具身认知在言语治疗中的应用进展

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2020.03.017

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2020, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3): 350-354.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2020.03.017

具身认知在言语治疗中的应用进展

王嘉煜,陈卓铭(),徐静,程文文

暨南大学附属第一医院语言障碍中心,广东广州市 510630

收稿日期:2019-07-21 修回日期:2019-10-24 出版日期:2020-03-25 发布日期:2020-04-01
通讯作者: 陈卓铭 E-mail:zm120tchzm@qq.com
作者简介:王嘉煜(1994-),男,汉族,福建厦门市人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向：语言认知康复。|陈卓铭(1966-),男,汉族,博士,主任医师,主要研究方向：神经康复。
基金资助:
1.国家自然科学基金项目(No. 81372113)(81372113);2.高校人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(16JJD190003);3.广东省科技基础条件资源领域项目(2018A030321015)

Application of Embodied Cognition in Speech Therapy (review)

WANG Jia-yu,CHEN Zhuo-ming(),XU Jing,CHENG Wen-wen

The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China

Received:2019-07-21 Revised:2019-10-24 Published:2020-03-25 Online:2020-04-01
Contact: CHEN Zhuo-ming E-mail:zm120tchzm@qq.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(81372113);Key Research Bases for Humanities and Social Sciences in Universities (Major)(16JJD190003);Guangdong Science and Technology Basic Condition Resources Field Project(2018A030321015)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

具身认知是当前语言心理学中的重要研究方向,知觉符号理论、索引假说、浸入式经历者框架、符号交互假说、镜像神经元系统作为具身认知在语言领域的重要研究成果,为言语治疗技术的进一步发展和完善提供了新的理论指导。

关键词: 言语治疗, 具身认知, 知觉符号, 镜像神经元, 心理语言学, 综述

Abstract:

Embodied cognition is an important research direction in current psycholinguistics. Perceptual symbols theory, indexical hypothesis, immersed experiencer framework, symbol interdependency hypothesis and mirror neuron system are important research achievements of embodied cognition in the field of language, which may light a way for the further development of speech therapy.

Key words: speech therapy, embodied cognition, perceptual symbol, mirror neuron, psycholinguistics, review

中图分类号:

R493

王嘉煜,陈卓铭,徐静,程文文. 具身认知在言语治疗中的应用进展[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(3): 350-354.

WANG Jia-yu,CHEN Zhuo-ming,XU Jing,CHENG Wen-wen. Application of Embodied Cognition in Speech Therapy (review)[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2020, 26(3): 350-354.

参考文献 44

[1]	陈卓铭. 语言治疗学[M]. 3版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018.
[2]	陈卓铭. 汉语语言心理加工与失语症评估[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2015, 30(11):1091-1094.
[3]	汪洁, 吴东宇, 袁英, 等. 失语症心理语言评价指导经颅直流电刺激靶向治疗感觉性失语症:1例报告[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2017, 32(1):102-105.
[4]	Bryon E, McLaughlin D, Mark B J, et al. Embodied Cognition, Acting and Performance[M]. Abingdon: Routledge, 2018.
[5]	Ghio M, Tettamanti M. Grounding sentence processing in the sensory-motor system [M]// Hickok G, Small S L. Neurobiology of Language. San Diego, Academic Press, 2016: 647-657.
[6]	李其维. “认知革命”与“第二代认知科学”刍议[J]. 心理学报, 2008, 40(12):1306-1327.
[7]	叶浩生. 具身认知:认知心理学的新取向[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(5):705-710.
[8]	Newen A, Bruin L D, Gallagher S. The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
[9]	叶浩生. 具身认知的原理与应用 [M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2017.
[10]	Monaco E, Jost L B, Gygax P M, et al. Embodied semantics in a second language: critical review and clinical implications[J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2019, 13:110. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00110 pmid: 30983983
[11]	Barsalou L W. Perceptual symbol systems[J]. Behav Brain Sci, 1999, 22(4):577-660. pmid: 11301525
[12]	Zwaan R A, Stanfield R A, Yaxley R H. Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects[J]. Psychol Sci, 2002, 13(2):168-171. pmid: 11934002
[13]	Zhong C B, Leonardelli G J. Cold and lonely: does social exclusion literally feel cold?[J]. Psychol Sci, 2008, 19(9):838-842. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02165.x
[14]	Schneider I K, Rutjens B T, Jostmann N B, et al. Weighty matters: importance literally feels heavy[J]. Soc Psychol Pers Sci, 2011, 2(5):474-478. doi: 10.1177/1948550610397895
[15]	Glenberg A M, Robertson D A. Indexical understanding of instructions[J]. Discourse Process, 1999, 28(1):1-26. doi: 10.1080/01638539909545067
[16]	Yang T. Image schemas in verb-particle constructions: evidence from a behavioral experiment[J]. J Psycholinguist Res, 2016, 45(2):379-393. doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9354-6
[17]	Zwaan R A. The immersed experiencer: toward an embodied theory of language comprehension[J]. Psychol Learn Motiv, 2004, 44:35-62.
[18]	Taylor L J, Lev-Ari S, Zwaan R A. Inferences about action engage action systems[J]. Brain Lang, 2008, 107(1):62-67. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.08.004
[19]	Zwaan R A. Processing narrative time shifts[J]. J Exp Psychol Learn, 1996, 22(5):1196. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1196
[20]	Hutchinson S, Louwerse M. Language statistics and individual differences in processing primary metaphors[J]. Cogn Linguist, 2013, 24(4):667-687. doi: 10.1515/cog-2013-0023
[21]	Louwerse M. Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition[J]. T Cogn Sci, 2011, 3(2):273-302.
[22]	Louwerse M, Hutchinson S. Neurological evidence linguistic processes precede perceptual simulation in conceptual processing[J]. Front Psychol, 2012, 3:385. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00385 pmid: 23133427
[23]	徐倩, 王萍, 施伯瀚, 等. 镜像神经元系统在失语症中的应用进展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2019, 25(7):771-773.
[24]	Molenberghs P, Cunnington R, Mattingley J B. Brain regions with mirror properties: a meta-analysis of 125 human fMRI studies[J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2012, 36(1):341-349. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.07.004
[25]	Anderson M L. Précis of after phrenology: neural reuse and the interactive brain[J]. Behav Brain Sci, 2016, 39:e120. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X15000631
[26]	Hickok G. The Myth of Mirror Neurons: The Real Neuroscience of Communication and Cognition [M]. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2014.
[27]	Anderlini D, Wallis G, Marinovic W. Language as a predictor of motor recovery: the case for a more global approach to stroke rehabilitation[J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2019, 33(3):167-178. doi: 10.1177/1545968319829454 pmid: 30757952
[28]	Cardona J F. Embodied cognition: a challenging road for clinical neuropsychology[J]. Front Aging Neurosci, 2017, 9:388. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00388 pmid: 29213236
[29]	Barsalou L W. On Staying grounded and avoiding quixotic dead ends[J]. Psychon B Rev, 2016, 23(4):1122-1142. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1028-3
[30]	Macedonia M, Mueller K, Friederici A D. The impact of iconic gestures on foreign language word learning and its neural substrate[J]. Hum Brain Mapp, 2011, 32(6):982-998. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21084 pmid: 20645312
[31]	Zettin M, Leopizzi M, Galetto V. How does language change after an intensive treatment on imitation?[J]. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2019, 29(9):1332-1358. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2017.1406861
[32]	Chen W L, Ye Q, Zhang S C, et al. Aphasia rehabilitation based on mirror neuron theory: a randomized-block-design study of neuropsychology and functional magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Neural Regener Res, 2019, 14(6):1004-1012.
[33]	Marangolo P, Bonifazi S, Tomaiuolo F, et al. Improving language without words: first evidence from aphasia[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2010, 48(13):3824-3833. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.025 pmid: 20887740
[34]	Snyder G J, Waddell D E, Blanchet P. Mirror neurons as a model for the science and treatment of stuttering[J]. Neuroreport, 2016, 27(1):56-60. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000500
[35]	Routhier S, Bier N, Macoir J. Smart tablet for smart self-administered treatment of verb anomia: two single-case studies in aphasia[J]. Aphasiology, 2016, 30(2-3):269-289.
[36]	Grechuta K, Rubio Ballester B, Espin Munne R, et al. Augmented dyadic therapy boosts recovery of language function in patients with nonfluent aphasia: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Stroke, 2019, 50(5):1270-1274. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023729 pmid: 30913976
[37]	Mower E, Black M P, Flores E, et al. Rachel: design of an emotionally targeted interactive agent for children with autism[C]. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 2011: 1-6.
[38]	Wilson A D, Golonka S. Embodied cognition is not what you think it is[J]. Front Psychol, 2013, 4:58.
[39]	Rowlands M. Extended cognition and the mark of the cognitive[J]. Philos Psychol, 2009, 22(1):1-19. doi: 10.1080/09515080802703620
[40]	Goel L, Johnson N, Junglas I, et al. Situated learning: conceptualization and measurement[J]. Decision Sci J Innov Educ, 2010, 8(1):215-240. doi: 10.1111/dsji.2010.8.issue-1
[41]	王会亭. 从“离身”到“具身”:课堂有效教学的“身体”转向[J]. 课程·教材·教法, 2015, 35(12):57-63.
[42]	殷明, 刘电芝. 身心融合学习:具身认知及其教育意蕴[J]. 课程·教材·教法, 2015, 35(7):57-65.
[43]	胡洁斯, 李琳. 浅析具身认知理论于设计中的应用[J]. 美术教育研究, 2018(9):81.
[44]	Dreyer F R, Pulvermüller F. Abstract semantics in the motor system?–An event-related fMRI study on passive reading of semantic word categories carrying abstract emotional and mental meaning[J]. Cortex, 2018, 100:52-70. doi: S0010-9452(17)30369-6 pmid: 29455946

具身认知在言语治疗中的应用进展

Application of Embodied Cognition in Speech Therapy (review)

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 44

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	邵伟婷, 雷江华. 反应中断再定向干预孤独症谱系障碍儿童刻板语言的效果：Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 10-20.
[2]	王航宇, 葛可可, 范永红, 都丽露, 邹敏, 封磊. 基于ICD-11和ICF主动式音乐疗法改善认知障碍老年人认知功能的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 36-43.
[3]	闻嘉宁, 金秋艳, 张琦, 李杰, 司琦. 认知参与型身体活动对发展儿童青少年执行功能的效果：基于ICF的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 44-53.
[4]	葛可可, 范永红, 王航宇, 都丽露, 李长江, 邹敏. 失眠老年人正念干预健康效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 54-60.
[5]	张婧雅, 邹敏, 孙宏伟, 孙昌隆, 朱峻同. 听障儿童青少年焦虑或抑郁情绪心理干预效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1004-1011.
[6]	王俊宇, 杨永, 袁逊, 谢婷, 庄洁. 高强度间歇训练对健康儿童青少年执行功能效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1012-1020.
[7]	魏晓微, 杨剑, 魏春艳. 特殊教育学校孤独症谱系障碍儿童参与适应性瑜伽活动的心理与行为效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1021-1028.
[8]	杨亚茹, 杨剑. 基于WHO-HPS架构学校身体活动相关健康服务及其健康效益：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1040-1047.
[9]	史佳伟, 李凌宇, 杨浩杰, 王琴潞, 邹海欧. 预康复对全膝关节置换术后患者的有效性：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1057-1064.
[10]	蒋长好, 黄辰, 高晓妍, 戴元富, 赵国明. 神经反馈训练对老年人认知功能效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 903-909.
[11]	魏晓微, 杨剑, 魏春艳, 贺启令. 学校环境下适应性体育课程促进智力与发展性残疾儿童心理运动发展的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 910-918.
[12]	崔尧, 丛芳, 黄富表, 曾明, 颜如秀. 不同镜像神经元训练策略下脑与肌肉的活动特征：基于近红外光谱与表面肌电图技术[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 782-790.
[13]	张园, 杨剑. 基于世界卫生组织健康促进学校架构的学校健康服务及效果：Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 791-799.
[14]	王少璞, 陈钢. 基于世界卫生组织健康促进学校架构的心理行为健康服务及其健康效益：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 800-807.
[15]	蒋长好, 高晓妍. 短时身体活动对儿童认知功能影响的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 667-672.