两种主动直腿抬高动作相关肌群募集模式的分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.07.020

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2019, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (7): 840-844.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.07.020

两种主动直腿抬高动作相关肌群募集模式的分析

卞荣^1,2, 陆晓^1,2, 熊浩², 曹文月², 朱海燕², 蔡雨生²

1.南京医科大学第一附属医院康复医学中心，江苏南京市 210029
2.南京医科大学康复医学院，江苏南京市 210000

收稿日期:2019-04-11 修回日期:2019-05-14 出版日期:2019-07-25 发布日期:2019-07-23
通讯作者: 陆晓 E-mail:luxiao1972@163.com
作者简介:卞荣(1979-)，男，汉族，江苏高邮市人，博士研究生，副主任物理治疗师，主要研究方向：神经、骨关节康复的治疗方法与机制。
基金资助:
南京医科大学大学生创新创业项目(No. KY123J2018040)

Analysis of Recruitment Pattern of Related Muscles in Two Types of Active Straight Leg Raise

BIAN Rong^1,2, LU Xiao^1,2, XIONG Hao², CAO Wen-yue², ZHU Hai-yan², CAI Yu-sheng²

1.Rehabilitation Department, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China
2.Faculty of Rehabilitation, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210000, China

Received:2019-04-11 Revised:2019-05-14 Published:2019-07-25 Online:2019-07-23
Contact: LU Xiao E-mail:luxiao1972@163.com
Supported by:
Supported by Nanjing Medical University Construction Funds (No. KY123J2018040)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的比较两种主动直腿抬高(ASLR)动作的募集程度，并探讨相关肌群的募集模式。方法 2018年6月至10月，选取11例健康受试者，记录动作A(连贯动作)和动作B(滞空10 s)单侧股直肌以及双侧腹直肌、腹外斜肌、腹内斜肌的表面肌电(sEMG)信号，并分析这些肌肉最大自主等长收缩(MVIC)时的募集程度(%MVIC)。结果在动作A中，同侧腹内斜肌和腹外斜肌募集程度大于对侧(t > 2.549, P < 0.05)；在动作B中，同侧的腹内斜肌、腹外斜肌和腹直肌募集程度大于对侧(t > 2.240, P < 0.05)；动作A时，双侧腹内斜肌和股直肌募集率更多(t > 3.549, P < 0.05)。结论两种ASLR动作都表现为同侧优势激活模式；在不同ASLR动作中，神经肌肉系统采取不同的运动控制策略。

关键词: 主动直腿抬高, 腹部肌群, 募集模式, 等长收缩, 等张收缩, 表面肌电图

Abstract: Objective To compare the rate of recruitment in two types of active straight leg raise (ASLR) and to investigate the activation patterns of the related muscles. Methods From June to October, 2018, eleven healthy subjects were recruited. Surface electromyography (sEMG) signals of unilateral rectus femoris, bilateral rectus abdominis, internal oblique abdominis, external oblique abdominis and multifidus were recorded in normal ASLR (Action A) and raising leg for ten seconds (Action B). %maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of these muscles was processed and analyzed. Results %MVIC of ipsilateral internal oblique muscle and external oblique muscle were greater than the opposite side (t > 2.549, P < 0.05) in Action A; %MVIC of ipsilateral internal oblique muscle, external oblique muscle and rectus abdominis muscle were greater than the opposite side (t > 2.240, P < 0.05) in Action B; compared with action B, Action A had higher %MVIC of bilateral internal oblique and rectus femoris (t > 3.549, P < 0.05). Conclusion The activation mode of ipsilateral dominance was shown in both actions, and the different motion control strategies may be adopted by the neuromuscular system in different ASLR.

Key words: active straight leg raise, abdominal muscles, recruitment pattern, isometric contraction, isotonic contraction, surface electromyography

中图分类号:

R681.6

卞荣, 陆晓, 熊浩, 曹文月, 朱海燕, 蔡雨生. 两种主动直腿抬高动作相关肌群募集模式的分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2019, 25(7): 840-844.

BIAN Rong, LU Xiao, XIONG Hao, CAO Wen-yue, ZHU Hai-yan, CAI Yu-sheng. Analysis of Recruitment Pattern of Related Muscles in Two Types of Active Straight Leg Raise[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2019, 25(7): 840-844.

参考文献

1 GattiR, CortiM, CerviP, et al. Biomechanics of lower limb raising from the supine position [J]. Eura Medicophys, 2006, 42(3): 185-193.
2 MensJ M, VleemingA, SnijdersC J, et al. Validity of the active straight leg raise test for measuring disease severity in patients with posterior pelvic pain after pregnancy [J]. Spine, 2002, 27(2): 196-200.
3 O'SullivanP, DarrenJ, JulieA, et al. Altered motor control strategies in subjects with sacroiliac joint pain during the active straight-leg-raise test [J]. Spine (Phila Pa1976), 2002, 27(1): E1-E8.
4 HuH, MeijerO G, van Die?nJ H, et al. Muscle activity during the active straight leg raise (ASLR), and the effects of a pelvic belt on the ASLR and on treadmill walking [J]. J Biomech, 2010, 43(3): 532-539.
5 de GrootM, Pool-GoudzwaardA L, SpoorC W, et al. The active straight leg raising test (ASLR) in pregnant women: Differences in muscle activity and force between patients and healthy subjects [J]. Man Ther, 2008, 13(1): 68-74.
6 ShadmehrA, JafarianZ, TalebianS. Changes in recruitment of pelvic stabilizer muscles in people with and without sacroiliac joint pain during the active straight-leg-raise test [J]. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil, 2012, 25(1): 27-32.
7 HuH, MeijerO G, HodgesP W, et al. Understanding the active straight leg raise (ASLR): an electromyographic study in healthy subjects [J]. Man Ther, 2012, 17(6): 531-537.
8 BealesD J, O'SullivanP B, BriffaN K. Motor control patterns during an active straight leg raise in pain-free subjects [J]. Spine (Phila Pa1976), 2009, 34(1): E1-E8.
9 BealesD J, O'SullivanP B, BriffaN K. Motor control patterns during an active straight leg raise in chronic pelvic girdle pain subjects [J]. Spine (Phila Pa1976), 2009, 34(9): 861-870.
10 MoellerC R, BlivenK C, ValierA R. Scapular muscle-activation ratios in patients with shoulder injuries during functional shoulder exercises [J]. J Athl Train, 2014, 49(3): 345-355.
11 李芳,郑洁皎. 表面肌电图在脑卒中患者异常步态分析中的研究进展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2016, 22(10): 1159-1161.
12 SahrmannS, AzevedoD C, DillenL V. Diagnosis and treatment of movement system impairment syndromes [J]. Braz J Phys Ther, 2017, 21(6): 391-399.
13 LuiT K S, TsangS M H, KwokA W L. Changes in lumbopelvic movement and muscle recruitment associated with prolonged deep squatting: a pilot study [J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2018, 15(5). pii: E1001. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15051001.
14 GirardJ, FerreP, PegorierJ P, et al. Muscles, Testing and Functions with Posture and Pain [M]. Wiley, 2005.
15 MensJ M, VleemingA, SnijdersC J, et al. The active straight leg raising test and mobility of the pelvic joints [J]. Eur Spine J, 1999, 8(6): 468-473.
16 Pool-GoudzwaardA L, VleemingA, StoeckartR, et al. Insufficient lumbopelvic stability: a clinical, anatomical and biomechanical approach to 'a-specific' low back pain[J]. Man Ther, 1998, 3(1): 12-20.
17 SnijdersC J, VleemingA, StoeckartR. Transfer of lumbosacral load to iliac bones and legs: Part 1: Biomechanics of self-bracing of the sacroiliac joints and its significance for treatment and exercise [J]. Clin Biomech, 1993, 8(6): 295-301.
18 孙悦,潘伟超,孙武栋,等. 多点多轴悬吊训练治疗非特异性腰痛的表面肌电研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2018, 24(9): 1058-1061.
19 MendellL M. The Size Principle: a rule describing the recruitment of motoneurons [J]. J Neurophysiol, 2005, 93(6): 3024-3026.
20 LaidlawD H. Steadiness is reduced and motor unit discharge is more variable in old adults [J]. Muscle Nerve, 2000, 23(4): 600-612.
21 WindhorstU. Muscle proprioceptive feedback and spinal networks [J]. Brain Res Bull, 2007, 73(4-6): 155-202.
22 ZajacF E, FadenJ S. Relationship among recruitment order, axonal conduction velocity, and muscle-unit properties of type-identified motor units in cat plantaris muscle [J]. J Neurophysiol, 1985, 53(5): 1303-1322.
23 LeitchM, MacefieldV G. Comparison of contractile responses of single human motor units in the toe extensors during unloaded and loaded isotonic and isometric conditions [J]. J Neurophysiol, 2015, 114(2): 1083-1089.
24 MacefieldV G, FuglevandA J, Bigland-RitchieB. Contractile properties of single motor units in human toe extensors assessed by intraneural motor axon stimulation [J]. J Neurophysiol, 1996, 75(6): 2509-2519.

[1]	崔尧, 丛芳, 黄富表, 曾明, 颜如秀. 不同镜像神经元训练策略下脑与肌肉的活动特征：基于近红外光谱与表面肌电图技术[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 782-790.
[2]	李丹, 王剑雄, 黄茂茂, 胥方元, 曾秋, 李佶钖, 李洋, 夏翠宏, 郑雅丹, 胥章彧, 方雯凤, 万腾刚. 健康中老年女性上下楼梯时下肢肌肉的表面肌电图表现[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 731-737.
[3]	朱旭,刘静,董泽萍,仇大伟. 基于表面肌电图手势动作意图识别的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(9): 1032-1038.
[4]	田亚星,洪永锋,阚秀丽,沈显山,毛晶,江炎,何紫艳,吴俣,胡伟,孙晓宁,胡顺银. 徒手感觉刺激对脑卒中偏瘫患者手指痉挛效果的表面肌电图观察[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(5): 515-519.
[5]	周越,刘旭,孙悦梅,胡春英,朱悦彤,李渤. 不同运动模式下Flexi-bar训练对躯干稳定性肌肉的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(4): 384-388.
[6]	张静,郭峰. 指屈肌主动不足条件下屈指运动时神经肌肉的调控[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(9): 1104-1109.
[7]	张思渊,张培珍,周兴龙. 不同干预方式对斜方肌在运动中激活模式的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(8): 951-961.
[8]	周越, 朱悦彤, 王紫敏, 胡春英, 黄秋晨, 孟丽君, 刘尊. 神经肌肉关节促进法踝关节模式对健康青年男性平衡功能的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(1): 107-110.
[9]	杨晓颜,周璇,毛琳,陈荣霞,靳梦蝶,夏义玲,王姗姗,汪德轩,杜青. 中西医结合治疗婴儿先天性肌性斜颈的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(8): 897-902.
[10]	黄武杰,李雅萍,刘红,江征. 慢性腰痛的表面肌电研究进展[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(7): 802-806.
[11]	周哲,沈夏锋,沈小花,吴雪娇,王凤爽,荣积峰,吴毅. 椅面前倾对脑卒中偏瘫患者坐-站转移的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(7): 825-829.
[12]	王慧灵,冯晓东,李瑞青,兰晓燕,赵薇,张铭. 表面肌电图在环咽肌失弛缓患者吞咽障碍评定中的应用[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(11): 1275-1279.
[13]	刘红, 侯美金, 黄武杰, 林荣, 江征. 慢性非特异性腰痛三维步态分析的研究现状[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2019, 25(8): 882-885.
[14]	卢惠苹, 陈瑞华, 张高飞, 陈昕. 半月板损伤患者膝周肌肉的表面肌电图分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2019, 25(5): 586-589.
[15]	杨慧馨, 刘晓蕾. 太极拳和八段锦对脑卒中患者偏瘫下肢运动功能和表面肌电的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2019, 25(1): 101-106.

两种主动直腿抬高动作相关肌群募集模式的分析

Analysis of Recruitment Pattern of Related Muscles in Two Types of Active Straight Leg Raise

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0