CJRTP

Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice >

2018 , Vol. 24 >Issue 8: 975 - 979

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.08.019

Quantitative and Structural Analysis of Professionals in the Institutions Affillated to System of China Disabled Persons' Federation

  • JING Qi ,
  • QIU Zhuo-ying ,
  • JI Li-hong ,
  • MA Gui-feng ,
  • LI Wei ,
  • WANG Pei-cheng ,
  • SHENG Hong-qi ,
  • ZHENG Wen-gui ,
  • MA An-ning ,
  • LI An-qiao ,
  • CHEN Bo-yuan
Expand
  • 1. Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China;
    2. The Innovation Center for Social Risk Prediction and Governance in Health Sector of Shandong, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China;
    3. China Academy of ICF, Weifang, Shandong 261000, China;
    4. Research Institute of Rehabilitation Information, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China;
    5. WHO-FIC Collaborating Center in China, Beijing 100068, China;
    6. Human Resources and Social Security Bureau of Weifang, Weifang, Shandong 261042, China;
    7. Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong 272067, China;
    8. Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan 471023, China

Received date: 2018-03-19

  Revised date: 2018-06-23

  Online published: 2018-08-20

Supported by

Supported by Shandong Natural Science Foundation (No. ZR2017BG022), National Natural Science Foundation of China (General) (No. 71673202), National Special Fund Projects of Basic Research of Public Benefits for Institutes at Central Governmental Level (Leading Project of Major Scientic Research) (No. 2017CZ-7; No. 2018CZ-4), Shandong Social Sciences Planning Project (No. 16DGLJ12) and Shandong Provincial Education Department's Higher Education Program (No. J17RA231)

Fold

Abstract

Objective To analyze the status, trends and issues of professionals in rehabilitation institutions in China, and provide policy recommendations on rehabilitation professional development.Methods The data from database and statistical bulletin of CDPF has been analyzed using descriptive analysis and deviation analysis.Results The quantity of professionals of rehabilitation institutions increased 24,900 (12.62%) in 2016. Average professionals per institution had been decreased from 33.89 in 2012 to 28.33 in 2016. In regard to the structure of distribution, the rehabilitation professionals at provincial level had been decreased 21.95% in 2015 than that of in 2012. Both training programs and the number of trainees from rehabilitation institutions had decreased.Conclusion There were big gap between services provision and needs of professionals. The distribution of professionals at provincial, city and county level was under optimization. The on-job training for rehabilitation professionals should be improved. It is recommendated to develop national plan for professionals development to meet the needs of rehabilitation services, advance the on-job training for professionals, develop the higher education of rehabilitation and improve attractiveness of rehabilitation to retain and recruit more professionals.

Key words： rehabilitation institutions; staff; China Disabled Persons' Federation system; quantitative and structural analysis

Cite this article

JING Qi , QIU Zhuo-ying , JI Li-hong , MA Gui-feng , LI Wei , WANG Pei-cheng , SHENG Hong-qi , ZHENG Wen-gui , MA An-ning , LI An-qiao , CHEN Bo-yuan . Quantitative and Structural Analysis of Professionals in the Institutions Affillated to System of China Disabled Persons' Federation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2018 , 24(8) : 975 -979 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.08.019

References

[1] 邱卓英,郭键勋,杨剑,等. 康复2030:促进实现《联合国2030年可持续发展议程》相关目标[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2017, 23(4): 373-378.
[2] 李欣,邱卓英,杨剑,等. 康复2030:扩大康复规模以满足日益增长的康复需求[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2017, 23(4): 380-384.
[3] 邱卓英,李欣,刘冯铂,等. 基于ICF的智力残疾模式、测量方法及社会支持系统研究[J].中国康复理论与实践, 2016, 22(4): 373-377.
[4] 世界卫生组织,世界银行. 世界残疾报告(国际中文版)[M]. 邱卓英,主译审. 日内瓦:世界卫生组织, 2013.
[5] 华颖. 健康中国建设:战略意义、当前形势与推进关键[J]. 国家行政学院学报, 2017(6): 105-111, 163.
[6] 王文娟,付敏. “健康中国”战略下医疗服务供给方式研究[J]. 中国行政管理, 2016(6): 58-61.
[7] 毛新志,李思雯. 我国残疾人社会工作的伦理困境及其出路[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 27(5): 741-746.
[8] 冯善伟,任占斌. 我国残疾人托养服务的现状及标准体系建设[J]. 残疾人研究, 2017(3): 13-21.
[9] 吴世彩. 构建中国特色康复医学体系的研究[J]. 社区医学杂志, 2014, 12(21): 5-7.
[10] 世界卫生组织. 国际功能、残疾和健康分类(国际中文增补版)[M]. 邱卓英,主译审.日内瓦:世界卫生组织出版社,2015.
[11] 杨立雄. 中国残疾人社会政策范式变迁[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2014(11): 42-47.
[12] 邱卓英. 世界卫生组织国际分类家族的发展与应用[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2013, 19(1): 1-3.
[13] 邱卓英,陈迪. 基于ICF的残疾和康复信息标准体系及其应用研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2014, 20(6): 501-507.
[14] Colquhoun HL, Lamontagne ME, Duncan EA, et al.A systematic review of interventions to increase the use of standardized outcome measures by rehabilitation professionals[J]. Clin Rehabil, 2017, 31(3): 299-309.
[15] Pascal MR, Mann M, Dunleavy K, et al.Leadership development of rehabilitation professionals in a low-resource country: a transformational leadership, project-based model[J]. Front Public Health, 2017, 5: 143.
[16] 张玲. “医教结合”:教育康复人才培养的创新路径与对策[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016, 52(3): 120-125.
[17] 吴世彩. 康复:现代医学的时代性价值旨归——也谈时下中国现代康复高等教育[J].中国康复理论与实践, 2017, 23(2): 131-135.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉