《中国康复理论与实践》

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2022, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (11): 1334-1341.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2022.11.013

• 康复发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

东亚地区物理治疗师配置、教育培训与职业准入体系的比较研究

林星茹1,2,3,4,赵盈喆1,2,3,4,刘亚2,3,4,5,孙舒悦1,2,3,4,郭培武6,吴芳2,3,4,5,欧阳筱瑶2,3,4,5,井淇1,2,3,4,7(),张建华1,2,3,4,5()   

  1. 1.潍坊医学院管理学院，山东潍坊市 261053
    2.“健康山东”重大社会风险预测与治理协同创新中心，山东潍坊市 261053
    3.潍坊医学院中国康复健康研究院，山东潍坊市 261053
    4.潍坊医学院中国ICF研究院，山东潍坊市 261053
    5.潍坊医学院公共卫生学院，山东潍坊市 261053
    6.潍坊市人民医院康复医学科，山东潍坊市 261053
    7.世界卫生组织国际分类家族中国合作中心，北京市 100068
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-09 修回日期:2022-11-11 出版日期:2022-11-25 发布日期:2022-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 井淇,张建华 E-mail:jingq@wfmc.edu.cn;zhangjh@wfmc.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:林星茹(1999-)，女，汉族，山东威海市人，硕士研究生，主要研究方向：社会医学与卫生事业管理、健康与康复政策。|井淇(1988-)，男，汉族，山东临朐县人，博士，副教授，主要研究方向：卫生政策与管理评价、康复政策与管理|张建华(1970-)，男，汉族，山东滨州市人，硕士，教授，主要研究方向：卫生法学与卫生政策。
  • 基金资助:
    1.山东省自然科学基金青年基金项目(ZR2020QG057);2.山东省社会科学规划研究项目青年学者重点培养计划研究专项(19CQXJ12)

Comparative study of physical therapist allocation, education and training, and professional accreditation system in East Asia

LIN Xingru1,2,3,4,ZHAO Yingzhe1,2,3,4,LIU Ya2,3,4,5,SUN Shuyue1,2,3,4,GUO Peiwu6,WU Fang2,3,4,5,OUYANG Xiaoyao2,3,4,5,JING Qi1,2,3,4,7(),ZHANG Jianhua1,2,3,4,5()   

  1. 1. School of Management, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China
    2. Collaborative Innovation Center for Prediction and Management of Major Social Risks in "Healthy Shandong", Weifang, Shandong 261053, China
    3. Chinese Institute of Rehabilitation and Health, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China
    4. Chinese ICF Institute of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China
    5. School of Public Health, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China
    6. Rehabilitation Medicine Department of Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China
    7. WHO-FIC Collaborating Center in China, Beijing 100068, China
  • Received:2022-11-09 Revised:2022-11-11 Published:2022-11-25 Online:2022-12-20
  • Contact: JING Qi,ZHANG Jianhua E-mail:jingq@wfmc.edu.cn;zhangjh@wfmc.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Shandong Natural Science Foundation (Youth)(ZR2020QG057);Shandong Social Science Planning and Research Project Key Training Plan for Young Scholars(19CQXJ12)

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

摘要：

目的 比较中国、日本、韩国物理治疗师发展现况。

方法 通过查阅官方网站和现有资料，分析中、日、韩三国物理治疗师在配置、教育和执业方面的差异。

结果 我国物理治疗师配置水平有待提升，教育培养机制有待完善，职业准入体系有待优化。

结论 物理治疗师的配置要基于康复服务情景和服务需求，物理治疗师的教育培训要基于世界卫生组织《康复胜任力架构》和《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》等标准要求构建，物理治疗师的职业准入和认证体系要基于世界卫生组织《康复胜任力架构》和国家职业准入制度要求构建。

关键词: 物理治疗师, 配置, 教育, 执业, 东亚

Abstract:

Objective To compare the current development of physical therapists in China, Japan and South Korea.

Methods The condition of configuration, education and practice of physical therapists in China, Japan and South Korea were browsed from the official websites and existing data.

Results The allocation, education and training mechanism, and the professional accreditation system needs to be optimized in China.

Conclusion The physical therapists should be allocated based on rehabilitation service settings and needing, trained based on the World Health Organization's Rehabilitation Competency Framework and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, and the professional system should be constructed based on the World Health Organization's Rehabilitation Competency Framework and national professional admission systems.

Key words: physical therapist, allocation, education and training, accredition, East Asia

中图分类号: