CJRTP

Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice >

2018 , Vol. 24 >Issue 10: 1133 - 1139

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.10.004

Construction of Framework and Indicators of Disability-related Service Data in China Using ICF

Expand
  • 1. China Research Center on Disability Issues/Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Risks Governance in Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China;
    2. the Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China;
    3. Research Institute of Rehabilitation Information, China Rehabilitation Research Center/WHO-FIC Collaborating Center in China, Beijing 100068, China;
    4. Shanghai Disabled Persons' Federation, Shanghai 200127, China

Received date: 2018-06-16

  Online published: 2018-10-30

Supported by

Shanghai Pujiang Program of Shanghai Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau (No. 17PJC003), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71673052; No. 71203034), China Scholarship Council (No. 201506105030), National Social Science Foundation of China (Major) (No. 17ZDA078), National Science & Technology Pillar Program during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period (No. 2014BAI08B01) and National Special Fund Projects of Basic Research of Public Benefits for Institutes at Central Governmental Level (Leading Project of Major Scientific Research) (No. 2017CZ-7; No. 2018CZ-4)

Fold

Abstract

Objective To develop a framework and indicators system for disability-related service data in China. Methods Using International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework and approach, the framework and indicators system were developed using content analysis, logical reasoning and expert consultation. Results A system with nine aspects, 35 dimensions and 115 indicators was established. Eleven experts with disability-related background all accepted the system, and satisfied in the importance and operability.Conclusion A data framework and indicators system with nine aspects, 35 dimensions and 115 indicators has been established for disability-related service, which can be used in further data collection.

Key words： disability-related service; disability survey; disability statistics; data framework; International Classification of Functioning,Disability and Health

Cite this article

CHANG Feng-shui, SUN Mei, HU Long-jun, QIU Zhuo-ying, YU Hui-jiong, CHEN Gang, XUE Lian-ding, LIU Qiao-yan, LI Cheng-yue, YANG Yu-hui, LÜ Jun . Construction of Framework and Indicators of Disability-related Service Data in China Using ICF[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2018 , 24(10) : 1133 -1139 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.10.004

References

[1] 李鹏. 以大数据助推国家治理体系和治理能力现代化[N]. 昆明日报, 2014-12-26(3)
[2] 邱卓英. 新世纪国际社会残疾康复指导性文件----学习第五十八届世界卫生大会通过的《残疾,包括预防、管理和康复》[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2005, 11(7): 506-523.
[3] 世界卫生组织非传染性疾病与精神卫生署损伤与暴力预防部残疾与康复小组. 世界卫生组织残疾与康复行动计划(2006年~2011年)[J]. 邱卓英,荀芳,张爱民,等,译. 中国康复理论与实践, 2007, 13(2): 109-110.
[4] Soltani S, Hafshejani AM, Salehiniya H.Trend of disability prevalence in Iran: an evidence to improve disability data[J]. J Res Med Sci, 2015, 20(5): 531-532.
[5] World Health Organization. Improving data for rehabilitation in health information systems [EB/OL]. [2018-08-10]. http://www.who.int/disabilities/care/1000-Improving-data-for-rehab-in-HIS-Anneke-Schmider.pdf?ua=1.
[6] 荆宁宁,程俊瑜. 数据、信息、知识与智慧[J]. 情报科学, 2005, 23(12): 1786-1790.
[7] 郑彦宁,化柏林. 数据、信息、知识与情报转化关系的探讨[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2011, 34(7): 1-4.
[8] 顾大权,刘高飞. 对数据、信息、知识和智慧的研究与思考[J]. 长春大学学报, 2012, 22(4): 399-401.
[9] 世界卫生组织. 世卫组织2014~2021 年全球残疾问题行动计划:增进所有残疾人的健康[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2014, 20(7): 601-610.
[10] 邱卓英,郭键勋,杨剑,等. 康复2030:促进实现《联合国2030年可持续发展议程》相关目标[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2017, 23(4): 373-378.
[11] 庞丽华,张蕾,张旭,等. 两次全国残疾人抽样调查人口数据质量分析[J]. 人口与发展, 2014, 20(4): 59-64,44.
[12] 邱卓英,黎东晓,李欣,等. 当代智力残疾测量与统计方法和社会支持与服务体系研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2016, 22(4): 383-388.
[13] 中国残疾人联合会. 反映残疾人需求提供精准服务[J]. 中国残疾人, 2016(4): 19.
[14] 邱卓英. 国际残疾调查统计标准与方法研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2004, 10(3): 64-67.
[15] 亚洲及太平洋残疾人"切实享有权利"仁川战略[EB/OL]. [2018-04-16].https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/Incheon%20Strategy%20%28Chinese%29.pdf.
[16] 世界卫生组织. 国际功能、残疾和健康分类(国际中文增补版)[M]. 邱卓英,译. 日内瓦:世界卫生组织, 2015.
[17] 世界卫生组织,世界银行. 世界残疾报告(国际中文版)[M]. 邱卓英,译. 日内瓦:世界卫生组织, 2013.
[18] 邱卓英. 《世界残疾报告》的架构、方法与应用意义[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2013, 19(10): 901-904.
[19] 吕军,陈刚,虞慧炯,等. 上海市残疾人康复服务评价指标体系研究概述[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2007, 13(6): 589-591.
[20] 陈刚,吕军,虞慧炯,等. 上海残疾人康复服务评价指标体系指标量化研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2007, 13(7): 681-683.
[21] Siordia C, Hoepner LA, Lewis AN.Why public health researchers should consider using disability data from the American Community Survey[J]. J Community Health, 2018, 43(4): 738-745.
[22] Leibovici D, Curtis S, Ritchie K.The application of disability data from epidemiological surveys to the development of indicators of service needs for dependent elderly people[J]. Age Ageing, 1995, 24(1): 14-20.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉