《中国康复理论与实践》

中国康复理论与实践 >

2019 , Vol. 25 >Issue 8: 946 - 955

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.00.007

临床研究

中文版上肢动作研究量表在早期脑梗死患者中的效度

  • 赵江莉 ,
  • 毛玉瑢 ,
  • 徐智勤 ,
  • 陈少贞 ,
  • 黄东锋
展开
  • 1.中山大学附属第一医院康复医学科，广东广州市 510080
    2.中山大学附属第七医院康复医学科，广东深圳市 518107
赵江莉(1982-)，女，汉族，江苏东海县人，硕士，主管物理治疗师，主要研究方向：神经康复及物理治疗专科技术。

收稿日期: 2019-03-22

  修回日期: 2019-04-15

  网络出版日期: 2019-08-16

基金资助

1.中山大学大型临床医学5010项目(No. 2014001)；2.广州市产学研协同创新重大专项民生科技专题项目(No. 2016B04020108)；3.广东省重点科技研发计划项目(No. 2015B020233006)

收起

Validity of Chinese Version of Action Research Arm Test in Patients with Early Cerebral Infarction

  • ZHAO Jiang-li ,
  • MAO Yu-rong ,
  • XU Zhi-qin ,
  • CHEN Shao-zhen ,
  • HUANG Dong-feng
Expand
  • 1.Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China
    2.Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, the Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518107, China

Received date: 2019-03-22

  Revised date: 2019-04-15

  Online published: 2019-08-16

Supported by

Supported by Foundation:5010 Planning Project of Sun Yat-Sen University of China (No. 2014001), Guangzhou Research Collaborative Innovation Project (No. 2016B04020108), and Guangdong Science and Technology Planning Project (No. 2015B020233006)

Fold

摘要

目的 探究中文版上肢动作研究量表(C-ARAT)在早期脑梗死患者中的效度。 方法 2015年8月至2018年12月，选择中山大学附属第一医院康复医学科住院的第一次发病的早期脑梗死患者90例，分别进行C-ARAT和Fugl-Meyer评定量表上肢部分(FMA-UE)评估，采用Spearman等级相关系数(ρ)检测两个量表评分的相关性。 结果 C-ARAT及其4个部分与FMA-UE均呈显著相关，相关性好至很好(ρ > 0.75, P ? 0.001)。 结论 在早期脑梗死患者中，C-ARAT具有良好的效度。

关键词： 康复评定; 上肢动作研究量表; 脑梗死; 效度

本文引用格式

赵江莉 , 毛玉瑢 , 徐智勤 , 陈少贞 , 黄东锋 . 中文版上肢动作研究量表在早期脑梗死患者中的效度[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2019 , 25(8) : 946 -955 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.00.007

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the concurrent validity of Chinese version of Action Research Arm Test (C-ARAT) in patients with first early cerebral infarction. Methods From August, 2015 to December, 2018, 90 inpatients with first early cerebral infarction in the department of rehabilitation medicine of the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University were enrolled. They were evaluated with C-ARAT and Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremities (FMA-UE). Concurrent validity was determined using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (ρ). Results C-ARAT and subscales generally exhibited good-to-excellent correlations with FMA-UE (ρ > 0.75, P ? 0.001). Conclusion At early stage of first cerebral infarction, C-ARAT demonstrated good-to-excellent concurrent validity.

Key words： rehabilitation assessment; Action Research Arm Test; cerebral infarction; validity

参考文献

1 郭文亮,郭光禹,白霜,等. 高同型半胱氨酸血症与脑血管病研究进展[J/OL]. 神经损伤与功能重建, 2019. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1759.r.20190410.0129.001.html
2 张伟,张通. 中老年脑卒中患者握力与认知功能的关系探讨:来自中国健康与退休前瞻性队列研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2019, 25(3): 279-283.
3 WangW, JiangB, SunH, et al. Prevalence, incidence, and mortality of stroke in China: results from a nationwide population-based survey of 480687 adults [J]. Circulation, 2017, 8(135): 759-771.
4 LangloisJ A, Rutland-BrownW, WaldM M. The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: a brief overview [J]. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 2006, 21(5): 375-378.
5 StrongK, MathersC, BonitaR. Preventing stroke: saving lives around the world [J]. Lancet Neurol, 2007, 6(2): 182-187.
6 黄烈弥,喻佳丽,杨秋萍. 经皮穴位电刺激对脑梗死后偏瘫患者肢体功能障碍康复的影响[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2016, 38(1): 49-51.
7 国家卫生计生委脑卒中防治工程工作委员会. 中国脑卒中防治报告[M]. 北京:中国协和医科大学出版社, 2015.
8 Nichols-LarsenD S, ClarkP C, ZeringueA, et al. Factors influencing stroke survivors' quality of life during subacute recovery [J]. Stroke, 2005, 36(7): 1480-1484.
9 贾杰. 脑卒中后左右制衡机制及其对上肢手功能康复的意义[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2018, 24(12): 1365-1370.
10 吴毅,胡永善,范文可, 等. 康复医学功能评定量表信度和效度研究[J]. 中国临床康复, 2002, 24(3): 310-317.
11 RabadiM H, RabadiF M. Comparison of the Action Research Arm Test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2006, 87(7): 962-966.
12 SantistebanL, TeremetzM, BletonJ P, et al. Upper limb outcome measures used in stroke rehabilitation studies: a systematic literature review [J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(5): e154792.
13 HsiehC L, HsuehI P, ChiangF M, et al. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the Action Research Arm Test in stroke patients [J]. Age Ageing, 1998, 27(2): 107-113.
14 HsuehI P, HsiehC L. Responsiveness of two upper extremity function instruments for stroke inpatients receiving rehabilitation [J]. Clin Rehabil, 2002, 16(6): 617-624.
15 LinJ H, HsuM J, SheuC F, et al. Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke [J]. Phys Ther, 2009, 89(8): 840-850.
16 NijlandR, van WegenE, VerbuntJ, et al. A comparison of two validated tests for upper limb function after stroke: the Wolf Motor Function Test and the Action Research Arm Test [J]. J Rehabil Med, 2010, 42(7): 694-696.
17 ChenH F, LinK C, WuC Y, et al. Rasch validation and predictive validity of the Action Research Arm Test in patients receiving stroke rehabilitation [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2012, 93(6): 1039-1045.
18 YozbatiranN, Der-YeghiaianL, CramerS C. A standardized approach to performing the Action Research Arm Test [J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2008, 22(1): 78-90.
19 NordinA, AltM M, DanielssonA. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability at the item level of the Action Research Arm Test for patients with stroke [J]. J Rehabil Med, 2014, 46(8): 738-745.
20 瓮长水,王军,王刚,等. 上肢动作研究量表在脑卒中患者中的信度[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2007, 13(9): 868-869.
21 瓮长水,王军,潘小燕, 等. 上肢动作研究量表在脑卒中患者中的效度[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2008, 14(1): 53-54.
22 ZhaoJ L, ChenP M, LiW F, et al. Translation and initial validation of the Chinese version of the Action Research Arm Test in people with Stroke [J]. Biomed Res Int, 2019, 2019: 5416560.
23 全国第四届脑血管病学术会议. 各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 1996, 29(6): 379-380.
24 LyleR C. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research [J]. Int J Rehabil Res, 1981, 4(4): 483-492.
25 McDonnellM N, HillierS L, RiddingM C, et al. Impairments in precision grip correlate with functional measures in adult hemiplegia [J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2006, 117(7): 1474-1480.
26 ProchazkaA, KowalczewskiJ. A fully automated, quantitative test of upper limb function [J]. J Mot Behav, 2015, 47(1): 19-28.
27 QianQ, HuX, LaiQ, et al. Early stroke rehabilitation of the upper limb assisted with an electromyography-driven neuromuscular electrical stimulation-robotic arm [J]. Front Neurol, 2017, 8: 447.
28 Fugl-MeyerA R, JaaskoL, LeymanI, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance [J]. Scand J Rehabil Med, 1975, 7(1): 13-31.
29 BerglundK, Fugl-MeyerA R. Upper extremity function in hemiplegia. A cross-validation study of two assessment methods [J]. Scand J Rehabil Med, 1986, 18(4): 155-157.
30 PlatzT, PinkowskiC, van WijckF, et al. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study [J]. Clin Rehabil, 2005, 19(4): 404-411.
31 HemmenB, SeelenH A. Effects of movement imagery and electromyography-triggered feedback on arm hand function in stroke patients in the subacute phase [J]. Clin Rehabil, 2007, 21(7): 587-594.
32 WeiX J, TongK Y, HuX L. The responsiveness and correlation between Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Motor Status Scale, and the Action Research Arm Test in chronic stroke with upper-extremity rehabilitation robotic training [J]. Int J Rehabil Res, 2011, 34(4): 349-356.
33 PageS J, LevineP, HadeE. Psychometric properties and administration of the wrist/hand subscales of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment in minimally impaired upper extremity hemiparesis in stroke [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2012, 93(12): 2373-2376.
34 BeatonD E, BombardierC, GuilleminF, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures [J]. Spine (Phila Pa1976), 2000, 25(24): 3186-3191.
35 PortneyL G. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice [M]. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2009.
36 HsiehY W, WuC Y, LinK C, et al. Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation [J]. Stroke, 2009, 40(4): 1386-1391.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉