Terminology, Diagnosis and Classification of Intellectual Disability Using WHO ICD-11 and ICF

  • ZOU Min ,
  • SUN Hong-wei ,
  • QIU Zhuo-ying ,
  • WANG Sheng-nan
Expand
  • 1. China Academy of ICF, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China;
    2. WHO-FIC Collaborating Center in China, Beijing 100068, China;
    3. Psychology Department of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China;
    4. Research Institute of Rehabilitation Information, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China;
    5. China Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Beijing 100068, China

Received date: 2019-01-06

  Revised date: 2019-01-07

  Online published: 2019-02-18

Supported by

National Special Fund Projects of Based Research of Public Benefits for Institutes at Central Governmental Level (Leading Project of Major Scientific Research) (No. 2017CZ-7; No. 2018CZ-4) and Opening Project of Key Laboratory of Evidence Science (China University of Political Science and Law, Ministry of Education) (No. 2018KFKT07)

Abstract

Objective To review the nomenclature and terminology, diagnostic criteria, classification and evaluation of intellectual disability using WHO ICD-11 and ICF.
Methods The theories and approaches of ICD-11 and ICF were adopted to analyze the nomenclature and terminology, diagnostic criteria, classification and evaluation of intellectual disability.
Results ICD-11 and ICF had established the nomenclature and terminology, diagnostic criteria, classification and evaluation of intellectual disability from the perspectives of content model of ICD-11 and functioning of ICF respectively. Intellectual disability had used nomenclature of disorder of intellectual development and one of sub-categories of mental, behavioral or neurodevelopmental disorders. Intellectual disability was also defined as both impairment of intellectual function (b117) and functional limitation of adaptive behaviors (d1-d9) using ICF. Occurrence age of intellectual disability was before 18 years old for diagnostic criteria of ICD-11 and ICF.
Conclusion The nomenclature and terminology, diagnostic criteria and classifications of intellectual disability have been reviewed and updated using the theories and approaches of ICD-11 and ICF. It provides theoretical supports, approaches, and standardized tools for the development of rehabilitation service for people with intellectual disability.

Cite this article

ZOU Min , SUN Hong-wei , QIU Zhuo-ying , WANG Sheng-nan . Terminology, Diagnosis and Classification of Intellectual Disability Using WHO ICD-11 and ICF[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2019 , 25(1) : 1 -5 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.01.001

References

[1] 世界卫生组织. 国际功能、残疾和健康分类(国际中文增补版)[M]. 邱卓英,译. 日内瓦:世界卫生组织, 2015.
[2] Bickenbach J, Cieza A, Rauch A, et al.ICF核心分类组合临床实践手册[M]. 邱卓英,励建安,吴弦光,译. 北京:人民军医出版社, 2013.
[3] Katz G, Lazcano-Ponce E.Intellectual disability: definition, etiological factors, classification, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis[J]. Salud Publica Mex, 2008, 50(Suppl 2): 132-141.
[4] American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Definition of intellectual disability [EB/OL]. [2018-08-17]. http://aaidd.org/intellectual-disability/definition
[5] 陈静, Garralda M E, 程文红. ICD-11精神与行为障碍(草案)关于神经发育障碍诊断标准的进展[J]. 中华精神科杂志, 2017, 50(6): 411-413.
[6] World Health Organization.International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision [EB/OL]. [2018-08-17].https://icd.who.int/browse11
[7] Carulla L S, Reed G M, Vaez Azizi L M, et al. Intellectual developmental disorders: towards a new name, definition and framework for “mental retardation/intellectual disability” in ICD-11[J]. World Psychiatry, 2013, 10(3): 175-180.
[8] First M.DSM-5鉴别诊断手册[M]. 张道龙,译. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2016.
[9] American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V) [M]. Washington D.C.: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2013.
[10] Tassé M J, Schalock R L, Balboni G, et al.The construct of adaptive behavior: its conceptualization, measurement, and use in the field of intellectual disability[J]. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil, 2012, 117(4): 291-303.
[11] Arias B, Angel Verdugo M, Navas P, et al.Factor structure of the construct of adaptive behavior in children with and without intellectual disability[J]. Int J Clin Health Psychol, 2013, 13(2): 155-166.
[12] Mefford H C, Batshaw M L, Hoffman E P.Genomics, intellectual disability and autism[J]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 366(23): 733-743.
[13] 杨兰,于明. ICD-11的模型与修订进展[J]. 中国病案, 2015, 16(5): 20-25.
[14] Baird G.Classification of diseases and the neurodevelopmental disorders: the challenge for DSM-5 and ICD-11[J]. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2013, 55(3): 200-201.
[15] 邱卓英,李欣,刘冯铂,等. 基于ICF的智力残疾模式、测量方法及社会支持系统研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2016, 22(4): 373-377.
[16] 邱卓英,黎东晓,李欣,等. 当代智力残疾测量与统计方法和社会支持与服务体系研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2016, 22(4): 383-388.
[17] Schalock R L, Borthwick-Duffy S A, Bradley V J, et al. Intellectual Disability: Definition, Classification and Systems of Supports[M]. Washington D.C.: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 2010.
[18] Schalock R L, Luckasson R A, Shogren K A, et al.The renaming of mental retardation: understanding the change to the term intellectual disability[J]. Intellect Dev Disabil, 2007, 45(2): 116-124.
[19] Reiss S.A mindful approach to mental retardation[J]. J Soc Issues, 2000, 56(1): 65-80.
[20] Simpson M.Developmental concept of idiocy[J]. Intellect Dev Disabil, 2007, 45(1): 23-32.
[21] 许家成. “智力障碍”定义的新演化——以“功能”、“支持”与“生活质量”为导向的新趋势[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2003(4): 19-23.
[22] 冬雪. 美国智力障碍定义的演变及其启示[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2011(5): 34-39.
[23] Wehmeyer M L.Disability, disorder, and identity[J]. Intellect Dev Disabil, 2013, 51(2): 122-126.
[24] Scior K.Public awareness, attitudes and beliefs regarding intellectual disability: a systematic review[J]. Res Dev Disabi, 2011, 32(6): 2164-2182.
[25] Wu L, Qiu Z, Wong D, et al.The research on the status, rehabilitation, education, vocational development, social integration and support services related to intellectual disability in China[J]. Res Dev Disabil, 2010, 31: 1216-1222.
[26] Wallace S J, Worrall L, Rose T, et al.Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to identify outcome domains for a core outcome set for aphasia: a comparison of stakeholder perspectives[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2017. [Epub ahead of print]
[27] Tasse M J, Luckasson R, Nygren M.AAIDD proposed recommendations for ICD-11 and the condition previously known as mental retardation[J]. Intellect Dev Disabil, 2013, 51(2): 127-131.
Outlines

/

〈 〉