临床研究

推拿手法对脑卒中患者表面肌电信号的影响

  • 廖若夷 ,
  • 张婷 ,
  • 蔡华安 ,
  • 张月娟 ,
  • 彭廷云 ,
  • 陈芊妤 ,
  • 樊冰倩 ,
  • 桂一莎 ,
  • 尹臻臻
展开
  • 1.湖南中医药大学,湖南长沙市 410208;
    2.湖南中医药大学第一附属医院,湖南长沙市 410007;
    3.湖南省人民医院,湖南长沙市 410016。
廖若夷(1970-),女,汉族,湖南益阳市人,博士研究生,主任护师,主要研究方向:心脑血管疾病中西结合护理基础和临床。

收稿日期: 2016-11-29

  网络出版日期: 2017-08-07

基金资助

1.湖南省中医药科研计划项目(No.201492); 2.湖南省中医药科研计划重点项目(No.201410; No.201604); 3.国家临床护理重点专科建设项目(No.湘财社指[2013]151号)

Variation of Surface Electromyogram with Manipulation of Tuina for Stroke Hemiplegics

  • LIAO Ruo-yi ,
  • ZHANG Ting ,
  • CAI Hua-an ,
  • ZHANG Yue-juan ,
  • PENG Ting-yun ,
  • CHEN Qian-yu ,
  • FAN Bing-qian ,
  • GUI Yi-sha ,
  • YIN Zhen-zhen
Expand
  • 1. Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan 410208, China;
    2. The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan 410007, China;
    3. Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha, Hunan 410016, China

Received date: 2016-11-29

  Online published: 2017-08-07

摘要

目的比较不同推拿手法作用于脑卒中患者偏瘫肢体所产生的肌电效应。方法2016年1月至5月,脑卒中偏瘫住院患者20例,由同一高年资推拿治疗师对患者双侧股直肌实施滚、拍、揉、搓、抖、按手法,每种手法持续1 min,间隔1 min。采集静息状态和实施手法过程中积分肌电值(iEMG)、均方根(RMS)和中值频率(MF)。结果静息状态下,两侧iEMG、RMS和MF均无显著性差异(t<1.147, P>0.05)。手法过程中,拍法iEMG和RMS最高(F>21.376, P<0.001),按法MF最高(F>11.772, P<0.001),其他手法下各肌电值无显著性差异(P>0.05)。拍法作用下,患侧iEMG、RMS低于健侧(P<0.05),其他手法两侧无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论不同的推拿手法对脑卒中偏瘫侧和健侧的刺激作用不同,拍法更能刺激神经肌肉兴奋和募集更多运动单位。

本文引用格式

廖若夷 , 张婷 , 蔡华安 , 张月娟 , 彭廷云 , 陈芊妤 , 樊冰倩 , 桂一莎 , 尹臻臻 . 推拿手法对脑卒中患者表面肌电信号的影响[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2017 , 23(7) : 807 -810 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.07.015

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the effect of various manipulation of Tuina on surface electromyogram (sEMG) in hemiplegics after stroke. MethodsFrom January to May, 2016, 20 inpatients with hemiplegia after stroke accepted Tuina on bilateral rectus femoris by the same therapist, with the techniques of rolling, patting, rubbing, shaking, kneading and pressing, one minute a manipulation and interval one minute. Integrated electromyography (iEMG), root mean square (RMS) and median frequency (MF) of sEMG were compared, both in rest and during Tuina. ResultsThere was no significant difference of iEMG, RMS and MF between affected and unaffected sides in rest (t<1.147, P>0.05). iEMG and RMS were the most under patting (F>21.376, P<0.001), and MF was the highest under pressing (F>11.772, P<0.001). iEMG, RMS and MF were not very different under other manipulation (P>0.05). iEMG and RMS were less in the affected side than in the unaffected side under patting (P<0.05). ConclusionVarious manipulation of Tuina may be different in neuromuscular stimulation, that patting may stimulate more muscles and motor units.

参考文献

[1] 付露,潘文宇. 中风后痉挛性瘫痪的针灸推拿及康复治疗现状[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2016, 25(10): 1137-1139.
[2] 陈峰,苏庆军. 穴位推拿结合抗痉挛技术对脑卒中后上肢肌痉挛改善的疗效观察[J]. 中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2011, 14(1): 74-75.
[3] 饶明俐. 中国脑血管病防治指南[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2007: 37-54.
[4] 国家中医药管理局全国中医脑病急症科研协作组.中风病诊断与疗效评定标准[J]. 北京中医药大学学报, 1996, 19(1): 55-56.
[5] 国家中医药管理局中医师资格认证中心. 中西医结合执业助理医师医师资格考试大纲[M]. 北京:中国中医药出版社, 2015: 145-160.
[6] 安媛. 手指活动影响前臂多腱肌运动单元募集模式的初步研究[D]. 重庆:重庆大学生物医学工程系, 2012.
[7] Pereira LM, Marcucci FC, de Oliveira Menacho M, et al. Electromyographic activity of selected trunk muscles in subjects with and without hemiparesis during therapeutic exercise [J]. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 2011, 21(2): 327-332.
[8] Stock MS, Drusch AS, Thompson BJ. The minimum number of contractions required to examine the EMG amplitude versus isometric force relationship for the vastus lateralis and vastus medialis [J]. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 2014, 24(6): 827-834.
[9] Zhu W, Zheng G, Gu Y, et al. Clinical efficacy and sEMG analysis of a new traditional Chinese medicine therapy in the treatment of spasticity following apoplectic hemiparalysis [J]. Acta Neurol Belg, 2014, 114(2): 125-129.
[10] Daly JJ, Roenigk K, Cheng R, et al. Abnormal leg muscle latencies and relationship to dyscoordination and walking disability after stroke [J]. Rehabil Res Prac, 2011, 2011: 313980.
[11] Kallenberg LA, Hermens HJ. Motor unit properties of biceps brachii during dynamic contractions in chronic stroke patients [J]. Muscle Nerve, 2011, 43(1): 112-119.
[12] Minetto MA, Botter A, Lanfranco F, et al. Muscle fiber conduction slowing and decreased levels of circulating muscleproteins after short-term dexamethasone administration in healthy subjects [J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2010, 95(4): 1663-1671.
[13] 郑萍,吴春微. 表面肌电在脑卒中偏瘫患者肢体功能评测中的应用[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2013, 22(18): 1966-1968.
[14] 谭志梅,姜文文,燕铁斌,等. 基于正常行走模式的功能性电刺激对脑卒中恢复期患者行走功能的影响[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2016, 96(29): 2342-2346.
[15] Wu LP, Huang YQ, Zhou WH, et al. Influence of cervical spine position, turning time, and cervical segment on cadaver intradiscal pressure during cervical spinal manipulative therapy [J]. J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 2012, 35(6): 428-436.
[16] 潘化平,冯慧,李亚娟,等. 疏经通督推拿结合康复训练对脑卒中患者偏瘫肢体运动能力的影响[J]. 中国中西医结合杂志, 2011, 31(11): 1474-1478.
[17] 汪菲,何晴,李建华. 表面肌电在中枢神经系统疾病肌痉挛患者评价中的研究现状[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2016, 31(11): 1277-1280.
[18] 程华军,陈尚杰,许琼瑜,等. 步态诱发功能性电刺激同步减重平板训练对脑卒中患者下肢表面肌电信号的影响[J]. 新医学, 2016, 47(10): 686-690.
[19] 杨唐柱,黄晓琳,熊蔡华,等. 偏瘫患者与正常人在五项日常生活活动中的表面肌电分析[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2011, 26(3): 236-239, 250.
[20] 樊留博,刘素芝,韩文胜,等. 脑卒中后痉挛性偏瘫患者膝关节控制能力障碍的sEMG特征研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2016, 14(5): 715-717.
[21] 徐嘉,谢利. 表面肌电图对卒中病人患侧下肢肌张力评价的研究[J]. 中国伤残医学, 2012, 20(2): 5-7.
[22] 夏清,袁海,王修敏,等. 表面肌电在脑卒中患者肢体功能障碍评价中的意义[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2013, 28(11): 1046-1048.
[23] 廖志平,魏爽,李建华,等. 表面肌电图评估技术在脑卒中患者下肢肌肉领域的应用[J]. 中国康复, 2015, 30(5): 388-390.
[24] 王培,王红星. 神经电生理检测技术在脑卒中后功能评定中的应用进展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2016, 22(12): 1404-1407.
文章导航

/