Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 1134-1142.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2025.10.004

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of single or combined transcranial direct current stimulation and functional electrical stimulation on grip strength and brain activation in young healthy individuals: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based study

WANG Yingya1, LI Taibiao2, SU Ahong2, LIN Youyi2, ZHOU Xianhong2, TIAN Lu3, XIE Hongwu4()   

  1. 1. Academy of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian 350122, China
    2. The Fifth Hospital of Xiamen, Xiamen, Fujian 361101, China
    3. Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330004, China
    4. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330008, China
  • Received:2025-09-09 Revised:2025-09-11 Published:2025-10-25 Online:2025-11-10
  • Contact: XIE Hongwu, E-mail: xiehongwu361@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Scientific Research Startup Fund of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University(B3563);Fujian Science and Technology Plan(2022Y01020084);Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program(202410412291X)

Abstract:

Objective To compare the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the forearm flexors, and their combined intervention on grip strength and cerebral cortical activation in healthy young adults.
Methods From December, 2024 to March, 2025, twelve healthy right-handed young volunteers aged 20 to 23 years were recruited from the Fifth Hospital of Xiamen. They were randomly assigned to receive tDCS alone (tDCS group), FES alone (FES group), or simultaneous tDCS-FES (Sim group) in a crossover design. For tDCS, synchronous bihemispheric stimulation of the primary motor cortex (M1) was applied (anode on the left/cathode on the right). FES was delivered to the right flexor carpi radialis and flexor digitorum superficialis muscles. Isometric maximal grip strength was measured before and after each intervention, and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to synchronously monitor oxyhemoglobin (HbO2) during grip strength tasks.
Results A case dropped down. The effect of time on grip strength was significant (F = 3.964, P = 0.048); Post-hoc tests revealed that grip strength significantly increased after intervention in both FES group and Sim group (P < 0.05). The effect of groups was significant on HbO2 of the left prefrontal cortex (PFC) and left premotor and supplementary motor cortex (PMC) (F > 3.613, P < 0.05); Post-hoc tests revealed that the HbO2 of the left PFC and left primary sensory cortex was higher in FES group than in Sim group, while the HbO2 of the left PMC and right PMC was higher in tDCS group than in Sim group (all P < 0.05). Correlation analysis indicated that the grip strength was positively correlated with the HbO2 of the bilateral M1 only in Sim group (r > 0.694, P < 0.05).
Conclusion For healthy young adults, tDCS alone mainly activates motor-related brain regions such as PFC and PMC, while FES alone directly enhances peripheral muscle force output and activates the left PFC to participate in motor regulation. The combined intervention achieves the maximum gain in grip strength through a brain-limb integrated regulation mechanism, which may be associated with optimization of neural resource and M1 activity.

Key words: brain-limb coordinated rehabilitation, transcranial direct current stimulation, functional electrical stimulation, functional near-infrared spectroscopy, grip strength

CLC Number: