居家运动对肩袖损伤术后疼痛、功能和生活质量的效果

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2024.12.012

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To explore the effect of home exercise on pain, function and quality of life after operation for rotator cuff injury.

Methods From June, 2023 to June, 2024, 45 patients after operation for rotator cuff injury were selected from Xuzhou Rehabilitation Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University and Xuzhou Central Hospital, and randomly divided into conventional group (n = 15), home-based group (n = 15) and combined group (n = 15). The conventional group received an eight-week routine rehabilitation program in hospital, the home-based group received an eight-week home exercise prescription training, and the combined group first received four weeks of routine rehabilitation in hospital, and followed by four weeks of home exercise prescription training. They were assessed with Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS), University of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating scale (UCLA), Constant-Murley Score (CMS), range of motion (ROM) of shoulder, and the Short-form of Health Survey-36 (SF-36) before treatment, and four and eight weeks after treatment.

Results VAS scores decreased in all the three groups four and eight weeks after treatment (Z > 2.964, P< 0.001), which was the most in the home-based group four weeks after treatment (|Z| > 2.531, P< 0.05). The main effect of time was significant in scores of UCLA, CMS, and physical health and mental health of SF-36 (F > 498.102, P< 0.001), which improved after treatment (P< 0.001). The main effect of group was significant in score of mental health of SF-36 (F = 7.408, P= 0.002), which was the most in the home-based group four and eight weeks after treatment (P< 0.01). The interaction was significant in score of physical health of SF-36 (F = 10.138, P< 0.001), which was the least in the home-based group four weeks after treatment (P< 0.05). The main effect of time was significant in every direction of ROM, which improved after treatment (P< 0.001). The interaction was significant in ROM of abduction and external rotation (F > 4.059, P< 0.01), and almost significant in ROM of flexion (F = 2.412, P= 0.055). However, ROM of flexion was less in the home-based group than in the combined group four weeks after treatment (P= 0.047), which was less in the home-based group than in the conventional group eight weeks after treatment (P= 0.042); ROM of abduction was the least in the home-based group four weeks after treatment (P< 0.01), which was less in the home-based group than in the combined group eight weeks after treatment (P= 0.046); ROM of external rotation was less in the home-based group than in the combined group four weeks after treatment (P= 0.022).

Conclusion Home exercise is effective on pain, function and quality of life in patients after operation for rotator cuff injury. There are benefits with both home exercise and institution-based rehabilitation, and almost the same in a whole eight weeks after treatment.

Key words: rotator cuff injury, home rehabilitation, pain, quality of life

CLC Number:

R686

YANG Ting, ZHOU Jingjie, WANG Tao, ZHU Weiwei, CHU Fengming, CHEN Wei. Effect of home exercise on pain, function and quality of life after operation for rotator cuff injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2024, 30(12): 1461-1472.

Figures/Tables 12

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

Table 9

Post hoc LSD test results of effect of time and group of shoulder ROM"

变量	组别/时间	组别/时间	组别/时间	平均值差	P值	95%CI
变量	组别/时间	组别/时间	组别/时间	平均值差	P值	下限	上限
前屈ROM	常规组	治疗前	治疗4周后	-29.600	< 0.001	-34.213	-24.987
		治疗前	治疗8周后	-57.667	< 0.001	-63.247	-52.087
		治疗4周后	治疗8周后	-28.067	< 0.001	-32.808	-23.325
	联合组	治疗前	治疗4周后	-29.533	< 0.001	-34.147	-24.920
		治疗前	治疗8周后	-50.400	< 0.001	-55.980	-44.820
		治疗4周后	治疗8周后	-20.867	< 0.001	-25.608	-16.125
	居家组	治疗前	治疗4周后	-24.067	< 0.001	-28.680	-19.453
		治疗前	治疗8周后	-49.133	< 0.001	-54.713	-43.553
		治疗4周后	治疗8周后	-25.067	< 0.001	-29.808	-20.325
	治疗前	常规组	联合组	-3.000	0.683	-17.727	11.727
		常规组	居家组	4.333	0.556	-10.393	19.060
		联合组	居家组	7.333	0.321	-7.393	22.060
	治疗4周后	常规组	联合组	-2.933	0.642	-15.575	9.709
		常规组	居家组	9.867	0.123	-2.775	22.509
		联合组	居家组	12.800	0.047	0.158	25.442
	治疗8周后	常规组	联合组	4.267	0.491	-8.139	16.672
		常规组	居家组	12.867	0.042	0.461	25.272
		联合组	居家组	8.600	0.169	-3.805	21.005
外展ROM	常规组	治疗前	治疗4周后	-30.467	< 0.001	-34.176	-26.757
		治疗前	治疗8周后	-55.267	< 0.001	-60.846	-49.687
		治疗4周后	治疗8周后	-24.800	< 0.001	-29.072	-20.528
	联合组	治疗前	治疗4周后	-26.867	< 0.001	-30.576	-23.157
		治疗前	治疗8周后	-51.533	< 0.001	-57.113	-45.954
		治疗4周后	治疗8周后	-24.667	< 0.001	-28.939	-20.394
	居家组	治疗前	治疗4周后	-18.067	< 0.001	-21.776	-14.357
		治疗前	治疗8周后	-47.933	< 0.001	-53.513	-42.354
		治疗4周后	治疗8周后	-29.867	< 0.001	-34.139	-25.594
	治疗前	常规组	联合组	-4.133	0.409	-14.132	5.865
		常规组	居家组	2.000	0.689	-7.999	11.999
		联合组	居家组	6.133	0.223	-3.865	16.132
	治疗4周后	常规组	联合组	-0.533	0.906	-9.624	8.557
		常规组	居家组	14.400	0.003	5.310	23.490
		联合组	居家组	14.933	0.002	5.843	24.024
	治疗8周后	常规组	联合组	-0.400	0.933	-9.931	9.131
		常规组	居家组	9.333	0.055	-0.198	18.865
		联合组	居家组	9.733	0.046	0.202	19.265
外旋ROM	常规组	治疗前	治疗4周后	-13.933	< 0.001	-16.673	-11.194
		治疗前	治疗8周后	-32.733	< 0.001	-35.825	-29.641
		治疗4周后	治疗8周后	-18.800	< 0.001	-21.087	-16.513
	联合组	治疗前	治疗4周后	-7.467	< 0.001	-10.206	-4.727
		治疗前	治疗8周后	-25.933	< 0.001	-29.025	-22.841
		治疗4周后	治疗8周后	-18.467	< 0.001	-20.754	-16.180
	居家组	治疗前	治疗4周后	-6.800	< 0.001	-9.540	-4.060
		治疗前	治疗8周后	-26.733	< 0.001	-29.825	-23.641
		治疗4周后	治疗8周后	-19.933	< 0.001	-22.220	-17.646
	治疗前	常规组	联合组	-4.000	0.124	-9.136	1.136
		常规组	居家组	-1.867	0.467	-7.003	3.269
		联合组	居家组	2.133	0.407	-3.003	7.269
	治疗4周后	常规组	联合组	2.467	0.271	-2.001	6.934
		常规组	居家组	5.267	0.022	0.799	9.734
		联合组	居家组	2.800	0.213	-1.667	7.267
	治疗8周后	常规组	联合组	2.800	0.181	-1.357	6.957
		常规组	居家组	4.133	0.051	-0.023	8.290
		联合组	居家组	1.333	0.521	-2.823	5.490

Table 9

Table 10

Table 11

Table 12

Post hoc LSD test results of effect of time and group of SF-36 score"

变量	组别/时间	组别/时间	组别/时间	平均值差	P值	95%CI
变量	组别/时间	组别/时间	组别/时间	平均值差	P值	下限	上限
生理健康	常规组	治疗前	治疗4周后	-18.083	< 0.001	-20.561	-15.606
		治疗前	治疗8周后	-23.833	< 0.001	-26.701	-20.966
		治疗4周后	治疗8周后	-5.750	< 0.001	-7.609	-3.891
	联合组	治疗前	治疗4周后	-18.667	< 0.001	-21.144	-16.189
		治疗前	治疗8周后	-25.500	< 0.001	-28.367	-22.633
		治疗4周后	治疗8周后	-6.833	< 0.001	-8.693	-4.974
	居家组	治疗前	治疗4周后	-9.083	< 0.001	-11.561	-6.606
		治疗前	治疗8周后	-20.417	< 0.001	-23.284	-17.549
		治疗4周后	治疗8周后	-11.333	< 0.001	-13.193	-9.474
	治疗前	常规组	联合组	0.833	0.769	-4.867	6.533
		常规组	居家组	-2.833	0.322	-8.533	2.867
		联合组	居家组	-3.667	0.201	-9.367	2.033
	治疗4周后	常规组	联合组	0.250	0.915	-4.471	4.971
		常规组	居家组	6.167	0.012	1.446	10.887
		联合组	居家组	5.917	0.015	1.196	10.637
	治疗8周后	常规组	联合组	-0.833	0.648	-4.493	2.827
		常规组	居家组	0.583	0.749	-3.077	4.243
		联合组	居家组	1.417	0.439	-2.243	5.077
心理健康	常规组	治疗前	治疗4周后	-11.404	< 0.001	-13.442	-9.365
		治疗前	治疗8周后	-20.811	< 0.001	-23.749	-17.873
		治疗4周后	治疗8周后	-9.407	< 0.001	-11.657	-7.158
	联合组	治疗前	治疗4周后	-10.611	< 0.001	-12.650	-8.573
		治疗前	治疗8周后	-20.581	< 0.001	-23.519	-17.644
		治疗4周后	治疗8周后	-9.970	< 0.001	-12.219	-7.721
	居家组	治疗前	治疗4周后	-14.381	< 0.001	-16.420	-12.343
		治疗前	治疗8周后	-24.556	< 0.001	-27.493	-21.618
		治疗4周后	治疗8周后	-10.174	< 0.001	-12.423	-7.925
	治疗前	常规组	联合组	2.500	0.333	-2.656	7.656
		常规组	居家组	-2.602	0.314	-7.758	2.555
		联合组	居家组	-5.102	0.052	-10.258	0.055
	治疗4周后	常规组	联合组	3.293	0.085	-0.470	7.055
		常规组	居家组	-5.580	0.005	-9.342	-1.817
		联合组	居家组	-8.872	< 0.001	-12.635	-5.110
	治疗8周后	常规组	联合组	2.730	0.235	-1.846	7.305
		常规组	居家组	-6.346	0.008	-10.922	-1.771
		联合组	居家组	-9.076	< 0.001	-13.652	-4.500

Table 12

References 34

[1]	HUEGEL J, WILLIAMS A A, SOSLOWSKY L J. Rotator cuff biology and biomechanics: a review of normal and pathological conditions[J]. Curr Rheumatol Rep, 2015, 17(1): 476. doi: 10.1007/s11926-014-0476-x pmid: 25475598
[2]	CANDELA V, LONGO U G, DI NARO C, et al. A historical analysis of randomized controlled trials in rotator cuff tears[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(18): 6863.
[3]	LONGO U G, RISI AMBROGIONI L, BERTON A, et al. Physical therapy and precision rehabilitation in shoulder rotator cuff disease[J]. Int Orthop, 2020, 44(5): 893-903. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04511-2 pmid: 32157371
[4]	LIU Y C, HUANG S W, ADAMS C R, et al. Preoperative handgrip strength can predict early postoperative shoulder function in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2024, 19(1): 270.
[5]	NASERI F, DADGOO M, POURAHMADI M, et al. Dry needling in a multimodal rehabilitation protocol following rotator cuff repair surgery: study protocol for a double-blinded randomized sham-controlled trial[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2023, 24(1): 330.
[6]	YAMAMOTO A, TAKAGISHI K, OSAWA T, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2010, 19(1): 116-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.04.006 pmid: 19540777
[7]	HINSLEY H, GANDERTON C, ARDEN N K, et al. Prevalence of rotator cuff tendon tears and symptoms in a Chingford general population cohort, and the resultant impact on UK health services: a cross-sectional observational study[J]. BMJ Open, 2022, 12(9): e059175.
[8]	RYU K, KO D, LIM G, et al. Ultrasound-guided prolotherapy with polydeoxyribonucleotide for painful rotator cuff tendinopathy[J]. Pain Res Manag, 2018, 2018: 8286190.
[9]	YAMAGUCHI K, DITSIOS K, MIDDLETON W D, et al. The demographic and morphological features of rotator cuff disease. A comparison of asymptomatic and symptomatic shoulders[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, 88(8): 1699-1704. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00835 pmid: 16882890
[10]	STENGAARD K, HEJBØL E K, JENSEN P T, et al. Early-stage inflammation changes in supraspinatus muscle after rotator cuff tear[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2022, 31(7): 1344-1356.
[11]	单洁玲, 周倩, 张静, 等. 肩袖损伤的超声诊断应用进展[J]. 中国医学计算机成像杂志, 2020, 26(6): 594-598.
	SHAN J L, ZHOU Q, ZHANG J, et al. The diagnostic progress of ultrasonography in rotator cuff injuries[J]. Chin Comput Med Imag, 2020, 26(6): 594-598.
[12]	WEBER S, CHAHAL J. Case studies AAOS clinical practice guideline: management of rotator cuff injuries[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2021, 29(3): e104-e108. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00450 pmid: 33156216
[13]	PIPER C C, HUGHES A J, MA Y, et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment for the management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2018, 27(3): 572-576. doi: S1058-2746(17)30628-6 pmid: 29169957
[14]	LEE B G, CHO N S, RHEE Y G. Effect of two rehabilitation protocols on range of motion and healing rates after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: aggressive versus limited early passive exercises[J]. Arthroscopy, 2012, 28(1): 34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.07.012 pmid: 22014477
[15]	«运动处方中国专家共识2023»专家组. 运动处方中国专家共识(2023)[J]. 中国运动医学杂志, 2023, 42(1): 3-13.
[16]	祝莉, 王正珍, 朱为模. 健康中国视域中的运动处方库构建[J]. 体育科学, 2020, 40(1): 4-15.
	ZHU L, WANG Z Z, ZHU W M. Construction of exercise prescription database under the vision of healthy China[J]. Chin Sport Sci, 2020, 40(1): 4-15.
[17]	中华医学会. 临床诊疗指南骨科分册[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2009: 63.
	Chinese Medical Association. Clinical diagnosis and treatment guide: orthopedics[M]. Beijing: People's Health Publishing House, 2009: 63.
[18]	SHAFSHAK T S, ELNEMR R. The visual analogue scale versus numerical rating scale in measuring pain severity and predicting disability in low back pain[J]. J Clin Rheumatol, 2021, 27(7): 282-285.
[19]	XU S, CHEN J Y, HAO Y, et al. Threshold scores for treatment success after arthroscopic bankart repair using Oxford Shoulder Instability Score, Constant-Murley Score, and UCLA shoulder score[J]. J Orthop, 2020, 22: 242-245.
[20]	田子睿, 姚敏, 王拥军, 等. 中文版Constant-Murley肩关节评分量表的研制与应用[J]. 中医正骨, 2019, 31(5): 20-21, 25.
[21]	TÜRKMEN E, ANALAY AKBABA Y, ALTUN S. Effectiveness of video-based rehabilitation program on pain, functionality, and quality of life in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Hand Ther, 2020, 33(3): 288-295. doi: S0894-1130(18)30396-X pmid: 32197805
[22]	LONGO U G, BERTON A, RISI AMBROGIONI L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of supervised versus unsupervised rehabilitation for rotator-cuff repair: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(8): 2852.
[23]	AGUADO H J, VENTURA-WICHNER P S, PEREZ-HICKMAN L, et al. Patient satisfaction using a home-based rehabilitation protocol for the non-surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a prospective longitudinal cohort study[J]. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil, 2021, 12: 21514593211040293.
[24]	MUÑOZ-TOMÁS M T, BURILLO-LAFUENTE M, VICENTE-PARRA A, et al. Telerehabilitation as a therapeutic exercise tool versus face-to-face physiotherapy: a systematic review[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2023, 20(5): 4358.
[25]	AMIN J, AHMAD B, AMIN S, et al. Rehabilitation professional and patient satisfaction with telerehabilitation of musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2022, 2022: 7366063.
[26]	张东芳, 王丰坤, 杨国栋, 等. 关节镜下肩袖修复术后早期疼痛影响因素分析[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2022, 36(3): 284-290.
	ZHANG D F, WANG F K, YANG G D, et al. Analysis of influencing factors of early pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair[J]. Chin J Repar Reconstruc Surg, 2022, 36(3): 284-290.
[27]	SACHINIS N P, YIANNAKOPOULOS C K, CHALIDIS B, et al. Biomolecules related to rotator cuff pain: a scoping review[J]. Biomolecules, 2022, 12(8): 1016.
[28]	WILLIAMS R C, MORRIS R P, EL BEAINO M, et al. Cortical suture button fixation vs. bicortical screw fixation in the latarjet procedure: a biomechanical comparison[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2020, 29(7): 1470-1478.
[29]	KARPPI P, RYÖSÄ A, KUKKONEN J, et al. Effectiveness of supervised physiotherapy after arthroscopic rotator cuff reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2020, 29(9): 1765-1774. doi: S1058-2746(20)30388-8 pmid: 32815806
[30]	SONG S J, JEONG T H, MOON J W, et al. Short-term comparison of supervised rehabilitation and home-based rehabilitation for earlier recovery of shoulder motion, pain, and function after rotator cuff repair[J]. Clin Shoulder Elb, 2018, 21(1): 15-21.
[31]	MARLEY W D, BARRATT A, PIGOTT T, et al. A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing gamification with remote monitoring against standard rehabilitation for patients after arthroscopic shoulder surgery[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2022, 31(1): 8-16.
[32]	RODDEY T S, OLSON S L, GARTSMAN G M, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing 2 instructional approaches to home exercise instruction following arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair surgery[J]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2002, 32(11): 548-559.
[33]	HAYES K, GINN K A, WALTON J R, et al. A randomised clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of physiotherapy after rotator cuff repair[J]. Aust J Physiother, 2004, 50(2): 77-83. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60099-4 pmid: 15151491
[34]	KRISCHAK G, GEBHARD F, REICHEL H, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing occupational therapy with home-based exercises in conservative treatment of rotator cuff tears[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2013, 22(9): 1173-1179. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.008 pmid: 23523073

组别	n	性别(男/女)/n	年龄/岁	病程/d	优势侧损伤(是/否)/n
常规组	15	6/9	55.60±5.47	41.20±6.14	9/6
联合组	15	7/8	54.13±6.13	43.27±6.62	11/4
居家组	15	4/11	49.60±11.96	38.53±4.98	9/6
χ²/F值		1.324	2.092	2.382	0.776
P值		0.516	0.136	0.105	0.687

组别	n	时间	M(Q_L,Q_U)	Z值	P值
常规组	15	治疗前	5.00(3.00, 5.00)	3.305	< 0.001
		治疗4周后	3.00(2.00, 3.00)
		治疗8周后	2.00(1.00, 2.00)
联合组	15	治疗前	4.00(3.00, 4.00)	3.073	< 0.001
		治疗4周后	3.00(2.00, 3.00)
		治疗8周后	2.00(1.00, 2.00)
居家组	15	治疗前	4.00(4.00, 5.00)	2.964	< 0.001
		治疗4周后	4.00(3.00, 4.00)
		治疗8周后	2.00(2.00, 2.00)
治疗前常规组和联合组差值			0.00(-1.00, 2.00)	-1.494	0.135
治疗前常规组和居家组差值			0.00(-1.00, 1.00)	-0.155	0.877
治疗前联合组和居家组差值			-1.00(-1.00, 0.00)	-1.434	0.152
治疗4周后常规组和联合组差值			0.00(-1.00, 1.00)	-0.159	0.873
治疗4周后常规组和居家组差值			-1.00(-2.00, 0.00)	-2.883	0.004
治疗4周后联合组和居家组差值			-1.00(-2.00, -1.00)	-2.531	0.011
治疗8周后常规组和联合组差值			0.00(-2.00, 1.00)	-0.939	0.347
治疗8周后常规组和居家组差值			0.00(-1.00, 1.00)	-1.392	0.164
治疗8周后联合组和居家组差值			0.00(-1.00, 1.00)	-0.277	0.782

变量	效应	平方和	自由度	均方	F值	P值
UCLA	时间	4364.281	2	2182.141	830.831	< 0.001
	组别	36.104	2	18.052	1.056	0.357
	时间×组别	14.430	4	3.607	1.373	0.250
CMS	时间	18449.837	2	9224.919	856.593	< 0.001
	组别	110.237	2	55.119	0.593	0.557
	时间×组别	120.207	4	30.052	2.791	0.031

变量	组别	n	治疗前	治疗4周后	治疗8周后
前屈ROM	常规组	15	83.60±18.66	113.20±14.50	141.27±17.06
	联合组	15	86.60±15.72	116.13±13.12	137.00±13.55
	居家组	15	79.27±24.56	103.33±22.38	128.40±19.38
外展ROM	常规组	15	73.33±13.73	103.80±11.88	128.60±11.49
	联合组	15	77.47±14.40	104.33±12.51	129.00±12.83
	居家组	15	71.33±12.51	89.40±12.60	119.27±14.33
外旋ROM	常规组	15	21.80±6.11	35.73±5.42	54.53±6.27
	联合组	15	25.80±8.33	33.27±7.21	51.73±5.44
	居家组	15	23.67±6.24	30.47±5.38	50.40±5.15

变量	效应	平方和	自由度	均方	F值	P值
前屈ROM	时间	61850.133	2	30925.067	672.601	< 0.001
	组别	2601.644	2	1300.822	1.470	0.242
	时间×组别	443.689	4	110.922	2.412	0.055
外展ROM	时间	59868.904	2	29934.452	772.307	< 0.001
	组别	2727.526	2	1363.763	3.201	0.051
	时间×组别	629.274	4	157.319	4.059	0.005
外旋ROM	时间	18933.733	2	9466.867	691.707	< 0.001
	组别	162.711	2	81.356	0.906	0.412
	时间×组别	299.289	4	74.822	5.467	0.001

Effect of home exercise on pain, function and quality of life after operation for rotator cuff injury

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 12

References 34

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

变量	组别	n	治疗前	治疗4周后	治疗8周后
UCLA	常规组	15	12.53±2.13	22.07±2.76	27.27±1.98
	联合组	15	13.80±2.83	22.80±3.30	27.20±2.88
	居家组	15	12.73±2.76	21.67±3.15	25.60±2.47
CMS	常规组	15	46.47±4.70	62.47±4.67	78.07±4.70
	联合组	15	48.93±6.98	61.00±8.54	75.40±6.95
	居家组	15	46.73±6.47	59.33±7.08	74.53±3.96

变量	组别	n	治疗前	治疗4周后	治疗8周后
生理健康	常规组	15	50.33±5.68	68.42±5.44	74.17±5.54
	联合组	15	49.50±9.35	68.17±7.54	75.00±5.47
	居家组	15	53.17±7.73	62.25±6.05	73.58±3.66
心理健康	常规组	15	49.76±6.82	61.16±5.83	70.57±5.60
	联合组	15	47.26±8.25	57.87±5.61	67.84±7.63
	居家组	15	52.36±5.68	66.74±3.58	76.91±5.11

变量	效应	平方和	自由度	均方	F值	P值
生理健康	时间	12562.940	2	6281.470	574.393	< 0.001
	组别	48.079	2	24.039	0.232	0.794
	时间×组别	443.449	4	110.862	10.138	< 0.001
心理健康	时间	10911.934	2	5455.967	498.102	< 0.001
	组别	1358.312	2	679.156	7.408	0.002
	时间×组别	90.874	4	22.718	2.074	0.091

[1]	ZHAO Jianbin, YAO Yingce, WU Jing, XUE Boshi, YANG Xiaowei, ZHOU Zhipeng, ZHENG Liangliang. Effect of muscle energy technique on dynamic postural control and lumbar neuromuscular function in patients with non-specific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2024, 30(9): 1092-1098.
[2]	WEN Yanfei, YANG Lu, BAN Yue, Ykabaru Daniela BERBESI NORIEGA, ZHANG Haoqi, WANG Li, LIU Hua. Effect of exercise therapy on chronic nonspecific neck pain: a meta-analysis based on ICF [J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2024, 30(7): 778-788.
[3]	CHEN Mengyuan, WANG Qiuqin, XU Yuchen, LIU Jie, ZHANG Xinyue, CHEN Juping, XU Guihua. Researches related to pain in Parkinson's disease: a bibliometrics analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2024, 30(7): 797-803.
[4]	LÜ Meiling, WANG Jie, ZENG Weisi, WEN Xiaoting, CHU Xin. Effect of virtual reality on cognitive function and quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2024, 30(6): 648-656.
[5]	CAO Yaping, LI Ju, HUANG Minghao, LI Zhongcheng, LANG Jian. Risk factors, health and rehabilitation intervention strategies for low back pain in adult golfers: a scoping review [J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2024, 30(6): 657-664.
[6]	WANG Xueyan, ZHANG Pengyan, LIAO Xuandong, DING Yi, XU Qiangqiang, LI Li. Effect of sling massage exercise on postpartum pelvic girdle pain [J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2024, 30(6): 719-725.
[7]	CHEN Linghui, ZHENG Qi, LI Yan, FU Jianming, ZENG Ming, JIN Xin, LU Jingjing. Effect of respiratory training based on core stability training on feedforward control in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain [J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2024, 30(6): 737-744.
[8]	GE Ying, ZHAO Wowa, ZHANG Lu, SHU Xuan, LI Jiawei, LIU Ying. Motor function and quality of life in Parkinson's disease patients with freezing of gait [J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2024, 30(3): 339-344.
[9]	MA Erhao, SHEN Yan, WANG Shangquan, DONG Jige. Effect of suspension combined with acupuncture on chronic non-specific neck pain [J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2024, 30(2): 232-237.
[10]	ZHANG Haoyuan, TIAN Gang, LI Xuefeng, LI Hongjiang, MIN Hongwei, TANG Peng, ZHANG Rui, GU Rui, LIU Kemin. Influence of clinical and rehabilitation characteristics on prognosis of diabetic foot amputees: a systematic review [J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2024, 30(11): 1281-1290.
[11]	WEN Cuifeng, YA Ru, HUANG Hao, LIAO Xuemei, BAI Yulong. Effect of mirror therapy on upper limb function and cerebral cortex activity in patients with type I complex regional pain syndrome after stroke: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2024, 30(10): 1203-1214.
[12]	HU Yonglin, MA Ying, DOU Chao, LU Anmin, JIANG Xiaoge, SONG Xinjian, XIAO Yuhua. Effect of neural mobilization based on shoulder control training on shoulder pain and upper limb function in stroke patients with hemiplegia [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2024, 30(1): 81-86.
[13]	LIU Dong, XU Zihan, LI Jiang, JU Ping. Effect of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in M1 region combined with dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on electroencephalogram θ frequency band amplitude of patients with neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2024, 30(1): 87-94.
[14]	ZHANG Guancong, HUANG Qiuchen, GU Rui, LIU Sihai, HU Chunying, LIU Kemin. Comparative effect of different neuromuscular exercises on pain and motor function of knee in patients with early knee osteoarthritis [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2023, 29(9): 1090-1097.
[15]	LI Mengyu, SONG Ya, XU Jian. Characteristics of health-related physical fitness of patients with chronic neck pain [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2023, 29(7): 756-760.