《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》 ›› 2019, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 377-380.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.04.002

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Test-retest Reliability of Lumbar Spine Position Sense for Aging People

GONG Di1, WANG Hui-fang2, LIU Xiao-chen1, HU Hao-yu1, ZHENG Yi-li1, WANG Xue-qiang1   

  1. 1.Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China
    2.Shanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Shanghai 201619, China
  • Received:2018-09-02 Revised:2018-10-08 Published:2019-04-20 Online:2019-04-24
  • Contact: WANG Xue-qiang, E-mail: qiang897@163.com
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China (General) (No. 81871844)

Abstract: Objective To determine the test-retest reliability of lumbar passive reposition accuracy for older people. Methods A total of 58 healthy older people stood on an isokinetic dynamometer, and passively moved their trunk forward and backward to the target positions as accurately as possible. The targeted positions were set as flexion forward 15°, 30° and 60°, and flexion backward 15°. The absolute error (AE) was recorded. They were tested again a week latter. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard errors of measurement (SEM and SEM%) were calculated. Results The ICC of AE was 0.699 to 0.833 for all the subjects, SEM was 1.18 to 3.26, and SEM% was 26.84% to 37.13%. For the men, the ICC was 0.462 to 0.818, SEM was 1.60 to 3.68, and SEM% was 36.37% to 48.78%. For the women, the ICC was 0.782 to 0.891, SEM was 1.48 to 2.71, and SEM% was 28.48% to 33.34%. Conclusions Lumbar passive reposition accuracy is some reliable to assess the position sense for older people. However, there are too large errors for clinical measurement, which need further improvment.

Key words: lumbar, proprioception, position sense, reliability, aged

CLC Number: