《中国康复理论与实践》

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2011, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3): 206-208.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

汉语深层失读语音诱发和语义诱发的个案研究

郑秀丽1，谢欲晓2，宋鲁平3，尹文刚4   

  1. 1.空军某研究所，北京市 100085；2.中日友好医院物理康复科，北京市 100029；3.首都医科大学康复医学院,中国康复研究中心神经康复二科，北京市 100068；4.中国科学院心理研究所，北京市 100101。
  • 收稿日期:2011-01-30 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2011-03-25 发布日期:2011-03-25
  • 通讯作者: 尹文刚

Semantic Inducement and Phonetic Inducement for Chinese Deep Dyslexia: A Case Study

ZHENG Xiu-li, XIE Yu-xiao, SONG Lu-ping, et al.   

  1. An Institute of Airforce, Beijing 100085, China
  • Received:2011-01-30 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2011-03-25 Online:2011-03-25

PDF (PC)

被引次数

2

摘要： 目的研究语义诱发对汉语深层失读症的疗效。方法对1例汉语深层失读患者给予声母诱发（语音诱发）、语义关联词诱发、数量词诱发、语境诱发和实物诱发（后四者均为语义诱发）。结果各项语义诱发的正确率均显著高于语音诱发(P<0.001)。结论语义诱发对汉语深层失读较语音诱发更有效。

关键词: 深层失读, 语音诱发, 语义诱发, 康复, 汉语

Abstract: ObjectiveTo investigate the semantic induce effects in reading disorder of the Chinese deep dyslexia. MethodsA patient with deep dyslexia was researched with initials inducement (as phonetic inducement), semantic-related words inducement, numeral inducement, quantifier inducement, context inducement and actual object inducement (all as semantic inducement). ResultsThe rate of correct results were more with semantic inducements than with phonetic inducement (91.30%, 76.67%, 94.44%, 83.33% vs 44.44%, P<0.001). ConclusionThe semantic induce training is more effective than the phonetic induce training on Chinese deep dyslexia.

Key words: deep dyslexia, semantic induce, phonetic induce, rehabilitation, Chinese