上肢运动游戏对轻度认知障碍脑卒中患者功能恢复的效果

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2023.01.015

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 98-103.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2023.01.015

上肢运动游戏对轻度认知障碍脑卒中患者功能恢复的效果

李秀丽¹^,², 李珊¹^,², 冯梦晨¹^,², 黄富表¹^,²()

1.中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院作业疗法科，北京市 100068
2.首都医科大学康复医学院，北京市 100068

收稿日期:2021-12-22 修回日期:2022-04-15 出版日期:2023-01-25 发布日期:2023-02-17
通讯作者: 黄富表(1983-)，男，汉族，浙江绍兴市人，博士，副主任治疗师，主要研究方向：作业治疗策略的循证研究，E-mail： huangfubiao123@126.com。
作者简介:李秀丽(1984-)，女，汉族，北京市人，硕士研究生，主管治疗师，主要研究方向：作业疗法。
基金资助:
中国康复研究中心课题(2021ZX-Q4)

Effects of upper limb exergames on functional recovery in stroke patients with mild cognitive impairment

LI Xiuli¹^,², LI Shan¹^,², FENG Mengchen¹^,², HUANG Fubiao¹^,²()

1. Department of Occupational Therapy, Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China
2. Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing 100068, China

Received:2021-12-22 Revised:2022-04-15 Published:2023-01-25 Online:2023-02-17
Contact: HUANG Fubiao, E-mail: huangfubiao123@126.com
Supported by:
China Rehabilitation Research Center Project(2021ZX-Q4)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的观察上肢运动游戏对轻度认知障碍脑卒中患者认知功能、上肢运动功能和日常生活活动能力的影响。

方法选取2020年8月至2021年11月在北京博爱医院住院的脑卒中后轻度认知障碍患者50例，随机分为对照组和试验组各25例，两组均接受常规作业疗法训练，对照组增加功能性作业治疗，试验组增加上肢运动游戏训练，共4周。治疗前后分别采用蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)、Fugl-Meyer评定量表上肢部分(FMA-UE)和改良Barthel指数(MBI)评估治疗效果。

结果治疗后，两组MoCA总分、FMA-UE评分和MBI评分均较治疗前明显改善(|t| > 3.354, |Z| > 4.379, P < 0.01)。对照组MoCA 5个认知维度(除命名和抽象思维外)较治疗前提高(|Z| > 2.000, P < 0.05)；试验组MoCA 6个认知维度(除命名外)较治疗前明显提高(|Z| > 2.646, P < 0.01)。试验组治疗后MoCA总分及5个维度评分(除命名和抽象思维外)以及FMA-UE评分较对照组改善(|Z| > 1.982, t = 3.565, P < 0.05)。

结论上肢运动游戏可促进轻度认知障碍脑卒中患者认知功能、上肢运动功能和日常生活活动能力的恢复。

关键词: 脑卒中, 上肢运动游戏, 认知功能, 上肢运动功能, 日常生活活动能力

Abstract:

Objective To explore the effects of upper limb exergames on cognitive function, upper limb motor function and activities of daily living in stroke patients with mild cognitive impairment.

Methods From August, 2020 to November, 2021, 50 troke patients with mild cognitive impairment in Beijing Bo'ai Hospital were randomly allocated to control group (n = 25) and experimental group (n = 25). Both groups received traditional occupational therapy. Additional functional occupational therapy was provided to the control group, and upper limb exergames were provided to the experimental group, for four weeks. They were assessed with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremities (FMA-UE) and modified Barthel Index (MBI) before and after the treatment.

Results After treatment, the scores of MoCA, FMA-UE and MBI improved in both groups (|t| > 3.354, |Z| > 4.379, P < 0.01), and the scores increased in five MoCA cognitive domains in the control group (except map naming and abstract thinking) (|Z| > 2.000, P < 0.05) and in six MoCA cognitive domains in the experimental group (except map naming) (|Z| > 2.646, P < 0.01). After treatment, the scores of MoCA, MoCA five cognitive domains (except map naming and abstract thinking) and FMA-UE were better in the experiment group than in the control group(|Z| > 1.982, t = 3.565, P < 0.05).

Conclusion Upper limb exergames can facilitate the recovery of cognitive function, upper limb motor function and activities of daily living in stroke patients with mild cognitive impairment.

Key words: stroke, upper limb exergames, cognitive function, upper limb motor function, activities of daily living

中图分类号:

R743.3

李秀丽, 李珊, 冯梦晨, 黄富表. 上肢运动游戏对轻度认知障碍脑卒中患者功能恢复的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(1): 98-103.

LI Xiuli, LI Shan, FENG Mengchen, HUANG Fubiao. Effects of upper limb exergames on functional recovery in stroke patients with mild cognitive impairment[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2023, 29(1): 98-103.

图/表 4

表1

表2

表3

表4

参考文献 37

[1]	FEIGIN V L, STARK B A, JOHNSON C O, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2021, 20(10): 795-820. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0 pmid: 34487721
[2]	VEERBEEK J M, KWAKKEL G, VAN WEGEN E E, et al. Early prediction of outcome of activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review[J]. Stroke, 2011, 42(5): 1482-1488. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.604090 pmid: 21474812
[3]	LO J W, CRAWFORD J D, DESMOND D W, et al. Profile of and risk factors for poststroke cognitive impairment in diverse ethnoregional groups[J]. Neurology, 2019, 93(24): e2257-e2271. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008612
[4]	STOLWYK R J, MIHALJCIC T, WONG D K, et al. Poststroke cognitive impairment negatively impacts activity and participation outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Stroke, 2021, 52(2): 748-760. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032215 pmid: 33493048
[5]	ROHDE D, GAYNOR E, LARGE M, et al. The impact of cognitive impairment on poststroke outcomes: a 5-year follow-up[J]. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, 2019, 32(5): 275-281. doi: 10.1177/0891988719853044
[6]	GIBSON E, KOH C L, EAMES S, et al. Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2022, 3(3): D6430.
[7]	吴保平, 郭霞, 刘晨, 等. 作业疗法对脑卒中后患者上肢运动功能康复效果的Meta分析[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2014(22): 6349-6351.
	WU B P, GUO X, LIU C, et al. Meta-analysis of the effects of occupational therapy on upper limb motor function rehabilitation in stroke patients[J]. Chin J Gerontol, 2014(22): 6349-6351.
[8]	杜振峰, 蔡琛. 计算机辅助认知训练联合作业治疗对脑卒中认知障碍患者的康复研究[J]. 中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2020, 23(23): 2074-2080.
	DU Z F, CAI C. Rehabilitation study of computer-assisted cognitive training combined with occupational therapy on patients with cognitive impairment after stroke[J]. Chin J Pract Nerv Dis, 2020, 23(23): 2074-2080.
[9]	孙妙璇, 周颖, 林玲, 等. 加拿大作业表现量表在脑卒中患者作业治疗中的应用[J]. 重庆医学, 2021, 50(10): 1733-1736.
	SUN M X, ZHOU Y, LIN L, et al. Application of Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in occupational therapy of patients with stroke[J]. Chongqing Med, 2021, 50(10): 1733-1736.
[10]	蔡琛, 孙秋芳, 葛继晖. 作业治疗联合头皮针在卒中认知障碍患者康复中的应用效果[J]. 慢性病学杂志, 2022, 23(4): 579-582.
	CAI C, SUN Q F, GE J H. Effect of occupational therapy combined with scalp acupuncture in rehabilitation of stroke patients with cognitive impairment[J]. Chron Pathematol J, 2022, 23(4): 579-582.
[11]	ZHAO Y, FENG H, WU X, et al. Effectiveness of exergaming in improving cognitive and physical function in people with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: systematic review[J]. JMIR Serious Games, 2020, 8(2): e16841.
[12]	ABD-ALRAZAQ A, ALAJLANI M, ALHUWAIL D, et al. The effectiveness and safety of serious games for improving cognitive abilities among elderly people with cognitive impairment: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. JMIR Serious Games, 2022, 10(1): e34592.
[13]	DOUMAS I, EVERARD G, DEHEM S, et al. Serious games for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a meta-analysis[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2021, 18(1): 100. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00889-1 pmid: 34130713
[14]	MURA G, CARTA M G, SANCASSIANI F, et al. Active exergames to improve cognitive functioning in neurological disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2018, 54(3): 450-462.
[15]	TOSTO-MANCUSO J, TABACOF L, HERRERA J E, et al. Gamified neurorehabilitation strategies for post-stroke motor recovery: challenges and advantages[J]. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, 2022, 22(3): 183-195. doi: 10.1007/s11910-022-01181-y
[16]	HENRIQUE P, COLUSSI E L, DE MARCHI A. Effects of exergame on patients' balance and upper limb motor function after stroke: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2019, 28(8): 2351-2357. doi: S1052-3057(19)30268-X pmid: 31204204
[17]	GELINEAU A, PERROCHON A, ROBIN L, et al. Measured and perceived effects of upper limb home-based exergaming interventions on activity after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19(15): 9112. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159112
[18]	宋卓君, 甄橙. 知识与话语权:脑卒中在ICD-11中疾病分类改变原因剖析[J]. 医学与哲学, 2021, 42(22): 77-81.
	SONG Z J, ZHEN C. Knowledge and discourse power: analysis of causes of disease classification changes in stroke in ICD-11[J]. Med Philosophy, 2021, 42(22): 77-81.
[19]	王善梅, 许允帅, 钱丽菊, 等. ICD-11精神、行为及神经发育障碍分类主要变化[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2020, 46(1): 43-45.
	WANG S M, XU Y S, QIAN L J, et al. ICD-11 Major changes in classification of mental, behavioral and neurodevelopmental disorders[J]. Chin J Nerv Ment Dis, 2020, 46(1): 43-45.
[20]	BERTANI R, MELEGARI C, DE COLA M C, et al. Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis[J]. Neurol Sci, 2017, 38(9): 1561-1569. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-2995-5 pmid: 28540536
[21]	HEBERT D, LINDSAY M P, MCINTYRE A, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015[J]. Int J Stroke, 2016, 11(4): 459-484. doi: 10.1177/1747493016643553 pmid: 27079654
[22]	NOROUZI-GHEIDARI N, HERNANDEZ A, ARCHAMBAULT P S, et al. Feasibility, safety and efficacy of a virtual reality exergame system to supplement upper extremity rehabilitation post-stroke: a pilot randomized clinical trial and proof of principle[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(1): 113. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010113
[23]	KARAMIANS R, PROFFITT R, KLINE D, et al. Effectiveness of virtual reality- and gaming-based interventions for upper extremity rehabilitation poststroke: a meta-analysis[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2020, 101(5): 885-896. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.10.195
[24]	MAIER M, BALLESTER B R, VERSCHURE P. Principles of neurorehabilitation after stroke based on motor learning and brain plasticity mechanisms[J]. Front Syst Neurosci, 2019, 17(13): 74.
[25]	WU X, GUARINO P, LO A C, et al. Long-term effectiveness of intensive therapy in chronic stroke[J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2016, 30(6): 583-590. doi: 10.1177/1545968315608448 pmid: 26450442
[26]	WILSON P H, ROGERS J M, VOGEL K, et al. Home-based (virtual) rehabilitation improves motor and cognitive function for stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial of the elements (EDNA-22) system[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2021, 18(1): 165. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00956-7 pmid: 34823545
[27]	YEN H Y, CHIU H L. Virtual reality exergames for improving older adults' cognition and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials[J]. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2021, 22(5): 995-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.03.009
[28]	HUANG X, ZHAO X, LI B, et al. Comparative efficacy of various exercise interventions on cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. J Sport Health Sci, 2022, 11(2): 212-223. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2021.05.003
[29]	CAI H, LI G, HUA S, et al. Effect of exercise on cognitive function in chronic disease patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J]. Clin Interv Aging, 2017, 11(12): 773-783.
[30]	DEMURTAS J, SCHOENE D, TORBAHN G, et al. Physical activity and exercise in mild cognitive impairment and dementia: an umbrella review of intervention and observational studies[J]. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2020, 21(10): 1415-1422. doi: S1525-8610(20)30737-4 pmid: 32981668
[31]	WATERS A, ZOU L, JUNG M, et al. Acute exercise and sustained attention on memory function[J]. Am J Health Behav, 2020, 44(3): 326-332. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.44.3.5 pmid: 32295680
[32]	ANDERSON-HANLEY C, BARCELOS N M, ZIMMERMAN E A, et al. The Aerobic and Cognitive Exercise Study (ACES) for community-dwelling older adults with or at-risk for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): neuropsychological, neurobiological and neuroimaging outcomes of a randomized clinical trial[J]. Front Aging Neurosci, 2018, 10: 76. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00076
[33]	SHEN X, LUO L, WANG F, et al. An Enriched environment enhances angiogenesis surrounding the cingulum in ischaemic stroke rats[J]. Neural Plast, 2020, 2020: 8840319.
[34]	VAN PRAAG H. Neurogenesis and exercise: past and future directions[J]. Neuromolecular Med, 2008, 10(2): 128-140. doi: 10.1007/s12017-008-8028-z
[35]	BAVELIER D, GREEN C S, POUGET A, et al. Brain plasticity through the life span: learning to learn and action video games[J]. Annu Rev Neurosci, 2012, 35: 391-416. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-152832 pmid: 22715883
[36]	赵德福, 景俊, 方琪, 等. 重复经颅磁刺激结合上肢机器人虚拟情景训练对脑卒中患者认知功能的研究[J]. 中国康复, 2020, 35(6): 295-298.
	ZHAO D F, JING J, FANG Q, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with upper limb robot virtual scenario training for stroke patients with cognitive impairment[J]. Chin J Rehabil, 2020, 35(6): 295-298.
[37]	顾琦, 田湉, 张芳芳, 等. 上肢康复机器人辅助治疗对改善脑卒中单侧忽略的疗效观察[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2020, 35(2): 166-170.
	GU Q, TIAN T, ZHANG F F, et al. Therapeutic effectiveness of upper limb rehabilitation robot-aided training on the unilateral neglect by stroke[J]. Chin J Rehabil Med, 2020, 35(2): 166-170.

项目	对照组 (n = 25)	试验组 (n = 25)	t/Z/χ²值	P值
性别(男/女)/n	20/5	17/8	0.936	0.333
年龄/岁	51.8±12.0	52.0±11.1	0.061	0.914
病程/d	40(35.5, 48)	40(21, 62)	-0.563	0.573
受教育年限/年	15(12, 16)	15(12, 17.5)	-0.437	0.662
MoCA总分	18.04±2.46	17.8±2.8	-1.743	0.081
卒中类型(梗死/出血)/n	10/15	12/13	0.325	0.569
脑损伤侧(右/左)/n	11/14	11/14	0.000	1.000

项目	对照组(n = 25)		试验组(n = 25)		t/Z值^a	P值^a	t/Z值^b	P值^b	t/Z值^c	P值^c	t/Z值^d	P值^d
项目	治疗前	治疗后	治疗前	治疗后	t/Z值^a	P值^a	t/Z值^b	P值^b	t/Z值^c	P值^c	t/Z值^d	P值^d
视空间执行能力	4.0(3.0，4.0)	4.0(3.0，4.0)	3.0(3.0，4.0)	4.0(3.0，5.0)	-2.449	0.014	-3.162	0.002	-0.459	0.646	-2.134	0.033
命名	3.0(3.0，3.0)	3.0(3.0，3.0)	3.0(3.0，3.0)	3.0(3.0，3.0)	-1.000	0.317	-1.414	0.157	-0.467	0.641	-1.429	0.153
注意力	3.0(3.0，4.0)	4.0(3.0，4.0)	3.0(3.0，4.0)	3.0(3.0，4.0)	-2.646	0.008	-2.646	0.008	-0.386	0.700	-2.086	0.037
语言流畅	2.0(1.0，2.0)	2.0(1.0，2.0)	1.0(1.0，2.0)	2.0(1.0，2.0)	-2.000	0.046	-2.646	0.008	-0.264	0.792	-1.982	0.048
抽象思维	1.0(1.0，1.0)	1.0(1.0，1.0)	1.0(1.0，1.0)	1.0(1.0，2.0)	-1.414	0.157	-2.646	0.008	-0.241	0.810	-1.402	0.161
延迟记忆	1.0(0.0，2.0)	2.0(1.0，2.0)	1.0(0.0，2.0)	2.0(1.0，3.0)	-3.606	< 0.001	-4.184	< 0.001	-0.264	0.792	-2.306	0.021
定向力	5.0(4.5，5.0)	5.0(5.0，5.0)	5.0(4.0，5.0)	5.0(5.0，6.00)	-2.236	0.025	-3.606	< 0.001	-0.705	0.481	-2.060	0.039
总分	18.04±2.458	18.76±2.83	17.80±2.80	20.52±3.27	-3.354	0.001	-12.364	< 0.001	-0.322	0.749	3.565	0.001

组别	n	治疗前	治疗后	Z值	P值
对照组	25	12.0(9.5，22.0)	20.0(12.5，30.5)	-4.383	< 0.001
试验组	25	18.0(12.5，35.5)	27.0(21.0，50.0)	-4.379	< 0.001
Z值		-1.477	-2.294
P值		0.140	0.022

组别	n	治疗前	治疗后	t值	P值
对照组	25	43.21±8.71	49.96±10.89	-10.246	< 0.001
试验组	25	42.54±6.24	53.17±7.48	-8.544	< 0.001
t值		-0.305	1.190
P值		0.762	0.241

上肢运动游戏对轻度认知障碍脑卒中患者功能恢复的效果

Effects of upper limb exergames on functional recovery in stroke patients with mild cognitive impairment

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 37

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	朱丽丽, 赵嘉欣, 程雪, 王会娟, 陈小霞. 康复期脑卒中患者疾病体验及需求的Meta整合[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2026, 32(3): 286-293.
[2]	刘平, 周楠, 薛晓杰, 邵伟波. 脑卒中后吞咽障碍康复治疗技术应用研究的文献计量分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2026, 32(3): 294-303.
[3]	杨玲, 王庆雷, 王洁, 徐雯婕, 王彤, 郭川, 钱雪. 基于功能性近红外光谱成像的卒中后焦虑患者前额叶皮质激活特征及机制研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2026, 32(3): 329-336.
[4]	岳圆, 张通, 刘元旻, 王亚囡. 下肢外骨骼机器人对卒中后小脑性共济失调患者平衡和步行功能的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2026, 32(1): 23-29.
[5]	吴澄, 章云枫, 王卫宁, 余克威, 张艳正, 沈嘉蓉, 吴毅. 肘腕功能支具对脑卒中偏瘫患者足底压力和平衡功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2026, 32(1): 30-39.
[6]	张军风, 陈昊, 杜宇征, 李琛, 于涛, 杨元庆. 2004年至2024年脑卒中后肢体痉挛非药物疗法的文献计量分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2026, 32(1): 45-58.
[7]	高凯祥, 芦海涛. 2015年至2024年神经康复研究的文献计量分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2026, 32(1): 59-68.
[8]	王潇婧, 魏婧怡, 卫晨, 王冉, 马赛, 刘西花. 针刺同步构音训练对脑卒中后痉挛型构音障碍的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(9): 1009-1016.
[9]	高云汉, 侯闪闪, 汪鑫煜, 朱崇田. 基于功能性近红外光谱探讨脑机接口对脑卒中患者上肢运动功能障碍的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(9): 1066-1073.
[10]	张子昂, 陈静, 沈孟茹, 耿宗晓, 韩雪, 赵旭, 徐磊. 不同运动模式对脑卒中患者步行及平衡功能的效果比较[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(8): 896-905.
[11]	王晓锋, 胡梦巧, 汪嫣, 魏坤, 徐文竹, 任丹, 马晔. 外骨骼机器人辅助步态训练对脑卒中和脊髓损伤下肢功能康复效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(8): 914-921.
[12]	都丽露, 姚仁魁, 赵衍宇, 李孟轩, 邹敏, 张功法. 生命意义感和居住方式在日常生活活动能力对老年人抑郁影响中的效应[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(8): 987-992.
[13]	孙婉婷, 艾丽皮乃·亚森, 龚翔, 肖悦, 甘兆丹, 刘铭洁, 曾兰婷, 马姝玥, 鲁俊, 许光旭. 基于运动序列学习探讨高频重复经颅磁刺激对脑卒中患者上肢功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(7): 812-821.
[14]	刘兰群, 李艳丽, 梁家琦, 陈爽, 刘慧林. 头针结合计算机辅助训练对脑卒中后记忆障碍的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(7): 862-868.
[15]	刘璇, 高玲, 褚凤明, 陈杰, 张明. 脑机接口联合上肢康复机器人对脑卒中患者上肢功能的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(6): 703-710.