《中国康复理论与实践》

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2011, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (6): 515-518.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

汉语版日常注意测验在中国大陆正常人群的信度、效度研究

王科英1，恽晓平2，3   

  1. 1.黑龙江省大庆油田总医院康复科，黑龙江大庆市 163001；2.首都医科大学康复医学院，北京市 100068；3.中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院康复评定科，北京市 100068。
  • 收稿日期:2011-06-07 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2011-06-25 发布日期:2011-06-25
  • 通讯作者: 恽晓平

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Test of Everyday Attention (TEA) among Normal Chinese People

WANG Ke-ying, YUN Xiao-ping.   

  1. Department of Rehabilitation, Daqing Oilfield General Hospital, Daqing 163001, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2011-06-07 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2011-06-25 Online:2011-06-25

PDF (PC)

摘要： 目的观察中国大陆汉语版日常注意测验(TEA) )的信度、效度。方法随机选取中国正常人117 7人(年龄18～65 5岁)，在蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA) )筛查后进行TEA A、连线测验B(TMT-B) )、同步序列加法任务(PASAT ,2.00s) )、Stroop p字色干扰任务(Stroop) )、连续作业测验(CPT) )。在正常组中选取200人完成TEA A的A、B两个版本的检验，以进行重测信度检验。结果A、B两个版本的相关分析结果显示：2周后两个版本的大部分子测验的相关系数较高(r>0.700,P<0.01) )。因子分析提取出4个主成分，为持续性注意、选择性注意、转移性注意及分配性注意，分别涉及TEA A子测验及相关实验室测验。结论TEA A有较好的信度、效度。

关键词: 注意, 注意评定, 日常注意测验, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To explore the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Test of Everyday Attention (TEA) in normal Chinese people. Methods 117 normal volunteers (18～65 years old) were screened with the Montreal Cognition Assessment (MoCA), and the normal volunteers were administered to TEA (versions A), Trail Making Test B (TMT-B), Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT), Stroop Color-Word Interference Test (SCWT), Continuous Performance Test (CPT). 20 normal volunteers were also given version B for testing of the test-retest reliability, time interval was 2 weeks between versions A and B. Results There was correlation between versions A and B in the major subtests (r>0.700, P<0.01) at a two-week interval. The varimax rotation principal-component analysis extracted 4 component factors, namely sustained attention, se lective attention, switching attention, and divided attention. The factors included various subtests of TEA and the other laboratory attentional test. Conclusion TEA has good reliability and validity.

Key words: attention, attentional assessement, the Test of Everyday Attention, reliability, validity