经颅直流电刺激在脑卒中康复中应用的文献计量分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2024.06.007

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 675-685.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2024.06.007

经颅直流电刺激在脑卒中康复中应用的文献计量分析

杨彬¹, 刘明月², 高丹¹, 李哲¹^,³^,⁴()

1.郑州大学第五附属医院康复医学科，河南郑州市 450052
2.北京小汤山医院运动康复科，北京市 102200
3.河南省康复临床医学研究中心，河南郑州市450052
4.郑州大学康复医学研究所，河南郑州市 450052

收稿日期:2023-06-26 修回日期:2024-05-06 出版日期:2024-06-25 发布日期:2024-07-03
通讯作者: 李哲(1974-)，男，博士，主任医师，主要研究方向：神经康复，E-mail： Lizhe.1974@163.com。
作者简介:杨彬(1998-)，男，汉族，河南平顶山市人，硕士研究生，主要研究方向：神经检测与神经调控技术。
基金资助:
河南省重大科技专项(221100310200)

Application of transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke rehabilitation: a bibliometrics analysis

YANG Bin¹, LIU Mingyue², GAO Dan¹, LI Zhe¹^,³^,⁴()

1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China
2. Department of Sport Rehabilitagion, Xiaotangshan Hospital, Beijing 102200, China
3. Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine in Henan, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China
4. Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China

Received:2023-06-26 Revised:2024-05-06 Published:2024-06-25 Online:2024-07-03
Supported by:
Henan Key Scientific and Technological Projects(221100310200)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的对经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)应用于脑卒中康复的相关研究进行可视化分析。

方法检索Web of Science核心合集和中国知网自建库至2023年3月31日收录的tDCS用于脑卒中康复研究的相关文献，采用CiteSapce 6.2.R2软件绘制学科、发文量、国家、关键词以及共被引的可视化图谱。

结果共纳入英文文献732篇，中文文献322篇，年发文量均呈上升趋势。英文发文量最多的国家是美国，被引频次最高的期刊是Stroke。较高关注度的关键词为虚拟现实、上肢、经颅磁刺激等。共被引文献的聚类词有失语症、稳态可塑性、运动恢复等。

结论 tDCS用于脑卒中康复领域的研究热度逐年提升，研究方向呈现出多元化趋势。研究热点包括脑卒中后运动、言语功能的恢复，以及与其他治疗手段(如重复经颅磁刺激、针刺等)的联合应用。未来tDCS与脑机接口、虚拟现实等新康复手段的结合，以及选择个性化刺激参数构建以患者为中心的tDCS模型，可能是该领域的研究趋势。

关键词: 脑卒中, 经颅直流电刺激, 康复, 文献计量学, 知识图谱

Abstract:

Objective To visualize and analyze the researches on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for stroke rehabilitation.

Methods The Web of Science core collection and CNKI were searched for literature on the use of tDCS for stroke rehabilitation, since the establishment of the database until March 31st, 2023. The literature was analyzed wtih CiteSapce 6.2.R2 in term of disciplines, articles number, countries, keywords and co-citation, etc.

Results A total of 732 articles in English and 322 articles in Chinese were included, and the number of articles was on the rise. The country with the largest number of publications was the United States, and the journal with the highest citation frequency was Stroke. The keywords with high attention in recent years were virtual reality, upper limb and transcranial magnetic stimulation. The clustering words of co-cited literature were aphasia, homeostatic plasticity, and motor recovery, etc.

Conclusion The researches about tDCS for stroke rehabilitation are increasing year by year, and the research fields are diversified. The hotspots include rehabilitation for motor and speech, and combination with other therapy, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and acupuncture. The combination of tDCS with new rehabilitation protocols such as brain-computer interfaces and virtual reality, as well as the selection of individualized stimulation parameters to construct patient-centered tDCS models may be hot in the future.

Key words: stroke, transcranial direct current stimulation, rehabilitation, bibliometrics, knowledge mapping

中图分类号:

R743.3

杨彬, 刘明月, 高丹, 李哲. 经颅直流电刺激在脑卒中康复中应用的文献计量分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(6): 675-685.

YANG Bin, LIU Mingyue, GAO Dan, LI Zhe. Application of transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke rehabilitation: a bibliometrics analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2024, 30(6): 675-685.

图/表 14

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

表2

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

表3

表4

参考文献 70

[1]	FEIGIN V L, BRAININ M, NORRVING B, et al. World Stroke Organization (WSO): Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022[J]. Int J Stroke, 2022, 17(1): 18-29. doi: 10.1177/17474930211065917 pmid: 34986727
[2]	STINEAR C M, LANG C E, ZEILER S, et al. Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2020, 19(4): 348-360. doi: S1474-4422(19)30415-6 pmid: 32004440
[3]	吴春薇, 谢瑛. 经颅直流电刺激的研究进展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2015, 21(2): 171-175.
	WU C W, XIE Y. Advance of transcranial direct current stimulation (review)[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2015, 21(2): 171-175.
[4]	LIU A, VOROSLAKOS M, KRONBERG G, et al. Immediate neurophysiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation[J]. Nat Commun, 2018, 9(1): 5092.
[5]	CHEN C. Mapping: a systematic review of the literature[J]. J Data Inf Sci, 2017, 2(2): 1-40.
[6]	YAN W, ZHENG K, WENG L, et al. Bibliometric evaluation of 2000-2019 publications on functional near-infrared spectroscopy[J]. Neuroimage, 2020, 220: 117121.
[7]	DONG Y, WENG L, HU Y, et al. Exercise for stroke rehabilitation: a bibliometric analysis of global research from 2001 to 2021[J]. Front Aging Neurosci, 2022, 14: 876954.
[8]	刘明月, 樊亚蕾, 张蒙, 等. 近10年脑机接口技术用于脑卒中康复领域的可视化分析[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2023, 29(2): 223-230. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2023.02.011
	LIU M Y, FAN Y L, ZHANG M, et al. Brain-computer interface technology for stroke in the past decade: a visualized analysis[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2023, 29(2): 223-230.
[9]	黄依杰, 李涓, 刘丹阳, 等. 近20年镜像疗法相关研究的可视化分析[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2019, 25(12): 1444-1449. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.12.013
	HUANG Y J, LI J, LIU D Y, et al. Researches of mirror therapy in recent 20 years: a visualization analysis using CiteSpace[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2019, 25(12): 1444-1449.
[10]	蒋鸿标. 三大中文期刊全文数据库质量述评[J]. 现代情报, 2015, 35(9): 84-88.
	JIANG H B. Review on the quality of 3 Chinese full-text journal databases[J]. Mod Inform, 2015, 35(9): 84-88.
[11]	LEFAUCHEUR J P, ANTAL A, AYACHE S S, et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2017, 128(1): 56-92.
[12]	BIKSON M, GROSSMAN P, THOMAS C, et al. Safety of transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence based update 2016[J]. Brain Stimul, 2016, 9(5): 641-661. doi: S1935-861X(16)30140-1 pmid: 27372845
[13]	LINDENBERG R, RENGA V, ZHU L L, et al. Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients[J]. Neurology, 2010, 75(24): 2176-2184. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318202013a pmid: 21068427
[14]	BOLOGNINI N, VALLAR G, CASATI C, et al. Neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS combined with constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients[J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2011, 25(9): 819-829. doi: 10.1177/1545968311411056 pmid: 21803933
[15]	FRIDRIKSSON J, RICHARDSON J D, BAKER J M, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves naming reaction time in fluent aphasia: a double-blind, sham-controlled study[J]. Stroke, 2011, 42(3): 819-821. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.600288 pmid: 21233468
[16]	KANG N, SUMMERS J J, CAURAUGH J H. Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates motor learning post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2016, 87(4): 345-355. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2015-311242 pmid: 26319437
[17]	TEDESCO TRICCAS L, BURRIDGE J H, HUGHES A M, et al. Multiple sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation and upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke: a review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2016, 127(1): 946-955. doi: S1388-2457(15)00307-7 pmid: 25998205
[18]	BAKER J M, RORDEN C, FRIDRIKSSON J. Using transcranial direct-current stimulation to treat stroke patients with aphasia[J]. Stroke, 2010, 41(6): 1229-1236. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.576785 pmid: 20395612
[19]	ROSSI C, SALLUSTIO F, Di LEGGE S, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the affected hemisphere does not accelerate recovery of acute stroke patients[J]. Eur J Neurol, 2013, 20(1): 202-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03703.x pmid: 22448901
[20]	FIORI V, COCCIA M, MARINELLI C V, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves word retrieval in healthy and nonfluent aphasic subjects[J]. J Cogn Neurosci, 2011, 23(9): 2309-2323.
[21]	NITSCHE M A, PAULUS W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation[J]. J Physiol, 2000, 527(Pt 3): 633-639.
[22]	HUMMEL F, COHEN L G. Improvement of motor function with noninvasive cortical stimulation in a patient with chronic stroke[J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2005, 19(1): 14-19.
[23]	ELSNER B, KUGLER J, POHL M, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in adults with aphasia after stroke[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019, 5(5): CD009760.
[24]	CHAMORRO-HINOJOSA J A, MOLINA-RUEDA F, CARRATALÁ-TEJADA M. Transcranial direct current stimulation in the treatment of gait disturbance in post-stroke patients: an overview of systematic reviews[J]. Sensors (Basel), 2023, 23(23): 9301.
[25]	MONTI A, COGIAMANIAN F, MARCEGLIA S, et al. Improved naming after transcranial direct current stimulation in aphasia[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2008, 79(4): 451-453. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.135277 pmid: 18096677
[26]	FUSCO A, DE ANGELIS D, MORONE G, et al. The ABC of tDCS: effects of anodal, bilateral and cathodal montages of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with stroke: a pilot study[J]. Stroke Res Treat, 2013, 2013: 837595.
[27]	MULLER C O, MUTHALIB M, MOTTET D, et al. Recovering arm function in chronic stroke patients using combined anodal HD-tDCS and virtual reality therapy (ReArm): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2021, 22(1): 747.
[28]	KIM H, KIM J, LEE G, et al. Task-related hemodynamic changes induced by high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation in chronic stroke patients: an uncontrolled pilot fNIRS study[J]. Brain Sci, 2022, 12(4): 453.
[29]	KUO I J, TANG C W, TSAI Y A, et al. Neurophysiological signatures of hand motor response to dual-transcranial direct current stimulation in subacute stroke: a TMS and MEG study[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2020, 17(1): 72.
[30]	OTAL B, DUTTA A, FOERSTER A, et al. Opportunities for guided multichannel non-invasive transcranial current stimulation in poststroke rehabilitation[J]. Front Neurol, 2016, 7: 21. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00021 pmid: 26941708
[31]	MAZZOLENI S, TRAN V D, IARDELLA L, et al. Randomized, sham-controlled trial based on transcranial direct current stimulation and wrist robot-assisted integrated treatment on subacute stroke patients: intermediate results[J]. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot, 2017, 2017: 555-560. doi: 10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009306 pmid: 28813878
[32]	NARAYAN S K, JAYAN J, ARUMUGAM M. Short-term effect of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques on motor impairment in chronic ischemic stroke: a systematic review with meta-analysis[J]. Neurol India, 2022, 70(1): 37-49. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.338700 pmid: 35263851
[33]	PINTO E F, GUPTA A, KULKARNI G B, et al. A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study of transcranial direct current stimulation as an augmentation intervention for the attenuation of motor deficits in patients with stroke[J]. J ECT, 2021, 37(4): 281-290. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000769 pmid: 33840803
[34]	BORNHEIM S, CROISIER J L, MAQUET P, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation associated with physical-therapy in acute stroke patients: a randomized, triple blind, sham-controlled study[J]. Brain Stimul, 2020, 13(2): 329-336.
[35]	BAI X, GUO Z, HE L, et al. Different therapeutic effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on upper and lower limb recovery of stroke patients with motor dysfunction: a meta-analysis[J]. Neural Plast, 2019, 2019: 1372138.
[36]	GEROIN C, PICELLI A, MUNARI D, et al. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted gait training in patients with chronic stroke: a preliminary comparison[J]. Clin Rehabil, 2011, 25(6): 537-548. doi: 10.1177/0269215510389497 pmid: 21402651
[37]	NITSCHE M A, DOEMKES S, KARAKOSE T, et al. Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex[J]. J Neurophysiol, 2007, 97(4): 3109-3117. doi: 10.1152/jn.01312.2006 pmid: 17251360
[38]	COMINO-SUAREZ N, MORENO J C, GOMEZ-SORIANO J, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with robotic therapy for upper and lower limb function after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2021, 18(1): 148.
[39]	BRADNAM L V, STINEAR C M, BARBER P A, et al. Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke[J]. Cereb Cortex, 2012, 22(11): 2662-2671. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr344 pmid: 22139791
[40]	HORDACRE B, MCCAMBRIDGE A B, RIDDING M C, et al. Can Transcranial direct current stimulation enhance poststroke motor recovery? Development of a theoretical patient-tailored model[J]. Neurology, 2021, 97(4): 170-180. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012187 pmid: 33986136
[41]	DE AGUIAR V, BASTIAANSE R, CAPASSO R, et al. Can tDCS enhance item-specific effects and generalization after linguistically motivated aphasia therapy for verbs?[J]. Front Behav Neurosci, 2015, 9: 190. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00190 pmid: 26903832
[42]	YOU D S, KIM D Y, CHUN M H, et al. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the right Wernicke's area improves comprehension in subacute stroke patients[J]. Brain Lang, 2011, 119(1): 1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.05.002 pmid: 21641021
[43]	MEINZER M, DARKOW R, LINDENBERG R, et al. Electrical stimulation of the motor cortex enhances treatment outcome in post-stroke aphasia[J]. Brain, 2016, 139(Pt 4): 1152-1163. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww002 pmid: 26912641
[44]	MARANGOLO P, FIORI V, CALTAGIRONE C, et al. Transcranial cerebellar direct current stimulation enhances verb generation but not verb naming in poststroke aphasia[J]. J Cogn Neurosci, 2018, 30(2): 188-199.
[45]	MINHAS P, BANSAL V, PATEL J, et al. Electrodes for high-definition transcutaneous DC stimulation for applications in drug delivery and electrotherapy, including tDCS[J]. J Neurosci Methods, 2010, 190(2): 188-197.
[46]	PIPATSRISAWAT S, KLAPHAJONE J, KITISAK K, et al. Effects of combining two techniques of non-invasive brain stimulation in subacute stroke patients: a pilot study[J]. BMC Neurol, 2022, 22(1): 98.
[47]	WANG H, WANG X, JIN J, et al. Simultaneous stimulation using rTMS and tDCS produces the most effective modulation of motor cortical excitability in healthy subjects: a pilot study[J]. Neurosci Lett, 2019, 694: 46-50. doi: S0304-3940(18)30717-1 pmid: 30342993
[48]	彭通, 赵雅宁, 刘瑶, 等. 三种类型经颅直流电刺激对脑卒中上肢偏瘫患者干预效果的网状Meta分析[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2022, 22(12): 1436-1444.
	PENG T, ZHAO Y N, LIU Y, et al. Efficacy of three types of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with upper limb hemiparesis after stroke: a network meta-analysis[J]. Chin J Evid Based Med, 2022, 22(12): 1436-1444.
[49]	金明滢, 王俊华, 刘飞, 等. 经颅直流电刺激结合Walker View步行训练系统对早期脑卒中患者步行功能的影响[J]. 湖北医药学院学报, 2020, 39(3): 244-248.
	JING M Y, WANG J H, LIU F, et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with Walker View walking training system on walking function in early stroke patients[J]. J Hubei Univ Med, 2020, 39(3): 244-248.
[50]	程攀, 金红姝, 郑杰, 等. 经颅直流电刺激与电针治疗中风偏瘫上肢痉挛的临床对照研究[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2015, 33(8): 1994-1997.
	CHENG P, JING H S, ZHENG J, et al. Clinical research on transcranial direct current stimulation and electrical acupuncture therapy for upper limb spasticity after stroke[J]. Chin Arch Tradit Chin Med, 2015, 33(8): 1994-1997.
[51]	贾博惟. 经颅直流电刺激结合针刺治疗卒中后认知功能的临床研究[D]. 沈阳: 辽宁中医药大学, 2020.
	JIA B W. Effect of scalp acupuncture combined with transcranial direct current stimulation on patients with cognitive impariment after stroke[D]. Shenyang: Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2020.
[52]	李南华, 方荣金, 陈重捷, 等. 针刺廉泉联合经颅直流电刺激治疗脑卒中后吞咽障碍临床观察[J]. 光明中医, 2020, 35(22): 3607-3610.
[53]	MORONE G, CAPONE F, IOSA M, et al. May dual transcranial direct current stimulation enhance the efficacy of robot-assisted therapy for promoting upper limb recovery in chronic stroke?[J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2022, 36(12): 800-809. doi: 10.1177/15459683221138743 pmid: 36458455
[54]	ANG K K, GUAN C, PHUA K S, et al. Facilitating effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor imagery brain-computer interface with robotic feedback for stroke rehabilitation[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2015, 96(3 Suppl): S79-S87.
[55]	YAO X, CUI L, WANG J, et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation with virtual reality on upper limb function in patients with ischemic stroke: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2020, 17(1): 73.
[56]	SALAMEH A, MCCABE J, SKELLY M, et al. Stance phase gait training post stroke using simultaneous transcranial direct current stimulation and motor learning-based virtual reality-assisted therapy: protocol development and initial testing[J]. Brain Sci, 2022, 12(6): 701.
[57]	MURASE N, DUQUE J, MAZZOCCHIO R, et al. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke[J]. Ann Neurol, 2004, 55(3): 400-409. doi: 10.1002/ana.10848 pmid: 14991818
[58]	FREGNI F, BOGGIO P S, MANSUR C G, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients[J]. Neuroreport, 2005, 16(14): 1551-1555. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000177010.44602.5e pmid: 16148743
[59]	BOGGIO P S, NUNES A, RIGONATTI S P, et al. Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients[J]. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2007, 25(2): 123-129.
[60]	RIECKER A, GRÖSCHEL K, ACKERMANN H, et al. The role of the unaffected hemisphere in motor recovery after stroke[J]. Hum Brain Mapp, 2010, 31(7): 1017-1029. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20914 pmid: 20091792
[61]	DI PINO G, PELLEGRINO G, ASSENZA G, et al. Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2014, 10(10): 597-608. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.162 pmid: 25201238
[62]	LLORENS R, FUENTES M A, BORREGO A, et al. Effectiveness of a combined transcranial direct current stimulation and virtual reality-based intervention on upper limb function in chronic individuals post-stroke with persistent severe hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2021, 18(1): 108.
[63]	CHEW E, TEO W P, TANG N, et al. Using transcranial direct current stimulation to augment the effect of motor imagery-assisted brain-computer interface training in chronic stroke patients: cortical reorganization considerations[J]. Front Neurol, 2020, 11: 948.
[64]	VLOTINOU P, TSIPTSIOS D, KARATZETZOU S, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation in conjunction with mirror therapy for upper extremity rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients[J]. Maedica (Bucur), 2022, 17(1): 169-176.
[65]	MAROTTA N, DEMECO A, MOGGIO L, et al. The adjunct of transcranial direct current stimulation to robot-assisted therapy in upper limb post-stroke treatment[J]. J Med Eng Technol, 2021, 45(6): 494-501.
[66]	ELSNER B, KUGLER J, POHL M, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2020, 11(11): D9645.
[67]	BEGEMANN M J, BRAND B A, CURCIC-BLAKE B, et al. Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive functioning in brain disorders: a meta-analysis[J]. Psychol Med, 2020, 50(15): 2465-2486. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720003670 pmid: 33070785
[68]	KARATZETZOU S, TSIPTSIOS D, TERZOUDI A, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation implementation on stroke prognosis[J]. Neurol Sci, 2022, 43(2): 873-888.
[69]	YANG S, LI R, LI H, et al. Exploring the use of brain-computer interfaces in stroke neurorehabilitation[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2021, 2021: 9967348.
[70]	FIORI V, NITSCHE M A, CUCUZZA G, et al. High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation improves verb recovery in aphasic patients depending on current intensity[J]. Neuroscience, 2019, 406: 159-166. doi: S0306-4522(19)30161-7 pmid: 30876982

期刊名称	频次	中心性
Stroke	584	0.02
Clin Neurophysiol	535	0.05
Brain Stimul	517	0.07
Neurorehabil Neural Repair	502	0.01
Neurology	499	0.01

经颅直流电刺激在脑卒中康复中应用的文献计量分析

Application of transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke rehabilitation: a bibliometrics analysis

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 14

参考文献 70

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

国家	频次	中心性
美国	225	0.35
意大利	86	0.38
德国	84	0.28
中国	68	0.07
英国	57	0.33

关键词	频次	中心性	关键词	频次	中心性
transcranial magnetic stimulation	294	0.02	失语	41	0.39
non-invasive brain stimulation	198	0.00	吞咽障碍	37	0.19
motor cortex	175	0.00	上肢	30	0.47
brain stimulation	152	0.18	认知功能	23	0.18
excitability	148	0.02	针刺治疗	20	0.29
cortex	105	0.29	运动功能	19	0.39
upper limb	85	0.23	偏瘫	18	0.32
modulation	80	0.11	综述	10	0.07
plasticity	78	0.01	抑郁	8	0.04
motor recovery	73	0.13	镜像疗法	7	0.15

文献	频次
Lefaucheur等^[11] (2017)	67
Bikson等^[12] (2016)	54
Lindenberg等^[13] (2010)	54
Bolognini等^[14] (2011)	51
Fridriksson等^[15] (2011)	45
Kang等^[16] (2016)	43
Tedesco Triccas等^[17] (2016)	43
Baker等^[18] (2010)	40
Rossi等^[19] (2013)	39
Fiori等^[20] (2011)	39

[1]	郭桐桐, 张欣怡, 嵇丽红, 董志伟, 李宗润, 王立端, 蔡伟芹, 高倩倩, 井淇, 郑文贵. 我国残疾人康复政策量化研究：基于政策建模一致性指数模型[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(6): 621-629.
[2]	叶睿雪, 王玉龙, 高焱, 薛凯文, 张泽宇, 闫杰, 邹瑜聪, 但果. 中国多层次康复服务体系文献计量分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(6): 630-638.
[3]	荣先凤, 李方晖, 谭嘉俐. 基于世界卫生组织康复胜任力架构建设运动康复专业[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(6): 639-647.
[4]	胥琪玲, 姜晓煜, 毕鸿雁. 近10年非侵入性脑刺激治疗帕金森病的文献计量分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(6): 665-674.
[5]	李艳丽, 刘兰群, 徐基民, 王海芳. 脑卒中后足下垂相关研究的文献计量分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(6): 686-692.
[6]	张哲, 董献文, 徐成铭, 胡文静, 贺婷丽, 崔鑫鑫, 徐红艳, 周章盈, 韩雅男. 近10年脑电图应用于孤独症谱系障碍领域研究的文献计量分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(6): 693-700.
[7]	杨世宁, 马将, 李红, 郭立颖, 刘先莹, 张莉芳. 不同病程脑卒中患者上肢体感诱发电位与感觉、运动功能的相关性[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(6): 701-708.
[8]	王雪, 王立平, 宋宁, 刘兰群, 周洁, 吴珺. 脑卒中后眼球运动障碍行为视觉训练的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(6): 726-730.
[9]	韦添元, 林煜凡, 何怡, 宋明洁, 李晁金子, 张庆苏, 杜晓霞. 计算机辅助训练对脑卒中后构音障碍患者的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(5): 520-525.
[10]	徐冬艳, 王卫宁, 潘力, 刘罡, 刘加鹏, 吴毅, 朱玉连. 基于丰富环境理论的多感官反馈步态训练对脑卒中患者步行功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(5): 526-534.
[11]	熊杏秀, 张正辉, 邓春燕, 李云波, 陈镇鹏, 李元杰, 宋景. 减重结合功能性电刺激对脑卒中患者下肢运动功能的疗效[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(5): 554-559.
[12]	崔志刚, 晋陶然, 刘四海, 王飞, 刘克敏, 李建军. 创伤后膝关节松解术后关节活动度反弹现象及其影响因素[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(5): 565-569.
[13]	卫宁, 曾艳玲, 蒋娜, 张倩, 益筱哲, 王建云, 王登廷, 张艳, 裴泓波, 黄朝荣. 家长医患沟通效能对孤独症谱系障碍儿童康复效果的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(5): 577-585.
[14]	杨亚茹, 杨剑, 邱服冰, 宋贝贝, 王少璞, 肖晓飞, 彭一峰. 深圳市重度残疾人居家康复体育活动的健康效益[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(5): 586-590.
[15]	唐乐天, 刘妤姝, 杨亚茹, 崔良波, 肖晓飞. 基于世界卫生组织康复胜任力架构构建辅助技术专业本科课程体系[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(5): 591-597.