《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2025, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12): 1421-1429.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2025.12.006

• 循证研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

2016年至2025年产后盆底康复研究的文献计量分析

陈雯()   

  1. 九江职业大学,江西九江市 332000
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-29 修回日期:2025-10-31 出版日期:2025-12-25 发布日期:2025-12-29
  • 通讯作者: 陈雯 E-mail:465769747@qq.com
  • 作者简介:陈雯(1987-),女,汉族,江西九江市人,硕士,讲师,主要研究方向:孕产妇康复护理。
  • 基金资助:
    1. 江西省教育厅科学技术研究项目(GJJ2405805);2. 九江职业大学科研创新培育团队项目(JJZD-TD2423)

Postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation from 2016 to 2025: a bibliometric analysis

CHEN Wen()   

  1. Jiujiang Vocational University, Jiujiang, Jiangxi 332000, China
  • Received:2025-09-29 Revised:2025-10-31 Published:2025-12-25 Online:2025-12-29
  • Contact: CHEN Wen E-mail:465769747@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    Science and Technology Research Project of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education(GJJ2405805);Jiujiang Vocational University Research Innovation Cultivation Team Projects(JJZD-TD2423)

摘要:

目的 分析近10年产后盆底康复研究的现状、热点及前沿趋势。
方法 检索2016年1月1日至2025年6月30日中国知网、万方数据库、维普、Web of Science核心合集、PubMed和Scopus中产后盆底康复相关文献,采用CiteSpace 6.2.R4进行可视化分析。
结果 共纳入1 331篇文献,其中中文文献810篇,英文文献521篇。英文文献发文量呈上升趋势。中国、美国和挪威发文量领先。中文文献发文量于2023年后下降。中、英文文献关键词分别形成41和51个聚类,整合为4个核心领域:疾病类型、危险因素、康复干预技术和疗效评价指标。中文文献多聚焦临床应用和技术整合,英文文献侧重于机制探索和精准干预。
结论 近10年产后盆底康复研究呈持续发展趋势,中、英文文献研究重点分化明显。

关键词: 产后康复, 盆底肌, 文献计量学

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the current status, research hotspots and trends of postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation over the past decade.
Methods Literatures related to postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation published between January 1st, 2016 and June 30th, 2025 were retrieved from CNKI, Wanfang data, VIP, Web of Science Core Collection, PubMed and Scopus. CiteSpace 6.2.R4 was used for visualized analysis.
Results A total of 1 331 papers were included, including 810 Chinese and 521 English publications. The annual publication volume increased in English articles, and China, the United States and Norway were the countries with the most publication. However, Chinese publication volume decreased after 2023. The keywords of the Chinese and English literatures formed 41 and 51 clusters, respectively, which were integrated into four core research areas: disease types, risk factors, rehabilitation intervention techniques, and outcome evaluation indicators. Chinese literatures mainly focused on clinical applications and technological integration, whereas English literatures mainly focused on mechanism exploration and precision interventions.
Conclusion Researches on postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation are rising over the past decade. There is a significant divergence in the main topics between Chinese and English researches.

Key words: postpartum rehabilitation, pelvic floor muscle, bibliometrics

中图分类号: