Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 822-829.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2025.07.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation on post-stroke depression

SHAN Lei(), LIU Ying, ZHANG Xin, CHI Qianqian, ZHU Xiaomin   

  1. Department of Neurological Rehabilitation, Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China
  • Received:2024-12-12 Revised:2025-06-23 Published:2025-07-25 Online:2025-07-30
  • Contact: SHAN Lei, E-mail: shanlei_cn@sina.com
  • Supported by:
    China Rehabilitation Research Center Project (General)(2021zx-17)

Abstract:

Objective To explore the effect of accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) on post-stroke depression (PSD).

Methods From July, 2021 to July, 2023, 48 PSD patients in Beijing Bo'ai Hospital were randomly assigned to control group (n = 16), high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) group (n = 16) and aiTBS group (n = 16). aiTBS group received left-sided aiTBS treatment at dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), HF-rTMS group received left-sided 10 Hz rTMS treatment at DLPFC, and the control group received left-sided sham stimulation treatment, for three weeks. They were evaluated with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) before and after treatment, and one month of follow-up.

Results One case dropped down in each group. The inter-group effect, intra-group effect and interaction effect of HAMD, HAMA and BDI scores were all significant (F > 3.235, P < 0.05). The post-hoc test results showed that the scores of HAMD, HMMA and BDI were lower in HF-rTMS group and aiTBS group than in the control group (P< 0.05), and no significant difference was found between HF-rTMS group and aiTBS group (P > 0.05). There was significant difference in the effective rate of depression improvement among three groups (χ2= 7.834, P = 0.019), the effective rate was higher in aiTBS group than in the control group (P < 0.017), and no significant difference was found between HF-rTMS group and aiTBS group (P > 0.017).

Conclusion aiTBS can improve the depression and anxiety symptoms of patients with PSD, with shorter treatment time, compared with HF-rTMS.

Key words: post-stroke depression, intermittent theta burst stimulation, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, Beck Depression Inventory

CLC Number: