《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2026, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 453-462.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2026.04.009

• 应用研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同呼吸训练对慢性非特异性腰痛患者躯干深层肌肉形态与功能的影响

马竹一1, 任超学2()   

  1. 1 西安体育学院运动与健康科学学院, 陕西西安市 710068
    2 西北大学体育教研部, 陕西西安市 710127
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-08 出版日期:2026-04-25 发布日期:2026-05-06
  • 通讯作者: 任超学,E-mail: 280124559@qq.com
  • 作者简介:马竹一(2000-),女,汉族,山西吕梁市人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:运动损伤的预防与康复。
    任超学(1978-),男,汉族,教授,主要研究方向:运动机能监控与评价,运动损伤的预防与康复,运动与健康促进。

Effect of different breathing training on morphology and function of deep trunk muscles in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain

MA Zhuyi1, REN Chaoxue2()   

  1. 1 College of Sports and Health Sciences, Xi'an Physical Education University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710068, China
    2 Department of Physical Education, Northwest University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710127, China
  • Received:2025-12-08 Published:2026-04-25 Online:2026-05-06
  • Contact: REN Chaoxue, E-mail: 280124559@qq.com

摘要:

目的 对比膈式、腹式呼吸训练对慢性非特异性腰痛患者躯干深层肌肉形态与功能的影响。

方法 2025年3月至5月,纳入西安体育学院慢性非特异性腰痛患者37例,随机分为对照组(n = 12)、腹式呼吸组(n = 12)和膈式呼吸组(n = 13)。各组均接受经皮神经电刺激治疗和核心稳定训练,在此基础上,腹式呼吸组增加腹式呼吸训练,膈式呼吸组增加膈式呼吸训练,共6周。干预前后采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评定其疼痛程度;采用表面肌电均方根值(RMS)评定多裂肌、腹横肌激活水平;采用肌骨超声评定多裂肌、腹横肌、膈肌厚度以及膈肌移动度。

结果 干预后,除对照组膈肌厚度和移动度外,其余各组各项指标均显著改善(P < 0.001)。VAS评分的所有效应均显著(F > 4.634, P < 0.016),膈式/腹式呼吸组均显著优于对照组(P < 0.01);各肌肉形态和功能指标的组内效应(F > 64.869, P < 0.001)和交互效应(F > 12.379, P < 0.001)均显著,膈式呼吸组在多裂肌和腹横肌RMS、左侧多裂肌厚度、双侧腹横肌厚度、膈肌厚度和膈肌移动度方面,均优于对照组和腹式呼吸组(P < 0.05);腹式呼吸组双侧腹横肌RMS、膈肌移动度和右侧多裂肌厚度方面优于对照组(P < 0.05)。

结论 联合膈式/腹式呼吸训练可进一步改善慢性非特异性腰痛患者躯干深层肌肉的形态和功能,且膈式呼吸可能优于腹式呼吸。

关键词: 慢性非特异性腰痛, 膈式呼吸, 腹式呼吸

Abstract:

Objective To compare the effect of diaphragmatic and abdominal breathing training on the morphology and function of deep trunk muscles in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

Methods From March to May, 2025, a total of 37 patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain recruited at Xi 'an Physical Education University, were randomly divided into control group (n = 12), abdominal breathing group (n = 12) and diaphragmatic breathing group (n = 13). All groups received transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and core stability training. On this basis, the abdominal breathing group was added with abdominal breathing training, and the diaphragmatic breathing group was added with diaphragmatic breathing training, for six weeks. The degree of pain was evaluated with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) before and after intervention, while the activation levels of multifidus and transversus abdominis were evaluated with the root mean square value (RMS) of surface electromyography, and the thickness of the multifidus muscle, transverse abdominis muscle, diaphragm and diaphragm mobility were evaluated with musculoskeletal ultrasound.

Results After intervention, all the indicators improved in all the groups (P< 0.001), except for the diaphragm thickness and mobility in the control group. All the effects (F> 4.634, P< 0.016) of VAS score were significant, and were better in the diaphragmatic/abdominal breathing groups than in the control group (P< 0.01). The intra-group effects (F> 64.869, P< 0.001) and interaction effects (F> 12.379, P< 0.001) of muscle morphology and function indexes were significant, and the RMS of multifidus and transversus abdominis, left multifidus thickness, bilateral transversus abdominis thickness, diaphragm thickness, and diaphragm excursion was better in the diaphragmatic breathing group than in the control group and the abdominal breathing group (P< 0.001), while bilateral transversus abdominis RMS, diaphragm excursion, and right multifidus thickness were better in the abdominal breathing group than in the control group (P< 0.037).

Conclusion The combination of diaphragmatic/abdominal breathing exercises can further improve the morphology and function of the deep muscles of trunk in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain, and diaphragmatic breathing may be superior to abdominal breathing.

Key words: chronic nonspecific low back pain, diaphragmatic breathing, abdominal breathing

中图分类号: