Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice ›› 2025, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 1234-1240.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2025.10.015
Received:2025-06-29
Revised:2025-09-12
Published:2025-10-25
Online:2025-11-10
Contact:
JIA Jie, E-mail: shannonjj@126.com
Supported by:CLC Number:
XIE Na, LI Li, JIA Jie. Specific risk factors among initial swelling sites of breast cancer-related lymphedema[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2025, 31(10): 1234-1240.
Table 1
Results of univariate analysis on clinical data of patients with different initial swelling sites"
| 变量 | 胸壁组(n = 2)a | 上臂组(n = 57) | 前臂组(n = 50) | 手部组(n = 21) | H/χ2值 | P值 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄/岁 | 48.50±9.19 | 59.98±8.77 | 55.74±11.46 | 55.62±12.40 | 5.969 | 0.130 | |
| BMI/(kg·m-2) | 20.50±0.99 | 24.54±3.31 | 24.43±3.91 | 24.09±3.20 | 4.044 | 0.645 | |
| 利手侧/n | 左 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0.741 | 0.717 |
| 右 | 2 | 56 | 48 | 20 | |||
| 手术侧/n | 左 | 0 | 33 | 25 | 12 | 4.368 | 0.839 |
| 右 | 2 | 20 | 20 | 8 | |||
| 双侧 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 1 | |||
| 前哨活检/n | 是 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 0.255 | 0.976 |
| 否 | 2 | 52 | 45 | 19 | |||
| 淋巴结摘除数 | 14.50±10.61 | 11.35±8.48 | 11.90±8.49 | 14.00±11.19 | 2.356 | 0.349 | |
| 放疗/n | 是 | 2 | 39 | 34 | 13 | 1.292 | 0.852 |
| 否 | 0 | 18 | 16 | 8 | |||
| 化疗/n | 是 | 2 | 47 | 44 | 16 | 2.012 | 0.449 |
| 否 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 5 | |||
| 水肿侧/n | 左 | 0 | 34 | 28 | 12 | 2.833 | 0.928 |
| 右 | 2 | 23 | 22 | 9 | |||
| 水肿发生时间/月 | 0.25±0.35 | 17.63±40.28 | 32.78±55.38 | 25.62±34.80 | 7.592 | 0.147 | |
| 水肿分级/n | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10.499 | 0.161 |
| 1 | 1 | 12 | 9 | 8 | |||
| 2 | 1 | 24 | 26 | 11 | |||
| 3 | 0 | 20 | 14 | 1 | |||
| 肩痛/n | 是 | 1 | 18 | 15 | 7 | 0.402 | 0.960 |
| 否 | 1 | 39 | 35 | 14 | |||
| 肩周炎/n | 是 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
| 否 | 2 | 57 | 50 | 21 | |||
| 肩袖损伤/n | 是 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 2.039 | 0.999 |
| 否 | 1 | 49 | 43 | 18 | |||
| 肩峰撞击/n | 是 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 5.591 | 0.775 |
| 否 | 1 | 52 | 47 | 20 | |||
| 肩关节活动受限/n | 是 | 1 | 23 | 16 | 4 | 3.440 | 0.200 |
| 否 | 1 | 34 | 34 | 17 | |||
| 关节活动度/° | 前屈 | 160.00±28.28 | 152.18±43.92 | 159.84±41.26 | 168.81±30.16 | 3.185 | 0.218 |
| 外展 | 145.00±49.50 | 145.88±50.24 | 155.74±47.81 | 168.57±31.83 | 4.356 | 0.123 | |
| 外旋 | 60.00±42.43 | 68.04±30.60 | 72.88±28.22 | 81.86±18.42 | 4.069 | 0.156 | |
| 腋网综合征/n | 是 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 15.910 | 0.552 |
| 否 | 1 | 56 | 48 | 21 | |||
| 患肢瘫痪/n | 是 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1.335 | 0.558 |
| 否 | 2 | 52 | 48 | 19 | |||
| 患肢异常感觉/n | 是 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 2.339 | 0.943 |
| 否 | 1 | 49 | 44 | 18 |
Table 2
Results of multivariate Logistic regression analysis of initial swelling in the upper arm"
| 自变量 | B | SE | Wald | OR(95%CI) | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄 | 0.057 | 0.023 | 6.181 | 1.059(1.012~1.108) | 0.013 |
| BMI | -0.032 | 0.061 | 0.277 | 0.968(0.859~1.092) | 0.599 |
| 手术侧 | -0.218 | 0.315 | 0.478 | 0.804(0.434~1.491) | 0.489 |
| 利手侧 | 0.892 | 1.319 | 0.457 | 2.441(0.184~32.409) | 0.499 |
| 放疗 | 0.484 | 0.479 | 1.018 | 1.622(0.634~4.148) | 0.313 |
| 化疗 | -0.117 | 0.601 | 0.038 | 0.889(0.274~2.887) | 0.845 |
| 前哨活检 | -0.060 | 0.801 | 0.006 | 0.942(0.196~4.524) | 0.941 |
| 淋巴结摘除数量 | -0.032 | 0.026 | 1.543 | 0.969(0.921~1.019) | 0.214 |
| 水肿发生时间 | -0.016 | 0.006 | 6.524 | 0.984(0.972~0.996) | 0.011 |
| 水肿分级 | 0.191 | 0.307 | 0.386 | 1.210(0.663~2.209) | 0.534 |
| 肩痛 | -0.361 | 0.620 | 0.338 | 0.697(0.207~2.351) | 0.561 |
| 肩袖损伤 | -0.531 | 0.728 | 0.531 | 0.588(0.141~2.452) | 0.466 |
| 肩峰撞击 | 0.278 | 0.823 | 0.114 | 1.321(0.263~6.628) | 0.735 |
| 肩关节活动受限 | 0.753 | 0.596 | 1.599 | 2.124(0.661~6.828) | 0.206 |
| 腋网综合征 | -1.040 | 1.479 | 0.495 | 0.354(0.019~6.411) | 0.482 |
| 患肢瘫痪 | 1.788 | 1.187 | 2.269 | 5.976(0.584~61.183) | 0.132 |
| 患肢异常感觉 | -0.894 | 0.765 | 1.364 | 0.409(0.091~1.833) | 0.243 |
Table 3
Results of multivariate Logistic regression analysis of initial swelling in the forearm"
| 自变量 | B | SE | Wald | OR(95%CI) | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄 | -0.041 | 0.022 | 3.624 | 0.960(0.920~1.001) | 0.057 |
| BMI | 0.030 | 0.062 | 0.240 | 1.031(0.913~1.164) | 0.624 |
| 手术侧 | 0.221 | 0.311 | 0.505 | 1.247(0.678~2.295) | 0.477 |
| 利手侧 | -0.500 | 1.107 | 0.204 | 0.607(0.069~5.311) | 0.652 |
| 放疗 | -0.400 | 0.481 | 0.690 | 0.671(0.261~1.722) | 0.406 |
| 化疗 | 0.642 | 0.639 | 1.010 | 1.901(0.543~6.647) | 0.315 |
| 前哨活检 | 0.192 | 0.788 | 0.059 | 1.211(0.258~5.678) | 0.808 |
| 淋巴结摘除数量 | 0.011 | 0.025 | 0.193 | 1.011(0.962~1.063) | 0.660 |
| 水肿发生时间 | 0.014 | 0.006 | 6.461 | 1.014(1.003~1.025) | 0.011 |
| 水肿分级 | 0.283 | 0.313 | 0.822 | 1.328(0.719~2.450) | 0.365 |
| 肩痛 | 0.287 | 0.608 | 0.223 | 1.333(0.405~4.389) | 0.637 |
| 肩袖损伤 | 0.077 | 0.725 | 0.011 | 1.080(0.261~4.471) | 0.915 |
| 肩峰撞击 | -0.602 | 0.837 | 0.518 | 0.547(0.106~2.826) | 0.472 |
| 肩关节活动受限 | 0.134 | 0.572 | 0.055 | 1.144(0.373~3.511) | 0.814 |
| 腋网综合征 | 0.343 | 1.263 | 0.074 | 1.409(0.119~16.753) | 0.786 |
| 患肢瘫痪 | -2.412 | 1.294 | 3.473 | 0.090(0.007~1.133) | 0.062 |
| 患肢异常感觉 | 0.200 | 0.719 | 0.078 | 1.222(0.299~4.996) | 0.781 |
Table 4
Results of multivariate Logistic regression analysis of initial swelling in the hand"
| 自变量 | B | SE | Wald | OR(95%CI) | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄 | -0.029 | 0.030 | 0.963 | 0.971(0.916~1.030) | 0.326 |
| BMI | 0.056 | 0.093 | 0.356 | 1.057(0.881~1.269) | 0.551 |
| 手术侧 | -0.147 | 0.437 | 0.114 | 0.863(0.367~2.031) | 0.736 |
| 利手侧 | -0.535 | 1.327 | 0.163 | 0.586(0.043~7.892) | 0.687 |
| 放疗 | -0.295 | 0.673 | 0.192 | 0.745(0.199~2.783) | 0.661 |
| 化疗 | -1.022 | 0.804 | 1.617 | 0.360(0.074~1.739) | 0.203 |
| 前哨活检 | 0.151 | 1.114 | 0.018 | 1.163(0.131~10.328) | 0.892 |
| 淋巴结摘除数量 | 0.046 | 0.036 | 1.641 | 1.047(0.976~1.123) | 0.200 |
| 水肿发生时间 | 0.000 | 0.007 | 0.000 | 1.000(0.986~1.015) | 0.989 |
| 水肿分级 | -0.764 | 0.399 | 3.656 | 0.466(0.213~1.019) | 0.056 |
| 肩痛 | 0.631 | 0.908 | 0.482 | 1.879(0.317~11.143) | 0.488 |
| 肩袖损伤 | 0.436 | 1.067 | 0.167 | 1.547(0.191~12.533) | 0.683 |
| 肩峰撞击 | -0.352 | 1.342 | 0.069 | 0.703(0.051~9.574) | 0.793 |
| 肩关节活动受限 | -2.007 | 1.030 | 4.067 | 0.125(0.017~0.943) | 0.044 |
| 腋网综合征 | -18.614 | 19598.087 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.999 |
| 患肢瘫痪 | 1.853 | 1.559 | 1.413 | 6.377(0.301~135.286) | 0.235 |
| 患肢异常感觉 | 0.095 | 1.106 | 0.007 | 1.100(0.126~9.610) | 0.931 |
| [1] |
REN Y, KEBEDE M A, OGUNLEYE A A, et al. Burden of lymphedema in long-term breast cancer survivors by race and age[J]. Cancer, 2022, 128(23): 4119-4128.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.34489 pmid: 36223240 |
| [2] |
BROWN S, DAYAN J H, CORIDDI M, et al. Doxycycline for the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2022, 13: 1028926.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1028926 |
| [3] | LIU Y F, LIU J E, ZHU Y, et al. Development and validation of a nomogram to predict the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema among Chinese breast cancer survivors[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2021, 29(9): 5435-5445. |
| [4] |
BAHANESTEH A, YARMOHAMMADI H, SHAHSHENAS S, et al. Risk factors for severity of breast cancer-related lymphedema[J]. Radiat Oncol, 2025, 20(1): 81.
doi: 10.1186/s13014-025-02663-2 |
| [5] | 谢娜, 贾杰. 乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿发生及康复机制[J]. 康复学报, 2017, 27(6): 54-58. |
| XIE N, JIA J. Progress on development and rehabilitation mechanism of upper extremity lymphedema after radical mastectomy[J]. Rehabil Med, 2017, 27(6): 54-58. | |
| [6] |
中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会, 中华医学会肿瘤学分会乳腺肿瘤学组. 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2024年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33 (12): 1092-1187.
doi: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2023.12.004 |
| [7] | AMIN M B, EDGE S B, GREENE F L, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual[M]. 8th ed. New York: Springer, 2016. |
| [8] |
WANG H, SHEN L, LIU T, et al. Circumference-based criteria for detection of secondary arm lymphedema for Chinese women[J]. Lymphat Res Biol, 2017, 15(3): 262-267.
doi: 10.1089/lrb.2017.0002 pmid: 28749717 |
| [9] | 国家肿瘤质控中心乳腺癌专家委员会, 北京乳腺病防治学会健康管理专业委员会. 中国乳腺癌随诊随访与健康管理指南(2022版)[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2022, 44(1): 1-28. |
| [10] | 沈莉, 王鹤玮, 陈栎屹, 等. 筋膜松解手法联合运动疗法对乳腺癌术后腋网综合征患者的疗效观察[J]. 中国医刊, 2024, 59(3): 324-329. |
| [11] |
MCEVOY M P, RAVETCH E, PATEL G, et al. Prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema[J]. Clin Breast Cancer, 2021, 21(2): 128-142.
doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.02.009 |
| [12] |
ZHANG X, OLIVERI J M, PASKETT E D. Features, predictors, and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema[J]. Curr Breast Cancer Rep, 2020, 12(4): 244-254.
doi: 10.1007/s12609-020-00381-0 |
| [13] | FOURGEAUD C, VIGNES S. New insights in breast cancer-related lymphedema[J]. J Med Vasc, 2024, 49(3/4): 135-140. |
| [14] |
SHARIFI N, AHMAD S. Breast cancer-related lymphedema: a critical review on recent progress[J]. Surg Oncol, 2024, 56: 102124.
doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102124 |
| [15] | RAFN B S, CHRISTENSEN J, LARSEN A, et al. Prospective surveillance for breast cancer-related arm lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2022, 40(9): 1009-1026. |
| [16] |
SHAH C, ASHA W, VICINI F. Current diagnostic tools for breast cancer-related lymphedema[J]. Curr Oncol Rep, 2023, 25(3): 151-154.
doi: 10.1007/s11912-023-01357-w |
| [17] | MAYROVITZ H N. Noninvasive measurements of breast cancer-related lymphedema[J]. Cureus, 2021, 13(11): e19813. |
| [18] |
耿文慧, 周严红, 尹俊普, 等. 乳腺癌术后肩关节活动度分析[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2025, 31(3): 356-364.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2025.03.013 |
| GENG W H, ZHOU Y H, YIN J P, et al. Shoulder joint range of motion after operation for breast cancer[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2025, 31(3): 356-364. | |
| [19] | GONZÁLEZ-RUBINO J B, VINOLO-GIL M J, MARTÍN-VALERO R. Effectiveness of physical therapy in axillary web syndrome after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2023, 31(5): 257. |
| [20] |
张浩, 刘锐芮, 朱琳, 等. 中国女性乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2021, 24(26): 3349-3358, 3376.
doi: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.01.206 |
| ZHANG H, LIU R R, ZHU L, et al. Risk factors for breast cancer-related lymphedema in Chinese women: a meta-analysis[J]. Chin Gener Prac, 2021, 24(26): 3349-3358, 3376. |
| [1] | GENG Wenhui, ZHOU Yanhong, YIN Junpu, HAN Lei, GAO Yang. Shoulder joint range of motion after operation for breast cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2025, 31(3): 356-364. |
| [2] | LIU Hua, JIA Mingyue, DU Xiaoxia, YANG Yaru, LI Jing, LÜ Jihui. Physical fitness and characteristics of cognitive function among people aged 55 to 75 years with high and low risk of dementia in communities in Beijing [J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2024, 30(2): 195-201. |
| [3] | TIAN Pei, FAN Rongfu, WANG Hongyan, PENG Mingli. Pathogenic bacteria distribution, clinical features and risk factors of urinary tract infection in patients with ischemic stroke [J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2024, 30(10): 1179-1186. |
| [4] | DENG Ting, CHEN Jingmian, LIU Xiaomeng, YAO Xiaohua, LIU Lushan, HE Wei, ZHANG Tong, LU Haitao. Risk factors of stroke-associated pneumonia for patients with mild to moderate acute ischemic stroke [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2023, 29(6): 708-713. |
| [5] | SUN Ning,HUANG Fubiao,YE Ting. Lifestyle for young and middle-aged stroke patients: 268 cases investigation [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2022, 28(1): 24-31. |
| [6] | WU Xiaoli,HU Xueyan,ZHANG Yuge,YE Changqing,CHEN Yudong,LI Hanzhi,YANG Lingyu,GAO Fei,YANG Yuqi,SHAN Lei,LIU Lixu. Epidemiology and functional outcome of venous thromboembolism after stroke in rehabilitation wards [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2022, 28(1): 44-49. |
| [7] | ZHI Jincao,ZHANG Shiwen,HUANG Meiling,PEI Fei,WANG Yan. Risk factors during pregnancy and perinatal period for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children: a scoping review [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2022, 28(1): 79-89. |
| [8] | HU An-ming,WANG Yu,SUN Wei. Risk Factors Related to Hydrocephalus Following Traumatic Brain Injury in Neurosurgical Rehabilitation Unit [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2020, 26(9): 1083-1088. |
| [9] | JING Li-wei,LIU Hui,LIU Ye,QU Wen-qiao,HU Yuan-ping,JIN Feng,WANG Ai-ping. Advance in Sexual Dysfunction for Patients with Breast Cancer (review) [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2020, 26(4): 458-462. |
| [10] | HUANG Jing-hui, FANG Fan-fu, LI Bai. Advance in Assessment and Treatment for Postoperative Lymphedema Related Tissue Fibrosis in Extremities after Malignant Tumor Surgery (review) [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2019, 25(9): 1043-1046. |
| [11] | LI Zhen-sheng, GENG Wen-hui, YIN Jun-pu, ZHANG Jun, ZHANG Yuan-yuan, LI Shan-shan. Consistency between Arm Circumference and Water Drainage Volume in Measurements of Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2019, 25(9): 1089-1093. |
| [12] | XIE Na, JIANG Liu-ya, JIA Jie. Effect of Compressive Low Elastic Bandage on Upper Limb Lymphedema after Breast Cancer Surgery [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2019, 25(9): 1094-1097. |
| [13] | OU Jian-lin, GONG Xuan, REN Guo-xing, LI Chen-xi, LIAO Wei-jing. Effect of PhysioTouch on Upper Limb Lymphedema after Breast Cancer Surgery [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2019, 25(9): 1098-1102. |
| [14] | QIU Hui, LIU Jun-e, SU Ya-li, LIU Li-hui, HAN Jing. Interview of Rehabilitation Exercise for Breast Cancer Patients to Prevent Upper Limb Lymphedema [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2019, 25(8): 986-992. |
| [15] | ZHONG Jiu-gen, HOU Xiao-hui, LAN Hao. Advance in Aromatase Inhibitor Related Arthralgias (review) [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2019, 25(7): 805-812. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
|
||
