《人体损伤致残程度分级》与《永久残损评定指南》的比较研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.02.021

《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》 ›› 2019, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 239-243.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.02.021

Previous Articles Next Articles

Comparison of Classification of the Impairment Related to Injury and Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment

ZHOU Jing, WANG Xu

1.Key Laboratory of Evidence Science, Ministry of Education， China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China
2. Collaborative Innovation Center of Judicial Civilization， China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China
3. Forensic Science Standards Research Center, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China
4. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Scene Evidence, Shanghai 200083, China

Received:2018-06-19 Revised:2018-10-17 Published:2019-02-25 Online:2019-04-01
Contact: WANG Xu. E-mail: wangxu0409@126.com
Supported by:
Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Sciences Fund (No. 18YJA820018 and No. 10YJA820105)

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To perfect disability assessment in China. Methods The nature and method of disability compensation inside and outside China were reviewed, as well as the promulgation of disability assessment outside the region. The Classification of the Impairment Related to Injury was analyzed based on the Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (GEPI). Results The Classification of the Impairment Related to Injury was consistent with GEPI in general, but there also were some problems, such as the omission of clauses, and lacking the promoted principle of multiple injury. Conclusion The Classification of the Impairment Related to Injury is universal. But it needs to take quantification of impairment of GEPI as reference, and refine the principle and supplement of the promoted principle, to meet the practical needs of disability assessment in China.

Key words: disability assessment, Classification of the Impairment Related to Injury, Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment

CLC Number:

R492

ZHOU Jing, WANG Xu. Comparison of Classification of the Impairment Related to Injury and Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2019, 25(2): 239-243.

References

[1] 蔡颖雯,郑晓鹏. 最高人民法院侵权责任法司法解释精释精解[M]. 北京:中国法制出版社, 2016: 208-228.
[2] 何勤华,李秀清. 外国民商法[M]. 上海:复旦大学出版社, 2015: 345-349.
[3] Mendelson G, Mendelson D. Current and Future Evidence in Personal Damage Evaluation [M]// Santo Ferrara D. P5 Medicine and Justice: Innovation, Unitariness and Evidence. Berlin: Springer International Publishing AG, 2017: 296-329.
[4] 《道路交通事故人员伤残评定》研究组. 道路交通事故伤残评定操作指南与实务研究[M]. 北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2004: 4.
[5] 李沁燚,邱卓英,陈迪,等. 基于ICF构建国家功能、残疾和健康的信息架构和数据体系[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2017, 23(4): 385-389.
[6] 王军,刘春梅. 英国人身伤害之非金钱损失赔偿制度研究——兼论对我国相关制度的构建[J]. 北方法学, 2009, 3(1): 19-29.
[7] Capek K D, Hughes B D, Warden G D. Functional sequelae and disability assessment [J]. Total Burn Care, 2018: 673-678.
[8] 杨天潼,向思阳. GEPI关于多项残损的复合计算溯源——兼谈《伤残分级》晋级问题[J]. 证据科学, 2017, 25(3): 281-288.
[9] Robert D R, Elizabeth G, Richard T K, et al. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment [M]. 6th ed. Chicago: American Medical Association, 2008: 490-512.
[10] 杨天潼,向思阳. 美国GEPI伤残标准之争议[J]. 东方论坛, 2017(3): 281-288.
[11] Yang T, Xiang S. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment and workers' compensation [J]. Evidence Science, 2017, 1: 88-95.
[12] Leclair N, Leclair S, Brigham C R. The Medical Model of Impairment [M]// Goldstein S, Naglieri J A. Assessing Impairment. New York: Springer Science+Bussiness Media, 2009: 59-75.
[13] Rondinelli R D. Commentary on reliability of the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment [J]. J Occup Environ Med, 2010, 52 (12): 5-30.
[14] 王旭. 我国法医临床学鉴定标准现状与展望[J]. 中国法医学杂志, 2016, 31(5): 433-436.
[15] 范飞,胥科,樊迪. 听力减退及相关残疾标准比较研究[J]. 证据科学, 2017, 25(3): 289-306.
[16] Warren P A. The usage of the AMA Guides, for the determination of psychological injury within the State and Federal Workers’ Compensation Systems [J]. Psychol Injury Law, 2016, 9(4): 313-340.

Comparison of Classification of the Impairment Related to Injury and Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 10

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	XU Yue-ying, ZHENG Jie-jiao, XIA Wen, LI Yong, XU Guo-hui, DUAN Lin-ru, QU Bing, QIU Zhuo-ying. Functioning Evaluation for Patients with Chronic Diseases Using World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2019, 25(9): 993-999.
[2]	BAI Li-ming, LI Xin-ping, QIU Zhuo-ying, ZHANG Ming-sheng, MA Hong-zhuo, LI An-qiao. Evaluation of Functioning for Aging Patients with Stroke Using World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2019, 25(9): 1000-1003.
[3]	WANG Xu, CHEN Jun, JIN Kang-jia. Development of Standards of Disability in China and Comparison with Foreign Countries [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2019, 25(9): 1060-1065.
[4]	SHI Hong-mei, WU Ming, LI An-qiao. Functioning and Disability for Patients with Spinal Cord Injury or Traumatic Brain Injury: Accessed with WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 Chinese Version [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2017, 23(6): 741-744.
[5]	FU Yan-ling;QIU Zhuo-ying;LI Qin-yi. Functioning of Outpatients with Chronic Diseases Using World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2015, 21(09): 999-1001.
[6]	ZHUANG Zhi- ping;LAI Guo-zhou;LIU Shi-wen;QIU Zhuo-ying;CHEN Di. . Functioning and Inclusive Development of Persons with Disabilities in Longgang, Shenzhen, China [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2014, 20(9): 812-814.
[7]	HUNG Anchor Tak-fung;CHEUNG Mike Kwun-ting;POON Peter King-kong;et al.. Difficulty in Activity and Participation among Persons with Disabilities and Chronic Illness in Hong Kong SAR with WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS 2.0) [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2014, 20(6): 508-512.
[8]	SHI Hong-mei;WANG Kuei-yuan;ZHANG Jing;CHEN Di. Activity and Participation Assessment of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: Study with WHO-DAS 2.0 Chinese Version [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2014, 20(11): 1060-1062.
[9]	SANG De-chun;JI Shu-rong;ZHANG Ying;et al.. Application of Community Extremity Impairment Assessment Schedule in Community Rehabilitation for Stroke [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2011, 17(12): 1116-1118.
[10]	HE Yan-yan;QIU Zhuo-ying. Assessment of the Function of Disabled Athletes Using Disability Assessment Schedule Ⅱ(WHO-DAS Ⅱ) [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2006, 12(03): 268-269.