辅助技术服务模式是辅助技术选择和适配的指导方针和理论依据,深入了解辅助技术服务模式可以帮助残疾人选择合适的辅助技术。本文详细介绍了国外常用的四种辅助技术服务模式,并从适用对象、适用环境、目标、评估项目、有无评估流程、有无具体评估工具等几个方面对四个模式进行对比和分析。
Assistive technology model is the guideline and theoretical basis of assistive technology selection and adaptation, and in-depth understanding of assistive technology model can help disabled people choose the appropriate assistive technology. This paper introduced four assistive technology models which were commonly used abroad, and they were compared and analyzed from the applicable objects, suitable environment, target, evaluation project, with or without any assessment steps and tools, and several other aspects.
[1] U.S.Department of Education. Individual with Disabilities Education Act [A/OL].[2017-05-12]. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/?src=policy-page.
[2] Lee H, Templeton R.Ensuring isabilities[J]. Theory Into Practice, 2008, 47(3): 212-219.
[3] Assistive Technology Outcomes Measurement System. ATOMS Project: Models and Taxonomies Relating to Assistive Technology Resource [EB/OL]. [2017-05-15]. http://www.r2d2.uwm.edu/atoms/archive/technicalreports/fieldscans/fs7/tr-fs-taxonomiesmodels-resource.html.
[4] U.S.Government Printing Office. Assistive Technology Act of 1998 [A/OL]. [2017-05-12]. https://www.section508.gov/assistive-technology-act-1998.
[5] Lenker JA, Paquet VL.A review of conceptual models for assistive technology outcomes research and practice[J]. Assist Technol, 2003, 15(1): 1-15.
[6] Cook AM, Polgar JM, Hussey SM.Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice[M]. 4th ed. St Louis: Mosby-Elsevier, 2014.
[7] Zabala JS. Sharing the SETT framework [EB/OL]. [2017-05-25]. http://www.joyzabala.com/Home.php.
[8] Zabala JS. SETT Framework Documents [EB/OL]. [2017-05-25]. http://www.joyzabala.com/Documents.html.
[9] Zabala JS. SETT Scaffold for Consideration of ST Needs [EB/OL]. [2017-05-20]. http://www.joyzabala.com/uploads/Zabala_SETT_Scaffold_Consideration.pdf.
[10] Zabala JS. Using the SETT Framework to Level the Learning Field for Students with Disabilities [EB/OL]. [2017-06-15]. http://www.joyzabala.com/uploads/Zabala_SETT_Leveling_the_Learning_Field.pdf.
[11] Zabala JS. SETT Scaffold for Tool Selection [EB/OL]. [2017-06-15]. http://www.joyzabala.com.
[12] Scherer MJ. The Institute for Matching Person and Technology [EB/OL]. [2017-06-18]. http://www.matchingpersonandtechnology.com/purpose.html.
[13] Scherer MJ. Matching Person and Technology (MPT) Assessment Process. The Institute for Matching Person and Technology [EB/OL]. [2017-06-18]. http://www.matchingpersonandtechnology.com/mptdesc.html.
[14] Scherer MJ, Craddock G.Matching Person & Technology (MPT) assessment process [EB/OL]. [2017-06-18].https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279688474.
[15] Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative. Mission Statement [EB/OL]. [2017-12-05]. http://www.wati.org/about/.
[16] Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative. Assessing Students, Needs for Assistive Technology [EB/OL]. [2017-06-20]. http://www.wati.org/free-publications/assessing-students-needs-for-assistive-technology/.
[17] Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative. Student Information Guide Process Forms [EB/OL]. [2017-12-05]. http://www.wati.org/free-publications/wati-student-information-guide-process-forms/.
[18] Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative. Assistive Technology Consideration to Assessment [EB/OL]. [2017-12-05]. http://www.wati.org/free-publications/assistive-technology-consideration-to-assessment/.
[19] Bromley BE. Assistive Technology Assessment: A Comparative Analysis of Five Models [EB/OL]. [2017-06-30]. http://homemods.org/resources/pages/ATAssess.shtml.
[20] Watts EH, O'Brian M, Wojcik BW. Four Models of Assistive Technology Consideration: How Do They Compare to Recommended Educational Assessment Practices?[J]. J Spec Educ Technol, 2003, 19(1): 43-56.
