兴   

  1. 1.首都医科大学康复医学院，北京市100068；2.中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院，北京市100068。
  • 出版日期:2016-01-25 发布日期:2016-05-23

Effects of Collaboration Intervention on Self-efficacy and Self-perceived Burden in Stroke Patients

HU Yan-li, XIE Jia-xing   

  1. 1. Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing 100068, China; 2. Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China
  • Published:2016-01-25 Online:2016-05-23

PDF (PC)

摘要： 目的探讨协同干预对脑卒中患者自我效能及自我感受负担的影响。方法将2014 年1~6 月神经内科收治的92 例脑卒中患者，按入院顺序分为对照组和试验组各46 例，对照组采用神经内科常规护理，试验组在此基础上采用协同干预。干预前后采用慢性病自我效能量表和自我感受负担量表进行评定。结果干预前，两组患者自我效能及自我感受负担得分均无显著性差异(t<0.585, P>0.05)。干预后，试验组自我效能评分显著优于对照组(t=3.483, P<0.001)，自我感受负担得分显著低于对照组(t=-5.698,P<0.001)。结论应用协同干预能有效提高脑卒中患者的自我效能，降低患者的自我感受负担。

关键词: 脑卒中, 协同干预, 自我效能, 自我感受负担, 护理

Abstract: Objective To explore the effects of collaboration intervention on self-efficacy and self-perceived burden in stroke patients. Methods 92 stroke patients hospitalized in the neurology department from January to June, 2014 were divided into control group (n=46) and intervention group (n=46). The control group received routine nursing and the intervention group received collaboration intervention in addition. They were assessed with Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Diseases and Self-perceived Burden Scale before and after intervention. Results There was no difference in the scores of self-efficacy and self-perceived burden between groups before intervention (t<0.585, P> 0.05). The score of self-efficacy was more in the intervention group than in the control group (t=3.483, P<0.001) after intervention, and was less of self-perceived burden (t=-5.698, P<0.001). Conclusion The collaboration intervention can improve self-efficacy and relieve self-perceived burden in stroke patients.

Key words: stroke, collaboration intervention, self-efficacy, self-perceived burden, nursing