Factors Impacting Whereabouts and Referral in Patients with Acute Stroke after Discharge

  • TU Jian-ying ,
  • REN Xiao-shu ,
  • LU Bo-xun
Expand
  • Department of Neurology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China

Received date: 2016-10-07

  Online published: 2017-02-17

Abstract

Objective To study the selection of the follow-up care and related factors in stroke patients after acute treatment in general hospital. Methods A total of 230 acute stroke patients discharged from January to December, 2015, were reviewed. They were classified with age, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, referral options, etc., and the key consideration in the selection were compared. Results There were 125 patients needing referral. Referral increased while mRS worsening (P<0.05). The demand for the continuation of rehabilitation was higher in the patients with mRS scores of 0-1 and 2-3 than that of 4-5 (F=4.300, P<0.05), but the latter cared more about medical quality (F=3.464, P<0.05) and hospitalization length (F=3.692, P<0.05). The patients more than 80 years old cared more about medical quality (F=4.630, P<0.05). The patients selecting continuous treatment in our hospital paid more attention on continuation (F=7.590, P<0.001), while those selecting rehabilitation institutions cared more about rehabilitation capacity (F=32.156, P<0.001), and those selecting community hospitals or nursing home cared more about hospitalization length (F=18.823, P<0.001), easy to visit (F=14.070, P<0.001), etc. Referral information mainly came from the doctors (72.0%), only 28.0% from the patients. Conclusion Severity of disability, age and the prognosis may impact the choice for the following rehabilitation in acute stroke patients. Doctors can do more for reasonable referral recommendations to the patients.

Cite this article

TU Jian-ying , REN Xiao-shu , LU Bo-xun . Factors Impacting Whereabouts and Referral in Patients with Acute Stroke after Discharge[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2017 , 23(1) : 106 -109 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.01.025

References

[1] 中国健康教育中心办公室. 2015年“世界卒中日”宣传主题及提纲[J]. 疾病监测, 2015, 30(10): 879-885.
[2] 王陇德. 中国脑卒中防治报告[M]. 北京:中国协和医科大学出版社, 2015.
[3] 宇传华,罗丽莎,李梅,等. 从全球视角看中国脑卒中疾病负担的严峻性[J]. 公共卫生与预防医学, 2016, 27(1): 1-5.
[4] Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Measuring the global burden of disease [J]. N Engl J Med, 2013, 369(5): 448-457.
[5] Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 (GBD 2013) Results by Location, Cause, and Risk Factor [M]. Seattle, United States: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), 2016.
[6] 饶明俐. 脑卒中[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2007.
[7] 单春雷,余滨宾,励建安. 建立规范化的卒中三级康复治疗体系[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2012, 9(6): 281-283.
[8] 中华医学会神经病学分会神经康复学组,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组,卫生部脑卒中筛查与防治工程委员会办公室. 中国脑卒中康复治疗指南(2011 完全版)[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2012, 18(4): 301-318.
[9] 黄永禧,徐本华,戴红,等. 北京地区综合医院康复医学科建设现状和对策[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 1998, 13(4): 173-175.
[10] 姜从玉,王倩,胡永善,等. 脑卒中患者6个月三级康复治疗期间的成本-效果研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2004, 19(7): 486-489.
[11] 王茂斌. 关于康复医疗服务体系建设的若干问题[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2012, 27(7): 587-589.
[12] 韩平,陶静,陈立典,等. 福建省脑卒中患者社区康复现状调查[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2009, 24(7): 663-664.
Outlines

/

〈 〉