《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2026, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 13-22.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2026.01.002
收稿日期:2025-11-07
出版日期:2026-01-25
发布日期:2026-01-28
通讯作者:
杨远滨(1967-),女,博士,主任医师,主要研究方向:中西医结合神经康复、骨科康复。E-mail: 作者简介:张季辉(1999-),男,汉族,山东枣庄市人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:中西医结合康复。
基金资助:
ZHANG Jihui1, YI Longyue1,2, YANG Yuanbin1(
)
Received:2025-11-07
Published:2026-01-25
Online:2026-01-28
Contact:
YANG Yuanbin, E-mail: Supported by:摘要:
目的 明确中老年人平衡功能障碍的多维影响因素,为精准识别高危人群和制定跌倒预防策略提供循证依据。
方法 基于中国健康与养老追踪调查项目(CHARLS),选取2015年随访数据中年龄≥ 45岁中老年人,收集基本特征、生活习惯和健康状况等信息,采用全串联站立评估平衡功能,采用Logistic回归模型分析影响因素及其与5次坐立试验(FTSST)的相关性。
结果 女性(OR = 1.958, 95%CI 1.706~2.247)、年龄(OR = 1.035, 95%CI 1.030~1.040)、抑郁状态(OR = 1.151, 95%CI 1.050~1.262)、高血压(OR = 1.115, 95%CI 1.015~1.225)、糖尿病(OR = 1.587, 95%CI 1.390~1.813)、卒中病史(OR = 1.582, 95%CI 1.289~1.942)、肌少症(OR = 1.273, 95%CI 1.080~1.500)、日常生活能力受损(OR = 1.306, 95%CI 1.142~1.493)是中老年人平衡功能障碍的危险因素。能够完成FTSST (OR = 0.411, 95%CI 0.341~0.496)和高认知水平(OR = 0.974, 95%CI 0.965~0.983)是中老年人群平衡功能的保护因素。对于能够完成FTSST的人群,在校正混杂因素的情况下,较长的FTSST完成时间增加了平衡功能障碍发生的风险(Q2: OR = 1.287, 95%CI 1.116~1.485; Q3: OR = 1.517, 95%CI 1.321~1.745; Q4: OR = 1.857, 95%CI 1.615~2.137)。
结论 中老年人平衡功能受到多种因素的综合影响,其中FTSST的完成情况与平衡功能障碍呈负相关。
中图分类号:
张季辉, 伊龙悦, 杨远滨. 中老年人平衡功能障碍的相关因素及其与功能性下肢肌力的关联:基于CHARLS数据库的分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2026, 32(1): 13-22.
ZHANG Jihui, YI Longyue, YANG Yuanbin. Associated factors of balance dysfunction and its correlation with functional lower limb muscle strength in middle-aged and older adults: an analysis based on CHARLS database[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2026, 32(1): 13-22.
表1
不同平衡功能的人群特征"
| 变量 | 例数(n = 15151) | 平衡功能正常(n = 12238) | 平衡功能障碍(n = 2913) | χ²/Z值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄/岁 | 60.00(52.00, 67.00) | 59.00(51.00, 66.00) | 64.00(57.00, 72.00) | -22.600 | < 0.001 |
| 性别/n(%) | 259.315 | < 0.001 | |||
| 男 | 7183(47.41) | 6192(50.60) | 991(34.02) | ||
| 女 | 7968(52.59) | 6046(49.40) | 1922(65.98) | ||
| 婚姻状况/n(%) | 107.214 | < 0.001 | |||
| 已婚 | 12407(81.89) | 10215(83.47) | 2192(75.25) | ||
| 其他 | 2744(18.11) | 2023(16.53) | 721(24.75) | ||
| 居住地/n(%) | 9.120 | 0.003 | |||
| 城市 | 2922(19.29) | 2418(19.76) | 504(17.30) | ||
| 乡村 | 12229(80.71) | 9820(80.24) | 2409(82.70) | ||
| 学历/n(%) | 112.010 | < 0.001 | |||
| 大学及以上 | 488(3.22) | 417(3.41) | 71(2.44) | ||
| 中学 | 3906(25.78) | 3365(27.50) | 541(18.57) | ||
| 小学及以下 | 10757(71.00) | 8456(69.10) | 2301(78.99) | ||
| 吸烟情况/n(%) | 115.051 | < 0.001 | |||
| 吸烟 | 4259(28.11) | 3662(29.92) | 597(20.49) | ||
| 曾经吸烟 | 2344(15.47) | 1903(15.55) | 441(15.14) | ||
| 从不吸烟 | 8548(56.42) | 6673(54.53) | 1875(64.37) | ||
| 饮酒情况/n(%) | 132.311 | < 0.001 | |||
| 饮酒 | 5299(34.97) | 4546(37.15) | 753(25.85) | ||
| 曾经饮酒 | 1698(11.21) | 1318(10.77) | 380(13.04) | ||
| 从不饮酒 | 8154(53.82) | 6374(52.08) | 1780(61.11) | ||
| 高血脂/n(%) | 9.452 | 0.002 | |||
| 否 | 12417(81.95) | 10087(82.42) | 2330(79.99) | ||
| 是 | 2734(18.05) | 2151(17.58) | 583(20.01) | ||
| 高血压/n(%) | 85.924 | < 0.001 | |||
| 否 | 10199(67.32) | 8449(69.04) | 1750(60.08) | ||
| 是 | 4952(32.68) | 3789(30.96) | 1163(39.92) | ||
| 糖尿病/n(%) | 100.032 | < 0.001 | |||
| 否 | 13648(90.08) | 11169(91.26) | 2479(85.10) | ||
| 是 | 1503(9.92) | 1069(8.74) | 434(14.90) | ||
| 卒中病史/n(%) | 88.084 | < 0.001 | |||
| 否 | 14649(96.69) | 11914(97.35) | 2735(93.89) | ||
| 是 | 502(3.31) | 324(2.65) | 178(6.11) | ||
| 肌少症/n(%) | 293.967 | < 0.001 | |||
| 否 | 10527(69.48) | 8850(72.32) | 1677(57.57) | ||
| 肌少症风险 | 3605(23.79) | 2722(22.24) | 883(30.31) | ||
| 是 | 1019(6.73) | 666(5.44) | 353(12.12) | ||
| 抑郁状态/n(%) | 105.697 | < 0.001 | |||
| 否 | 10106(66.70) | 8398(68.62) | 1708(58.63) | ||
| 是 | 5045(33.30) | 3840(31.38) | 1205(41.37) | ||
| ADL损害/n(%) | 240.527 | < 0.001 | |||
| 否 | 13686(90.33) | 11277(92.15) | 2409(82.70) | ||
| 是 | 1465(9.67) | 961(7.85) | 504(17.30) | ||
| FTSST/n(%) | 369.257 | < 0.001 | |||
| 否 | 576(3.80) | 287(2.35) | 289(9.92) | ||
| 是 | 14575(96.20) | 11951(97.65) | 2624(90.08) | ||
| 认知评分 | 15.00(11.00, 19.00) | 16.00(12.00, 19.00) | 13.00(9.00, 17.00) | -18.357 | < 0.001 |
表2
中老年人群平衡功能影响因素的Logistics回归分析"
| 变量(参照) | β | S.E | Z值 | P值 | OR(95%CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄 | 0.034 | 0.003 | 12.809 | < 0.001 | 1.035(1.030~1.040) |
| 性别(男) | |||||
| 女 | 0.672 | 0.070 | 9.571 | < 0.001 | 1.958(1.706~2.247) |
| 学历(大学及以上) | |||||
| 小学及以下 | -0.031 | 0.145 | -0.211 | 0.833 | 0.970(0.730~1.288) |
| 中学 | -0.004 | 0.145 | -0.026 | 0.980 | 0.996(0.749~1.324) |
| 婚姻状况(其他) | |||||
| 已婚 | -0.063 | 0.055 | -1.147 | 0.251 | 0.939(0.844~1.045) |
| 居住地(城市) | |||||
| 乡村 | 0.112 | 0.062 | 1.798 | 0.072 | 1.118(0.990~1.264) |
| 吸烟情况(吸烟) | |||||
| 曾吸烟 | 0.089 | 0.073 | 1.216 | 0.224 | 1.093(0.947~1.262) |
| 不吸烟 | -0.010 | 0.073 | -0.131 | 0.896 | 0.991(0.859~1.143) |
| 饮酒情况(饮酒) | |||||
| 曾饮酒 | 0.138 | 0.075 | 1.844 | 0.065 | 1.148(0.991~1.329) |
| 不饮酒 | 0.047 | 0.056 | 0.830 | 0.407 | 1.048(0.938~1.170) |
| 高血脂(否) | |||||
| 是 | -0.027 | 0.059 | -0.452 | 0.651 | 0.974(0.867~1.093) |
| 高血压(否) | |||||
| 是 | 0.109 | 0.048 | 2.274 | 0.023 | 1.115(1.015~1.225) |
| 糖尿病(否) | |||||
| 是 | 0.462 | 0.068 | 6.811 | < 0.001 | 1.587(1.390~1.813) |
| 卒中病史(否) | |||||
| 是 | 0.459 | 0.105 | 4.390 | < 0.001 | 1.582(1.289~1.942) |
| FTSST完成(否) | |||||
| 是 | -0.890 | 0.096 | -9.297 | < 0.001 | 0.411(0.341~0.496) |
| ADL损害(否) | |||||
| 是 | 0.267 | 0.068 | 3.900 | < 0.001 | 1.306(1.142~1.493) |
| 肌少症(否) | |||||
| 肌少症风险 | 0.147 | 0.053 | 2.782 | 0.005 | 1.158(1.044~1.284) |
| 是 | 0.241 | 0.084 | 2.881 | 0.004 | 1.273(1.080~1.500) |
| 抑郁状态(否) | |||||
| 是 | 0.141 | 0.047 | 3.010 | 0.003 | 1.151(1.050~1.262) |
| 认知水平 | -0.026 | 0.005 | -5.723 | < 0.001 | 0.974(0.965~0.983) |
表3
FTSST完成时间与平衡功能相关关系"
| 项目/模型 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | P值(趋势) | 每增加1个标准差的OR值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTSST时间均数/s | 6.04 | 8.03 | 9.85 | 14.36 | ||
| 平衡功能障碍/n(%) | 381(10.4%) | 547(14.9%) | 698(19.2%) | 998(27.4%) | ||
| 模型1,OR(95%CI) | 参照 | 1.507(1.311~1.734) | 2.035(1.780~2.330) | 3.234(2.846~3.681) | < 0.001 | 1.541(1.480~1.606) |
| 模型2,OR(95%CI) | 参照 | 1.326(1.151~1.529) | 1.604(1.398~1.843) | 2.086(1.820~2.395) | < 0.001 | 1.321(1.265~1.379) |
| 模型3,OR(95%CI) | 参照 | 1.287(1.116~1.485) | 1.517(1.321~1.745) | 1.857(1.615~2.137) | < 0.001 | 1.268(1.214~1.325) |
表4
FTSST完成时间与平衡功能相关性的亚组分析"
| 变量 | OR | 95%CI | P值 | P值(交互) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 吸烟情况 | 0.680 | ||||
| 吸烟 | 1.068 | 1.042~1.095 | < 0.001 | ||
| 曾吸烟 | 1.076 | 1.045~1.108 | < 0.001 | ||
| 不吸烟 | 1.060 | 1.045~1.076 | < 0.001 | ||
| 饮酒情况 | 0.052 | ||||
| 饮酒 | 1.083 | 1.057~1.109 | < 0.001 | ||
| 曾饮酒 | 1.068 | 1.036~1.101 | < 0.001 | ||
| 不饮酒 | 1.057 | 1.041~1.072 | < 0.001 | ||
| 年龄 | 0.018 | ||||
| < 60 | 1.086 | 1.061~1.112 | < 0.001 | ||
| ≥ 60 | 1.060 | 1.046~1.074 | < 0.001 | ||
| 性别 | 0.149 | ||||
| 男 | 1.076 | 1.055~1.096 | < 0.001 | ||
| 女 | 1.058 | 1.043~1.073 | < 0.001 | ||
| 高血脂 | 0.402 | ||||
| 否 | 1.066 | 1.052~1.080 | < 0.001 | ||
| 是 | 1.059 | 1.033~1.085 | < 0.001 | ||
| 高血压 | 0.375 | ||||
| 否 | 1.056 | 1.041~1.073 | < 0.001 | ||
| 是 | 1.074 | 1.055~1.094 | < 0.001 | ||
| 糖尿病 | 0.318 | ||||
| 否 | 1.066 | 1.053~1.080 | < 0.001 | ||
| 是 | 1.054 | 1.021~1.088 | 0.001 | ||
| 卒中病史 | 0.736 | ||||
| 否 | 1.063 | 1.051~1.076 | < 0.001 | ||
| 是 | 1.086 | 1.032~1.142 | 0.001 | ||
| ADL受损 | 0.155 | ||||
| 否 | 1.067 | 1.053~1.081 | < 0.001 | ||
| 受 | 1.056 | 1.032~1.081 | < 0.001 | ||
| 抑郁状态 | 0.146 | ||||
| 否 | 1.066 | 1.050~1.083 | < 0.001 | ||
| 是 | 1.060 | 1.041~1.078 | < 0.001 | ||
| [1] |
HU W L, CHENG Y L, SU D H, et al. Association between atherogenic index of plasma trajectory and new-onset coronary heart disease in Chinese elderly people: a prospective cohort study[J]. J Geriatr Cardiol, 2025, 22(10): 835-843.
doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2025.10.001 |
| [2] | DONG R, WANG X X, ZHANG L J. Elderly care needs and factors influencing negative emotions among first-generation only child parents in a Chinese city[J]. World J Psychiatry, 2025, 15(5): 104113. |
| [3] | 中华人民共和国中央人民政府. «2020中国卫生健康统计年鉴»[EB/OL].(2021-12-06)[2025-09-21]. https://www.nhc.gov.cn/mohwsbwstjxxzx/tjtjnj/202112/982dd4fa7f9f4b7f8ba9b752aa8aa2e3.shtml. |
| [4] | LI X, LI C, HUANG Y. Spatial-temporal analysis of urban-rural differences in the development of elderly care institutions in China[J]. Front Public Health, 2022, 10: 1086388. |
| [5] |
WU H, WEI Y, MIAO X, et al. Characteristics of balance performance in the Chinese elderly by age and gender[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2021, 21(1): 596.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02560-9 pmid: 34696721 |
| [6] |
MAHLKNECHT P, KIECHL S, BLOEM B R, et al. Prevalence and burden of gait disorders in elderly men and women aged 60-97 years: a population-based study[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(7): e69627.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069627 |
| [7] | VÖLTER C, THOMAS J P, MAETZLER W, et al. Sensory dysfunction in old age[J]. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2021, 118(29-30): 512-520. |
| [8] |
BERTSCHI D, KISS C M, BEERLI N, et al. Impact of sarcopenia on daily functioning: a cross-sectional study among older inpatients[J]. Aging Clin Exp Res, 2022, 34(9): 2041-2046.
doi: 10.1007/s40520-022-02175-z pmid: 35794312 |
| [9] |
RAMKHALAWANSINGH R, KESHAVARZ B, HAYCOCK B, et al. Examining the effect of age on visual-vestibular self-motion perception using a driving paradigm[J]. Perception, 2017, 46(5): 566-585.
doi: 10.1177/0301006616675883 pmid: 27789758 |
| [10] |
WANG J, LI Y, YANG G Y, et al. Age-related dysfunction in balance: a comprehensive review of causes, consequences, and interventions[J]. Aging Dis, 2024, 16(2): 714-737.
doi: 10.14336/AD.2024.0124-1 |
| [11] | KUAN Y C, HUANG L K, WANG Y H, et al. Balance and gait performance in older adults with early-stage cognitive impairment[J]. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2021, 57(4): 560-567. |
| [12] | ZHANG R, LIU B, BI J, et al. Relationship between chronic conditions and balance disorders in outpatients with dizziness: a hospital-based cross-sectional study[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2021, 27: e928719. |
| [13] |
梁聪, 蒲玉翠, 袁义, 等. 老年人平衡功能障碍危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中国疗养医学, 2023, 32(4): 350-356.
doi: 10.13517/j.cnki.ccm.2023.04.003 |
|
LIANG C, PU Y C, YUAN Y, et al. Risk factors for balance dysfunction in elderly: a meta-analysis[J]. Chin J Conval Med, 2023, 32(4): 350-356.
doi: 10.13517/j.cnki.ccm.2023.04.003 |
|
| [14] |
XIA Q, ZHOU P, LI X, et al. Factors associated with balance impairments in the community-dwelling elderly in urban China[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2023, 23(1): 545.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04219-z pmid: 37679669 |
| [15] |
MITCHELL M B, BHATTACHARYYA N. Balance disorder trends in US adults 2008-2016: epidemiology and functional impact[J]. OTO Open, 2023, 7(2): e58.
doi: 10.1002/oto2.58 pmid: 37287493 |
| [16] |
XU Z, JIA S, HUANG N, et al. Association between balance impairment and incidence of motoric cognitive risk syndrome in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study[J]. J Nutr Health Aging, 2025, 29(3): 100476.
doi: 10.1016/j.jnha.2024.100476 |
| [17] |
CHEN L K, WOO J, ASSANTACHAI P, et al. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment[J]. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2020, 21(3): 300-307.e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012 |
| [18] | 张舒, 朱顺, 倪敬年, 等. 疼痛对中老年人认知功能的影响:基于CHARLS的横断面与纵向动态研究[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2025, 17(5): 109-117. |
| ZHANG S, ZHU S, NI J N, et al. Pain and cognitive function in middle-aged and older adults: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study using CHARLS[J]. Chin J Front Med Sci, 2025, 17(5): 109-117. | |
| [19] |
ANDRESEN E M, MALMGREN J A, CARTER W B, et al. Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale)[J]. Am J Prev Med, 1994, 10(2): 77-84.
pmid: 8037935 |
| [20] |
MEUNIER C C, SMIT E, FITZPATRICK A L, et al. Balance and cognitive decline in older adults in the cardiovascular health study[J]. Age Ageing, 2021, 50(4): 1342-1348.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab038 pmid: 33693525 |
| [21] | KHAN F, CHEVIDIKUNNAN M F. Prevalence of balance impairment and factors associated with balance among patients with stroke. A cross sectional retrospective case control study[J]. Healthcare (Basel), 2021, 9(3): 320. |
| [22] |
PUSZCZALOWSKA-LIZIS E, BUJAS P, JANDZIS S, et al. Inter-gender differences of balance indicators in persons 60-90 years of age[J]. Clin Interv Aging, 2018, 13: 903-912.
doi: 10.2147/CIA |
| [23] |
KANNAN L, BHATT T, AJILORE O. Cerebello-cortical functional connectivity may regulate reactive balance control in older adults with mild cognitive impairment[J]. Front Neurol, 2023, 14: 1041434.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1041434 |
| [24] |
KANNAN L, PITTS J, SZTURM T, et al. Perturbation-based dual task assessment in older adults with mild cognitive impairment[J]. Front Rehabil Sci, 2024, 5: 1384582.
doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1384582 |
| [25] |
YOON J J, YOON T S, SHIN B M, et al. Factors affecting test results and standardized method in quiet standing balance evaluation[J]. Ann Rehabil Med, 2012, 36(1): 112-118.
doi: 10.5535/arm.2012.36.1.112 pmid: 22506243 |
| [26] |
BARRETT E J, LIU Z, KHAMAISI M, et al. Diabetic microvascular disease: an endocrine society scientific statement[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2017, 102(12): 4343-4410.
doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-01922 pmid: 29126250 |
| [27] |
WANG Z, CHEN Q, CHEN J, et al. Risk factors of cerebral small vessel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2021, 100(51): e28229.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028229 |
| [28] |
BERNABEU-MORA R, GIMÉNEZ-GIMÉNEZ L M, MONTILLA-HERRADOR J, et al. Determinants of each domain of the Short Physical Performance Battery in COPD[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2017, 12: 2539-2544.
doi: 10.2147/COPD |
| [29] |
GURALNIK J M, SIMONSICK E M, FERRUCCI L, et al. A Short Physical Performance Battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission[J]. J Gerontol, 1994, 49(2): M85-94.
doi: 10.1093/geronj/49.2.M85 |
| [30] |
YEE X S, NG Y S, ALLEN J C, et al. Performance on sit-to-stand tests in relation to measures of functional fitness and sarcopenia diagnosis in community-dwelling older adults[J]. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act, 2021, 18(1): 1.
doi: 10.1186/s11556-020-00255-5 |
| [31] |
BUATOIS S, PERRET-GUILLAUME C, GUEGUEN R, et al. A simple clinical scale to stratify risk of recurrent falls in community-dwelling adults aged 65 years and older[J]. Phys Ther, 2010, 90(4): 550-560.
doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090158 pmid: 20203094 |
| [32] |
LORD S R, MURRAY S M, CHAPMAN K, et al. Sit-to-stand performance depends on sensation, speed, balance, and psychological status in addition to strength in older people[J]. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2002, 57(8): M539-543.
doi: 10.1093/gerona/57.8.M539 |
| [33] | MUÑOZ-BERMEJO L, ADSUAR J C, MENDOZA-MUÑOZ M, et al. Test-retest reliability of Five Times Sit to Stand Test (FTSST) in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Biology (Basel), 2021, 10(6): 510. |
| [34] |
COELHO-JÚNIOR H J, DA SILVA AGUIAR S, DE OLIVEIRA GONÇALVES I, et al. Agreement and associations between countermovement jump, 5-Time Sit-To-Stand, Lower-Limb Muscle Power Equations, and Physical Performance Tests in community-dwelling older adults[J]. J Clin Med, 2024, 13(12): 3380.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13123380 |
| [35] |
谭晓欢, 姜桂萍, 黄芯怡, 等. 社区高龄老年人下肢肌力与步速的关系:柔韧和动态平衡的链式中介作用[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2023, 29(6): 646-653.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2023.06.004 |
| TAN X H, JIANG G P, HUANG X Y, et al. Relationship between lower limb muscle strength and walk speed in community dwelling older adults: the chain mediating role of flexibility and dynamic balance[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2023, 29(6): 646-653. | |
| [36] |
BOHM S, MANDLA-LIEBSCH M, MERSMANN F, et al. Exercise of dynamic stability in the presence of perturbations elicit fast improvements of simulated fall recovery and strength in older adults: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Front Sports Act Living, 2020, 2: 52.
doi: 10.3389/fspor.2020.00052 |
| [37] |
RIZZATO A, BOZZATO M, ROTUNDO L, et al. Multimodal training protocols on unstable rather than stable surfaces better improve dynamic balance ability in older adults[J]. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act, 2024, 21(1): 19.
doi: 10.1186/s11556-024-00353-8 |
| [38] |
WHITNEY S L, WRISLEY D M, MARCHETTI G F, et al. Clinical measurement of sit-to-stand performance in people with balance disorders: validity of data for the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test[J]. Phys Ther, 2005, 85(10): 1034-1045.
pmid: 16180952 |
| [39] |
EJUPI A, BRODIE M, GSCHWIND Y J, et al. Kinect-based Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test for clinical and in-home assessment of fall risk in older people[J]. Gerontology, 2015, 62(1): 118-124.
doi: 10.1159/000381804 pmid: 26021781 |
| [40] |
WARD R E, LEVEILLE S G, BEAUCHAMP M K, et al. Functional performance as a predictor of injurious falls in older adults[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2015, 63(2): 315-320.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.13203 pmid: 25688606 |
| [1] | 梁冠军, 徐欢岚, 张何威, 张大力, 顾琴, 李明娣. 不同视觉输入及任务条件下痉挛型偏瘫儿童平衡与下肢生物力学变化[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2026, 32(3): 345-355. |
| [2] | 岳圆, 张通, 刘元旻, 王亚囡. 下肢外骨骼机器人对卒中后小脑性共济失调患者平衡和步行功能的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2026, 32(1): 23-29. |
| [3] | 林利霞, 曾秋婵, 郭蕴源, 梁荣相, 吴昊, 邵玉萍. 睡眠时长模式对中老年日常生活活动能力的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(3): 331-338. |
| [4] | 马雯雯, 温嬿峥, 满日帕提·肉孜, 崔博雅, 苏音其梅. 健侧倾斜训练对脑卒中后Pusher综合征患者平衡功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(2): 225-230. |
| [5] | 黄茂茂, 邢菲, 李丹, 王剑雄. 中国老年人胃肠道疾病与痴呆的关联:基于CHARLS数据库的分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(12): 1456-1463. |
| [6] | 粟昭隐, 康巍瀚, 刘亚涛, 吕媛, Michael NERLICH. 中国中老年人身体活动水平与脑卒中发生的相关性:基于CHARLS数据[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(4): 449-453. |
| [7] | 张边疆, 杨剑. 身体活动对智力与发展性残疾儿童青少年的动作技能和平衡功能的效果:系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(10): 1117-1124. |
| [8] | 王晓君, 王利春, 史美超, 刘俊, 应宵策, 白德浩. 治疗性体位摆放对脑卒中偏瘫患者姿势控制和平衡能力的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(11): 1353-1358. |
| [9] | 王亚囡,刘惠林,朱琳,杜雪晶,朱晓敏,刘元旻. 水中平板步行训练对脑卒中偏瘫患者双侧腹肌厚度及平衡功能的疗效[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(5): 524-529. |
| [10] | 葛章伟,黄馨,刘正东,张敏,张家奎. 重症监护室中老年患者术后谵妄影响因素分析及风险预测模型建立与评价[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(3): 340-345. |
| [11] | 兰文岑,张丹璇,王斌. 双任务干预改善健康老年人平衡功能效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(12): 1426-1434. |
| [12] | 林强,郑煜欣,廖婉晨,罗志伟,黎婉颖,欧海宁,梁俊杰. 脑卒中患者静态平衡的足底压力分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(3): 290-296. |
| [13] | 金龙,丛芳,宋桂芸,司凤山,姚斌,贾威,崔尧. 水中太极对不完全性脊髓损伤患者平衡功能的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2017, 23(8): 955-958. |
| [14] | 宋雅云,蔡毅,. 社区中老年人四项身体功能评估及相关因素分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2017, 23(8): 980-983. |
| [15] | 杜佳音,范艳萍,李鑫,孙艳秋,庞伟. 自制脑性瘫痪儿童下肢康复器的研制及临床效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2017, 23(4): 430-432. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
|
||