Objective To follow up the rehabilitation, education, and assistive devices utilization of school age children with cerebral palsy. Methods From 2012 to 2015, 80 children with cerebral palsy were called their parents with telephone and filled in the questionnaires. Results 69 children (85.25%) continued to receive rehabilitation, 11 children (13.75%) stopped rehabilitation. 42 children (56.25%) received education in ordinary schools, 15 children (18.75%) received education in special schools, 4 children (5.00%) were nursed in nursing institution, 16 children (20.00%) stayed at home and did not receive any education. The main problem and needing at present were receiving rehabilitation, receiving school education, relief the rehabilitation cost of more than one institution, etc. 61 children (76.25%) ever applied for assistive devices, 19 children (23.75%) did not. The feedback of application process in order were smoothly; applied, but didn't get; the assistive devices that received was inappropriate. 29 children (73.75%) needed assistive devices currently, 21 children (26.25%) did not. When asked the category of needed assistive devices at present, 19 parents (20%) answered that they did not know the category of assistive devices well or they did not know which kind of assistive devices they needed. Conclusion It is important to provide quality and quantity rehabilitation and education service, popularize the knowledge of assistive devices and their clinical application for cerebral palsy children. Assistive devices providing departments should do more communication with cerebral palsy children and their parents, in order to reduce the waste of resources, and increase the rational use of resources, and provide more benefits for children with disabilities.
XIONG Ni-na
,
WANG Jian-wen
,
CHEN Yao-hong
,
ZHAO Peng
,
LI Yuan-yuan
,
SUN Xiu-ping
,
YANG Li
,
SHAO Cui-xia
. Rehabilitation, Education, and Assistive Devices Utilization of School Age Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Follow-up Study[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2017
, 23(2)
: 237
-241
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.02.024
[1] 范佳露,王辉. 特殊教育学校脑瘫学生特殊需求的分析[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2012, 27(8): 753-756.
[2] 张菲. 不同类型脑瘫患儿的社会生活能力及其相关因素研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2016, 31(3): 523-524.
[3] 冯高起,朱中亮,顾敏莉,等. 学龄脑瘫儿童康教结合对其粗大运动发育和生活能力的影响[J]. 中国当代医药, 2014, 21(3): 10-12.
[4] 徐素琼,黄丽. 手足徐动型脑瘫儿童随班就读的个案研究报告[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2010(3): 23-25.
[5] 蒋良华,江丽娟,汤春红,等. 社区医教结合服务模式对学龄期脑瘫儿童运动功能的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2014, 29(13): 1989-1990.
[6] 张会春. 探讨学龄期脑瘫儿童智力和手功能分级的相关性[J]. 中西医结合心血管病电子杂志, 2015, 3(1): 45-46.
[7] 汤加利,史惟,郭金颖,等. 学龄期脑瘫患儿日常生活活动能力状况及影响因素分析[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2014, 29(6): 552-556.
[8] 李林. 教育康复对学龄脑瘫儿童认知能力的影响初探[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2010, 16(10): 999-1000.
[9] 郭新志,孙阳,张向葵. 心理干预对轻中度脑瘫儿童综合功能和生活质量的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(2): 238-243.
[10] 代早荣,许晶莉,阮景颜, 等. 学龄期脑性瘫痪儿童智力与语言发育相关性研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2013, 19(1): 79-81.
[11] 陈瑶,张备,王凡,等. 集体治疗对大龄脑瘫儿童运动功能和功能独立性的影响[J]. 同济大学学报(医学版), 2015, 36(6): 123-127.
[12] 闫冬梅,陶乙霆,马珊,等. 混智龄训练对脑瘫患儿适应性行为的影响[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2014, 29(9): 867-868.
[13] 李初阳,梁琪,侯晓晖,等. 游泳对学龄期脑瘫儿童的康复作用[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2010, 16(7): 626-628.
[14] 陈瑶,白玉龙,张备. 上海地区大龄脑瘫儿童康复治疗探讨[J]. 上海医药, 2015, 36(6): 57-62.
[15] 王宏. 将残疾人辅助器具服务纳入社会保障体系[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2012, 18(3): 208-210.
[16] 赵辉三,刘建军,胡莹媛. 脑瘫患儿常用矫形器及辅助器具[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2003, 9(4): 214-217.
[17] 许晓鸣,王宏,许弦歌. 论辅助器具与残疾人的关系[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2007, 13(4): 312-313.
[18] 师昉,王龙,李鹏征, 等. 肢体残障者辅助器具的临床应用与发展现状[J]. 中国康复, 2013, 28(3): 234-237.
[19] 胡莹媛. 小儿脑瘫康复常用矫形器及其他辅助器具的临床实践[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2003, 9(9): 454-456.
[20] 刘璇,陈振声,王保华, 等. 肢残儿童四类辅助器具满意度调查[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2013, 19(5): 418-420.
