《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2017, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (7): 766-769.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.07.005

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

肌力定量检查方法研究进展

刘根林, 李建军, 周红俊, 康海琼, 郑樱, 郝春霞, 张缨, 卫波, 逯晓蕾, 袁媛   

  1. 1.首都医科大学康复医学院,北京市100068;
    2.中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院,北京市100068。
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-26 出版日期:2017-07-25 发布日期:2017-08-07
  • 作者简介:刘根林(1965-),男,汉族,浙江义乌市人,硕士,主任医师,主要研究方向:脊髓损伤康复。通讯作者:李建军。E-mail: crrc100@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金项目(No.2012CZ-31)

Advance in Quantitative Tests of Muscle Strength Measurement (review)

LIU Gen-lin, LI Jian-jun, ZHOU Hong-jun, KANG Hai-qiong, ZHENG Ying, HAO Chun-xia, ZHANG Ying, WEI Bo, LU Xiao-lei, YUAN Yuan   

  1. 1. Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing 100068, China;
    2. Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Centre, Beijing 100068, China
  • Received:2017-02-26 Published:2017-07-25 Online:2017-08-07
  • Contact: Correspondence to LI Jian-jun. E-mail: crrc100@163.com

摘要: 由于徒手肌力检查不能定量反映肌力增强的训练效果,人们越来越多地开始应用等速仪器和手持测力计等工具进行肌力定量检查。本文简要回顾了临床常用肌力检查方法的发展历程,对各种肌力定量检查方法的优缺点进行了比较分析,在此基础上提出了临床肌力检查的具体操作建议。

关键词: 肌力, 定量检查, 等速仪器, 手持测力计, 测试, 康复, 综述

Abstract: As the manual muscle testing is not sensitive enough to reflect the change of muscle strength, more and more people begin to use isokinetic dynamometry and handheld dynamometer for quantitative tests of muscle strength measurement. This paper briefly introduced the history of clinical approaches of muscle strength measurement, compared the advantages and disadvantages of various quantitative muscle strength testing, on which the specific techniques of clinical muscle strength measurement were discussed.

Key words: muscle strength, quantitative tests, isokinetic dynamometry, handheld dynamometer, measurement, rehabilitation, review

中图分类号: