残疾认同量表的信度与效度检验

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.04.016

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2019, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 455-459.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.04.016

残疾认同量表的信度与效度检验

李学会^1,2, 傅志军³, 刘江⁴, 董咚⁵

1.复旦大学社会发展与公共政策学院，上海市 200433
2.深圳市守望心智障碍者家庭关爱协会，广东深圳市518009
3.上海财经大学法学院，上海市 200433
4.南京理工大学社会学系，江苏南京市 210094
5.香港中文大学医学院赛马会公共卫生及基层医疗学院，香港

收稿日期:2018-11-07 修回日期:2019-01-18 出版日期:2019-04-20 发布日期:2019-04-24
通讯作者: 董咚，E-mail: dongdong@cuhk.edu.hk
作者简介:李学会(1987-)，男，汉族，山东临朐县人，博士候选人，主要研究方向：残疾社会学、社会组织治理。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金一般项目(No. 18BSH054)

Reliability and Validity of Disability Identity Scale in Chinese Version

LI Xue-hui^1,2, FU Zhi-jun³, LIU Jiang⁴, DONG Dong⁵

1.School of Social Development and Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
2.Shenzhen Association for Families with Persons with Intellectual Disabilities, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518009, China
3.Law School, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China
4.Department of Sociology, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210094, China
5.JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

Received:2018-11-07 Revised:2019-01-18 Published:2019-04-20 Online:2019-04-24
Contact: DONG Dong, E-mail: dongdong@cuhk.edu.hk
Supported by:
National Social Science Foundation of China (General) (No. 18BSH054)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的考察残疾认同量表在中文语境中的适用性。方法 2018年5月，多阶段抽样获得291份残疾认同量表问卷结果，利用探索性因子分析研究残疾认同量表的结构，采用验证性因子分析讨论量表的结构效度。结果量表总Cronbach α系数为0.865，量表各维度内部一致性为0.742~0.838，重测信度总量表为0.776，各维度内部一致性为0.640~0.893。提取到5个因子，分别命名为个人认同维度的肯定残疾、污名/羞耻，以及社会认同维度的社会接纳、社会排斥-个人归因、社会排斥-社会归因。结论该量表有较高的信度和效度，经过进一步修订可用于中国残疾认同研究。

关键词: 残疾认同量表, 信度, 效度, 个人认同, 社会认同

Abstract: Objective To investigate the applicability of Disability Identity Scale in Chinese context. Methods A total of 291 questionnaires about Disability Identity Scale were collected with multi-stage sampling in May, 2018. The preliminary structure of the Disability Identity Scale was analyzed with exploratory factor analysis, and the structural validity of the scale was discussed with confirmatory factor analysis. Results The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total scale was 0.865, and the internal consistency of each dimension of the scale was 0.742 to 0.838. The total test-retest reliability was 0.776, and the internal consistency of each dimension was 0.640 to 0.893. Five factors were extracted, named Positive Disability and Stigma/Shame in the dimension of personal identity, Social Acceptance, Social Exclusion-Personal Attribution, Social Exclusion-Social Attribution in the dimension of social identity. Conclusions Disability Identity Scale is reliable and stable that can be used in the study of disability identity in China after modification.

Key words: Disability Identity Scale, reliability, validity, personal identity, social identity

中图分类号:

R492

李学会, 傅志军, 刘江, 董咚. 残疾认同量表的信度与效度检验[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2019, 25(4): 455-459.

LI Xue-hui, FU Zhi-jun, LIU Jiang, DONG Dong. Reliability and Validity of Disability Identity Scale in Chinese Version[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2019, 25(4): 455-459.

参考文献

[1] DarlingR B. Disability and Identity: Negotiating Self in a Changing Society [M]. Boulder, Col.: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2013.
[2] DunnD S, BurcawS. Disability identity: exploring narrative accounts of disability [J]. Rehabil Psychol, 2013, 58(2): 148-157.
[3] PutnamM. Conceptualizing disability: developing a framework for political disability identity [J]. J Disabil Policy Studies, 2005, 16(3): 188-198.
[4] HahnH, BeltT L. Disability identity and attitudes toward cure in a sample of disabled activists [J]. J Health Soc Behav, 2004, 45(4): 453-464.
[5] HahnH, BeaulaurierR. Attitudes toward disabilities: a research note on activists with disabilities [J]. J Disabil Policy Studies, 2001, 12(1): 40-46.
[6] AntonakmR F, LivnehH. Measurement of attitudes toward persons with disabilities [J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2000, 22(5): 211-224.
[7] 郑曦. 大学生残疾人态度量表测评[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2005, 11(9): 772-773.
[8] 田琪,郝元涛,陶健婷,等. 世界卫生组织残疾态度量表中文版的信度、效度分析[J]. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复, 2010, 14(46): 8681-8685.
[9] DarlingR B, HeckertD A. Activism, models, identities, and opportunities: a preliminary test of a typology of disability orientations [M]// Barnartt S N. Disability as a Fluid State. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2010: 203-229.
[10] DarlingR B, HeckertD A. Orientations toward disability: differences over the lifecourse [J]. Int J Disabil Dev Educ, 2010, 57(2): 131-143.
[11] GillC J. Four types of integration in disability identity development [J]. J Vocational Rehabil, 1997, 9(1): 39-46.
[12] RhodesP, NoconA, SmallN, et al. Disability and identity: the challenge of epilepsy [J]. Disabil Soc, 2008, 23(4): 385-395.
[13] OliverM. The social model of disability: thirty years on [J]. Disabil Soc, 2013, 28 (7): 1024-1026.
[14] 李学会,傅志军. 从隔离走向融合?——我国视力障碍者高等教育的历史、特点及政策变迁[J]. 社会工作, 2015(6): 35-46, 126.
[15] 李学会,张凤琼. 心智障碍者的权益保障:家庭视角的审视[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2018, 20(5): 58-65.
[16] 赵必华,顾海根. 心理量表编制中的若干问题及题解[J]. 心理科学, 2010, 33(6): 1467-1469.
[17] ChaskesJ. Out of a coma and into a wheelchair: social and physical accessibility and the construction of disabled identity [M]// Barnartt SN. Disability as a Fluid State. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2010: 49-66.
[18] ShakespeareT. Disability, identity and difference [M]// Barnes C C, Merce G. Exploring the Divide: Illness and Disability. Leeds: The Disability Press, 1996: 94-113.
[19] MalhotraR, RoweM. Exploring Disability Identity and Disability Rights through Narratives: Finding a Voice of Their Own [M]. London: Routledge, 2014.
[20] 邱卓英,李安巧,黄珂,等. 基于ICF和联合国《残疾人权利公约》对国际组织有关残疾定义及其测量的内容研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2018, 24(10): 1117-1121.

残疾认同量表的信度与效度检验

Reliability and Validity of Disability Identity Scale in Chinese Version

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	耿立蒙, 刘聪聪, 李玲, 吕攀攀, 王鑫, 刘芳. 运用心理教育量表(第3版)评估孤独症谱系障碍儿童心理行为特征[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1035-1039.
[2]	易琦峰, 黄卓尔, 杨国莉, 谢丽华, 谢胜锋, 吴小霞, 严谨. 在职医护人员呼吸康复培训知识需求问卷的编制及信度、效度检验[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 985-992.
[3]	李俊毅, 陈泽华, 吴祖贵, 王毅, 李聪聪, 王帅, 陈伟健, 叶子璇, 沈星星, 向瑞安, 刘文刚, 许学猛. 超声回声强度评价膝骨关节炎患者股四头肌质量的信度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 738-744.
[4]	邱晓, 凌骏麒, 从洋洋, 白玉龙. 3D扫描容积法评定上肢远端体积的信度和效度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(3): 364-367.
[5]	沈星星, 熊玉玲, 陈伟健, 李聪聪, 李俊毅, 王帅, 章家皓, 向瑞安, 陈佳浩, 刘文刚, 许学猛. 慢性颈痛患者颈肩部肌肉性能差异及其与疼痛、体质量指数的相关性[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(12): 1420-1428.
[6]	杨佳曼,王毅,毛志涛,刘通,范德辉. 足姿指数评价青少年特发性脊柱侧弯患者足部位置的信度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(8): 909-913.
[7]	谭茗丹,冯锭瑶,陈曦,刘汉军,李咏雪. 中文版构音障碍影响程度量表对帕金森病患者的信度和效度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(6): 696-703.
[8]	周兆雯,王翠,黄真. 周历活动规划中文版在社区中老年人执行功能评测中的信度和效度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(6): 737-744.
[9]	吴炜,倪波业,施加加. 扩展Barthel指数在脑卒中患者中的信度与效度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(3): 261-268.
[10]	郭亚雯,林蓓蕾,张振香,王永利,符博,齐琲. 工作能力支持量表(中文版)在就业年龄脑卒中患者中的信度和效度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(9): 1076-1082.
[11]	王玉仲,梁丹艳,郝江慧,温树正,王继宏. 跟腱完全断裂评分在急性跟腱断裂中的应用[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(6): 707-710.
[12]	怀宝玉,王翠,黄真,高雅. 周历活动规划中文版在大学生执行功能评测中的信度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(3): 363-367.
[13]	张振香,丁春戈,张春慧,梅永霞,林蓓蕾,王少阳,叶森. 居家脑卒中患者护理分级评估指标体系的构建和信效度检验[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(3): 368-372.
[14]	陈泽华,叶翔凌,陈伟健,许学猛. 足姿指数评价足部位置的信效度研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(10): 1193-1197.
[15]	徐悦莹, 郑洁皎, 夏汶, 李勇, 徐国会, 段林茹, 曲冰, 邱卓英. 基于世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0慢性病患者整体功能的评估研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2019, 25(9): 993-999.