《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》 ›› 2018, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (12): 1417-1421.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.12.012

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Advance in Measurement Instruments of Return-to-work (review)

GUO Ya-wen, FU Bo, MEI Yong-xia, LIN Bei-lei, ZHANG Zhen-xiang   

  1. The Nursing College of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China
  • Received:2018-07-13 Revised:2018-09-11 Published:2018-12-25 Online:2019-01-04
  • Contact: ZHANG Zhen-xiang. E-mail: zhangzx6666@126.com
  • Supported by:
    Henan Science and Technology Research Project (No. 182102310198)

Abstract: There are many return-to-work measurement instruments, including return-to-work ability, return-to-work self-efficacy, readiness for return-to-work and obstacles to return-to-work. This paper reviewed the return-to-work measurement instruments, content, evaluation method, targeting group, reliability and validity of measurements, and summarized its advantages and disadvantages. It could provide reference for construction of vocational rehabilitation programs and improvement of evaluation of the effect.

Key words: return to work, measurement instruments, review

CLC Number: