Objective To analyze the cost-effectiveness of hospital rehabilitation and hospital-family rehabilitation in children with cerebral palsy.Methods From January to December, 2016, 60 cases of children aged one to three years with cerebral palsy were divided into hospital rehabilitation group and hospital-family rehabilitation group, with 30 cases in each group. The hospital rehabilitation group received rehabilitation of traditional Chinese and Western medicine treatment, including exercise therapy, physical therapy and Chinese Medical therapy; while the hospital-family rehabilitation group received family rehabilitation. The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) and Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-fine Motor (PDMS-FM) were used to evaluate the motor function and fine motor function before and after treatment.Results The GMFM score was higher (t=5.333, P<0.001), and the total medical cost was higher (t=23.614, P<0.001) in the hospital rehabilitation group than in the hospital-family rehabilitation group. However, the cost of medical care was significantly lower for every 1-point increase in GMFM and visual-motion integration of PDMS-FM in the hospital rehabilitation group than in the hospital-family rehabilitation group (t>2.065, P<0.05).Conclusion The hospital rehabilitation model may be a more economical and effective treatment for younger age children with cerebral palsy, and the hospital-family rehabilitation model could be used as an effective complementary rehabilitation model for this age group.
JIN Bing-xu
,
QIAN Xu-guang
,
ZHAO Yong
,
LIU Zhen-huan
,
LI Nuo
,
ZHANG Meng-tao
. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Hospital Rehabilitation and Hospital-family Rehabilitation in Children with Cerebral Palsy[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2017
, 23(10)
: 1231
-1235
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.10.022
[1] Pan Y, Liu B, Li R, et al. Bowel dysfunction in spinal cord injury: current perspectives [J]. Cell Biochem Biophys, 2014, 69(3): 385-388.
[2] Krogh K, Perkash I, Stiens SA, et al. International Bowel Function Basic Spinal Cord Injury Data Set [J]. Spinal Cord, 2009, 47(3): 230-234.
[3] Krogh K, Emmanuel A, Perrouin-Verbe B, et al. International Spinal Cord Injury Bowel Function Basic Data Set (Version 2.0) [J]. Spinal Cord, 2017. [Epub ahead of print].
[4] Krogh K, Christensen P, Sabroe S, et al. Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score [J]. Spinal Cord, 2006, 44(10): 625-631.
[5] Juul T, Bazzocchi G, Coggrave M, et al. Reliability of the International Spinal Cord Injury Bowel Function Basic and Extended Data Sets [J]. Spinal Cord, 2011, 49(8): 886-891.
[6] 徐青,高飞,王磊,等. 脊髓损伤后肠道功能障碍:美国临床实践指南解读[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2010, 16(1):83-86.
[7] Drossman DA, Sandler RS, Mckee DC, et al. Bowel patterns among subjects not seeking health care. Use of a questionnaire to identify a population with bowel dysfunction [J]. Gastroenterology, 1982, 83(3): 529-534.
[8] Sezer N, Akkus S, Ugurlu FG. Chronic complications of spinal cord injury [J]. World J Orthop, 2015, 6(1): 24-33.
[9] 蒋玮,李青,张欢欢,等. 美国肠道管理指南在脊髓损伤神经源性肠道功能障碍患者中的应用研究[J]. 重庆医学, 2016, 45(34): 4877-4879.
[10] 王玉明,冯雨桐,杨华东. 脊髓损伤后神经源性肠道功能管理的研究进展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2016, 22(3):286-289.
[11] Krogh K, Perkash I, Stiens SA, et al. International bowel function extended spinal cord injury data set [J]. Spinal Cord, 2009, 47(3): 235-241.
