目的 基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)和《残疾人权利公约》(CRPD),分析国际有关残疾模式、残疾相关术语体系、残疾定义和残疾测量工具的相关内容,为发展符合国际标准的残疾术语、分类以及测量提供依据。方法 基于ICF和CRPD对残疾和残疾人的定义,分析国际组织有关的残疾定义,并运用ICF进行编码;对国际组织推荐的残疾测量工具进行内容和编码分析。结果 基于ICF和CRPD残疾和残疾人定义,对相关国际组织残疾和残疾人定义进行内容分析与编码研究,分析各定义中涉及的残疾核心概念与相应的ICF编码。国际组织残疾定义内容涉及ICF身体功能与结构、活动和参与以及环境因素和个人因素等维度。 标准化残疾测量工具世界卫生组织残疾评定量表、华盛顿残疾统计小组(WG)残疾数据标准WG和WG-C,以及示范残疾调查(MDS),均以ICF与CRPD为理论基础的,且完全采用ICF的分类体系、术语体系和编码标准,测量内容覆盖ICF有关残疾的核心内容,符合CRPD有关残疾和残疾人的定义。结论 基于ICF和CRPD有关残疾理论架构、术语体系和编码系统,发展标准化的残疾定义和测量工具,并且构建标准化残疾数据理论架构与数据标准。基于ICF残疾数据标准在残疾相关的健康、康复、教育、职业、社区和社会服务领域,将促进实现跨行业和领域的残疾数据交换。
Objective To analyze theoretical frameworks, definitions, terminology and measurements of disability using International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), and United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), to provide a scientific basis for developing definition, classification and measurements to meet international standards.Methods Content analysis had been conducted for the definitions and measurements of disability issued by international organizations using the ICF terminology and code and the definitions of disability and people with disability by CRPD.Results The core concepts and content had been reviewed using the ICF terminology and code, and the definitions of disability and people with disability by CRPD. The contents of definitions of disability proposed by international organizations cover all components of ICF. The contents of standardized disability measurements issued by United Nations or World Health Organization cover all components of ICF and map to CRPD definitions of disability and people with disability as the framework, classification, terminology and coding system had been adopted for the development.Conclusion The definition and measurements had been developed using ICF and CRPD framework, terminology, and coding system of disability. The framework and standard of disability had been constructed. The standard of disability data will implement in the fields of health, rehabilitation, education, employment, community and social services for people with disability to promote data exchange across sectors.
[1] Altman BM, Barnartt SN, Loeb ME, et al.Paradigms lost: the changing face of disability in research[J]. Res Soc Sci Disabil, 2006, 4: 111-129.
[2] 世界卫生组织,世界银行. 世界残疾报告(国际中文版)[M]. 邱卓英,译. 日内瓦:世界卫生组织, 2013.
[3] 邱卓英,陈迪. 基于ICF的残疾和康复信息标准体系及其应用研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2014, 20(6): 501-507.
[4] 邱卓英,黎东晓,李欣,等. 当代智力残疾测量与统计方法和社会支持与服务体系研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2016, 22(4): 383-388.
[5] 邱卓英,李欣,刘冯铂,等. 基于ICF的智力残疾模式、测量方法及社会支持系统研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2016, 22(4): 373-377.
[6] 邱卓英,陈迪. 基于ICF的残疾和康复信息标准体系及其应用研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2014, 20(6): 501-507.
[7] Madans JH, Loeb ME, Altman BM.Measuring disability and monitoring the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: the work of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics[J]. BMC Public Health, 2011, 11(Suppl 4): S4.
[8] 李安巧,邱卓英,吴弦光,等. 康复2030:国际康复发展状况与行动呼吁[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2017, 23(4): 379.
[9] 邱卓英,陈迪. 发展卫生保健和康复服务,增进残疾人健康----学习《世卫组织2014~2021年全球残疾问题行动计划:增进所有残疾人的健康》[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2014, 20(7): 611-615.
[10] 邱卓英,陈迪,祝捷. 构建基于ICF的功能和残疾评定的理论和方法[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2010, 16(7): 675-677.
[11] 邱卓英. 《世界残疾报告》的架构、方法与应用意义[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2013, 19(10): 901-904.
[12] 李沁燚,邱卓英,陈迪,等. 基于ICF构建国家功能、残疾和健康的信息架构和数据体系[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2017, 23(4): 385-389.
[13] 世界卫生组织. 国际功能、残疾和健康分类(国际中文增补版)[M]. 邱卓英,译. 日内瓦:世界卫生组织, 2015.
[14] 联合国. 残疾人权力国际公约[Z]. A/61/611. 2006.
[15] 邱卓英. 国际残疾调查统计标准与方法研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2004, 10(3): 188-191.